
Oct. 31, 2022
NEWS
TOP
ENERGY TRANSITION & POLICY
ELECTRICITY MARKETS
OIL, GAS & MINING
ANALYSIS
BURNED BY THE SUN: ON-THE-GROUND REPORT OF
A LOCAL CONFLICT OVER SOLAR DEVELOPMENT
“At the end of the day, it’s all about money. People weren’t getting into the solar business because they had strong opinions on energy,” says a restaurant owner in a small town in central Japan. The owner shrugs as he recounts an unfortunate story about a local solar development gone wrong.
Apathetic or even negative views towards renewables are not unusual in rural Japan. That bodes ill for the country’s 2030 climate targets.
In an effort to remedy the issue, the government recently created a conflict resolution panel. What challenges will the panel’s experts face? For this special report, Japan NRG visited the auto heartland of Nagoya to speak with a community in conflict.
NUCLEAR REACTOR LIFE EXTENSIONS:
A QUICK BUT TEMPORARY SOLUTION FOR JAPAN
Japanese power firms have spent roughly $40 billion since the Fukushima disaster to revamp nuclear safety. Despite the rich outlay, most of the utilities have so far failed to reap any benefits as most of the units remain offline for over a decade. So, it comes as little surprise that the government wants to help the utilities increase the permitted operating life of reactors to help balance the financials. But even if all goes smoothly and the units are able to work for longer, the core challenges of the industry will not be resolved. We review the practical issues faced by the nation’s reactors.
GLOBAL VIEW
Asia will surpass the EU in offshore wind capacity by 2030. Chinese energy firm discovers major shale gas reserves. China needs $14 trillion in investments to hit net zero: World Bank. European gas prices decline as storage fills up. Kazakhstan touts green hydrogen ambitions. Details on these and more in our global wrap.
PUBLISHER
K. K. Yuri Group
Editorial Team
Yuriy Humber (Editor-in-Chief)
John Varoli (Senior Editor, Americas)
Mayumi Watanabe (Japan)
Yoshihisa Ohno (Japan)
Wilfried Goossens (Events, global)
Regular Contributors
Chisaki Watanabe (Japan)
Takehiro Masutomo (Japan)
Art & Design
22 Graphics Inc.
Events
SUBSCRIPTIONS & ADVERTISING
Japan NRG offers individual, corporate and academic subscription plans. Basic details are our website or write to subscriptions@japan-nrg.com
For marketing, advertising, or collaboration opportunities, contact sales@japan-nrg.com For all other inquiries, write to info@japan-nrg.com
OFTEN USED ACRONYMS
METI The Ministry of Energy, Trade and Industry
MOE Ministry of Environment
ANRE Agency for Natural Resources and Energy
NEDO New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization
TEPCO Tokyo Electric Power Company
KEPCO Kansai Electric Power Company
EPCO Electric Power Company
JCC Japan Crude Cocktail
JKM Japan Korea Market, the Platt’s LNG benchmark
CCUS Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage
mmbtu Million British Thermal Units
mb/d Million barrels per day
mtoe Million Tons of Oil Equivalent
kWh Kilowatt hours (electricity generation volume)

Govt announces ¥39 trillion package including power, gas, gasoline subsidies
(Japan NRG, Oct. 28)
TAKEAWAY: Electricity subsidies alone may cost about ¥1 trillion per quarter, based on prices and volumes in the first months of this year. Together with existing gasoline and new natural gas subsidies, the government’s annual outlay could approach ¥10 trillion.
The deluge of government spending should calm households and small businesses. But it could also have some negative consequences. Construction experts warn of “hangovers” as the rush to supply equipment to procure the subsidies could flood the market with low quality storage batteries and renewables systems.
METI clarifies revised offshore wind auction rules
(Japan NRG, Oct. 28)
TAKEAWAY: One panel member said that a lack of port facilities may create difficulties for operators under the deadline pressure as their port access plans may crash.
Kishida asks GX Council for effective carbon pricing scheme
(Japan NRG, Oct. 26)
TAKEAWAY: The idea of “growth-oriented carbon pricing” was to rely wholly on voluntary emission cuts of businesses and their zeal for new markets, and no “tax” of any form, but this assumption is already changing.
METI to establish carbon footprint guidelines in March 2023
(Japan NRG, Oct. 27)
TAKEAWAY: The guidelines are expected to align with standards set by Partnership for Carbon Transparency.
IGES reports on progress of pre-COP27 MWP discussions
(Japan NRG, Oct. 25)
METI set to revise roadmap to develop next-gen reactor
(Japan NRG, Oct. 24)
TAKEAWAY: The remarkable point of this meeting was that METI said the present roadmap should be revised. Also, METI referred to the UK’s nuclear regulated asset base (RAB) model as suitable for Japan to increase financing for development of next-gen reactors.

Source: METI
Ruling party lawmakers set up biofuel and synthetic fuel group
(Japan NRG, Oct. 24)
TAKEAWAY: Biofuel reports are expected to be published by the government. Japan’s biotech development has focused on medicine and this move will push more research into green fuel. The major challenge is to ignite a rapid expansion in the bio feedstock production while striking a balance among energy and food security, net-zero and biodiversity. Most energy experts feel the increased consumption of biofuels will not change the shifts to EV or battery-fueled aircrafts.
Asahi Kasei to produce PPE plastic from biomass raw materials starting next year
(Kankyo Business, Oct. 21)
MHI wins order from ArcelorMittal and BHP to trial carbon capture at a steel plant
(Japan NRG, Oct. 27)
METI, Singapore’s Trade Ministry sign agreement on LNG and energy transition
(Japan NRG, Oct. 26)
TAKEAWAY: The two ministries have yet to narrow down the investment details, which could be anything upstream or downstream, but will be key in improving supply security. METI is in talks with other Asian countries to expand cooperation on LNG supplies.
IHI and Sembcorp will develop the ammonia supply chain in Singapore and APAC
(Japan NRG, Oct. 25)
TAKEAWAY: In four days, IHI put out three press releases on ammonia and hydrogen. This indicates the high level of priority that ammonia holds for the company.
Osaka Gas, MHI and IBM to visualize emissions and set a value on synthetic methane
(Kankyo Business, Oct. 25)
New material promises low-temperature charging of lithium batteries
(Nikkei X-Tech, Oct. 26)
Toyota, Kyoto University lead research into fluoride-ion batteries
(Nikkei, Oct. 24)
Toyota pioneers use of reclaimed vehicle batteries in grid battery systems
(JCN Newswire, Oct. 27)
Hitachi introduces Lumada-based energy supply service to reduce CO2 emissions by 15%
(MONOist; Oct. 24)
METI community conflicts panel criticizes solar operators, then meets criticism itself
(Japan NRG, Oct. 25)
TAKEAWAY: Rules need to be consistent across renewable types and locations. However, as the Japan Wind Power Association pointed out, flexibility is required for rules that relate to geographic and climatic conditions. The panel has the difficult task to provide guidance on delivering value to communities. See also the Analysis section for a report on this issue.
20-year revenue guarantee for green generators
(Kyodo, Oct. 25)
Power companies raised a record ¥1.5 trillion in April-Sept in rush to get liquidity
(Nikkei; Oct. 20)
Canada’s CDPQ invests ¥70 billion in Shizen Energy
(Company Statement, Oct. 24)
TEPCO gets additional compensation in nuclear subsidy payout
(Japan NRG, Oct. 24)
TAKEAWAY: TEPCO has suffered greatly from rising fuel prices and weaker yen. The utility has to pay for decommissioning of 10 units at the Fukushima Dai-Ichi and Fukushima Dai-Ni NPPs, as well as investing in new business lines. Currently, the only way to significantly improve TEPCO’s financial performance would be to restart the company’s remaining operable nuclear power plant, the Kashiwazaki Kariwa NPP. However, scandals around TEPCO staff continue to plague the company and erode public trust. In the latest episode, a TEPCO staff was recently accused of taking home sensitive information about nuclear security with permission.
Mitsubishi sets up branches in Akita and Chiba to develop offshore wind farms
(Denki Shimbun, Oct. 27)
Tokyo Land to develop 121 MW onshore wind farm in Wakayama
(New Energy Business News, Oct. 26)
INPEX joins geothermal power project in Indonesia
(Denki Shimbun, Oct. 26)

Source: Inpex
Kyushu Electric invests in PetroGreen Energy in the Philippines
(Denki Shimbun, Oct. 27)
Eurus Energy’s Aomori wind farm meets unexpected opposition
(Mainichi Shimbun, Oct. 27)
JERA to restart thermal unit at Anesaki power plant
(Nikkei, Oct. 22)

(Bloomberg, Oct. 28)
Kishida visits BHP nickel refinery in Australia
(Japan NRG, Oct. 22)
Government wants to make propane suppliers more efficient
(Nikkei, Oct. 25)
Panasonic signs MoU for off-take from Canadian graphite manufacturer
(New Energy Business News, Oct. 25)
LNG stocks rise to 2.56 million tons
(Government data, Oct. 26)
Russian LNG accounts for 11% of total imports in Sept; No crude from Russia
(Government data, Oct. 28)
BY MAYUMI WATANABE
Burned by the Sun: Learning from a Local Solar Power Conflict
“At the end of the day, it’s all about money. People weren’t getting into the solar business because they had strong opinions on energy,” says a restaurant owner in a small town in central Japan. The owner shrugs as he explains in detail an apathetic and sometimes hostile local attitude towards renewable energy.
Like a number of municipalities around the country, this township about 60 km south of Nagoya City, has its own unfortunate story related to solar development. That and gaps in local resources and knowledge about renewables are making it more and more difficult for developers to move forward with projects in rural Japan.
That bodes ill for the government’s 2030 climate targets. To meet internationally declared cuts in greenhouse gases, METI estimates that Japan needs to boost its operational solar capacity to 103-118 GW, from the current 66 GW. With other renewables unlikely to fill the gap near-term, reversing the malaise that’s descended on the solar sector is crucial.
The country needs a growth strategy that makes communities happy and allows operators to turn a profit, though working in the confines of the law. That’s the basis for a key advisory panel launched by the government. Its role is to be the peacemaker between renewables operators and communities.
What challenges will the government’s experts need to tackle? For this special report, Japan NRG visited the nation’s auto industry heartland of Nagoya to speak with a community in conflict.
Policy background
On Oct 17, the government re-launched a four-ministry advisory panel that is tasked with resolving conflicts between renewable operators and communities. The panel was originally formed in April this year.
The panel advises METI, the MoE, the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, and the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. The experts spent their first meeting discussing forestry protection, effective regulatory oversight, and improving communications between operators and communities.
Along with its previous peacemaker role, the panel has an additional mission to explore expansion of renewable capacities.
Big Trouble in Little Chita
About 60 kilometers south of Nagoya is the coastal town of Minami Chita. In the first hour of the drive from Nagoya, the scenes are industrial with trucks heading to JERA’s thermal power stations, as well as to Nippon Steel and Aichi Steel. But then the landscape turns green.
Minami Chita is a laid-back fishing and farming community with a population of about 4,000. The area is mostly flat with no tall structures. Locals say “seaside” to mean east and “mountainside” to mean west.
The town is bordered on the north by small mountains owned by the local farms. Two years ago, the Nagoya-based developer DSS started to buy up property and applied to the town with a plan to build some 9.9 kW solar power stations in the mountain area. There’s little regulatory scrutiny over solar projects smaller than 10 kW. Little did the locals know that DSS was planning 107 units of the mini-solar stations.
DSS began construction in 2021, tearing down areas far larger than land needed for a 9.9 kW power station. Not only that. Workers were intruding into unauthorized areas and by “error” had depleted 1.8 hectares of forest while damaging roads.
The town asked the company to file elaborate plans and solicited help from METI and Aichi Prefecture for stronger regulatory enforcement. In February this year, DSS canceled the project and agreed to repair the roads and restore the forests at its own expense. The town confirmed to Japan NRG that the road repairs had mostly been completed.
Community impact
Even before DSS, some residents were frustrated with solar and on-shore wind projects. One fruit farmer told Japan NRG that for the last few years developers and banks had been knocking on their doors, asking if they were interested in investing in new renewables projects. The farmer was told that banks and developers would take care of everything. Then, after a solar facility goes online, the farmer would be able to sell it to the local grid.
“I became dizzy when I learned about the amount of money involved, so I backed out. But some friends made a hideous profit by reselling the facilities,” said one local carpenter, who was also invited to projects.
That’s pretty much all that was at stake, says a local restaurant owner. “At the end of the day, it’s all about money. People weren’t getting into the power business because they had strong opinions on energy. Many neglect the plant’s maintenance and wouldn’t know whom to contact if they catch fire, or if panels were blown away by strong wind,” said a restaurant owner.
Numerous municipalities shared similar concerns and the four-ministry panel on community conflicts drafted action plans in summer that included:
The problem was that many operators weren’t energy experts or pioneers. News of tighter regulations drove them to consider exit strategies. And they got stuck. “Removing the plant costs money, they realized, and they have no idea how to dispose of or recycle the panels,” said one resident close to a solar plant.
The Minami Chita township tightened its solar safety guidelines with immediate effect in February 2022, and the guidelines will be escalated into ordinances pending town assembly approval later this year.
Some local construction firms won’t engage with renewable projects, including residential rooftop solar panel installations, although the recent regulations don’t cover residential systems. “Go speak to solar panel manufacturers like Panasonic if you want a rooftop solar,” said another local carpenter.
Some community members have mixed feelings, as they feel there is a need for new power sources. In the last two or three years, three gasoline service stations closed. One was due to the absence of a business heir, and the others due to the regulatory requirement to overhaul their 30-year-old tank facilities. The owners decided it wasn’t worth investing in new tanks.
“I’m keen to drive electric vehicles and the good news is the local supermarket has decided to open a new charging station,” said a local car repair shop owner. She hopes for charging stations powered by locally generated solar power.
Some added that they saw DSS as an extreme case and it would be a great loss to the community if all renewable projects were perceived negatively.
METI panel has lots of work
Municipal governments will still have a vital role in gathering the renewable energy businesses and community stakeholders. Compared to cities, there’s vibrant communication between the municipality and town residents in places the size of Minami Chita, because taxpayers want the small local budget to be spent wisely.
Ties are strong enough to build frameworks for clean power supplies, and communities will be rewarded from them. There is already a foundation for community-wide collaboration since locals are very aware that a better future will only materialize if they begin work today.
Many would be happy to engage in a clean energy value chain that will be relevant to current projects to transform the Chita area into an “organic farm capital”, for example. The town coordinating plans and measures with neighboring villages is also important.
“Varying regulations and guidelines would only create the impression that after all that commotion, the government was unable to bring renewable businesses under control,” said one home builder. “People will say, no renewables, period.”
Some municipalities may be empathetic to Minami Chita’s experiences but not all areas are the same. Policies need to be uniform and strictly enforced while offering flexibility to take into account the needs of each area.
This is precisely what the re-launched METI panel needs to clarify. This work load is a tall order, and the panel certainly has its work cut out in the coming months.
BY YOSHIHISA OHNO
Reactor Life Extensions: A Quick but Temporary Solution for Japan
In tough times, it pays to stretch your money and make it work a little bit harder. This is especially true if the money at stake is $40 billion. That’s roughly the amount Japanese firms have spent since the Fukushima disaster to revamp nuclear safety.
Despite the rich outlay, most of the utilities have so far failed to reap any benefits. Less than one in five of the nation’s nuclear reactors are currently online. What’s worse, after the 2011 accident a 40-year limit was placed on the equipment’s operating life. So far, most of the reactors have spent over a quarter of that life fixing pipes and polishing the dust, all without producing a kW of electricity.
So it comes as little surprise that Prime Minister Kishida made headlines in recent months arguing for more of the Japanese nuclear fleet to be brought online. But even if his words move regulators and local politicians to accelerate the restart process, current reactor economics look grim. Safety upgrades have increased utility investments into the nuclear stations by about 30-40%. And yet, the facilities have spent a quarter of their permitted life without earning a single yen.
It was only a matter of time before the issue of operational life extension came up. But this can’t be more than a temporary answer.
Background
Before the 2011 accident at the Fukushima Dai-Ichi NPP, Japan counted 54 operable nuclear reactors. When the disaster was analyzed, reactor age often came up as an issue since the older units lacked some of the new safety features of more recent models. This pushed utilities to agree to decommission more than 20 of the older, smaller or experimental units (This includes six units of the damaged Fukushima Dai-Ichi NPP and four units of the not damaged but nearby Fukushima Dai-Ni NPP).
Today, there are 33 reactors classified as operable by the industry regulator, the NRA. Only 17 of those have so far received NRA approval to come back online. This figure includes two units at TEPCO’s Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPP, which the regulator has again “frozen” pending probes into onsite safety culture.
Only 10 reactors have made it all the way back to generating electricity, a process that also requires a green light from local municipalities and prefectural chiefs. With some of the 10 currently down for maintenance or additional safety upgrade work, just six reactors are on the grid as of late October.
Rebranding the restarts
Since coming into office a year ago, PM Kishida has unveiled an ambitious decarbonization program called “Green Transformation”, or GX for short. The program is supposed to involve multiple elements, many of which are as yet undefined. One that has come front and center in recent months, however, is the need to revive nuclear energy in Japan.
Kishida’s interest in nuclear energy clearly increased as energy prices jumped over the past year. It peaked after western sanctions related to Russia’s war in Ukraine put energy security on high alert.
As a result, the great taboo of Japanese politics of the last decade – discussing the construction of new nuclear power plants – has been broken. In the past few months, PM Kishida, METI and key government figures have floated plans to:
The ideas above are the boldest pronouncements by the government in a decade. And, without many other elements of GX visible or tangible at this moment, it feels almost as if the GX platform was put forward as a way to rebrand nuclear energy in the country.
Of course, for the administration, there is ample cover. Renewed interest in nuclear energy is a global trend and extending the lifespan of reactors is happening even in locations that hitherto fiercely opposed the idea. Germany’s recent reversal of pledges to phase out its nuclear units by the end of this year follows on the heels of similar decisions by Belgium, California, and the Netherlands, among others.
Portraying nuclear restarts as a way to cut LNG imports, leaving more on the market for other players, and a bulwark against further yen weakening, are other talking points Kishida and METI have deployed.
Short-term fix
Keeping as much existing nuclear capacity online is vital for the economics of domestic utilities, which in turn affects the bills of ordinary consumers and businesses. After 2011, Japan’s power firms spent approximately $90 billion more on coal, LNG and oil supplies to cover the gap left by nuclear capacity. In that context, $40 billion invested in nuclear safety upgrades is a cost that should pay itself back.
The challenge for the government and the utilities, however, is the Fukushima accident severely cut available domestic power capacity, and as a result heightened energy security concerns. The decommissioning of older reactors eliminated more than 16.3 GW in baseload power capacity. TEPCO alone lost 10 nuclear units through the accident itself and public pressure.
So, extending the lifespan of remaining reactors is really a way to prevent further capacity leakage. As a result, it is only a temporary solution.
So far, only four reactors are approved to operate for an additional 20 years (Mihama #3, Takahama #1・2 and Tokai Dai-Ni). But, as per the graph above, other reactors are soon to reach their 40-year limit. Giving them a 20-year extension buys Japan time to find other ways to plug the capacity gap, but does not solve it since eventually the reactors will need to decommission.
|
Company |
NPP |
MW |
Type |
Supplier |
Started Operations |
Age |
Years left on permit |
Restarted since 2011? |
|
Kansai |
Takahama #1 |
826 |
PWR |
WH / MHI |
1974/11/01 |
47 |
13 |
No |
|
Kansai |
Takahama #2 |
826 |
PWR |
MHI |
1975/11/01 |
46 |
14 |
No |
|
Kansai |
Mihama #3 |
826 |
PWR |
MHI |
1976/12/01 |
45 |
15 |
Yes |
|
JAPC |
Tokai Daini |
1,100 |
BWR |
Hitachi / Toshiba |
1978/11/28 |
43 |
17 |
No |
|
Kyushu |
Sendai #1 |
890 |
PWR |
MHI |
1984/07/01 |
38 |
2 |
Yes |
|
Tokyo |
Kashiwazaki-Kariwa #1 |
1,100 |
BWR |
Toshiba |
1985/09/01 |
37 |
3 |
No |
|
Kansai |
Takahama #3 |
870 |
PWR |
MHI |
1985/01/01 |
37 |
3 |
Yes |
|
Kansai |
Takahama #4 |
870 |
PWR |
MHI |
1985/06/01 |
37 |
3 |
Yes |
|
Kyushu |
Sendai #2 |
890 |
PWR |
MHI |
1985/11/01 |
36 |
4 |
Yes |
|
Chubu |
Hamaoka #3 |
1,100 |
BWR |
Toshiba / Hitachi |
1987/08/01 |
35 |
5 |
No |
|
JAPC |
Tsuruga #2 |
1,160 |
PWR |
MHI |
1987/02/01 |
35 |
5 |
No |
|
Hokkaido |
Tomari #1 |
579 |
PWR |
MHI |
1989/06/01 |
33 |
7 |
No |
|
Chugoku |
Shimane #2 |
820 |
BWR |
Hitachi |
1989/02/01 |
33 |
7 |
No |
|
Tokyo |
Kashiwazaki-Kariwa #2 |
1,100 |
BWR |
Toshiba |
1990/09/01 |
32 |
8 |
No |
|
Tokyo |
Kashiwazaki-Kariwa #5 |
1,100 |
BWR |
Hitachi |
1990/04/01 |
32 |
8 |
No |
|
Hokkaido |
Tomari #2 |
579 |
PWR |
MHI |
1991/04/01 |
31 |
9 |
No |
|
Kansai |
Ohi #3 |
1,180 |
PWR |
MHI |
1991/12/01 |
30 |
10 |
Yes |
|
Tokyo |
Kashiwazaki-Kariwa #3 |
1,100 |
BWR |
Toshiba |
1993/08/01 |
29 |
11 |
No |
|
Chubu |
Hamaoka #4 |
1,137 |
BWR |
Toshiba / Hitachi |
1993/09/01 |
29 |
11 |
No |
|
Hokuriku |
Shika #1 |
540 |
BWR |
Hitachi |
1993/07/01 |
29 |
11 |
No |
|
Kansai |
Ohi #4 |
1,180 |
PWR |
MHI |
1993/02/01 |
29 |
11 |
Yes |
|
Tokyo |
Kashiwazaki-Kariwa #4 |
1,100 |
BWR |
Hitachi |
1994/08/01 |
28 |
12 |
No |
|
Kyushu |
Genkai #3 |
1,180 |
PWR |
MHI |
1994/03/01 |
28 |
12 |
Yes |
|
Tohoku |
Onagawa #2 |
825 |
BWR |
Toshiba |
1995/07/01 |
27 |
13 |
No |
|
Shikoku |
Ikata #3 |
890 |
PWR |
MHI |
1994/12/01 |
27 |
13 |
Yes |
|
Tokyo |
Kashiwazaki-Kariwa #6 |
1,356 |
ABWR |
Toshiba / GE / Hitachi |
1996/11/01 |
25 |
15 |
No |
|
Tokyo |
Kashiwazaki-Kariwa #7 |
1,356 |
ABWR |
Hitachi / GE / Toshiba |
1997/07/01 |
25 |
15 |
No |
|
Kyushu |
Genkai #4 |
1,180 |
PWR |
MHI |
1997/09/01 |
25 |
15 |
Yes |
|
Tohoku |
Onagawa #3 |
825 |
BWR |
Toshiba/Hitachi |
2001/01/01 |
21 |
19 |
No |
|
Chubu |
Hamaoka #5 |
1,267 |
ABWR |
Toshiba / Hitachi |
2005/01/01 |
17 |
23 |
No |
|
Tohoku |
Higashi-Dori |
1,100 |
BWR |
Toshiba |
2005/12/01 |
16 |
24 |
No |
|
Hokuriku |
Shika #2 |
1,358 |
ABWR |
Hitachi |
2006/03/01 |
16 |
24 |
No |
|
Hokkaido |
Tomari #3 |
912 |
PWR |
MHI |
2009/12/01 |
12 |
28 |
No |
Permitted operating life of reactors in Japan
(Remaining permit life in blue)

Source: Power companies, METI
Nuclear plant planning and construction often takes a decade or more, so if the older units are to be replaced with the latest reactors, discussion on this needs to start almost as soon as the 20-year extension is granted.
Furthermore, reactor construction and operations require engineering and human resources that have started to disperse since the Fukushima accident. To retain staff and vendors for the nuclear industry, the government needs to offer a vision for the future. To attract the best young minds, that vision cannot be about standing still by replacing existing technology with similar units. There has to be emphasis on new developments.
In a way, METI’s nuclear industry strategy published in the summer vaunted the potential of four reactor technologies in addition to the regular BWR/ ABWR and PWR tech that account for all of the commercial reactors in Japan today. The following GX committee discussions, however, focused on improved (“advanced”) versions of the same BWR and PWR reactors.
It’s normal for governments to focus on the immediate future, and simply getting social and legal approval for reactor life extensions will require a massive amount of political capital. But if Kishida truly believes in a nuclear energy future for Japan, his government will need to provide a more exciting vision for next-gen reactors to tempt next-gen talent.
BY JOHN VAROLI
Below are some of last week’s most important international energy developments monitored by the Japan NRG team because of their potential to impact energy supply and demand, as well as prices. We see the following as relevant to Japanese and international energy investors.
Asia/ Wind power
Asia will surpass the EU in offshore wind power by 2030, and eventually garner 60% of total global capacity by 2050. In 2019, Asia had 5 GW of installed offshore wind capacity, while Europe had 19 GW, said the International Renewable Energy Agency. EU turbine-makers still have a technological advantage over Chinese competitors.
China/ Natural gas
Sinopec discovered major shale gas reserves in the Sichuan basin. With daily natural gas production reaching 258,600 c/m, and an estimated resource capacity of 388 bcm, it’s touted as a breakthrough for China’s shale gas sector.
China/ Renewables
About $14 trillion investment in power and transportation is needed by 2060 to reach Beijing’s goal of net zero emissions, said the World Bank. The ruling Party congress last week reaffirmed its green energy plans.
EU/ Natural gas price
Thanks to warm weather and near full gas storage, EU natural gas prices dropped below €100/ MWh for the first time since Russian supplies were cut. EU gas prices are now 70% below August levels, when they soared over €300/MWh, but they’re still well above the €20 to €40/ MWh range they traded at over the past decade.
Germany/ Coal
The government has again legalized the use of idled brown coal capacity to next summer. Already, one small wind farm is being dismantled to expand an open-pit lignite coal mine operated by RWE. The company said this will “strengthen the security of supply in Germany during the energy crisis.”
Kazakhstan/ Green hydrogen
Svevind Energy Group will build a $50 billion hub that will annually produce about 2 million tons of green hydrogen. The project consists of a 40 GW renewable energy station (wind, solar), and a 20 GW water electrolysis production, mainly for export to the EU.
Poland/ Nuclear power
U.S. firm Westinghouse Electric will build Poland’s first nuclear power plant. The first stage envisions three AP1000 reactors to start by 2033, with an additional three possibly to be built. If completed in full, total capacity would be as much as 9 GW.
Slovakia/ Nuclear power
Slovakia’s 471 MW Mochovce Unit 3 nuclear power plant is expected to launch in early 2023. The unit will produce about 3.7 TWh per year, nearly 13% of Slovakia’s electricity consumption.
U.S./ Wind power
The White House wants to spark an offshore wind power boom, growing the industry from less than 1 GW today to 30 GW by the end of the decade. But executives are concerned that many challenges are pushing that target beyond reach: permits are too slow, leases too expensive, equipment is in short supply and inflation is high.
UK/ Energy tax
The de facto windfall tax on low carbon electricity companies will have “catastrophic consequences” for investment in green technologies. The policy was introduced to raise funds for the government’s energy bills support plan for households and could remain in place until the end of 2027. The bill is still in Parliament.
Oil services
Schlumberger is rebranding from an oilfield services giant to a global energy innovation company, changing its name to SLB. CEO Olivier Le Peuch said: “Our new identity symbolizes SLB’s commitment to moving farther and faster in facilitating the world’s energy needs and forging the road ahead for the energy transition.”
A selection of domestic and international events we believe will have an impact on Japanese energy
|
January |
OPEC quarterly meeting; JCCP Petroleum Conference – Tokyo; EU Taxonomy Climate Delegated Act activates; Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) Trade Agreement that includes ASEAN countries, China and Japan activates; Indonesia to temporarily ban coal exports for one month; Regional bloc developments: Cambodia assumes presidency of ASEAN; Thailand assumes presidency of APEC; Germany assumes presidency of G7; France assumes presidency of EU; Indonesia assumes presidency of G20; and Senegal assumes presidency of African Union; Japan-U.S. two-plus-two meeting; Japan’s parliament convenes on Jan. 17 for 150 days; Prime Minister Kishida visits Australia (tentative) |
|
February |
Chinese New Year (Jan. 31 to Feb. 6); Beijing Winter Olympics; South Korea joins RCEP trade agreement |
|
March |
Renewable Energy Institute annual conference; Smart Energy Week – Tokyo; Japan Atomic Industrial Forum annual conference – Tokyo; World Hydrogen Summit – Netherlands; EU New strategy on international energy engagement published; End of 2021/22 Japanese Fiscal Year; South Korean presidential election |
|
April |
Japan Energy Summit – Tokyo; MARPOL Convention on Emissions reductions for containerships and LNG carriers activates; Japan Feed-in-Premium system commences as Energy Resilience Act takes effect; Launch of Prime Section of Japan Stock Exchange with TFCD climate reporting requirement; Convention on Biological Diversity Conference for post-2020 biodiversity framework – China; Elections: French presidential election; Hungarian general election |
|
May |
World Natural Gas Conference WCG2022 – South Korea; Elections: Australian general election; Philippines general and presidential elections |
|
June |
Happo-Noshiro offshore wind project auction closes; Annual IEA Global Conference on Energy Efficiency – Denmark; UNEP Environment Day, Environment Ministers Meeting – Sweden; G7 meeting – Germany |
|
July |
Japan to finalize economic security policies as part of natl. security strategy review; China connects to grid 2nd 200 MW SMR at Shidao Bay Nuclear Plant, Shandong; Czech Republic assumes presidency of EU; Elections: Japan’s Upper House Elections; Indian presidential election |
|
August |
Japan: Africa (TICAD 8) Summit – Tunisia; Kenyan general election |
|
September |
IPCC to release Assessment and Synthesis Report; Clean Energy Ministerial and the Mission Innovation Summit – Pittsburg, U.S.; Japan LNG Producer/Consumer Conference – Tokyo; IMF/World Bank annual meetings – Washington; Annual UN General Assembly meetings; METI to set safety standards for ammonia and hydrogen-fired power plants; End of 1H FY2022 Fiscal Year in Japan; Swedish general election |
|
October |
EU Review of CO2 emission standards for heavy-duty vehicles published; Chinese Communist Party 20th quinquennial National Party Congress; G20 Meeting – Bali, Indonesia; Innovation for Cool Earth TCFD & Annual Forums – Tokyo; Elections: Okinawa gubernational election; Brazilian presidential election; |
|
November |
COP27 – Egypt; U.S. mid-term elections; Soccer World Cup – Qatar; |
|
December |
Germany to eliminate nuclear power from energy mix; Happo-Noshiro offshore wind project auction result released; Japan submits revised 2030 CO2 reduction goal following Glasgow’s COP26; Japan-Canada Annual Energy Forum (tentative); Tesla expected to achieve 1.3 million EV deliveries for full year 2022 |
Disclaimer
This communication has been prepared for information purposes only, is confidential and may be legally privileged. This is a subscription-only service and is directed at those who have expressly asked K.K. Yuri Group or one of its representatives to be added to the mailing list. This document may not be onwardly circulated or reproduced without prior written consent from Yuri Group, which retains all copyright to the content of this report.
Yuri Group is not registered as an investment advisor in any jurisdiction. Our research and all the content express our opinions, which are generally based on available public information, field studies and own analysis. Content is limited to general comment upon general political, economic and market issues, asset classes and types of investments. The report and all of its content does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell, subscribe for or underwrite any product or physical commodity, or a financial instrument.
The information contained in this report is obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith. No representation or warranty is made that it is accurate or complete. Opinions and views expressed are subject to change without notice, as are prices and availability, which are indicative only. There is no obligation to notify recipients of any changes to this data or to do so in the future. No responsibility is accepted for the use of or reliance on the information provided. In no circumstances will Yuri Group be liable for any indirect or direct loss, or consequential loss or damages arising from the use of, any inability to use, or any inaccuracy in the information.
K.K. Yuri Group: Oonoya Building 8F, Yotsuya 1-18, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 160-0004.
NEWS
・Govt unveils ¥39 trillion package to shield consumers from energy price increases from January, covering multiple sectors
・PM Kishida asks GX Council for effective carbon pricing plan, seeking a way to kickstart full-scale trading by FY2026
・Solar operators and bureaucrats clash over ways to help industry gain better traction at community level