
May 8, 2023
NEWS
TOP
ENERGY TRANSITION & POLICY
ELECTRICITY MARKETS
OIL, GAS & MINING
ANALYSIS
WILL A STRONGER REGULATOR EMERGE
IN THE ELECTRICITY AND GAS SECTOR?
Recent scandals over cartel behavior in Japan’s power market have sent shockwaves across the energy sector. Authorities spent the past few months investigating what exactly has transpired and the results are grim, revealing illegal practices that go back to 2016 – the year that the markets were fully liberalized. In response, a wave of indignation has led to calls for major reforms in the power sector. There’s a growing momentum behind the idea that former regional power monopolies, the EPCOs, should be forced to fully separate their assets.
ENERGY JOBS IN JAPAN COLUMN:
WHICH COMPANIES PAY THE MOST?
For many years, the energy industry had certain preconceptions about salary. That oil & gas pays higher than renewables; that multinational companies pay higher than Japanese firms; that large corporations are the best paying players in the market. As the energy industry transitions and diversifies, subsidies and large-scale investment have flowed into new technologies across renewable generation, grid flexibility and next-generation mobility, resulting in a shift in the salary and power balance.
GLOBAL VIEW
A wrap of top energy news from around the world.
EVENTS SCHEDULE
A selection of events to keep an eye on in 2023.
PUBLISHER
K. K. Yuri Group
Editorial Team
Yuriy Humber (Editor-in-Chief)
John Varoli (Senior Editor, Americas)
Mayumi Watanabe (Japan)
Yoshihisa Ohno (Japan)
Wilfried Goossens (Events, global)
Kyoko Fukuda (Japan)
Filippo Pedretti (Japan)
Regular Contributors
Chisaki Watanabe (Japan)
Takehiro Masutomo (Japan)
Events
SUBSCRIPTIONS & ADVERTISING
Japan NRG offers individual, corporate and academic subscription plans. Basic details are our website or write to subscriptions@japan-nrg.com
For marketing, advertising, or collaboration opportunities, contact sales@japan-nrg.com For all other inquiries, write to info@japan-nrg.com
OFTEN USED ACRONYMS
|
METI |
The Ministry of Energy, |
mmbtu |
Million British Thermal Units | |
|
MoE |
Ministry of Environment |
mb/d |
Million barrels per day | |
|
ANRE |
Agency for Natural Resources and Energy |
mtoe |
Million Tons of Oil Equivalent | |
|
NEDO |
New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization |
kWh |
Kilowatt hours (electricity generation volume) | |
|
TEPCO |
Tokyo Electric Power Company |
FIT |
Feed-in Tariff | |
|
KEPCO |
Kansai Electric Power Company |
FIP |
Feed-in Premium | |
|
EPCO |
Electric Power Company |
SAF |
Sustainable Aviation Fuel | |
|
JCC |
Japan Crude Cocktail |
NPP |
Nuclear power plant | |
|
JKM |
Japan Korea Market, the Platt’s LNG benchmark |
JOGMEC |
Japan Organization for Metals and Energy Security | |
|
CCUS |
Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage | |||
|
OCCTO |
Organization for Cross-regional Coordination of Transmission Operators | |||
|
NRA |
Nuclear Regulation Authority | |||
|
GX |
Green Transformation |

MoE releases final GHG data for FY2021
(Government statement, April 21)
METI edges closer to a new day-ahead power market that combines volumes and balancing
(Denki Shimbun, April 26)
TAKEAWAY: The new day-ahead market is inspired by the PJM system in the U.S., which operates a synchronized reserve market. While a spot market by itself is only able to put a value on price and quantity, the PJM system also takes into account the cost of bringing power capacity online. This can be useful for avoiding mismatches in capacity calculations and making sure the reality of securing more generation is reflected in the final price.
METI won’t hold additional capacity market auction this year
(Denki Shimbun, April 27)
METI minister seeks heavier penalties on non-compliant power companies
(Sankei Shimbun, April 28)
ANRE seeks stringent recycling requirement for renewable operators
(Japan NRG, April 24)
TAKEAWAY: Solar panel recycling poses a major challenge. As much as 280,000 tons of panels is forecast to require disposal by 2036, accounting for as much as 2.7% of Japan’s total amount of non-recyclable wastes. Hydro, geothermal and biomass operators will also be required to speed up the dismantling of their equipment and decommissioning once operations finish.
METI to give priority to retired oil-fired power plants for reserve power capacity
(Denki Shimbun, April 27)
TAKEAWAY: Before liberalization of the power market, major power utilities (the EPCOs) voluntarily maintained retired oil-fired power plants as reserve power sources to be used during peak demand times. In a fully competitive market, however, the utilities started to decommission aging oil-fired plants because of their high costs. METI seeks to bring back the financial incentive for utilities to retain the capacity because it is concerned that there is a shortage of capacity nationwide in case of emergency.
NRA to require same inspection for 40 year and 60-year life extension application
(Nikkei, April 26)
TAKEAWAY: This is largely a procedural item, but it does indicate a certain flexibility from the regulator, at least on the surface. Preparing for inspections is a long and laborious process. If the procedure can be replicated at the 60-year mark, it will help operators deal with it more efficiently.
Japan receives first low-carbon ammonia from Saudi Arabia
(Reuters, April 21)
Kubota to invest ¥1 billion to enter market for EV battery materials
(Company statement, April 25)
Honda, GS Yuasa and Blue Energy to invest ¥434 billion for Li-ion battery gigafactory
(Company statement, April 28)
Mitsubishi to establish $1 billion decarbonization fund, one of Japan’s largest
(Company statement, Nikkei Asia, May 2)
MHI and Italy’s Saipem sign agreement on CO2 capture
(Company statement, April 27)

Mitsubishi and South Pole establish largest diversified portfolio of CO2 removal
(Company statement, April 26)
ENEOS tests transparent solar PVs at Takanawa Gateway Station
(Company statement, April 26)

Metropolitan Tokyo to test H2 co-firing boiler for district heating
(Government statement, April 28)
MHI and Iwatani plan development and sale of liquefied hydrogen boosting pumps
(Company statement, April 26)
Hole discovered at bottom of Fukushima NPP Unit 1 reactor pressure vessel
(Nikkei, April 24)

INPEX and Idemitsu seek to supply ANA with “zero emissions” jet fuel for G7
(Company statement, May 1)
Marubeni and Pros join forces on rice husk charcoal production
(Nikkei, April 28)
G7 members should take into account Japan’s stance on global energy
(Nikkei Asia, April 24)

METI to give priority to retired oil-fired power plants for reserve power capacity
(Denki Shimbun, April 27)
TAKEAWAY: Before liberalization of the power market, major power utilities (the EPCOs) voluntarily maintained retired oil-fired power plants as reserve power sources to be used during peak demand times. In a fully competitive market, however, the utilities started to decommission aging oil-fired plants because of their high costs. METI seeks to bring back the financial incentive for utilities to retain the capacity because it is concerned that there is a shortage of capacity nationwide in case of emergency.
Cosmo plans 1 GW offshore wind farm in Hokkaido
(Company statement, April 25)
Sumitomo to start construction of 500 MW offshore wind farm in France
(Company statement, April 27)
Kyushu Electric to increase capital by ¥200 billion amid losses due to high fuel prices
(Nikkei, April 27)
Toyota Tsusho completes SB Energy acquisition, renames the company
(Company statement, April 28)
TAKEAWAY: The announcement of the purchase was made in February this year. SB Energy was founded in 2011, and operates around 773 MW of capacity including 667 MW of solar and 56 MW of wind in Japan. It also operates 50 MW of wind power in Mongolia. The purchase follows Toyota Tsusho’s acquisition of Eurus Energy from TEPCO. Toyota Tsusho is part of the Toyota Motor group.
Kansai Electric to apply for license extension at Takahama NPP Units 3 and 4
(Denki Shimbun, April 26)
TAKEAWAY: Kansai Electric has already won such an operating life extension for three of its reactors: Takahama NPP Units 1 and 2 (both PWR, 826 MW) and Mihama NPP Unit 3 (PWR, 826MW). Two more of its reactors, at the Ooi NPP, have another 10 years to go until their 40-year limit is reached.
First geothermal power plant to be designated “important power source” by METI
(Denki Shimbun, April 26)
TAKEAWAY: METI designates sites as “important power source” in order to facilitate procedures by the relevant ministries and agencies. It also serves the purpose of gaining local consensus. Geothermal power plants often face resistance from hot springs owners, as they fear it will cause a drop in water pressure and temperature at their services.
Hitachi demos tech for improving power grid efficiency in Thailand
(Company statement, April 26)
Concern about experience of staff at TEPCO’s only nuclear power plant
(Yomiuri Shimbun, April 27)
TAKEAWAY: Kashiwazaki-Kariwa’s reactors have long been idle. Units 2 and 3 haven’t operated since 2007; Unit 4 since 2008; Units 1 and 7 since 2011; and Units 5 and 6 since 2012. In such a situation of prolonged idleness, staff have certainly lost their expertise.
NYK’s new CTV arrived in Hokkaido
(Company statement, April 20)
TAKEAWAY: As the offshore wind sector develops, demands for CTVs will grow. Shipping and shipbuilding companies are watching for opportunities in this new market.

In March, Oman exported more LNG to Japan than Qatar
(Government data, April 27)


UAE surpasses Saudi Arabia as Japan’s top oil exporter
(Government data, April 27)
Tokyo Gas to buy back ¥113 billion in shares, the company’s largest ever
(Nikkei, April 26)
LNG stocks rise to 2.56 million tons
(Government data, April 26)
Japan’s March thermal coal imports down 19.9% YoY, value up by 44%
(Government data, April 27)
BY MAYUMI WATANABE
Will a Stronger Regulator Emerge in Japan’s Power and Gas Sector?
Recent scandals over cartel behavior in Japan’s power market have sent shockwaves across the energy sector. Authorities spent the past few months investigating what exactly has transpired and the results are grim, revealing illegal practices that go back to 2016 – the year that the markets were fully liberalized.
In response, a wave of indignation has led to calls for major reforms in the power sector.
Official probes found that major power utilities were illicitly accessing customer data of other generators. Also, it seems that Chubu Electric, Chugoku Electric, Kyushu Electric, Chubu Electric Power Miraiz, and Kyuden Mirai Energy had agreed in 2018 to restrain competition in the high-voltage market, which covers business users. In response, the Japan Fair Trade Commission has levied penalties totaling ¥101 billion against the firms.
At first glance, this scandal couldn’t have come at a worse time. The government is launching its much vaunted GX program to entirely overhaul the national energy system in line with global efforts to transition to clean energy. It wants and needs the country’s biggest power providers to invest large sums in boosting non-fossil energy volumes.
However, as Churchill once said: “Never let a crisis go to waste”. This scandal is giving the reformers among government and bureaucracy circles an opportunity to push for even deeper changes than the 2016 liberalization. For example, there’s a growing momentum behind the idea that former regional power monopolies, the EPCOs, should be forced to fully separate their generation, transmission and retail units to guarantee a level playing field. The fragility of EPCOs’ current arrangement has been exposed.
More power to the EGC?
While the full liberalization of the power sector in 2016 and of the gas sector in 2017 led to the unbundling of EPCOs, most of these major power utilities simply formed a new holding company to manage their legacy generation, transmission and other assets.
In theory, the integrity of each business unit is protected by Chinese walls. In reality, what Japanese officials found was that staff from one division of an EPCO had access to data from another.
During discussions with industry over how to revise market rules in line with the shift to non-fossil generation, government officials discovered that some EPCO staff had regular access to the govt database of renewable energy operators, including privacy data. What’s more, these staff stand accused of passing the data to the retail businesses that sit within the same EPCO group or holding.
The data on renewables operators was stored in a METI database, access to which was guarded by select logins. However, in one case, it was found that one ID and password issued by the government to an EPCO was shared by up to 50 people inside the groups.
Oversight of the industry is conducted by the Electricity and Gas Markets Surveillance Commission (EGC), which falls under the METI umbrella. Upon the discovery of the irregularities, the regulator simply asked the EPCOs to report back with improvement plans. Such a response was criticized by many as soft and entirely inappropriate when dealing with criminal conduct such as unauthorized data access and data breach.
In some ways, it evoked memories of the kind of cozy relationships that the previous nuclear industry regulator enjoyed with nuclear generators prior to the Fukushima accident.
So, it is no surprise that calls for a stronger regulatory body, or an EGC with more teeth, have come to the fore.
It’s complicated
Some officials say that the main problem lies in IT security rather than regulatory systems. One government panel consisting of IT security experts, for example, said that METI was not following the government’s own cyber security rules in administering its database. The EGC consequently recommended that METI change its ID and password policies and that by 2026 all the customer data systems within EPCOs are fully separated.
The regulator also asked that EPCOs conduct compliance staff training and disclose progress of corrective actions. But behind the veneer of IT trouble and compliance gaffs lies a more complicated situation.
EGC as a regulator has little coercive power. The EGC is a “soft regulator” classified as an “Article 8 commission”, which means it can only provide advice to the state minister, and issue non-binding advisories and guidance to companies. It can’t enforce decisions.
In contrast, other agencies are classified as Article 3 commissions, which means they can issue orders to companies and impose penalties if non-compliant. The Japan Fair Trade Commission (JFTC) is just such a group.
On March 2, the Cabinet Taskforce to Review Renewable Regulations submitted a proposal to improve regulatory enforcement in the power sector. The main measures are: 1) To probe EPCO non-compliance back to 2016 to measure the costs of regulatory failure; 2) To penalize offenders by taking away their licenses, while the government facilitates a smooth transition to a second service provider; and 3) to empower the EGC with the required authority to implement these measures.
The four panelists were Hatta Tatsuo, the inaugural EGC chairman; Prof. Takahashi Hiroshi of Hosei University; Obayashi Mika of the Renewable Energy Institute (REI); and Kawamoto Akira of Aspirant Group. Hatta told the taskforce that EPCOs have an attitude: they “well know that their licenses will never be taken away and they can get away with anything.” The panelists proposed elevating the EGC to an Article 3 Commission, giving it teeth to bite and not just engage in advisory.
The EGC’s independence from METI was also questioned, as it was forced to probe a data breach case that involved the ministry’s own data system.
|
Article 3 Commissions |
Article 8 Commissions | |
|
Role definition |
Government functions |
Advisory bodies reporting to state ministers |
|
Authority |
Enforce orders, penalties, guidance |
Issue non-binding advisory, guidance |
|
Staff recruitment |
Can recruit its own staff |
State minister appoints staff |
|
Examples |
JFTC, Nuclear Regulation Authority |
EGC, Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission |
Wanted: Experienced professionals
For any reform to succeed, one critical area will be to build capable teams of experienced and motivated experts, one former EGC official told Japan NRG. The four members of the Cabinet Taskforce to Review Renewable Regulations also proposed to make EGC’s current part-time chairman and four commissioners full-time officials.
For the sake of independence, the regulator will also need to limit the number of METI and ANRE staff it takes in. EGC’s Tokyo head office has 77 staff, of which 40 are temporary transfers from METI and ANRE; they usually return to their original ministry after two years.
“If more people from the JFTC joined the EGC it will make a world of difference,” Prof. Takahashi Hiroshi told Japan NRG. Presently, the head of the market surveillance unit is an official from the JFTC.
Takahashi and others hope that the increased number of JFTC officials taking EGC positions will improve its effectiveness. The antitrust watchdog was the one that exposed the non-compliant practices of the EPCOs, not just the cartel but potential infringements in wholesale trade and power generation units. On March 30, the EGC took over the non-cartel investigation from the JFTC.
EGC reform proposal
|
Independence |
Change to Article 3 Commission from Article 8. |
|
Increase authority |
Give supervisory authority to impose orders and penalties by amending the Electricity Business Act. |
|
Increase staffing |
Make chairman and four commissioners full time positions; Recruit more staff but decrease staff from METI and ANRE. |
But hiring entirely from outside of METI in the name of independence would not work either, says the former EGC official. Market surveillance is a niche skill and antitrust officials that arrived at the power industry regulator in the past had to start from scratch when it came to understanding how the sector operates.
Since EGC cannot hire people from the power companies to avoid a conflict of interest, taking in some staff from METI makes sense, the former EGC official said. METI people can provide sector experience and balance in decision-making. Completely separating the EGC from METI in the name of independence is like running a computer without software, he said.
Complete separation?
The EGC has three units: one to monitor power and gas markets, another to monitor networks, and a policy coordination unit. Compared to the UK’s Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (OFGEM) EGC’s role is quite limited.
Division of authorities
|
Tasks |
Japan |
The UK |
|
Licensing |
ANRE/METI |
OFGEM |
|
Competition law compliance |
JFTC | |
|
Consumer affairs |
Consumer Affairs Agency | |
|
Wholesale/retail markets |
EGC | |
|
Network connection |
OCCTO |
Some observers say the EGC should monitor the effectiveness of government policies in addition to market compliance. ANRE/ METI should focus on policy making; while everything else, including licensing, should shift to the EGC. But not everything could be split clearly between them.
The JFTC is the most relevant authority to write competition rules. METI and ANRE policy makers are more focused on breaking up the EPCOs, seen as a fast track approach to creating a level playing field by weakening their market power, building on the “partial” unbundling that the former monopolies achieved by packaging the assets inside holding companies or group structures.
On April 28, METI announced its plan to amend the Electricity Business Act to raise penalties for non compliance. In June, the Cabinet is expected to come up with a proposal to improve regulatory practices. Prime Minister Kishida’s popularity has been on the rise in recent months and he may be able to expend some political capital to push for strong industry reforms, especially if it will be seen as a boon to his GX initiative.
However, it would be risky to bet against the EPCOs. They are the great survivors and stalwarts of Japan’s electricity system with strong influence in the media, among big business lobby groups and beyond. PM Kishida’s government will need to decide whether this is a hill on which it wants to take a stand or accept another mid-way solution that papers over the cracks in competition.
BY ANDREW STATTER
Salary Trends Across Japan’s Energy Sector
For many years, the energy industry had certain perceptions about salary. That oil & gas pays higher than renewables; that multinational companies pay higher than the Japanese firms; that large corporations are the best paying players in the market.
As the energy industry transitions and diversifies, subsidies and large-scale investment have flowed into new technologies across renewable generation, grid flexibility and next-generation mobility, resulting in a shift in the salary and power balance.
Do Japanese companies pay less, and does oil & gas pay more?
The answer is not so simple. We need to look into the value of the whole package, not only taking into account the cash (base + bonus) portion of a salary package. Typically, large Japanese firms do pay a lower cash portion than their foreign counterparts, and often oil and gas majors are competitive with global renewable energy firms.
Looking at the benefits offered and understanding their value is key when assessing the true total package. A few common benefits are listed below:
Risk vs reward
As energy technologies have developed, investment has diversified and players have globalized. There’s now a wide range of options for professionals to choose from. We tend to see a clearer correlation between risk and reward, compared to Japanese vs multinational, for example.
Size matters
Though many Japanese see foreign capital firms as inherently risky, the truth is that well-known foreign names such as the oil and gas majors, as well as power utilities, have become desirable employers, and they have a long-term view of the Japanese market. This has resulted in such large foreign firms having a lower risk profile and means that they tend to pay in line with, or modestly more than, domestic counterparts of similar standing in the industry. However, no one is doubling their salary moving from a major trading house to a multinational power utility.
Put your money where your mouth is
Developers backed by private equity are increasingly prevalent in the market. Typically, they take on more risk, get involved in projects at an earlier stage, keep leaner teams where each employee’s work is clearly visible to management. The mandate of these funds is to turn a profit; therefore, in a down market the risk of downsizing or leaving is certainly higher. These firms often pay for performance, giving a higher base salary, as well as a lucrative bonus, profit sharing, carried interest, etc. Not only choosing the company’s size, but also choosing the timing to join can have a significant effect on the offer given to a new employee. Similar to tech startups in the U.S., those joining earlier bear greater risk, bring bigger impact to the firm and are rewarded in line with this.
In-demand talent and transferable skills
Supply vs demand is basic economics, and in the energy transition there are windows of opportunity for professionals who have experience or widely desired skills. Experience in bidding for an offshore wind project, or structuring and negotiating an offsite corporate PPA, are examples of this. Often, those who hold the in-demand experience are in a position to gain multiple offers, and command negotiation power to increase the value of offers. Both companies looking to attract such talent, and firms who seek to retain their top performers, need to be aware of this trend, as increases of 20-40% are not uncommon.
Naturally, in a growth market, there’s not enough experienced talent to fill all open positions. Companies will often hire talent they see as high-potential, without the required experience, but who have a strong base of transferable skills. Engineering, project management and building supply chains for wind or battery projects are common examples. In these cases, the employer needs to invest significant time, energy and resources into upskilling, often including business trips to HQ or regional project sites. In these cases, the onus is often on the employee to understand the value that the new skills will bring them. Ambitious employees may then accept a smaller pay increase or even a small drop in their overall remuneration in order to take this chance and acquire the valuable skills.
Case A: Combining risk vs reward and in-demand talent scenarios. Titan introduced a Head of Engineering with over six years of directly relevant experience to an investment driven development platform as one of their original members. The employee was leaving a stable Japanese organization with a sizable operational portfolio. His offer was a 60% increase in base salary, as well as access to potentially lucrative profit-sharing opportunities.
Case B: Investing in future development. In another case, Titan introduced a young, high potential professional for a senior role that would lead commercial, contract and PPA negotiations for a well-known developer with an excellent track record and training capabilities. Though the employee didn’t have direct experience with such contracts, he demonstrated agility, adaptability and willingness to learn. He understood the value of the skills and experience he’d gain by taking on the role, and made the move without an increase.
Salary benchmarking or value-based offers
What are they making now vs what value do they bring? These two significantly different questions are asked when companies consider their budget or how to make an offer. This tends to correlate with risk vs reward, or size and complexity of the organization.
Large, publicly-traded companies will typically set a budget range prior to beginning a search, and when identifying talent at the lower end of the range, they often pay a menial increase that doesn’t touch their budget ceiling. The basic idea tends to revolve around the candidate’s current salary level, and how it compares to those already in the team (internal equity).
On the other hand, smaller, leaner, result-driven firms give a wide budget range, or ask their agency partner to provide typical ranges. Rather than excluding candidates who exceed their ideal range, they’ll typically meet the candidate and try to understand what additional value that person can bring. The position may be widened, scope changed, and budget increased to accommodate such talent. Often, large increases are seen here, where previously undervalued talent are given a chance to show what they are worth.
It’s difficult to say which approach is better, as each organization has different needs, internal resources and benefits for those who decide to join. As with assessing the package value mentioned above, much more than simply cash compensation must be considered by both the employer and employee when it comes to number crunching time.
BY JOHN VAROLI
Below are some of last week’s most important international energy developments monitored by the Japan NRG team because of their potential to impact energy supply and demand, as well as prices. We see the following as relevant to Japanese and international energy investors.
California/ Diesel truck ban
California became the first U.S. state to approve regulation to end diesel truck sales by 2036. By 2045 the governor’s plan calls for all trucks on the road to reach zero emissions.
Denmark/ Energy island
Shell joined the VindØ Energy Island Consortium that will be connected to 10 GW of offshore wind in order to power Denmark and neighboring countries. Located about 100 km off Denmark’s west coast, the project will be the world’s first energy island.
Europe/ Biofuels
Global incentives to slash fossil fuels have inflated biofuels demand, but feedstocks are in short supply, such as vegetable oils, animal fats, and waste products. This has led to much fraudulent biofuel on sale, warns the European Biodiesel Board, especially from China.
France/ Climate lawsuit
TotalEnergies has sued Greenpeace France and climate consultants Factor-X over a 2019 report claiming that the energy company underestimated its emissions to 455 million tons of CO2. Greenpeace alleged that Total’s emissions were 1.6 billion tons of CO2.
North Sea/ Oil and gas
Spain’s Repsol agreed with China’s Sinopec to resolve an 8-year dispute over North Sea oil and gas assets. Repsol paid $2.1 billion to acquire Sinopec’s 49% stake in their JV.
Norway/ Gas exploration
The Petroleum and Energy Minister called on oil and gas companies to fulfill their “social responsibility” to find more natural gas resources in the Barents Sea. Norway wants more oil and gas to boost energy security and help EU partners.
Nuclear Power/ SMRs
Westinghouse unveiled plans for a small modular reactor (SMR) called AP300 (300 MW capacity), which won’t use special fuels or liquid metal coolants, unlike some other next-gen reactors. Work on the reactors begins by 2030. The company sees Africa as a major market.
Scotland/ Energy transition
Cerulean Winds plans to build the North Sea Renewables Grid, an offshore integrated power and transmission system powered by floating wind that oil and gas platforms can plug into. The £20 billion project will develop three sites of hundreds of floating turbines to produce many GW of electricity.
U.S./ Climate aid
The White House made a $1 billion commitment to the Green Climate Fund, a major international climate aid program. Biden also pledged to approve $500 million over five years to combat rainforest deforestation through Brazil’s Amazon Fund program.
U.S./ Hydrogen power
Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and eight companies applied for $1.25 billion from the Department of Energy to build the Western Interstate Hydrogen Hub that will produce “green” and “blue” hydrogen. The federal govt has earmarked about $8 billion for hydrogen hub projects.
U.S./ LNG
The White House formally approved Alaska LNG, a $39 billion project that will export natural gas to Asian markets. The project is touted as the only major new LNG project in the U.S. that has so far secured all its permits and an export license.
A selection of domestic and international events we believe will have an impact on Japanese energy
Disclaimer
This communication has been prepared for information purposes only, is confidential and may be legally privileged. This is a subscription-only service and is directed at those who have expressly asked K.K. Yuri Group or one of its representatives to be added to the mailing list. This document may not be onwardly circulated or reproduced without prior written consent from Yuri Group, which retains all copyright to the content of this report.
Yuri Group is not registered as an investment advisor in any jurisdiction. Our research and all the content express our opinions, which are generally based on available public information, field studies and own analysis. Content is limited to general comment upon general political, economic and market issues, asset classes and types of investments. The report and all of its content does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell, subscribe for or underwrite any product or physical commodity, or a financial instrument.
The information contained in this report is obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith. No representation or warranty is made that it is accurate or complete. Opinions and views expressed are subject to change without notice, as are prices and availability, which are indicative only. There is no obligation to notify recipients of any changes to this data or to do so in the future. No responsibility is accepted for the use of or reliance on the information provided. In no circumstances will Yuri Group be liable for any indirect or direct loss, or consequential loss or damages arising from the use of, any inability to use, or any inaccuracy in the information.
K.K. Yuri Group: Oonoya Building 8F, Yotsuya 1-18, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 160-0004.
NEWS
・Japan’s total GHG emissions rise 2% compared to a year earlier; but growth in carbon capture volumes is even greater
・METI edges closer to creating a new day-ahead power markets that would combine spot volume with balancing function
・Oman overtakes Qatar as Japan’s top LNG exporter thanks to more flexible shipping terms