
March 22, 2021
NEWS
TOP
ENERGY TRANSITION & POLICY
ELECTRICITY MARKETS
OIL, GAS & MINING
ANALYSIS
IF GOLDMAN SACHS IS SELLING, IS IT TIME
TO EXIT JAPAN’S SOLAR MARKET?
This year’s marquee deal in Asia-Pacific renewables may well be the potential exit of Goldman Sachs from Japan’s solar market. The bank, known for its investment acumen, has started to sound out potential buyers for a majority ownership in Japan Renewable Energy Corp, a developer of solar and other green energy assets.
The potential sale will have many investors wondering if the Japanese renewables market has turned after a surge in solar capacity over the last 10 years. Certainly, the market’s structure has shifted. Still, Goldman’s likely exit is not only about structural reforms. This is a story about returns expectation.
TEPCO MARKS FUKUSHIMA’S 10-YEAR
ANNIVERSARY WITH A “RED CARD”
On the 10th anniversary of the Fukushima accident another nuclear catastrophe beset TEPCO, casting further doubt on it re-emerging as an operator of atomic power facilities. In a mixed week for the nuclear industry in Japan, TEPCO was issued with a “red rating” by the regulator, the most serious warning, for poor execution of safety measures. This immediately aborts the utility’s plan to restart two of its reactors in spring and rules out the possibility of TEPCO operating a nuclear power plant until at least H2 2022.
With a growing renewables business and options to expand in power transmission, the TEPCO name and current structure looks ripe for change.
GLOBAL VIEW
A selection of global energy-related news.
2021 EVENT CALENDAR
DATA SECTION
PUBLISHER
K. K. Yuri Group
Editorial Team
Yuriy Humber (Editor-in-Chief)
Tom O’Sullivan (Japan, Middle East, Africa)
John Varoli (Americas)
Regular Contributors
Mayumi Watanabe (Japan)
Daniel Shulman (Japan)
Takehiro Masutomo (Japan)
Art & Design
22 Graphics Inc.
Sponsored
SUBSCRIPTIONS & ADVERTISING
Japan NRG offers individual, corporate and academic subscription plans. Basic details are our website or write to subscriptions@japan-nrg.com
For marketing, advertising, or collaboration opportunities, contact sales@japan-nrg.com
For all other inquiries, write to info@japan-nrg.com
OFTEN USED ACRONYMS
METI
The Ministry of Energy, Trade and Industry
ANRE
Agency for Natural Resources and Energy
NEDO
New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization
TEPCO
Tokyo Electric Power Company
KEPCO
Kansai Electric Power Company
EPCO
Electric Power Company
JCC
Japan Crude Cocktail
JKM
Japan Korea Market, the Platt’s LNG benchmark
CCUS
Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage
mmbtu
Million British Thermal Units
mb/d
Million barrels per day
mtoe
Million Tons of Oil Equivalent
kWh
Kilowatt hours (electricity generation volume)
Japan industry association asks government to set a ¥5,000 ($46) carbon price
(Japan NRG, March 17)
Government launches panel to plan submarine cables for offshore wind power transmission
(Japan NRG, March 21)
TAKEAWAY: Japan’s current grid has several bottlenecks between regions because of low interconnection capacity. Investment in the grid on-land could be expensive as it may require purchase of additional land. In this sense, underwater construction may be cheaper. Still, any deep-sea construction projects are likely to require major expenditure, which is currently guesstimated at a trillion yen. That would prevent the ability of offshore wind power to reduce its costs in Japan in the next decade or so.
Euglena sees first jet flights powered by algae biofuel within a year
(New Energy Business News, March 18)
J-Power says it will cut CO2 emissions by 40% within a decade via hydrogen
(New Energy Business News, March 16)
Japan publishes detailed account of 2017 emissions, with numbers little-changed from 2016
(Japan NRG, March 17)
Shipper MOL buys stake in Norway’s Larvik Shipping to develop liquid CO2 carriers for CCS
(Nikkei, March 20)
Mitsubishi tests CO2 recovery technology in Norway
(New Energy Business News, March 18)
Japanese manufacturers claim edge in solid-state and grid battery markets
(Nikkei, March 15)
Mitsubishi Power begins development of ammonia-fired gas turbine
(New Energy Business News, March 17)
Wave power, noise harnessed to generate electricity in Shimane
(New Energy Business News, March 17)
Marubeni launches vehicle-to-building power service
(Kankyo Business, March 17)
Japan’s JGC wins contract to build Mongolia’s first solar and storage facility
(Asia Nikkei, March 20)
Softbank and Enpower Greentech succeed in demonstrating next-generation battery
(Nikkei; March 15, 2021)
Sumitomo Corp signs MoU to develop hydrogen ecosystem in Australia
(Japan NRG, March 19)
| No. of operable nuclear reactors | 33 | |||
| of which | applied for restart | 25 | ||
| approved by regulator | 16 | |||
| restarted | 9 | |||
| in operation today | 6 | |||
| able to use MOX fuel | 4 | |||
| No. of nuclear reactors under construction | 3 | |||
| No. of reactors slated for decommissioning | 27 | |||
| of which | completed work | 1 | ||
| started process | 4 | |||
| yet to start / not known | 22 | |||
Spot Electricity Prices, Monthly Avg.

Source: Company websites, JANSI and JAIF, as of March. 15, 2021
A mixed week for the nuclear industry in Japan:
Iberdrola says plans to develop 600 MW offshore wind farm in Japan with Cosmo and Hitz
(Japan NRG, March 17)
Hitachi-backed offshore wind project publishes environmental assessment
(New Energy Business News, March 19)
Chubu Electric and Chudenko to buys stake in Taiwan hydropower project
(New Energy Business News, March 15)
Shikoku Electric to invest in trading platform LO3 Energy
(New Energy Business News, March 19)
Transmission operators establish capacity market to balance supply and demand
(New Energy Business News, March 19)
Japan Oil Price: $50.09/ barrel

Japan (JLC) LNG Price: $8.27/ mmbtu

Petroleum Association pledges net zero CO2 emissions by 2050
(Sankei Biz, March 19)
Kawasaki Kisen completes ship-to-ship fueling for its LNG-powered carrier
(Denki Shimbun, March 17)
BY ESWAR MANI
MANAGING PARTNER
MANI KAPITAL
If Goldman Sachs is selling,
Is it time to exit Japan’s solar market?
This year’s marquee deal in the Asia-Pacific renewables space may well be the potential exit of Goldman Sachs from Japan’s solar market. The bank, known for its investment acumen, has started to sound out potential buyers for its majority ownership in Japan Renewable Energy Corp (JRE), a developer of solar and other green energy assets. The potential sale will have many investors wondering if the Japanese renewables market has turned after a surge in solar capacity over the last 10 years. Certainly, the structure of this market has shifted.
Still, Goldman’s likely exit is not only about structural reforms, but also a reflection of the ESG momentum. Many European pension funds and other institutional investors have taken to supporting ESG themes and threatening a withdrawal of funding from firms and investment vehicles that do not engage.
With Japan’s investable pool of renewable assets still shallow, sizeable investment options inside the country are slim. The expected return (and perceived risk) of Japan solar has significantly decreased since JRE was formed.
This JRE sale will be the deal that people will not want to lose, even if it makes them bid irrationally in the end to secure the bragging rights. For Goldman, it will mean collecting significant financial gains.
How it started
Goldman’s entry timing was favorable. At the start of the previous decade, the renewables industry, and especially solar, was in a funk. One of the early front-runners in solar adoption, Spain, had recently reneged on government-subsidized tariffs for renewable energy. Germany had started decreasing their own tariffs to mirror a drop in solar panel prices and construction costs.
Goldman was one of the earlier investors to build an institutional business in Japan around a new renewables tariff system introduced soon after the 2011 Fukushima disaster. It registered Japan Renewable Energy (JRE) in 2012, the same year that the country introduced the then world’s highest Feed-In Tariff; a guaranteed price at which an operator of a solar or wind generation facility can sell their electricity over a period of 20 or so years.
In less than a decade, JRE has built a portfolio of almost 420 MW, with another 410 MW currently under construction. In 2017, Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund GIC agreed to buy a 25% stake in JRE.
The Fukushima disaster switched sentiment. Germany and several others vowed to quit nuclear energy. The immediate winner was renewables. Even as Japan turned to fossil fuels to fill in the gap vacated by nuclear, the then ruling party hastily put together the FIT scheme to scale the renewable energy industry in Japan.
All experienced European and other global players were only too happy to bring their knowhow to Japan.
How it’s going
Japan’s renewables capacity has certainly grown and the electricity market’s unbundling has further diversified the industry that hitherto had been dominated from generation to retail by 10 vertically integrated utilities.
However, while the market has developed and Japan’s government predictably followed the European model of lowering the FIT price over time, some of the trend lines from Europe have not carried over.
(1) Balance of Systems costs (non-solar panel costs) have not decreased in Japan in line with the rest of the world. One reason is the often-long chain between the prime Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) contractor and the company that sends workers to the site; so, the project has a lot of mouths to feed. There is no legal limit on the number of subcontractors, and banks tend to lend only if there is a blue-chip general contractor on the paperwork.
(2) A bankable general contractor decreases the perceived risk of the construction process of the solar power plant. The risk, and therefore the expected return, between operational projects and those under construction with debt financing locked in is slim, reflecting a high degree of confidence in project execution.
JRE has as much capacity under construction as it does in operation. Bidders will likely need to price its entire asset base as if it is all online.
How it will be – the biggest unknown
The FIT business model is being phased out. From next April, most new renewables projects will need to apply for a Feed-In Premium (FIP), a less generous mechanism that tends to reward renewables operators that also invest in storage. The stated goal of the government is to have the FIP also expire and for solar, wind and other renewable sources to compete for consumers in the open market.
Current investors in renewable energy in Japan bid for a FIT price that is almost four times lower than the original.
Still, Goldman was not alone among investors eager to snap up early FIT certificates at world-beating prices. Plenty of domestic and overseas prospectors entered the field and were rewarded with 93 GW of FIT-certified projects. Of that, only about 58 GW is online or close. The true operational capacity may be much less, with a substantial number of solar power plants poorly managed.
The remaining FIT-certified capacity could be construed as market overhang for the Goldman deal, but several factors preclude this. While FIT certificates were relatively easy to obtain, initially, getting access to land rights, a grid connection and securing relevant permits was not.
Moreover, METI has begun a campaign to cancel FIT certificates for those that are deemed to be sitting on them but not acting towards project realization. This move may be due to feedback from the big power utilities, which argue that there is already sufficient capacity in overall generation assets (including new coal power plants).
As a consequence, FIT certificates for projects not deemed as progressing by April 2022 will be canceled or asked to re-apply – at the current, lower FIT price. In addition, today’s solar FIT certificates are awarded with an “unlimited curtailment risk”. This means that if even if a new entrant renewables generator produces power, the grid – still controlled by units of the 10 legacy power utilities – can decide not to accept it.
Banks have been scratching their heads around curtailment and only a handful of unlimited curtailment projects have been awarded limited-recourse project finance.
Many players with deep pockets have tried to get around the roadblocks to debt financing and expedited construction by building the projects themselves, obtaining financing after project completion. This likely means having to bundle and cross-collateralize several projects together, which makes it tough to later sell them individually.
Conclusion – Lots of bidders, leaks abound
With the pool of existing FIT-approved projects set to shrink, and the valuation of new projects uncertain, the liquidity of the world’s No. 3 solar market is being tested. Goldman’s asset should prove attractive and gather a significant number of bidders.
The sell-side bankers will need to identify whether potential bidders are spurious or legitimate before opening up details of all projects for the suitors. This will affect not only project values after divestiture, but also the investment of Goldman’s partner, GIC.
While Goldman’s sale seems logical if opportunistic, the bank will likely not want to indicate that it is exiting Japanese renewables completely. The bank has other structural options. The margins from a JRE sale today, however, are probably too good for Goldman to resist.
If Goldman Sachs is selling, is it time to exit Japan’s solar market? The answer primarily depends on your return expectation.
BY TOM O’SULLIVAN
TEPCO Marks Fukushima’s 10-Year Anniversary With “Red Card”
Casting Doubt on its Nuclear Strategy
On the 10th anniversary of the Fukushima accident another nuclear catastrophe beset TEPCO, casting further doubt on it re-emerging as an operator of atomic power facilities.
In a mixed week for the nuclear industry in Japan, TEPCO was issued with a “red rating” by the regulator, the most serious warning, for poor execution of installing safety measures. This immediately aborts the utility’s plan to restart two of its reactors in spring and rules out the possibility of TEPCO operating a nuclear power plant until at least H2 2022.
The latest in a long list of TEPCO missteps, after a concerted recent campaign to buy goodwill with locals near its nuclear plants, may mark the end of the line for TEPCO as it stands today. With a growing renewables business and options to expand in power transmission, the TEPCO name and current structure looks ripe for change.
Last week, Japan’s Nuclear Regulatory Authority (NRA) issued TEPCO with the worst of four possible ratings. The status was assigned to TEPCO’s only operable nuclear facility, the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPP in Niigata prefecture, because of deficiencies relating to physical security of nuclear materials.
TEPCO is the first company to receive a “red rating.” NRA noted that a probe into the deficiencies at the NPP will now take at least a year. METI confirmed that the facility is not currently fit to operate, causing TEPCO’s stock to fall 10% on Wednesday knocking $500 million off shareholder value.
Delaying restarting Kashiwazaki to late 2022 means it will be 10 years since the NPP’s Units 6 was operating, and more than 11 years for Unit 7. Three of the facility’s four oldest reactors have been offline since 2007, never restarted after a separate earthquake that same year damaged equipment.
Even with regular maintenance, restarting a nuclear plant after such a long layoff is technically challenging.
Given the cost of ongoing maintenance, safety checks, and additional investment in new safety measures, the business case for TEPCO restarting Kashiwazaki is also fading.
Once a fully private company and the world’s third-largest utility, TEPCO is now under the control of the government. Its main shareholder is the state Nuclear Damage Compensation and Decommissioning Facilitation Corporation (NDF).
The utility’s state-mandated task is to operate its power business and generate cash to pay for the Fukushima accident compensation and the decommissioning costs for the wrecked Dai-Ichi NPP, as well as the nearby Dai-Ni NPP site. However, Fukushima decommission cost estimates have jumped to $74 billion, compensation payments to $80 billion, and area decontamination and storage to $60 billion.
This puts the total Fukushima accident-related costs at over $200 billion, with the decommissioning timetable expected to take another 30 to 40 years.
NDF has already injected almost $100 billion into the company through over 100 separate fund-raising rounds to help it meet the Fukushima liabilities while also remaining as a solvent business. TEPCO took cumulative losses of $25 billion in the three years following the 2011 accident.
Ten years after Fukushima, TEPCO is still Japan’s largest power utility with sales of 220 TWh ($57 billion) for FY2019 compared with a peak of 292 TWh before the accident. TEPCO continues to service almost one quarter of Japan’s total electricity consumption though it has lost more customers than any other power utility since consumers were allowed to switch providers in 2016.
TEPCO now has a peak load of 55 GW for its catchment area of nine prefectures that includes greater Tokyo, compared with a 62 GW peak load in 2007. It has 31,000 staff and over $100 billion in assets.
TEPCO Service Area

All three of TEPCO’s NPPs have been closed since 2011.
Until Covid-19 hit, TEPCO had hoped to rebuild its profit to $3 billion per annum by 2027. The pandemic reduced TEPCO’s electricity sales by 10% YoY. Profits in 1H FY2020 were down 65%. Management had also hoped to increase TEPCO’s stock market capitalization 15-fold to $75 billion by 2027.
Even before Covid, TEPCO has struggled to rebuild its business. One of its electricity sales agents was reprimanded last year for dubious sales practices. The retail unit has lost over 15% of its sales to competitors in the last five years, and now faces the possibility of being split off from TEPCO and sold in the near future. ENEOS is seen as a possible buyer.
Meanwhile, TEPCO’s plans to expand into the gas distribution business in new areas have mostly failed. The firm’s retail gas business in Kansai may be stalling due to low subscriber numbers.
In the last five years, the company has separated into five legal entities: TEPCO Holdings, TEPCO Fuel and Power, TEPCO Power Grid, TEPCO Energy Partner, and TEPCO Renewable Power.

TEPCO’s thermal generation assets (41 GW) were transferred to a new entity, JERA, in April 2019, including its four LNG terminals, for $8 billion. The thermal generation assets of Chubu Electric (24 GW), TEPCO’s adjacent utility, were also consolidated into JERA (Japan NRG profiled JERA in our Aug. 24, 2020 edition).
TEPCO had hoped to list JERA and raise cash, but Covid-19 stalled those plans.

TEPCO’s only remaining generation assets of any significance are in hydropower: 10 GW at 164 locations. The net book value of fixed assets was $70 billion at the end of FY2020, including the residual value of its nuclear fleet.
TEPCO now buys its electricity mainly from JERA, paying $17 billion for power during FY2019, and purchases of electricity sourced from renewables is expected to be almost $6 billion this fiscal year.
TEPCO was one of Japan’s first major utilities to announce plans to become carbon neutral by 2050. As part of this plan, it aims to install 7 GW of renewable generation by 2030.
Energy transition has offered other avenues for TEPCO to revitalize, with the utility seizing on its size and network to tap into a diverse set of partnerships. Below is a selection of new energy joint ventures TEPCO is pursuing:
Outside Japan, TEPCO recently won a substation contract in Thailand and also has investments in Vietnam.
At core, TEPCO still has the biggest slice of the world’s No. 3 electricity market. What’s more, the country’s 2050 net-zero emissions pledge and the associated move to greater electrification present the utility with a growing market and new business opportunities.
The hope that nuclear energy can be a money-spinner for TEPCO diminished last week. NRA’s ruling is only the latest in a series of red cards shown to TEPCO’s nuclear business.
If TEPCO is to raise $200 billion or more in needed to pay for the Fukushima cleanup, it needs to pass the Kashiwazaki NPP to a more proficient operator.
The Japanese government also urgently needs to address its strategy for managing the country’s nuclear assets in a consistent manner and implementing reforms to the national grid system and TEPCO’s roles in those initiatives.
Japan must also keep electricity costs at an internationally competitive level.
Below are some of last week’s most important international energy developments monitored by the Japan NRG team because of their potential to impact energy supply and demand, as well as prices. We see the following as relevant to Japanese and international energy investors.
Coal
Methane leaks from planned coal mines could have a bigger climate impact than carbon emissions from U.S. coal plants, the nonprofit Global Energy Monitor said in a report.
Biofuels
U.S. President Joe Biden’s green fuel push using edible oils is helping drive up vegetable oil prices that are already near record highs, hitting key cost-sensitive consumers in India and Africa and stoking global food inflation fears.
Renewables / Hydrogen
1). Apple said that it allotted $2.8 billion raised from green bonds last years to fund 17 projects with 1.2 GW of renewable energy capacity.
2). Germany and Canada said they will jointly develop projects in green hydrogen that utilize Canadian hydroelectric power with an eye on the fuel’s export to Germany.
3). Planned investment in clean energy must increase by 30% to a total of $131 trillion by 2050 to avert catastrophic climate change, International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) said in its annual report. The agency especially advocated the need to scale up hydrogen production.
LNG
Asia became the main destination for U.S. LNG exports last year as volumes to the region rose 67% YoY in 2020. Asia accounted for almost half, or 3.1 Bcf/d, of all U.S. LNG exports, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration
Aviation
U.S. airlines United and Delta said they may stop bleeding cash as soon as this month as air travel starts to recover. This month American airports had some of their busiest days since March 2020.
Australia
Australia’s Fortescue Metals Group, the world’s No.4 iron ore miner, outlined a plan to become carbon neutral by 2030, bringing forward the target by 10 years. The company aims to start producing green hydrogen as soon as 2023.
China
1) China published its next five-year energy plan, which sees to boost the share of non-fossil sources in the country’s energy mix (including nuclear and hydropower) to around 20% in by the end of the period, up from about 15.8%.
2) Factory and retail sector activity in China was strong in the first two months of this year, beating expectations. Industrial output was up 16.9% YoY.
Egypt
Shell agrees on deal with units of Cheiron Petroleum and Cairn Energy to sell onshore upstream assets in the country for $646 million.
India
Officials close to Prime Minister Modi are debating whether to set a 2050 net-zero-emissions target, similar to the pronouncements of most of the world’s major economies in the last six months. Such a target would mean an overhaul of the Indian economy, which currently relies on coal. The deadline might even be set at 2047, which would mark the centenary of India’s independence from British rule.
Russia
The price at which Gazprom supplies gas to China dropped below $120 per 1,000 m3 in January as it is tied to the oil price with a nine-month time lag. That price was a fifth of Asian LNG price at the time.
Thailand
Thai authorities are drafting a master plan to help the country reach zero net carbon emissions by 2050, and will present a draft during next month. Changing the power industry’s fuel mix and a move into EVs are expected to feature.
UAE
ADNOC banned engineering giant Petrofac from competing for new contracts in UAE after one of its former executives pleaded guilty to charges of making bribes to secure business. UAE accounts for 10% of Petrofac’s revenue.
UK
BP said it aims to build Britain’s largest hydrogen plant by 2030 as part of the country’s push to boost use of the fuel and cut emissions. The plant in northern England will have capacity of up to 1 GW of blue hydrogen, about a fifth of Britain’s target by the end of the decade.
U.S.
1) Jane Lubchenco, a marine ecologist with wide federal government experience, has joined the Biden administration to lead climate and environment efforts at the Office of Science and Technology Policy, the White House said on Friday.
2) Three environmental groups filed a false advertising complaint against Chevron with the Federal Trade Commission on Tuesday, alleging that the U.S. oil major has overstated its investment in renewable energy and actions to curb greenhouse gas emissions.
3) The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said it will require power plants in a dozen states to cut their smog emissions starting this year as part of an effort to help areas of the country that are downwind of polluting industry.
A selection of domestic and international events we believe will have an impact on Japanese energy.
| February | Approval of Fiscal 2021 Budget by Japanese parliament including energy funding projects;
CMC LNG Conference |
| March | 10th Anniversary of Fukushima Nuclear Accident;
Smart Energy Week – Tokyo; Quarterly OPEC Meeting; Japan LPG Annual Conference; Full completion of all aspects of the multi-year deregulation of Japan’s electricity market; End of 2020/21 Fiscal Year in Japan; |
| April | Japan Atomic Industrial Forum – Annual Nuclear Power Conference;
38th ASEAN Annual Conference-Brunei; Japan LNG & Gas Virtual Summit (DMG)-Tokyo Three crucial by-elections in Hokkaido, Nagano & Hiroshima – April 25th |
| May | Bids close in first tender for commercial offshore wind projects in Japan;
Prime Minister Suga to visit the U.S.-tentative |
| June | Release of New Japan National Basic Energy Plan-2021;
G7 Meeting – U.K. Forum for China-Africa Cooperation Summit (Senegal) |
| July | Tokyo Metropolitan Govt. Assembly Elections;
Commencement of 2020 Tokyo Olympics |
| August | Hydrogen Ministerial Conference in conjunction with IEA World Economic Forum in Singapore – Deferred from May |
| September | Ruling LDP Presidential Election;
UN General Assembly Annual Meeting that is expected to address energy/climate challenges; IMF/World Bank Annual Meetings (multilateral and central banks expected to take further action on emissions disclosures and lending to fossil fuel projects); End of H1 FY2021 Fiscal Year in Japan; Japan-Russia: Eastern Economic Forum (Vladivostok)-tentative |
| October | Last possible month for holding Japan’s 2021 General Election;
METI Sponsored LNG Producer/Consumer Conference; Innovation for Cool Earth Forum – Tokyo Conference; Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosure (TCFD) – Tokyo Conference; G20 Meeting-Italy |
| November | COP26 (Glasgow);
Asian Development Bank (‘ADB’) Annual Conference; Japan-Canada Energy Forum; East Asia Summit (EAS) – Brunei |
| December | Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Forum – New Zealand;
Final details expected from METI on proposed unbundling of natural gas pipeline network scheduled for 2022. |
Japan Oil Price

Crude Imports Vs Processed Crude

Monthly Oil Import Volume (Mbpd)

Monthly Crude Processed (Mbpd)

Domestic Fuel Sales

SOURCES: Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI), Ministry of Finance, and the Petroleum Association of Japan
Japan LNG Price

LNG Imports: Japan Total vs Gas Utilities Only

Total LNG Imports (M t)

LNG Imports by Gas Firms Only (M t)

City Gas Sales – Total (M m3)

City Gas Sales by Sector (M m3)

SOURCES: Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI),
Ministry of Finance
Japan Total Power Demand (GWh)

Current Vs Historical Demand (GWh)

Day-Ahead Spot Electricity Prices

Day-Ahead Vs Day Time Vs Peak Time

LNG Imports by Electricity Utilities

LNG Stockpiles of Electricity Utilities

SOURCES: Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI), and the Japan Electric Power Exchange
Disclaimer
This communication has been prepared for information purposes only, is confidential and may be legally privileged. This is a subscription-only service and is directed at those who have expressly asked K.K. Yuri Group or one of its representatives to be added to the mailing list. This document may not be onwardly circulated or reproduced without prior written consent from Yuri Group, which retains all copyright to the content of this report.
Yuri Group is not registered as an investment advisor in any jurisdiction. Our research and all the content express our opinions, which are generally based on available public information, field studies and own analysis. Content is limited to general comment upon general political, economic and market issues, asset classes and types of investments. The report and all of its content does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell, subscribe for or underwrite any product or physical commodity, or a financial instrument.
The information contained in this report is obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith. No representation or warranty is made that it is accurate or complete. Opinions and views expressed are subject to change without notice, as are prices and availability, which are indicative only. There is no obligation to notify recipients of any changes to this data or to do so in the future. No responsibility is accepted for the use of or reliance on the information provided. In no circumstances will Yuri Group be liable for any indirect or direct loss, or consequential loss or damages arising from the use of, any inability to use, or any inaccuracy in the information.
K.K. Yuri Group: Oonoya Building 8F, Yotsuya 1-18, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 160-0004.
NEWS
・Japan’s nuclear industry has mixed week: TEPCO gets major warning from regulator and delays all restart plans, but two other utilities win court battles; yet another court rules against J-Atomic
・Industry association asks govt. to set a $46/ ton carbon price
・Petroleum Association of Japan commits to 2050 net-zero carbon