
July 19, 2022
NEWS
TOP
ENERGY TRANSITION & POLICY
ELECTRICITY MARKETS
OIL, GAS & MINING
ANALYSIS
TOKYO AVOIDS A POWER CRUNCH, BUT SYSTEM IN PLACE TO PREVENT CRISES FALLS SHORT
In late June, Tokyo faced a severe power crunch, the second in four months. Foreseeing the problems that the hottest June record would create with electricity supply, the government made an impassioned plea to both businesses and households to conserve energy to avoid blackouts. The response was heartening and the danger passed. But in fact, Japan already has a market-based mechanism to cope with times of power crises. Worryingly, it failed to deliver. When the Tokyo grid operator turned to the market for help, none was forthcoming.
BRACING FOR LOSS OF RUSSIAN LNG,
JAPAN STEPS UP GAS CONSERVATION
Power crunches are increasingly common in Japan, and shortages of natural gas are the new reality. For the first time ever, the government has embarked on a review on what measures can be taken to conserve use of the fuel. METI hasn’t elaborated on the reasons why Japan is suddenly taking such a course. The ministry’s external advisors, however, have been more forthcoming: there’s a risk of Japan losing access to Russian supplies of LNG, which are about 10% of the nation’s total. But devising gas conservation measures isn’t straightforward.
GLOBAL VIEW
U.S. prepares for new oil lease auctions. Saudi Arabia boosts Russian oil imports to free more of own crude for export. Trafigura sells Russian oil firm stake. OPEC may struggle to meet 2023 demand. Hungary declares state of emergency over energy supply disruptions. Algeria plans 15 GW of renewables. Details on these and more in our global wrap.
EVENTS SCHEDULE
PUBLISHER
K. K. Yuri Group
Editorial Team
Yuriy Humber (Editor-in-Chief)
John Varoli (Senior Editor, Americas)
Mayumi Watanabe (Japan)
Wilfried Goossens (Japan, Events)
Events

Regular Contributors
Chisaki Watanabe (Japan)
Takehiro Masutomo (Japan)
Daniel Shulman (Japan)
Art & Design
22 Graphics Inc.
SUBSCRIPTIONS & ADVERTISING
Japan NRG offers individual, corporate and academic subscription plans. Basic details are our website or write to subscriptions@japan-nrg.com
For marketing, advertising, or collaboration opportunities, contact sales@japan-nrg.com For all other inquiries, write to info@japan-nrg.com
OFTEN USED ACRONYMS
METI The Ministry of Energy, Trade and Industry
MOE Ministry of Environment
ANRE Agency for Natural Resources and Energy
NEDO New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization
TEPCO Tokyo Electric Power Company
KEPCO Kansai Electric Power Company
EPCO Electric Power Company
JCC Japan Crude Cocktail
JKM Japan Korea Market, the Platt’s LNG benchmark
CCUS Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage
mmbtu Million British Thermal Units
mb/d Million barrels per day
mtoe Million Tons of Oil Equivalent
kWh Kilowatt hours (electricity generation volume)

Kishida tells METI to run more nuclear and thermal plants this winter
(Japan NRG, July 14)
TAKEAWAY: Initially, Kishida’s announcement was interpreted as the prime minister ordering the restart of nine more reactors – something that he is not at liberty to do. On closer inspection, however, his comments simply refer to the government expecting to have “up to nine” nuclear reactors operating in Japan during the winter months. That corresponds exactly with the operating and maintenance schedules of power utilities for their nuclear facilities. The nine units would be online in the Kansai, Shikoku and Kyushu regions by the time the winter peak demand season of January 2023 arrives.
It may be possible for utilities to accelerate some restarts. Normally, that would not be necessary as it would make little impact on meeting peak power demand. However, the summer power peak came early, with June temperatures the hottest on record. The government and utilities may be mindful of the need to prepare for an unusually early cold snap.
Presently, Ohi No. 3, Ikata No. 3, Genkai No. 4, Sendai No.1 and No.2 nuclear reactors are in operation.
Offshore wind auction panel proposes to limit award capacity, not bids
(Japan NRG, July 13)
TAKEAWAY: Auction rule committee panelists are divided on every item, even on the need to change the rules as well as the process of rule changes. Public comments may also be similarly divided. Major issues include: fair and competitive auction vs. robust sectoral growth; speedy rollout vs quality and safety guarantee; the level of information disclosure. This sector requires patience as there will clearly be an adjustment period before the next auction takes place.
Govt. mulls the introduction of income guarantee program to boost nuclear power
(Nikkei, July 18)
METI to push “user-driven alliances” to help mini-solar operators
(Japan NRG, July 13)
TAKEAWAY: Japan is in the world’s top three in terms of solar power installed, but 34% of that is from units of less than 50 kW. Individuals account for 64% of the ownership in the 10-50 kW category and 95% for units of below 10 kW. User-driven alliances and aggregators may not be effective at keeping these small plants running until 2050. There is a risk that as owners pass away no one takes over. The cost of identifying new owners is not negligible. Hence some experts argue that in order to improve the overall operating costs, the launch of mini-power stations should be restricted.
JMA to work closer with grids to improve renewable output forecast
(Government Statement, July 13)
China closes in on Japan’s hydrogen technology patent lead
(Nikkei Asia, July 13)
Opinion: Government can’t keep delaying energy decisions
(Nikkei, July 11)
Panasonic to build a second, $4bn EV battery plant in the U.S.
(Company Statement, July 14)
Toyota-led group starts planning hydrogen engines for large commercial vehicles
(New Energy Business News, July 12)
Mitsui subsidiary to start offering online purchase of carbon offsets
(New Energy Business News, July 14)
Kansai Electric and ORIX to build a battery storage plant in Wakayama area
(New Energy Business News, July 15)
Shiseido and others to build a recycling system for plastic cosmetic containers
(Kankyo Business, July 11)
University invents highly-efficient sunlight hydrogen technology
(Newswitch, July 6)
Kyushu plant prepares for glut of discarded panels
(Newswitch, July 11)
Marubeni and Osaka Gas join methanation venture in Peru
(Nikkei, July 14)

Top wind turbine makers reconsider entry into Japan market after rule changes
(Nikkei, July 15)
TAKEAWAY: Outside of Chinese turbine makers, which mostly supply their home market, Vestas, Gamesa and GE are the big global players. GE partnered with Toshiba to make turbine parts in Japan, but the others have yet to establish a local production base.
Mitsubishi picked GE’s turbines for all three of its offshore wind projects.
Kyushu and Kansai utilities restart nuclear reactors to ease power crunch
(Japan NRG, July 18)
TAKEAWAY: PM Kishida has called for more nuclear power to be brought online to cope with various energy shortages. This has yet to translate into major changes in the nuclear industry as the only three utilities to run NPPs in the country remain Kansai, Kyushu and Shikoku Electric.
Toshiba Energy Systems sees future in VPP business, hydrogen fuel cells
(Denki Shimbun, July 15)
Ministry gives opinion on Influx’s 1 GW Ishikari Bay offshore wind project
(New Energy Business News, July 14)
Sumitomo, Shikoku Electric group to develop 193 MW wind farm in Kochi
(New Energy Business News, July 13)
Hitachi Zosen to develop a large wind project in Fukushima region
(New Energy Business News, July 12)
Idemitsu partners with Skye to expand renewable energy in Southeast Asia
(Company Statement, July 12)
Court orders ex-Tepco executives to pay ¥13 trillion in damages for accident
(TV Asahi, July 14)
TAKEAWAY: In the eyes of Japan’s public, both the government and TEPCO avoided responsibility for Fukushima. This led to much frustration and may have added to the post-accident distrust of nuclear power. It has taken over 10 years and soaring electricity prices to win back majority support for nuclear plant restarts. This court decision will surely make some utilities nervous about operating reactors going forward. Executive liability can be capped with special insurance schemes.
JAPEX begins work on biomass plant
(Sekiyu Shimbun, July 11)
Kansai Electric invests in startup that provides decentralized power in Africa
(New Energy Business News, July 12)
Green Power wins financing for 80 MW onshore wind farm in Aomori
(Kankyo Business, July 11)
Hitachi Energy to supply Chinese wind farms with transformers
(Nikkei, July 13)

Japan aims to keep stakes in Russia’s Sakhalin-2 LNG project
(Kyodo, July 18)
Cosmo reveals testing breaches from three decades ago
(NHK, July 13)
METI calls on commercial users to conserve gas
(Reuters, July 11)
TAKEAWAY: See the Analysis section for a detailed writeup on this.
LNG stocks drop to 1.94 million tons
(Government Data, July 13)
BY YOSHIHISA OHNO
Tokyo Avoids a Power Crunch (So Far);
But System in Place to Prevent Crises Falls Short
In late June, Tokyo faced a severe power crunch, the second in four months. Foreseeing the problems that the hottest June record would create with electricity supply, the government made an impassioned plea to both businesses and households to conserve energy to avoid blackouts.
The response was heartening and the danger passed. But in fact, Japan already has a market-based mechanism to cope with times of power crises.
Rather than appealing to the social consciousness of citizens, the government should have been able to rely on the so-called Balancing Market set up to cope with exactly this kind of emergency. Worryingly, the Balancing Market failed to deliver. When the Tokyo area grid operator turned to the market for help, none was forthcoming.
The mechanism’s failure to resolve power crunches must be addressed. An initial assessment suggests that its modus operandi no longer fits with on-the-ground reality.
Spare capacity eroded
Before Japan liberalized its electricity market in 2016, regional power companies were fully responsible for all facets of power supply. They ran operations with a view of maintaining some power plants in reserve to make sure there was at least 7% of spare capacity to deal with emergencies.
As a result, Japan boasted the world’s lowest rate of power outages.
After the 2011 Fukushima disaster, the majority of the nation’s nuclear baseload power was taken offline. Even today, none of the nuclear plants in the country’s east, which covers the home territories of TEPCO, Tohoku Electric and Hokkaido Electric, have been able to restart.
Saddled with maintaining and upgrading non-operating nuclear reactors while trying to compete in a newly liberalized electricity industry, the big utilities have mothballed many of their older and inefficient thermal power plants, eroding the spare capacity available to the power system. This year, Japan faces its lowest level of thermal power generation capacity available in years.
To make sure Japan’s power system could at least maintain some buffer for times of need, the government set up several mechanisms, chief among them the Balancing Market. The market allowed power companies and other businesses that own generation assets to contract some of their capacity to this market, receiving compensation for keeping it available for emergencies.
The adjustment mechanism splits power plants and power conservation services into several categories. The top one was Power Source I, which largely refers to power plants that can be started up very quickly (i.e., within 5 minutes) and are owned by large utilities close to the grid operators and, thus, quick to answer the call to action.

Other categories encompass power generation that’s less susceptible to grid company command and / or plants that take time to ramp up and down, such as nuclear reactors.
A key category to note, however, is Power Source Ⅰ‘. In addition to some thermal and pumped hydro generation, it relies on “demand-response” services. The latter refer to ways that power providers can encourage consumers to lower electricity use during a crunch period with incentives.
There are few demand-response service providers in Japan. The niche was pioneered in Japan by a French company, Energy Pool, around the middle of the last decade. But, the popularity of demand-response services in Japan is growing. Its providers help mostly industrial and commercial users set clearly defined roadmaps to reduce energy use in response to a call from the power system operator.
The impact of demand-response measures can be significant, but the way that Power Source I‘ contracts are ordered in Japan proved a key reason why the adjustment failed to provide support for the Tokyo area during the June shortages. These contracts specify that power conservation measures and / or additional capacity must only be made available during the two peak summer and the two peak winter months.
| Power Source I | Capacity that is always secured by transmission and distribution operators (likely belongs to the generation firm closely aligned with the local grid company); can be made available within 5 minutes |
| Power Source I‘ | Capacity that can be made available in extremely harsh conditions, such as once-in-a-decade crises; can be made available within 3 hours
Contract period is limited to 9:00 to 20:00, July to September (summer), and December to February (winter) peak seasons |
| Power Source II | Capacity that may be secured by transmission and distribution operators but which may also belong to others in the local power industry (utilities or industrial users); can be made available within 15 minutes
Refers to surplus electricity that can be supplied after gate close (i.e. after 17:00, which is the deadline for submitting power supply plans for the next day) |
| Power Source III | Capacity beyond all control of transmission and distribution operators |
(Source: METI and Japan NRG)
June was too soon
This year’s first power crunch came in March, after a major earthquake offshore from the Fukushima and Miyagi prefectures, as well as Tokyo’s unusually severe cold weather and snow, cut available supply and increased demand. The government was slow to issue an alert to notify the public about the risks, with the official announcement coming after 21:00 the night before the day of expected shortages.
Still, Tokyo’s power grid scored a lucky win. Despite the late call, Energy Pool Japan via its demand-response clients managed to shave off 300 MW to 500 MW of demand from the system, easing the burden on supply. Equally, strong public support in cutting electricity use in homes helped demand in the Tokyo area drop by a third in the afternoon of March 21, the most critical period.
While the response was good, it was clear that potential summer shortages would be more prolonged. The government adjusted the alerts system so as to warn users about a crunch two nights before it was due.
Despite the extra warning, when it came to the crunch in late June, TEPCO got no support from Power Source I‘ clients whatsoever. In other words, no factories or businesses cut demand according to contract rules, because it was still June and their contracts kicked in only in July.
The system designed to deal with “extremely harsh conditions, such as occur once in a decade” failed because no one was ready to deal with a power crunch outside of the usual power crunch season.
TEPCO filled the gaps in other ways, such as additional supply from industrial firms with in-house power plants. Starting this month, around 7 GW of capacity is scheduled back online after maintenance work – just in time for the official peak power demand season.
Still, one obvious conclusion is that Japan’s changing climate patterns show that crises can occur at any time. The government and power industry need to prepare demand-responses and other conservation strategies to engage at any time of year.
The entrenched notion of ‘peak season’ is being shaken. The legal and market frameworks need to adjust once again to make sure that Japan’s official mechanisms are relevant going forward and that the country doesn’t have to rely on social consciousness alone to navigate difficult times.
BY MAYUMI WATANABE
Bracing for Loss of Russian LNG, Japan Steps Up Gas Conservation
Power crunches are increasingly common in Japan, and shortages of natural gas are the new reality. For the first time ever, the government has embarked on a review on what measures can be taken to conserve use of the fuel.
METI hasn’t elaborated on the reasons why Japan is suddenly taking such a course. The ministry’s external advisors, however, have been more forthcoming: there’s a risk of Japan losing access to Russian supplies of LNG, which are about 10% of the nation’s total.
Devising gas conservation measures isn’t straightforward. In the past decade, the rising frequency of short-term shortages of electricity supply have helped forge an evolving government, business and now even household response. The topic even airs on morning chat shows.
The regulatory basis for gas is quite different than for electricity.
| Gas Business Act | Gas operators need to coordinate/collaborate to maintain gas pipeline networks and to enhance users’ benefit (58th article) |
| Electricity Business Act | Power operators need to coordinate/collaborate to serve public interest and to ensure supply security (28th article) |
Legal framework needs to be amended
Japan’s gas sector is regulated under the Gas Business Act, which unlike the Electricity Business Act does not have a clause that empowers the state to intervene in case of emergencies. For this reason, METI can only hope that voluntary actions from industry users are good enough to overcome a crisis.
Hope is not enough, though, and one of the most influential METI advisors, Prof. Kikkawa Takeo of International University, is calling for the Gas Business Act to be amended before the heating demand season arrives in January.
While METI’s official position is that Japan is not currently facing a threat to its gas supply, the launch of a public-private debate around gas conservation in recent months has set off some anxiety among major gas consumers.
For now, METI is asking users to voluntarily conserve gas. If further consumption cuts are needed, then it will file direct requests to large consumers. Businesses account for 70% of national city gas consumption. METI says it would focus conservation requests on users that have the capacity to switch to other sources.
As such, the government is asking all firms to rewrite business continuity plans to include gas supply cuts in risk scenarios. METI’s current thinking is to form an alert system in times of supply crunch similar to that used in the electricity sector. There would be warnings of different levels relative to the degree of shortages.
Substitution options?
Gas and power are both essential national energy infrastructure, complementing one another. Last January, when gas heating systems were in short supply due to cuts in imports of semiconductors, home builders shifted to electric central heating systems.
After the recent June power crunch, end-users are again shifting back to gas. This symbiosis suggests that power and gas conservation policy making should be centralized, rather than split between two separate METI regulator bodies. Ultimately, a shortage in one of the two areas can stall the entire energy system.
Substitution of gas with oil or coal are also no longer seen as the easy, go-to solution due to their high prices. While Japan’s import price for LNG is up 121% YoY, coal prices are up 227% in the same period.
“At the end of the day, energy conservation is critical for national security,” said one METI gas panel member.
Big differences between power and gas
The power sector was able to build up a national power conservation structure following the Fukushima crisis and other earthquakes that damaged thermal power plants in subsequent years.
“Gas supply cuts were not seen as a risk… thanks to gas utilities managing their resources extremely well. You can never thank them enough,” Tokyo University professor Matsumura Toshihiro told the METI gas panel.
METI is not able to oversee gas and power sectors single-handedly, as the room for active state intervention is limited for gas due to the legal framework. In addition, while any power contracts with large business users tend to include a clause that allows grid operators to curtail supply in times of emergencies, very few gas contracts have similar clauses.
Gas and power are structured differently. While the power sector is dominated by the 10 former regional monopolies, also known as EPCos, Japan’s gas supply is split between 193 mostly small enterprises with just four major firms in the industry. In rural areas with less than 50,000 inhabitants, there is no city gas operator. Power grid companies have to cover even the smallest communities.
The 10 regional electricity grids publish supply and demand forecasts on their websites; data that is updated daily. Such disclosure may not be possible for all gas suppliers. And yet, without clear data, it will be difficult to push consumers to make significant savings.
In addition, while power saving can make a difference by being enacted for just a few hours at certain peak consumption times of the day, gas conservation requires days, weeks or even months of continuous effort until the next LNG cargo arrives.
The demand response system, where users adjust consumption patterns to match supply and are compensated for this, may not work as well in the gas sector. Some suppliers are too small to manage such programs.
Lastly, due to the spread of smart meters, grids can gauge power consumption and supply on a real time basis. It takes time for the gas system to grasp real-time consumption trends.
One thing is clear. The gas and power facilities need to work closely together so that ministry action – from non-legally binding conservation requests and guidelines, to ordinances and ministerial orders – improve total energy efficiency.
In a worst-case scenario, the gas industry will repeat the mistakes of its power sector cousin by shutting all the old, inefficient facilities used as a buffer in times of crises. Unlike electricity, which has at least several sources of generation, there are few alternatives to gas for heating and industrial use.
BY JOHN VAROLI
Below are some of last week’s most important international energy developments monitored by the Japan NRG team because of their potential to impact energy supply and demand, as well as prices. We see the following as relevant to Japanese and international energy investors.
Algeria/ Solar power
The first electricity from the 1 GW “Solar 1,000” project is expected in late 2023 when a 30 MW solar park in Bechar province goes online. International investors are invited to join the project. Algeria plans 15 GW of renewable energy capacity by 2035.
Germany/ Natural gas
Uniper, Europe’s largest buyer of Russian gas, seeks a state rescue as it faces insolvency due to a drastic reduction in Russian gas. Uniper has been losing tens of millions of euros a day as it has to buy expensive gas on spot markets but is unable to pass on the extra cost to customers.
Hungary/ Energy crisis
The government declared a “state of emergency” over supply disruptions and rising energy prices, and it plans to increase domestic energy production to ensure supply. The government of Prime Minister Viktor Orbán blames the war in Ukraine and western sanctions on Russia for the energy crisis.
Kazakhstan/ Oil pipeline
Last week, a Russian court ordered a 30-day stoppage on operations of the Caspian Pipeline Consortium, which sends oil from Kazakhstan via Russia to Black Sea ports, due to concerns about spills. CPC’s shareholders include Shell, ExxonMobil and Chevron. This week, that decision was overturned, ending the threat of disruption.
Malaysia/ Oil legal case
Two Luxembourg-based subsidiaries of state oil company Petronas were seized by descendants of a late sultan in a dispute over an agreement dating to 1878. The subsidiaries — Petronas Azerbaijan and Petronas South Caucasus — had gas interests in Azerbaijan worth more than $2 billion. In March, an arbitrator in France ruled that Malaysia must pay the heirs $15 billion.
OPEC/ Oil demand
In 2023, global oil demand will rise to levels that OPEC will struggle to meet. The amount of oil that the group must pump to meet global demand, also known as the “call on Opec crude”, could rise to 32 mbpd by the end of 2023.
Russia/ Gas pipeline
Russia’s main gas pipeline to Germany went offline for scheduled maintenance, amid fears whether Gazprom will restart deliveries through Nord Stream 1 once those repairs end on July 21.
Russia/ Oil assets
Commodity trader Trafigura sold a multibillion-dollar 10% stake in Vostok Oil, which is in Russia’s Arctic region, to Hong Kong-based Nord Axis Ltd. Corporate filings show Nord Axis was incorporated on Feb. 15, a week before Russia launched a full-scale attack on Ukraine.
Saudi Arabia/ Oil
Reuters reports that the world’s largest oil exporter more than doubled Russian oil imports in Q2 in order to feed power stations to meet summer cooling demand and free up the kingdom’s own crude for export. Russia is selling fuel at discounted prices following international sanctions.
U.S./ Oil leases
The White House is preparing proposals for new oil lease auctions in federal waters over the next five years. Options range from 10 lease sales in the Gulf, plus another off Alaska, to no new lease sales at all. In related news, Houston-based Pickering Energy Partners, with an unnamed institutional investor, will spend $300 million to acquire and develop oil and gas assets in the Permian Basin.
U.S./ Power generation
Power generation from utility-scale renewables reached 85.3 million MWh in April, down from 87.1 million MWh in March, supplying 28% of U.S. power for the month. Wind generation supplied 46.2 million MWh, accounting for over half of the total renewable output; while utility-scale solar supplied 13.5 million MWh, or 15.8%.
UK/ BHP lawsuit
A £5 billion lawsuit against BHP by 202,600 Brazilian claimants will go ahead in an English court. The judges overturned a 2018 decision that the courts should not hear the case. The lawsuit centers on Brazil’s worst environmental disaster, when the Fundão Dam collapsed in 2015, releasing 40 million cubic meters of tailings from iron ore mining.
A selection of domestic and international events we believe will have an impact on Japanese energy
| January | OPEC quarterly meeting;
JCCP Petroleum Conference – Tokyo; EU Taxonomy Climate Delegated Act activates; Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) Trade Agreement that includes ASEAN countries, China and Japan activates; Indonesia to temporarily ban coal exports for one month; Regional bloc developments: Cambodia assumes presidency of ASEAN; Thailand assumes presidency of APEC; Germany assumes presidency of G7; France assumes presidency of EU; Indonesia assumes presidency of G20; and Senegal assumes presidency of African Union; Japan-U.S. two-plus-two meeting; Japan’s parliament convenes on Jan. 17 for 150 days; Prime Minister Kishida visits Australia (tentative) |
| February | Chinese New Year (Jan. 31 to Feb. 6);
Beijing Winter Olympics; South Korea joins RCEP trade agreement |
| March | Renewable Energy Institute annual conference;
Smart Energy Week – Tokyo; Japan Atomic Industrial Forum annual conference – Tokyo; World Hydrogen Summit – Netherlands; EU New strategy on international energy engagement published; End of 2021/22 Japanese Fiscal Year; South Korean presidential election |
| April | Japan Energy Summit – Tokyo;
MARPOL Convention on Emissions reductions for containerships and LNG carriers activates; Japan Feed-in-Premium system commences as Energy Resilience Act takes effect; Launch of Prime Section of Japan Stock Exchange with TFCD climate reporting requirement; Convention on Biological Diversity Conference for post-2020 biodiversity framework – China; Elections: French presidential election; Hungarian general election |
| May | World Natural Gas Conference WCG2022 – South Korea;
Elections: Australian general election; Philippines general and presidential elections |
| June | Happo-Noshiro offshore wind project auction closes;
Annual IEA Global Conference on Energy Efficiency – Denmark; UNEP Environment Day, Environment Ministers Meeting – Sweden; G7 meeting – Germany |
| July | Japan to finalize economic security policies as part of natl. security strategy review;
China connects to grid 2nd 200 MW SMR at Shidao Bay Nuclear Plant, Shandong; Czech Republic assumes presidency of EU; Elections: Japan’s Upper House Elections; Indian presidential election |
| August | Japan: Africa (TICAD 8) Summit – Tunisia;
Kenyan general election |
| September | IPCC to release Assessment and Synthesis Report;
Clean Energy Ministerial and the Mission Innovation Summit – Pittsburg, U.S.; Japan LNG Producer/Consumer Conference – Tokyo; IMF/World Bank annual meetings – Washington; Annual UN General Assembly meetings; METI to set safety standards for ammonia and hydrogen-fired power plants; End of 1H FY2022 Fiscal Year in Japan; Swedish general election |
| October | EU Review of CO2 emission standards for heavy-duty vehicles published;
Chinese Communist Party 20th quinquennial National Party Congress; G20 Meeting – Bali, Indonesia; Innovation for Cool Earth TCFD & Annual Forums – Tokyo; Elections: Okinawa gubernational election; Brazilian presidential election; |
| November | COP27 – Egypt;
U.S. mid-term elections; Soccer World Cup – Qatar; |
| December | Germany to eliminate nuclear power from energy mix;
Happo-Noshiro offshore wind project auction result released; Japan submits revised 2030 CO2 reduction goal following Glasgow’s COP26; Japan-Canada Annual Energy Forum (tentative); Tesla expected to achieve 1.3 million EV deliveries for full year 2022 |
Disclaimer
This communication has been prepared for information purposes only, is confidential and may be legally privileged. This is a subscription-only service and is directed at those who have expressly asked K.K. Yuri Group or one of its representatives to be added to the mailing list. This document may not be onwardly circulated or reproduced without prior written consent from Yuri Group, which retains all copyright to the content of this report.
Yuri Group is not registered as an investment advisor in any jurisdiction. Our research and all the content express our opinions, which are generally based on available public information, field studies and own analysis. Content is limited to general comment upon general political, economic and market issues, asset classes and types of investments. The report and all of its content does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell, subscribe for or underwrite any product or physical commodity, or a financial instrument.
The information contained in this report is obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith. No representation or warranty is made that it is accurate or complete. Opinions and views expressed are subject to change without notice, as are prices and availability, which are indicative only. There is no obligation to notify recipients of any changes to this data or to do so in the future. No responsibility is accepted for the use of or reliance on the information provided. In no circumstances will Yuri Group be liable for any indirect or direct loss, or consequential loss or damages arising from the use of, any inability to use, or any inaccuracy in the information.
K.K. Yuri Group: Oonoya Building 8F, Yotsuya 1-18, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 160-0004.
NEWS
・Kishida tells METI to run more nuclear, thermal units this winter; the PM outlines measures as a way to deal with power crunch
・Top wind turbine makers reconsider entry into Japan market as auction rule change proposals signal profits may be insufficient
・Japan asks U.S. and Australia to boost LNG output and supply hoping to secure more alternatives to Russian gas to the market