
June 5, 2023
NEWS
TOP
ENERGY TRANSITION & POLICY
ELECTRICITY MARKETS
OIL, GAS & MINING
ANALYSIS
EX-HEAD OF POWER REGULATOR EGC SAYS:
REFORMS ARE IMPERATIVE
Japan NRG spoke with Hatta Tatsuo, the very first chair of the nation’s electricity market regulator, the EGC, who served there 2015 to 2021. According to Hatta, major reforms at the EGC are imperative if the power markets are to function effectively. He also believes that Japan must rethink the role of the regulator and its financing model.
NUCLEAR RESTARTS: IMMOVABLE REGULATOR VS
UNSTOPPABLE ENERGY POLICY
Almost a year ago, Prime Minister Kishida promised to have up to 17 nuclear reactors operating at the start of the summer of 2023. The premier’s comments were interpreted as a significant acceleration of the restart program. After all, 17 units is just over half of Japan’s total. It is now the start of the summer, 2023. There are nine reactors online. One of the main reasons is the independent stance taken by the industry regulator that makes it difficult for the govt to make good on its promises.
GLOBAL VIEW
A wrap of top energy news from around the world.
EVENTS SCHEDULE
A selection of events to keep an eye on in 2023.
PUBLISHER
K. K. Yuri Group
Events
Editorial Team
Yuriy Humber (Editor-in-Chief)
John Varoli (Senior Editor, Americas)
Mayumi Watanabe (Japan)
Yoshihisa Ohno (Japan)
Wilfried Goossens (Events, global)
Kyoko Fukuda (Japan)
Filippo Pedretti (Japan)
Regular Contributors
Chisaki Watanabe (Japan)
Takehiro Masutomo (Japan)
SUBSCRIPTIONS & ADVERTISING
Japan NRG offers individual, corporate and academic subscription plans. Basic details are our website or write to subscriptions@japan-nrg.com
For marketing, advertising, or collaboration opportunities, contact sales@japan-nrg.com For all other inquiries, write to info@japan-nrg.com
OFTEN USED ACRONYMS
|
METI |
The Ministry of Energy, |
mmbtu |
Million British Thermal Units | |
|
MoE |
Ministry of Environment |
mb/d |
Million barrels per day | |
|
ANRE |
Agency for Natural Resources and Energy |
mtoe |
Million Tons of Oil Equivalent | |
|
NEDO |
New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization |
kWh |
Kilowatt hours (electricity generation volume) | |
|
TEPCO |
Tokyo Electric Power Company |
FIT |
Feed-in Tariff | |
|
KEPCO |
Kansai Electric Power Company |
FIP |
Feed-in Premium | |
|
EPCO |
Electric Power Company |
SAF |
Sustainable Aviation Fuel | |
|
JCC |
Japan Crude Cocktail |
NPP |
Nuclear power plant | |
|
JKM |
Japan Korea Market, the Platt’s LNG benchmark |
JOGMEC |
Japan Organization for Metals and Energy Security | |
|
CCUS |
Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage | |||
|
OCCTO |
Organization for Cross-regional Coordination of Transmission Operators | |||
|
NRA |
Nuclear Regulation Authority | |||
|
GX |
Green Transformation |

GX Decarbonization Power Supply Act passed by Diet’s upper house
(Japan NRG, May 31)
TAKEAWAY: The law confirms that METI will be the main authority on overall reactor lifespan decisions, but also confirms that the NRA can request inspections of the facilities every 10 years after 30 years of operation. This makes the METI license terms subject to NRA approval since the regulator has sole authority over nuclear safety. This is a nuance that could develop into a bigger issue as any outside funding for reactor development, for example from banks, will question whether the guaranteed license term for a new nuclear facility is 30 or 40 years. For further details, see this week’s Analysis section.
Govt to establish expert group to decide mechanism for new electricity settlement platform
(Denki Shimbun, May 31)
Measures to reduce renewable energy output curtailment to be compiled by year’s end
(Denki Shimbun, May 30)
JOGMEC to rewrite resource diplomacy strategy to integrate net zero projects
(Japan NRG, May 29)
|
Classification |
Countries |
Description |
Strategy |
|
Comprehensive partners |
U.S., Australia, Canada, Norway |
Have capacities to export resources, strong tech and accountability |
Collaborations in ammonia, hydrogen, CCS, etc. |
|
Traditional and stable suppliers |
UAE, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Chile |
Traditional suppliers with potential to expand ties in energy transition |
Secure traditional supplies, etc. |
|
Countries establishing frameworks |
DR Congo, Zambia, Namibia, Peru, Madagascar, Mozambique |
Has rooms to improve investment climate while has huge resource potential |
Build infrastructure to drive investments, etc. |
|
Regional partners |
Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia |
Close neighbors with potential to expand ties in net zero economies |
Share energy transition concepts, etc. |
|
Emerging resource giants |
Argentina, Brazil, South Africa, India |
Has huge growth potential and would take visible rule-making roles |
Collaborate in net zero rule-making, etc. |
TAKEAWAY: This ambitious approach will require major reforms within JOGMEC, which has historically had strong silos. For example, staff in its gas unit, one of the biggest, hardly spoke with those involved in rare metals.
MoE tightens criteria for offshore wind, will coordinate with METI and MLIT
(Government statement, June 1)
Toshiba, Toray, and Panasonic develop tech to lower costs of green hydrogen
(Nikkei Asia, June 2)
TAKEAWAY: Japan seeks to reduce the cost of hydrogen from ¥100/m3 today to ¥20/m3 by 2050. These new technologies mentioned above will reduce costs, but still aren’t enough to achieve targets. The hope is that more companies will strive to develop new technologies in the coming years, which will increase overall hydrogen demand.
Major trading houses plan multi-trillion-yen investments in green energy
(Nikkan Kogyo Shimbun, May 30)
Tokyo govt, Sekisui Chemical plan PSC solar system tests in closed space
(Japan NRG, May 29)
TAKEAWAY: This may be the country’s first pilot PSC in a closed space. Other companies developing PSC include Toshiba Energy Systems, Kaneka, Panasonic, Aisin, Mitsubishi Chemicals, and Enecoat Technologies. Municipal govts are keen to collaborate as they need to set zero-carbon plans and attract new industries. Toshiba Energy Systems launched Japan’s first PSC outdoor test in Yokohama in February.
Perovskite panel layout

Source: Tokyo metropolitan govt
Itochu partners with Finland’s Neste on renewable diesel in Japan
(Company statement, May 29)
Marubeni and Pembina to develop low-carbon ammonia supply chain from Canada to Asia
(Company statement, May 30)
Sojitsu invests in a SAF plant in the U.S.
(Company statement, May 29)
Toyota Tsusho and Eurus Energy collaborate on EV batteries as renewable energy storage
(Company statement, May 29)
ENEOS, Toyota test-drive synthetic fuel cars
(Company statement, May 29)
TAKEAWAY: A ride on e-fuel and gasoline may feel the same but they’re not, according to some industry sources. E-fuel quality consistency and potential problems with driving need to be studied in depth, the Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association warns.
Hitachi Zosen partners with TRE to recycle industrial wastes, investing ¥10 million
(Company statement, May 22)
A hotel in Hakone uses green energy from hot springs
(Company statement, May 22)
TAKEAWAY: Japan NRG Weekly’s May 22 issue told of a hotel powered by hydrogen. The cost of using clean energy still exceeds that of supply from traditional sources, on average, but social interest in climate issues could support those businesses that seek to differentiate themselves through such offerings.

Mitsui Fudosan issues ¥130 billion green bond, biggest in industry’s history
(Company statement, May 31)
Tokyo, Ota City, Kawasaki City sign hydrogen collaboration
(Government statement, June 2)
DHL Japan starts delivery service fueled by SAF
(Company statement, May 31)
TAKEAWAY: In February, DHL Express announced that “GoGreen Plus” will cover Italy, Denmark, Sweden, Canada, Australia, and South Africa. SAF made from recycling waste oil will be supplied by BP and Neste, and is expected to reduce GHGs by 80%. DHL plans to expand this optional service to other countries.
Mitsubishi Electric begins DR experiment with heat pumps in Europe
(Company statement, May 31)
Japan Gas Association, Francegaz to collaborate on e-methane, biogas initiatives
(JGA statement, May 29)
NRA mulls using ChatGPT to process public documents
(Japan NRG, May 31)

Summer power supply clears minimum requirement, all regions cleared reserve rate of 3%
(Government statement, May 30)
Regional reserve rates (%)
|
|
July |
August |
September |
|
Hokkaido |
5.2 |
7.6 |
5.8 |
|
Tohoku | |||
|
Tokyo |
3.1 |
4.5 |
5.3 |
|
Chubu |
9.8 |
11.7 |
7.8 |
|
Hokuriku |
11.9 |
11.3 | |
|
Kansai | |||
|
Chugoku | |||
|
Shikoku |
11.2 |
14.4 | |
|
Kyushu |
9.8 |
11.9 |
18.5 |
|
Okinawa |
22.3 |
18.7 |
21.6 |
Niigata municipality heads call to remove TEPCO from running nuclear reactors
(Japan NRG, June 1)
TAKEAWAY: See this week’s Analysis section for further discussion of this issue.
EPCO shareholders file resolutions for stronger compliance
(Japan NRG, May 30)
|
Shareholder resolutions related to cartel |
Potential shareholder suit | |
|
Kepco |
none |
Acknowledges cartel but no charges |
|
Chubu Electric |
Set up compliance committee |
Challenges cartel allegation |
|
Chugoku Electric |
none |
Challenges cartel allegation |
|
Kyushu Electric |
Executive pay cuts |
Acknowledges non-compliance |
TAKEAWAY: Shareholder lawsuits on anti-trust violations are quite rare in Japan. The methodology that the plaintiff will try to employ to calculate the KEPCO damage will be interesting since the company wasn’t hit with penalties and their amount is the base for calculating compensation.
JWPA published publishes roadmap for wind power sector until 2050
(Company statement, May 29)
TAKEAWAY: In 2019, METI and the JWPA released a plan to adopt 36 GW of both onshore and offshore wind power by 2030, 66 GW by 2040, and 75 GW by 2050. In Dec 2020, METI revised the offshore wind target to 10 GW by 2030 and 30-45 GW by 2040. As of Dec 2022, installed wind power capacity was 4.7 GW for onshore and 0.1 GW for offshore. Capacity has been growing every year, but reaching 140 GW by 2050 requires 5 GW of installations per year for the next 27 years. Although Wind Vision 2023 is not an official govt plan, the association does coordinate closely with the authorities and pushes officials to aim higher. The latest plan shows just how much will need to change in this sector for the govt to meet its GX goals.
J-Power develops 20 kW floating wind turbines that lower costs
(Company statement, May 30)
TAKEAWAY: METI plans to increase offshore wind power generation capacity to 30-45 GW by 2040. The government has asked industry to source at least 60% of the components for wind systems domestically by 2040. Yet, very few wind turbines for onshore or offshore are made by Japanese companies. Nearly all sales in Japan are by overseas turbine manufacturers such as GE, Vestas, and Siemens Gamesa, which primarily use supply chains in Europe and elsewhere. This project promises to be a “game changer” for Japanese manufacturers interested in the wind sector, but it is still at an early stage.

Eurus Energy bids for a 650 MW wind power project in Hokkaido
(Company statement, June 1)
SSE Pacifico to join a 420 MW offshore wind project in Niigata
(Company statement, May 22)
Japan Wind Development plans 105 MW offshore wind station in Aomori
(Company statement, May 24)
Kansai curtailed solar and wind power output for the first time
(Nikkei, June 3)
TAKEAWAY: Renewable energy power generation is growing in the Kansai area. At the end of April, the region’s solar and wind power generation capacity was 7.18 million kW, a 43% increase compared to the end of October 2018. To further expand renewable energy power generation, it’s necessary to develop power transmission and distribution networks, as well as power storage facilities.
MoE won’t rule out decommissioning Konan GTCC gas-fired power plant
(Government statement, June 1)
TAKEAWAY: The MoE’s push for a faster departure from fossil fuels will propel more companies to work with ammonia, hydrogen and CCUS. This week, Mitsui Chemical and Osaka Gas agreed to study deploying CCUS at the Semboku Industrial Zone by 2030.
Itochu and Kaneka to cooperate in storage, solar PPAs and regional microgrid
(Company statement, June 1)
Itochu acquires U.S. water turbine producer
(Company statement, May 29)
KEPCO postpones restart of Units 1 and 2 Takahama NPP
(Company statement, June 1)
TAKEAWAY: The new restart dates have not been given as they are subject to NRA inspection after the work is completed.

METI and Canada to cooperate on energy and R&D
(METI, May 30)
Nissan reportedly developing cobalt-free lithium iron phosphate battery
(Asahi Shimbun, May 31)
TAKEAWAY: Nissan has been pursuing cobalt-free batteries for almost two decades. It partnered with NEC Tokin, which has track records in development of cobalt substitutes, to form a battery joint venture, Automotive Energy Supply Corp (AESC). Nissan, however, sold AESC to China’s Envision group in 2018.
Tokyo Gas to invest ¥30 billion in synthetic methane and hydrogen R&D
(Jiji, June 1)
April LNG imports from Malaysia down 27% YoY; Saudi crude down 17%
(Government data, May 30)
LNG stocks rise to 2.48 million tons, up 0.4% from a week earlier
(Government data, May 31)
Japan’s coal imports from the U.S. up 29%, Russia down 81%
(Govt data, May 31)
BY MAYUMI WATANABE
Former Head of the Power Regulator Says:
Reforming the Industry Is a Must
The power sector requires trillions of yen in investment to upgrade to a net-zero economy. But there’s growing concern about the sector’s ability to raise the funds or carry out the long-term investment programs required for decarbonization. In addition to seeing their profits squeezed by high fuel prices and a weak yen, Japan’s major power utilities have been rocked by numerous scandals. None are bigger than the claim that the companies, which used to operate as regional power monopolies, failed to adapt to the new competitive landscape. State probes found that several of the utilities, known also as EPCOs, illicitly passed on competitor data to their retail units. Now, the companies face a record \101 billion in antitrust penalties.
The problems don’t seem to be limited to a few poor individual decisions. Criticism has swirled also about the role of the regulator and govt officials. In an effort to appease the public, in April, the METI Minister Nishimura vowed to make amendments to the Electricity Business Act that will strictly penalize wrongdoing. But many industry players say that this is not enough. While stricter laws should help, their impact will mean little without stricter enforcement.
The Electricity and Gas Market Surveillance Commission (EGC) was created to oversee the newly liberalized utility markets. The power sector was fully opened to new players in 2016, with the gas sector following in 2017. The EGC, however, is what is known as a “soft regulator”. It can issue advisories but not orders. It cannot impose fines. Such powers are reserved for ANRE and METI. So, is it time for Japan to rethink the role of the regulator?

Japan NRG interviewed Hatta Tatsuo, the very first chair of the EGC, who served in the role from 2015 to 2021. Hatta is a former professor of economics at Osaka University and presently a member of the Cabinet Taskforce to Review Renewables Regulations. He is also chair of the state-run Asian Growth Research Institute.
Basic reforms: amending the Electricity Business Act
Q: How should the Electricity Business Act change to make power sector regulation more effective?
A: The Electricity Business Act is a weak law. This needs to change more than anything else. The law’s major flaws are: 1) It is not aimed at promoting competition, and 2) there is no penalty for anticompetitive behavior. It needs to be revamped into a law the clear purpose of which is to promote fair competition. The law would be more effectively implemented if the regulator could administer penalties.
Currently, the law talks about the need for electricity to be sold in an “appropriate manner”. It’s unclear what that means. But is there anything more inappropriate than a transmission network passing on customer data of competitors to their [related] power retail division? This offense should be enough for a company to lose its operating license.
When ANRE was planning the liberalization of the power industry, EPCOs told the agency: please leave competition issues to us, we will ensure competition on a voluntary basis. We recently learned this was not the case at all.
Q: What are some rules that need to be clarified within the law?
A: The law needs to say clearly that it seeks to promotes fair competition. The law needs to restrict information and personnel exchanges between various EPCO units and ensures non-discriminatory power sales to parties in and outside of the [EPCO] business group. I would also add a new requirement for EPCOs to set up an independent compliance panel. Following the case of Kansai Electric (KEPCO) executives receiving gifts from the Takahama town mayor, KEPCO created a compliance panel comprised of outside lawyers. It now appears that the panel was instrumental to instilling change. In fact, it is the outside lawyers who may have influenced KEPCO management to report their cartel behavior to the Japan Fair Trade Commission (JFTC) and in return to seek leniency.
Q: The JFTC has been offering advice to small businesses about their rights in this case. Have whistleblowers come forward?
A: JFTC action tends to be whistleblower-driven. The Commission’s powers are backed by its ability to hand out heavy penalties. The Securities and Exchange Market Surveillance Commission is another government agency that the power to punish, thus people fear them. In the case of EGC, yes, businesses have reached to them for advice, but there are no whistleblowers. Because in the present system, offenders are not punished.
Financial independence paves way to a strong regulator
Q: How can EGC become more authoritative?
A: The regulator needs experts such as lawyers, electric engineers, accountants and IT engineers. Let me give you an example. In 2016, the EGC found that Tokyo Electric (TEPCO) Energy Partners was selling in the spot market at levels above their marginal cost, which pushed up spot prices. It was an IT programmer who spotted it. He was analyzing exchange data and started to dig deeper. A case was established and the EGC contacted the company president.
The market is evolving. Day ahead market trade volumes are rising. Regulators need to have the skills to detect non-compliance. METI officials often do not have this skill set. The EGC needs to hire outside talent and offer them competitive compensation. But is it possible for the EGC to increase staff while reducing its headcount seconded from METI or MoE? There is a cap on the number of government employees [the regulator can employ] and this is written in law. So, the EGC can become financially independent. In the U.S., the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and, in the UK, the Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem) are run by license fees charged to operators. The Japan Patent Office also has a similar scheme. The EGC can introduce such a system.
Q: A former EGC official said the regulator’s limited career path dampened motivation.
A: The EGC can create an affiliate organization that conducts research, plans programs and designs market mechanisms. The affiliate body will recruit people from power operators. If the EGC had its own budget, it could become an “Article 3 commission” like the JFTC. (Presently the EGC is an “Article 8 commission” with limited enforcement capacities.) This would help promote new career paths and opportunities. At an Article 3 commission, there are director-general positions and opportunities to climb to a vice-minister rank. Ultimately, the regulator’s experience and knowledge base won’t grow unless people stay. In the long term, as the EGC acquires a track record, it could take over some ANRE duties.
Independence from politics
Q: Does the EGC also needs to be more independent and neutral?
A: Independent from what? That is the question. The EGC needs to be independent from the subjects it regulates. Like the ANRE is. But the EGC is not independent from govt policymakers. METI officials told parliament that ANRE’s energy policies take priority over the EGC functions.
The EGC needs to stay independent from politics. Presently our electricity bills include surcharges that go towards nuclear power and renewables operators. In order to be independent from nuclear and renewables policies, the present mechanism to pool funds from electricity charges needs to stop. Any policy related programs should be financed by tax, not electricity fees or surcharges. Revenues from power services should be spent on those services. Separating policy-related items from the electricity bills will allow the regulator to focus on market efficiency and not be distracted by policy and budget issues.
The regulator should pursue market efficiency, think about avoiding losses, and promote fair practices. They’ll be able to do it if they are the best specialized professionals, who know what works.
BY YURIY HUMBER
Nuclear Restarts: What Happens When an Immovable Regulator
Meets an Unstoppable Energy Policy?
Almost a year ago, Prime Minister Kishida promised to have up to 17 nuclear reactors operating at the start of the summer of 2023. The premier’s comments raised much excitement/concern (depending on one’s stance on nuclear power), but all agreed this was a significant acceleration of the restart program. After all, 17 units is just over half of Japan’s total.
It is now the start of the summer, 2023. There are nine reactors online. That number has yet to actually hit double-figures since the nation’s nuclear plants were idled after the 2011 Fukushima accident. And, the two more Kansai Electric units that were certain to swirl into action this and next month are now back “under review” by the regulator with no restart date announced.
The situation is probably best described as what happens when the seemingly unstoppable force of energy policy, driven by record fuel and electricity prices, meets the immovable object of industry regulation. In the 10 years since its inception, Japan’s Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) has become one of the most powerful state entities, skillfully rebuffing nearly all attempts by industry and government to wrest control.
Perhaps unintentionally, the NRA now challenges the ability of bureaucrats and politicians to fully determine national energy policy. As a new debate heats up in Japan over policing of the broader electricity sector (see the first article in this week’s Analysis section), the NRA could serve as a useful case study. After a series of recent scandals involving major utilities, the power industry is ripe for stronger regulation. But, will the government accept less policy control?
Background
In 2022, on the back of record fuel and electricity prices, Kishida became the first Japanese PM in over a decade to announce unequivocal support for a revival of the domestic nuclear power industry. The PM said he wanted nine reactors online in the winter of 2022/23, and as many as 17 by the summer of 2023.
With Kishida’s backing, METI quickly rolled out a long-term roadmap for the nuclear sector that outlined a strategy to support the R&D of four additional reactor technologies in addition to those already deployed in Japan. The ministry’s plan called for new reactors to replace aging units at existing nuclear station sites, with an eye for further developments at an undefined point in the future.
In the last decade, the main stumbling block to a more positive nuclear energy strategy in Japan has been public opposition. However, in 2022, due to a jump in energy costs and concern about future resource supply from Russia, public opinion turned favorable towards nuclear power.
The government set course to accelerate the sector’s revival. Yet the regulator has shown up those plans.
The making of the NRA
Prior to the 2011 nuclear accident, both promotion and regulation of the nuclear industry was spearheaded by METI. Ostensibly, the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA) policed the nuclear operators, but it was simply a branch of METI. In 2012, NISA was disbanded and a new entity took its place.
The NRA was created as an Article 3 commission organization with the sole right to exercise authority over nuclear safety. Nominally, it was part of the Ministry of Environment (MoE), but it has grown as a fiercely independent entity with the resources to hold its own in the world of politics and policy. The NRA was reported as employing over 1,100 staff last year, almost a third of the personnel at the entire MoE.
From its inception, the NRA was determined to be viewed as independent and transparent. It avoided all “on-background” briefings with industry people, kept its correspondences strictly official, and streamed its main deliberations and meetings on YouTube.
The regulator has not shied away from publicly shaming nuclear operators for mistakes in their documentation, from challenging the validity of geological data to pointing out typographical errors. The NRA has recently cast doubt over the future of several major facilities that METI officials and the ruling party lawmakers deem vital to Japan’s energy security.
Who’s really in charge?
The NRA is led by five commissioners. Their terms are intentionally staggered so that they cannot be replaced at once at the whim of lawmakers and the NRA puts forward its own candidates, according to Florentine Koppenborg, Chair of Environmental and Climate Policy at the Technical University of Munich and author of “Japan’s nuclear disaster and the politics of safety governance”, which is due to be published later this month.
Koppenborg has spent years researching the NRA and concluded that the state entity has resisted capture by the industry, thus fundamentally altering the environment for nuclear policy implementation in Japan away from a top-down dictate. In the process, the NRA has opened up the industry to additional scrutiny from the public and wider legal action, raising the cost of nuclear generation while taking authority away from the government to control the sector’s development.
For example, this year TEPCO filed an application to METI asking for an increase in its power tariff to reflect the rising cost of purchasing natural gas and coal to fuel its thermal stations. The utility lowered the rate increase that it sought based on the understanding that it could restart at least one unit at its only operable nuclear power plant, Kashiwazaki Kariwa, in October 2023. However, while METI approved the tariff increase, the regulator did not concur that TEPCO’s NPP was fit to restart.
NRA Chair Yamanaka Shinsuke said in May that it was “up to TEPCO” in terms of how long the regulators will continue to inspect the Kashiwazaki Kariwa site.
De jure, Japan has an administrative act that limits to two years the time that a state entity has to respond. De facto, no company or government official can instruct the NRA on how and when to conduct its work, or challenge the regulator’s way of doing things.
Next month will be the 10-year anniversary since the NRA started to review the restart application of the three reactors at the Tomari NPP (Hokkaido Electric).
Conclusion
When asked to assess whether the nuclear industry revival promised by PM Kishida is real, an energy expert that sits on numerous METI committees and panels frowns.
Building new reactors is a huge up-front investment commitment, which requires good visibility on future demand and operational conditions. A regulator that avoids working with the industry to problem-solve makes that visibility very uncertain, the expert says. After all, even if the government promises industry players certain conditions, such as an operating license valid for a specific number of years, the NRA can unveil rules that effectively impose a different scenario. Private business simply can’t take on such risks, the expert concludes.
Even if Japan’s reactor builders prepare new designs, domestic utilities may hesitate to continue their involvement in the nuclear business, according to Koppenborg. But such an exit would open a Pandora’s box worth of challenges for the government, not the least of which is what would then happen to used nuclear fuel and processed plutonium.
Japan needs a state-owned nuclear company to take the industry forward, says one industry expert. Waiting on the revival of TEPCO as a nuclear operator has been a mistake. METI must resolve TEPCO’s future before the government can make realistic promises for the sector.
BY JOHN VAROLI
Below are some of last week’s most important international energy developments monitored by the Japan NRG team because of their potential to impact energy supply and demand, as well as prices. We see the following as relevant to Japanese and international energy investors.
Australia/ Solar power
The defunct firm Sun Cable was rescued by part owner and tech entrepreneur Mike Cannon-Brookes via his Grok Ventures, bidding less than A$100 million. The prize is the firm’s permit to build 20 GW in solar capacity with up to 42 GW hours of battery storage in the Northern Territory.
Belgium/ Synthetic fuel
TotalEnergies and a Belgian energy start-up Tree Energy Solutions plan to build a $2 billion plant in the U.S. to produce synthetic natural gas. The plant, which will probably be in Texas, will use wind and solar power to make hydrogen that will be combined with carbon dioxide to create synthetic methane.
Canada/ Oil pipeline
The govt will provide C$3 billion in loans to Trans Mountain Corp (TMC), which is building a long-delayed oil pipeline expansion that will triple the flow of crude (to 890,000 bpd) from Alberta’s oil sands to the Pacific coast. Most will be exported to Asian refining markets
China/ India/ Oil imports
In May, Russian crude oil imports by China and India hit an all-time high as buyers snapped up discounted supplies. The world’s No. 1 and No. 3 crude importers and top buyers of Russian oil imported about 110 million barrels in May, reported Kpler, which was up 10% from April despite U.S. warnings against price cap evasion.
India/ Clean energy
State-owned Oil and Natural Gas Corp will invest $12 billion by 2030 to develop 10 GW of green energy projects. The company produces more than half of India’s oil and gas. It wants to focus on using clean energy to produce ammonia and other technologies that offer around-the-clock generation.
Indonesia/ LNG
Indonesia might place caps on LNG exports, adding it to a list of critical raw materials subject to export controls. The goal of such limits, if enacted, is to secure sufficient supply for domestic consumption and encourage domestic industrial growth. Existing export commitments won’t be impacted, said the govt.
Portugal/ Offshore wind power
The country will have its first auction of licenses to build offshore wind farms for a total capacity of about 1 GW. Portugal will invest €30-€40 billion by 2030 to build a total of 10 GW of offshore wind capacity.
Qatar/ LNG deal
QatarEnergy will sign a long-term LNG supply contract with Bangladesh’s state-owned Petrobangla. The 15-year agreement is for a supply of 2 million tons annually. This is the second Asian deal for Qatar’s North Field project.
Russia/ Oil pipeline
On June 1, Ukraine raised transit fees for Russian oil running via the Druzhba pipeline. The transport of crude to Hungary and Slovakia rose €3.4/ ton to €17, bringing the total hike to 25% so far this year. This increase was the second this year; in January, Kiev raised the tariff 18.3%.
Ukraine/ Power capacity
Power generation capacity dropped by 23 GW, or about 40% of the 2021 total of 58 GW. Kiev cited both war damage to power generation infrastructure and the fact that some regions are under Russian control. The Zaporozhye NPP, which generated about 20% of all energy produced in Ukraine, is now controlled by Russian forces.
U.S./ Battery storage
Energy storage companies attracted $5.5 billion in 2022, and there are plans to install 65 GW of grid storage nationally by 2030, which is 15 times the 4 GW added in 2022. Texas will account for nearly 25% of the U.S. grid-scale storage market over the next five years. These projects are helped by a 30% tax credit for energy storage in the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA).
A selection of domestic and international events we believe will have an impact on Japanese energy
Disclaimer
This communication has been prepared for information purposes only, is confidential and may be legally privileged. This is a subscription-only service and is directed at those who have expressly asked K.K. Yuri Group or one of its representatives to be added to the mailing list. This document may not be onwardly circulated or reproduced without prior written consent from Yuri Group, which retains all copyright to the content of this report.
Yuri Group is not registered as an investment advisor in any jurisdiction. Our research and all the content express our opinions, which are generally based on available public information, field studies and own analysis. Content is limited to general comment upon general political, economic and market issues, asset classes and types of investments. The report and all of its content does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell, subscribe for or underwrite any product or physical commodity, or a financial instrument.
The information contained in this report is obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith. No representation or warranty is made that it is accurate or complete. Opinions and views expressed are subject to change without notice, as are prices and availability, which are indicative only. There is no obligation to notify recipients of any changes to this data or to do so in the future. No responsibility is accepted for the use of or reliance on the information provided. In no circumstances will Yuri Group be liable for any indirect or direct loss, or consequential loss or damages arising from the use of, any inability to use, or any inaccuracy in the information.
K.K. Yuri Group: Hulic Ochanomizu Bldg. 3F, 2-3-11, Surugadai, Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 101-0062.
NEWS
・GX Decarbonization Power Supply Act passed by Diet’s upper house, confirming among other things nuclear operating rules
・Summer power supply clears minimum requirement;
all regions cleared reserve rate of 3%
・Nissan reportedly developing cobalt-free lithium iron phosphate battery to reduce supply chain risks