
July 3, 2023
NEWS
TOP
ENERGY TRANSITION & POLICY
ELECTRICITY MARKETS
OIL, GAS & MINING
ANALYSIS
CALLS FOR CLIMATE ACTION
REVERBERATE AT JAPAN’S AGMS
Many say that the rainy season in June makes them sleepy. But in the corporate calendar, June is no time to relax because it’s when over 2,000 Japanese listed firms host their annual general meeting (AGM). What’s made the month particularly stormy is the high number of shareholder resolutions put to management. Climate issues featured prominently among them. But after all the votes are in, what were the results? We spoke with all sides to review the situation.
HYDROPOWER: JAPAN HAS TO STOP
GOING WITH THE FLOW
As Japan accelerates its energy transition, the country will have to tap into every possible renewable energy resource in order to fully replace fossil fuels and end their use by 2050. Hydropower is an area that has seen nearly flat growth in recent decades. But the potential is there, if the government is willing to commit the resource and partner with the private sector.
GLOBAL VIEW
A wrap of top energy news from around the world.
EVENTS SCHEDULE
A selection of events to keep an eye on in 2023.
PUBLISHER
K. K. Yuri Group
Events
Editorial Team
Yuriy Humber (Editor-in-Chief)
John Varoli (Senior Editor, Americas)
Mayumi Watanabe (Japan)
Wilfried Goossens (Events, global)
Kyoko Fukuda (Japan)
Filippo Pedretti (Japan)
Regular Contributors
Chisaki Watanabe (Japan)
Takehiro Masutomo (Japan)
SUBSCRIPTIONS & ADVERTISING
Japan NRG offers individual, corporate and academic subscription plans. Basic details are our website or write to subscriptions@japan-nrg.com
For marketing, advertising, or collaboration opportunities, contact sales@japan-nrg.com For all other inquiries, write to info@japan-nrg.com
OFTEN USED ACRONYMS
| METI | The Ministry of Energy, Trade and Industry | mmbtu | Million British Thermal Units | |
| MoE | Ministry of Environment | mb/d | Million barrels per day | |
| ANRE | Agency for Natural Resources and Energy | mtoe | Million Tons of Oil Equivalent | |
| NEDO | New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization | kWh | Kilowatt hours (electricity generation volume) | |
| TEPCO | Tokyo Electric Power Company | FIT | Feed-in Tariff | |
| KEPCO | Kansai Electric Power Company | FIP | Feed-in Premium | |
| EPCO | Electric Power Company | SAF | Sustainable Aviation Fuel | |
| JCC | Japan Crude Cocktail | NPP | Nuclear power plant | |
| JKM | Japan Korea Market, the Platt’s LNG benchmark | JOGMEC | Japan Organization for Metals and Energy Security | |
| CCUS | Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage | |||
| OCCTO | Organization for Cross-regional Coordination of Transmission Operators | |||
| NRA | Nuclear Regulation Authority | |||
| GX | Green Transformation |

Sapporo-Hokkaido seeks ¥150 billion investment in energy transition over 10 years
(City of Sapporo statement, June 24)
TAKEAWAY: Hokkaido is considered to be Japan’s most favorable region for wind power. The main challenge, however, will be building transmission capacity to transfer the power generated to major urban centers. This means sizable investment is required.
These kinds of announcements can seem largely bureaucratic, but it is expected that the actions in Sapporo City, and Hokkaido as a whole, will achieve meaningful progress and make an impact on Japan’s net-zero commitments. PM Kishida’s desire to bind the energy and digital transformations of the country work well in Hokkaido, where the govt also hopes to station a major semiconductor manufacturing hub.
EneCoat Technologies, Toyota Motor to develop perovskite solar cells
(Japan NRG, June 27)
TAKEAWAY: Previously PSC was called “the next-gen solar cell for outer space” because of its high lead content, discouraging applications involving direct human contact such as cars and appliances. It’s unclear if a breakthrough has been achieved for safe handling of PSC raw materials, but field studies in the sector are spreading. PSC applications on farms is a promising area, but no companies are as yet known to be active in this space.
Major PSC field studies
| JERA, Sekisui Chemicals | Thermal power plant, eyeing PSC solar power supplies |
| NTT Data, Sekisui Chemicals | PSC-equipped data centers |
| Tokyo Metropolitan govt, Sekisui Chemicals | PSC-equipped water recycling systems |
| Tokyu Group, Toshiba Energy Systems | PSC-equipped railway station |
| JR West, Sekisui Chemicals | |
| Toyota Motor, EneCoat | PSC-equipped cars |
| ??? | Solar power station in farms |
Japan NRG expects companies to work in an alliance with universities to develop this technology. Key players other than the aforementioned include: Fujifilm, Panasonic, Mitsubishi Chemicals, Zeon, Hosiden, Ricoh, Semiconductor Energy Laboratory. Tokyo Chemical Industry, Peccell Technologies, Tokyo University, and University of Hyogo. The much-awaited next major tech breakthrough would be to establish mass production.
ANRE drafts new regulations for renewables under GX Act
(Japan NRG, June 30)
Negative emissions study group makes policy recommendation
(Government Statement, June 28)
TAKEAWAY: METI is expected to soon draft the “CCS business act” as carbon capture and storage (CCS) is one of the quickest approaches to reducing emissions from the power sector. The new law is likely to address legal requirements associated with CCS and DACCS.
Final safety inspection for Fukushima NPP water release begins, IAEA head to visit Tokyo
(Japan NRG, June 29)
METI to set up organization for CCUS promotion
(Denki Shimbun, June 26)
Japan might phase out non-fossil certificates by 2030: REI’s Ishida
(Japan NRG, June 27)
Toshiba and IHI to work on decarbonization of coal-fired stations in Malaysia
(Company statements, June 27-28)
TAKEAWAY: Many observers, including JOGMEC, believe that ASEAN countries will still rely heavily on fossil fuels in the future; thus, the search for potential CCS sites has become essential. JOGMEC designated offshore Malaysia, alongside offshore Sawak and Sabah, as high rating areas for CCS due to their geological features.
A few weeks ago, JAPEX, JGC Holdings, Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha and JFE Steel signed a MoU with PETRONAS to study the value chain for CCS in Malaysia.
Sumitomo Electric gets first Australian order for vanadium redox flow battery system
(Company statement, June 22)
TAKEAWAY: Veco is an Australian vanadium mine operator part-owned by Idemitsu Kosan. In a way, Vecco and Sumitomo are competitors. Vecco plans to produce vanadium-electrolytes used in the redox flow batteries. The electrolytes were first developed by Australian researchers but Sumitomo was able to take the research and commercialize it.
Power X to import batteries for “battery tanker Power Arc 100”
(Japan NRG, June 27)
TAKEAWAY: Ito’s remarks raise questions about METI’s plan to provide ¥330 billion in subsidies to strengthen domestic battery production. Japan’s goal is to expand battery storage production capacity from the current 20 GWh to 150 GWh by 2030.
Mitsubishi Shipbuilding and NYK Line get approval for ammonia and LCO2 ship
(Company statement, June 29)
Success in using liquefied biomethane as marine fuel – Air Water and partners
(Company statement, June 21)

INPEX and Astomos supplied first biofuel bunker to VLGC in the Middle East
(Company statement, June 22)
Toyota and Mitsubishi introduce Thailand’s first biogas-derived hydrogen equipment
(Company statement, June 26)
Sagawa and Euglena strike biodiesel deal, asking individuals to pay extra for clean delivery
(Company statement, June 26)
TAKEAWAY: Euglena is aiming to promote a new business model that spreads the cost of the energy transition. A similar approach was trialed by the DHL courier service for its jet fuels, in which customers pay extra to switch to sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). But DHL’s customers are mainly companies, whereas Euglena is targeting individuals.
Mitsubishi’s rice-paddy methane-reduction project approved for J-Credit Scheme
(Company statement, June 28)
In Brief:

Round 2 offshore wind tenders worth ¥1 trillion attract heavy bidding
(Nikkei, Japan NRG, June 30)
TAKEAWAY: There is no official estimate for the cost of the projects, but the Nikkei reported a combined figure of ¥1 trillion. This would make it one of the biggest investment projects in energy in the country for decades. These kinds of investment numbers – and the rising costs in the offshore wind sector – have seen some expected bidders pull out of the race. While the govt maintains that Japan’s aim is to lower the cost of offshore wind to about ¥10/ kWh, in other countries inflation in raw materials prices and grid adjustments are pushing the overall costs up. It is not yet clear how Japanese operators could significantly reduce costs from the current position. Still, the govt’s support and national net-zero strategies indicate that offshore wind will be one of the bigger growth energy sectors in the company decades in Japan, which explains the currently strong industry interest. Businesses will hope that the govt won’t take too long to decide on the results for Round 2 and move expeditiously to Round 3.
Nuclear power plant restarts are delayed
(Nikkei, June 28)
TAKEAWAY: As Japan NRG detailed in a June 5, 2023 Analysis piece, the much-promised quick restart of nuclear reactors by PM Kishida has failed to materialize. This is partly because the prime minister was never in a position to deliver on the promise. He could only state the govt’s desire, but it is up to the NRA, the regulator, to approve plant restarts and the local authorities to give the final green light. The discrepancy between PM Kishida’s vows and reality is now starting to be picked up by the mainstream media. How the public will react is not yet clear. They may see this as a negative in terms of politicians not fulfilling their promises. Or, the focus could turn to the regulator, putting greater pressure on the NRA to justify the time they have spent on reviews.
Kyushu Electric explores ammonia/ hydrogen and coal co-firing
(Nikkei, June 29)
Offshore wind: Daido Metal invests ¥6 billion for new turbine bearing facility in Czechia
(New Energy Business, June 26)
AGMs reject EPCOs exit from nuclear, and spin off of power transmission units
(Company statements, June 28)
Osaka Gas enters battery storage and distributed energy generation in the U.S.
(Company statement, June 26)
20 successful bidders in latest solar auction
(OCCTO, various media, June 26)
Toyota Tsusho to build solar plant in Saudi Arabia, the company’s first in the region
(Company statement, June 28)
JEPX to gradually lift ban on resale of wholesale power purchases
(Denki Shimbun, June 28)
TEPCO PG to control transmission line overloads with new relay
(Denki Shimbun, June 28)
Kyocera and Kyudenko form a company for onsite PPA
(Company statement, June 28)
mmGuard and FCC partner in solar power plant maintenance with drones
(Company statement, June 26)
Sharing Energy and Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance collaborate on solar PV analytics
(Company statement, June 27)

Osaka Gas starts LNG bunkering in Osaka/ Setouchi area
(Company statement, June 27)
TAKEAWAY: A 50% reduction in GHG emissions by 2050 is the goal set by the International Maritime Organization. This seems to be driving demand for LNG-fueled vessels. Osaka Gas plans to supply e-methane (carbon neutral synthetic methane) to accelerate the decarbonization of bunker fuel. Osaka Gas and its Daigas Group intend to expand LNG bunkering and to commercialize e-methane.

LNG stocks fall to 2.23 million tons
(Government data, June 28)
Middle East oil imports fall 4.3% YoY
(Japan NRG, June 29)

LNG imports from the Middle East plummet 73%
(Japan NRG, June 29)

Ammonia imports down 57% YoY
(Japan NRG, June 29)

BY MAYUMI WATANABE
Calls for Climate Action Reverberate at Japan’s AGMs
Many say that the rainy season in June makes them sleepy. But in the corporate calendar, June is no time to relax because it’s when over 2,000 Japanese listed firms host their annual general meeting (AGM). What’s made the month particularly stormy of late is the rising number of shareholder resolutions put to management. Climate issues feature prominently among them.
This AGM season saw a record 90 shareholder resolutions filed, with more than 10% climate related. Activists demanded changes to company charters to reflect climate ambitions aligned with the Paris Agreement goals. There were calls for an exit from financing or investing in coal; and there were several demands for more disclosure.
Japan’s original climate activist shareholders were non-profit organizations or their staff. In recent years, however, European institutional investors have joined the movement, supporting and sometimes even initiating shareholder demands.
The campaigns generally receive strong media coverage, partly helped by the fact that most of the resolutions are tabled against blue chip companies and some of Japan’s most famous brands. This year, even Toyota Motor came under the spotlight. But how much impact are climate activists having on corporate decisions in Japan?
2020-2022 climate resolutions attract unexpected support
In Japan, the climate resolution boom took off in 2020 when a Mizuho Financial Group individual shareholder, who was also a member of activist group Kiko Network, filed a first-ever climate resolution. The activist demanded Mizuho to include Paris Agreement commitments to the Articles of Incorporation. Proxy advisory firms Glass Lewis and Institutional Shareholder Services were in support, and it won 34.5% of the votes, thanks to backing from Nordea Asset Management, Sweden’s AP7, Denmark’s AkademikerPension, and Allianz Global Investors among others.
In 2021, the Australian climate activist group Market Forces joined the movement, filing similar resolutions to trading house Sumitomo Corp, while Kiko Network filed resolutions to Mitsubishi UFJ Group. Glass Lewis and ISS were not supportive this time, but Japanese asset management funds were. The resolutions secured shareholder support rates of 20% and 23%, respectively. Separately, European funds filed similar resolutions to J-Power and saw 26% backing.
While the resolutions came up short of a majority and did not pass, they sent shock waves across financial markets. In Japan, shareholder resolutions – activist driven or not – rarely won over 20% of the vote. There are no legally binding rules on shareholder voting in Japan. They are left to the discretion of the company and its shareholders, resulting in some rules that are not fair to minority shareholders. For example, blank votes are automatically counted as votes in favor of the management.
Traditionally, so many AGMs are held in such a short time that each one is expected to be short and sweet. On June 29 alone almost 600 companies held their shareholders’ meeting.
Resolutions add to the AGM agenda and make it more eventful. They are also a new trend for many Japanese retail investors. In one 2023 AGM, management needed to explain shareholder rights to a confused individual, who asked the assembly why she was receiving resolution proposals from two parties.
This year, four climate activists filed resolutions to three banks, one trading house and two power utilities; and European funds filed to J-Power. The AGMs were held from June 23 to 29. None passed. J-Power said the funds’ two resolutions got 15% and 21% of the votes, down from last year. The exact support percentage and other details of the other resolution votes were not immediately available.
Climate action resolutions
| Shareholders | Companies | Changes in Articles of Corporation demanded | |
| 2020 | Kiko Network | Mizuho FG | Disclosure of climate risks; Make plans to ensure investments align with the Paris Agreement (34.5%) |
| 2021 | Kiko Network, Market Forces, RainForest Action Network (RAN), 350.org Japan | MUFJ | Disclosure of climate risks; Make plans to ensure investments align with the Paris Agreement (23%) |
| Market Forces | Sumitomo Corp. | Make and disclose plans to ensure operations align with the Paris Agreement (20%) | |
| 2022 | Kiko Network, 350.org Japan, Friends of the Earth (FoE) Japan, RAN | SMBC FG | Make business plans align with the Paris Agreement (27.05%)
Lending policy aligning with IEA scenario (9.55%) |
| Mitsubishi Corp. | Make business plans that align with the Paris Agreement (20.19%)
Disclosure of its analysis of investments that are alignment with net zero goals (16.22%) | ||
| TEPCO | Disclosure of its analysis of assets’ durability in the light of net zero goals (9.55%) | ||
| Chubu Electric | Disclosure of its analysis of assets’ durability in the light of net zero goals (19.9%) | ||
| Man Group, Amundi, HSBC Asset Management, Australian Centre for Corporate Responsibility (ACCR) | J-Power | Disclosure of short- and medium-term emission targets, how investments align with the targets, and how remuneration policies incentivise progress towards meeting emission reduction targets (26%) | |
| 2023 | Amundi, HSBC Asset Management, Man Group, ACCR | J-Power | Disclosure of short- and medium-term emission targets, how company investments align with the targets (21%), and how remuneration policies incentivize progress towards meeting emission reduction targets (15%) |
| Kiko Network, RAN, Market Forces | MUFJ | Aligning investment and lending activities to the Paris Agreement | |
| SMBC | Aligning investment and lending activities to the Paris Agreement | ||
| Mizuho FG | Aligning investment and lending activities to the Paris Agreement | ||
| FoE Japan, Market Forces | Mitsubishi Corp | Disclosure of short-term and mid-term GHG emission reduction targets aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement; Disclosure of its assessment of progress | |
| Kiko Network, Market Forces | TEPCO | Aligning capital allocation to the Paris Agreement | |
| Kiko Network, Market Forces | Chubu Electric | Aligning capital allocation to the Paris Agreement |
Impact on corporate decisions
Overseas, energy firms have been grappling with environmental activists and activist investors pushing for more climate action for a lot longer. Some have found that the best defense, from their point of view, was better and more communication with various stakeholders.
For example, Australia’s biggest oil and gas producer, Woodside Energy, has unsurprisingly faced withering attacks from activists, which say the company is delaying a shift away from fossil energy. In response, Woodside said it has conducted about 60 investor engagements on climate and governance issues.
In Japan, which has relatively small oil and gas firms compared to global majors, climate activists have primarily targeted businesses with a high exposure to coal-fired power generation. Like Woodside, many Japanese firms found that they need to be more vocal and engaging. Several targeted company officials told Japan NRG that activist campaigns led them to change their communication strategies and stakeholder engagement.
“We were influenced because thanks to them, we became highly aware of the need to communicate our side of the climate story,” said an official from a Japanese energy company. However, he noted that changes in his company’s business strategies — to make a partial shift away from fossil fuel – were influenced by government policy and market forces.
In short, Japanese firms feel that the core drivers of their business are state policy, as well as via regulatory and market trends. Taking orders on strategy from activists is not on their agenda, and in some cases, it’s not even considered feasible.
Take early closure of coal-fired power plants, as an example. Owing to concerns about capacity shortages and energy security, last year the government introduced rules that prevent utilities from decommissioning thermal power plants unless they get express approval from METI. The rationale is that the ministry needs to be consulted and on the lookout for potential gaps in energy supplies.
Furthermore, company executives in Japan doubt that the demands of a vocal minority for significant changes in corporate strategies would win approval from the majority of the shareholders. After all, institutional investors also have a fiduciary duty to extract the best possible returns from a business.
Activists themselves partly admit that their goals may not meet with majority approval. Kiko Network’s resolution vote analysis showed that while support for its demands for more disclosure was generally high, most shareholders were not strongly in favor of pushing companies to alter their business strategies.
Since climate activists in their essence are single-issue focused, they are seen by target company officials as having a narrow perspective. What’s more, officials claim that the activists are inconsistent in their demands, simply aligning their focus with the most recent trends in climate discourse and dismissing a more integrated approach to the energy transition.
“Power utilities can’t change strategies every year like activists,” said one executive.
Antitrust not a concern
One area in Japan’s power sector that climate activists have not discussed hardly at all is competition. A fair and competitive playing field is essential for spurring the growth of new clean energy supplies, and it won’t be possible to phase out fossil fuel generation without robust renewables market players.
Earlier this year, some of Japan’s biggest power utilities were accused by antitrust officials of cartel behavior. What’s worse, it was discovered that the grid units of the utilities, which are supposed to run the electricity transmissions network in a neutral manner that’s open to all market players, passed information about competitors to the utilities’ retail divisions. That directly affected some renewables operators.
When asked about this, however, activists including Market Forces say they are not interested in the cartel issue. Bernadette Maheandiran, Asia director of Market Forces, said the organization has no position on the cartel issues. Meanwhile, Kiko Network recognizes the importance of the cartel incident, and said it will continue engagements with Chubu Electric, one of the firms accused of anticompetitive behavior by government officials.
What’s next?
Climate activists have made more headway in Japan in the climate tech startups scene and with ESG consultancies. There is also a widely held belief in such circles that the government’s introduction of the GX Promotion Act, which took effect June 30, will help activists persuade companies that climate engagement cannot be separated from business strategy any longer.
Even so, the activists may need to tweak their approach. Pushing for a change in the corporate charter is unlikely to yield results. Japan NRG surveyed major business federations and found that, as of today, there does not appear to be any major company that articulates the Paris Agreement goals in their corporate charter and there is little appetite among those surveyed for that to change.
Even among climate solution startups, which often include a sustainability philosophy in their corporate charter, only one said that it was considering adding a similar commitment to the Paris Agreement.
There are also questions over whether these fights over documents and disclosures benefit the climate. After all, company share prices tend to reflect profits rather than climate action and there are currently no accounting schemes that directly tie emissions to financial results.
As Japan’s government now steps in to pressure domestic firms to improve their climate disclosures, activists will need to find a new approach before next year’s AGMs. If it offers businesses a way to convert emission reductions into real profit and a higher share price, officials say they will be all ears.
X
BY FILIPPO PEDRETTI
Hydroelectric Power: Japan Has to Stop Going with the Flow
As Japan accelerates its energy transition, the country will have to tap into every possible renewable energy resource in order to fully replace fossil fuels and end their use by 2050. Hydropower is an area that has seen nearly flat growth in recent decades. But the potential is there, if the government is willing to commit the resource and partner with the private sector.
Japan is the world’s sixth largest producer of hydropower, but most such plants are pumped-storage plants. Conventional hydropower plants account for roughly 20 GW out of the total installed hydro capacity of 50 GW.
Even though hydro is Japan’s second most important renewable energy source after solar energy, it’s often overlooked in renewable energy discussions and plans. The main obstacle is cost and return on investment. Hydropower plants require proximity to rivers that are often located in remote, mountainous regions. This in turn often leads to higher than usual transmission losses.
Unlike the U.S., Brazil and Russia, all of which have many large rivers, and hence, large-scale hydropower facilities, in Japan the rivers tend to be much smaller. This brings in problems related to the cost of scale for hydro plants. Japan has many small and micro hydro installations, with some offering just 30-40 kW of capacity.
Additionally, environmental concerns over large dam projects have been a factor limiting hydro’s development. Altogether, these factors have put a brake on the expansion of generation from large hydropower sources. Still, amply endowed with mountainous terrain and flowing rivers, Japan would be making a mistake not to find ways to further tap into this clean energy source.
Obstacles to development
During the early Showa period, from 1930 to 1950, hydro played a vital role in the expansion of Japan’s electricity generation. By the late 1960s, however, that growth began to slow in the face of limited suitable locations for large dam construction.
Today, the size classification references the Feed-in Tariff system. Large hydro is anything above 30 MW of capacity; medium is within a range of 1 MW to 30 MW; and small is anything under 1 MW. Pumped-storage hydropower is regarded as a separate category, while micro-hydro facilities refer to systems within the 5-100 kW range.
The primary obstacles for hydro development include high costs, stringent government regulation and community opposition. First and foremost, the construction and maintenance costs, including sediment removal and forest reclamation, are significant.
Furthermore, the concept of ‘back allocation’, where construction costs are retroactively borne by those benefiting from the facility, poses a challenge for hydro developers, as it can significantly reduce potential profits from power generation and sales.
Additionally, utilizing existing multipurpose dams for hydro can face opposition from nearby residents. Increasing water storage for electricity production may require releasing stored water during typhoons or heavy rain, potentially causing downstream flooding. Repurposing multipurpose dams for power generation is also difficult due to current laws, which stipulate that their use should be determined at the construction stage.
Japan’s biggest hydropower plants (excluding pumped hydro facilities)
| Power Plant Name | Company | Capacity (MW) |
| Okutadami Power Plant | J-Power | 560 |
| Tagokura Power Plant | J-Power | 400 |
| Sakuma Hydroelectric Plant | J-Power | 350 |
| Kurobegawa N.4 Power Station | Kansai Electric | 335 |
| Arimine N.1 Hydroelectric Plant | Hokuriku Electric | 265 |
Source: Agora
Potential of small and mid-sized hydro
In total, by 2035 hydropower generation is anticipated to grow by 5%. However, when this is broken down by size, capacity and type, there’s a very different picture. The forecast for large hydro capacity is negligible growth. Pumped hydro, however, is projected to grow by 9%. The problem is that building large hydro facilities can take decades from project phase to full operation. For example, construction of Japan’s largest hydro projects began in the late ’20s/early ’30s and were completed only after WWII.
Meanwhile, a 2019 report by the MoE indicated that small and mid-sized hydroelectric power plants have the potential to more than double installed capacity (now between 3.2 and 4.1 GW). However, it will be necessary to grapple with high construction costs, securing investment in an increasingly competitive capital market for renewable energy projects, and community approval.
Estimated costs for mid-sized hydroelectric power plants are comparable to coal-fired, LNG-fired and nuclear stations. Small-scale hydropower costs are much higher in terms of ¥/kWh partly because maintenance costs are about four times higher than for larger facilities, says METI. In addition, there are cost challenges in integrating small hydro into the grid.
One solution for new hydro facilities is to apply for a FIT license and, in the future, the Feed-in Premium (FIP) program.
Forecast Power Generation Costs in 2030 by Source
| Source | ¥/kWh |
| Coal | 13.6 |
| LNG | 10.7 |
| Nuclear | 11.7 |
| Oil | 24.9 |
| Onshore wind | 14.7 |
| Offshore wind | 25.9 |
| Solar (utility scale) | 11.2 |
| Solar (residential) | 14.2 |
| Small hydro | 25.2 |
| Medium-sized hydro | 11.0 |
| Geothermal | 16.7 |
| Biomass (co-firing) | 14.2 |
| Biomass (mono-firing) | 29.9 |
| Gas cogeneration | 13.5 |
| Oil cogeneration | 28.1 |
Source: MoE
Pumped-storage hydro: a viable solution
Pumped-storage hydropower, which stores and generates electricity using reservoirs at different elevations, has emerged as a valuable energy storage system in Japan, which ranks second globally in pure pumped hydro capacity, with 21.9 GW.
Initially developed to “store” surplus power from nuclear and thermal sources by using excess electricity to move water to a higher elevation, pumped hydro can now also be applied for solar.
As renewable energy gains traction, pumped-storage hydro is an increasingly vital energy storage system, helping to balance the intermittent nature of renewable sources like solar and wind. This function will continue to make it an attractive option for Japan’s energy sector.
Case studies: success stories and innovations
In Tochigi Prefecture, the Momura Power Plant, with its Units 1-2 (120 kW total), utilizes the elevation of an agricultural canal to generate electricity. Along with technologies like spiral water turbines and pressure reducing valves, this project demonstrates the potential for further growth in small and mid-sized hydropower generation. Water sources such as agricultural water, surplus from dams, and water supply and sewerage systems, can then be used.
One example is Gokase, a small town in Kyushu, which established the Gokase Research Institute of Renewable Energy (GRIRE) to promote renewables. With community involvement, from 2013 to 2019 they installed over 10 micro-hydro plants, ranging from 1 kW to 200 kW each. They also sold the electricity through the FIT program.
The Tagokura Power Station (400 MW) in Fukushima Prefecture has been generating hydropower since 1959. After the incident at the Fukushima Dai-Ichi NPP in 2011, the local prefecture decided to expand its hydropower facilities. Currently, with 11 dams and 14 power plants built in close proximity to the Tagokura Dam, this area has become a major hydro hub in the prefecture.
In 2015, Hinohara Hydroelectric set up a subsidiary, Suikoten, which is the first small hydro plant in Tokyo. It utilizes the natural drop (91 meters) of a river. With help from the state the company obtained water rights that paved the way for future hydro projects. The company sells electricity through the FIT program.
Future outlook and challenges
While the MoE predicts growth by 2050 in the small and medium-sized hydropower sector, which is forecasted at a 1.5-fold rise, there are reasons for skepticism. Unless the national government acts and offers financial support, many existing and potential plans will struggle to succeed. Integrating electricity from small hydro into the grid is one of the main obstacles due to the small volumes involved and high maintenance costs.
While companies may be interested in hydro, low production volume and remote locations with challenging grid connections mean that such investments won’t be profitable any time soon. This is especially true for run-of-river or irrigation channel projects, which lack storage capabilities.
On the contrary, pumped hydro solutions are gaining interest due to their ability to address intermittency issues.
Small hydro facilities can be a solution for small communities when state support is available. Many such projects benefit from FIT and there is a lot more potential for the sector via this funding mechanism than from solar. While solar PV capacity grew from 13.6 GW to 78.8 GW in the 2013-2022 period, hydro stayed almost flat, moving from 48.9 GW to 50 GW in the same period.
Further advantages could come under the FIP program. To maximize the effectiveness of such a program, which means managing the supply of weather-dependent solar and wind power generation, the use of storage batteries and other adjustment equipment will play an important role.
Hydro offers a relatively stable supply capacity and the ability to adjust output based on demand. Consequently, it becomes possible to sell electricity during periods of high demand and favorable market prices, making small hydropower a great fit for the FIP system.
BY JOHN VAROLI
Below are some of last week’s most important international energy developments monitored by the Japan NRG team because of their potential to impact energy supply and demand, as well as prices. We see the following as relevant to Japanese and international energy investors.
Australia/ Green hydrogen
Australia green-lit building a A$51 million renewable hydrogen plant in Victoria state. The 10 MW electrolyzer to be built in Wodonga in Victoria will be bigger than any current such unit in Australia.
Australia/ Nuclear power
BHP Group wants Australia to lift its ban on nuclear energy. Laura Tyler, the company’s CTO, said: “To make sure we have that safe, reliable energy mix, we need to be able to mix it up… by partnering nuclear with wind, solar, batteries and other sources of electricity.”
China/ LNG
China’s ENN will buy 1.8 million tons annually of LNG from Cheniere on a free-on-board basis for a purchase price indexed to Henry Hub, plus a fixed liquefaction fee. Deliveries begin in mid-2026. The agreement extends to 2050.
Italy/ Oil
Eni will acquire UK-based Neptune Energy for $4.9 billion, the largest cash deal in the EU oil and gas sector in a decade. Eni will acquire Neptune for $2.6 billion, while Vår Energi, Eni’s Norwegian subsidiary, will acquire Neptune’s operations in Norway for $2.3 billion.
Italy/ Wind power
In a revision of the country’s energy and climate strategy, Italy plans to get 65% of its electricity from renewables by 2030, up from a previous target of 55%. Also, hydrogen will power 42% of industrial needs by 2030.
Mongolia/ Critical minerals
The U.S. and Mongolia plan to work together on critical minerals. The countries signed a MoU on June 27, 2023, to jointly advance secure and resilient critical mineral supply chains in the Indo-Pacific region.
Natural gas
Companies such as Shell and Chevron will invest more in natural gas, as Chinese and EU importers sign long-term LNG deals. Shell’s CEO Wael Sawan said: “LNG can be easily transported to where it’s needed most. On average, natural gas emits about 50% less carbon emissions than coal when used to produce electricity.”
Norway/ Oil and gas
Norway approved oil and gas projects worth $18.5 billion. The 19 projects include new developments, additional development of producing oil and gas fields, and investments to increase resource recovery in producing fields.
Renewable energy
Global energy demand rose 1% last year, slowing from 5.5% in 2021. Record renewables growth was unable to challenge fossil fuels, which accounted for 82% of supply, according to Statistical Review of World Energy. Last year saw the largest ever increase in renewables capacity, for a total 266 GW; solar led the growth.
Wind power
Siemens Energy shares continue to fall, hit by target price cuts and rating downgrades in the wake of problems at its wind turbine division. The group’s loss in market valuation is about €7.4 billion.
U.S./ Gas plants
Gas plant capacity is booming, according to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Nearly 4.47 GW of natural gas-fired generation came online in the first four months this year, up from 0.55 GW in the same period in 2022.
A selection of domestic and international events we believe will have an impact on Japanese energy
Disclaimer
This communication has been prepared for information purposes only, is confidential and may be legally privileged. This is a subscription-only service and is directed at those who have expressly asked K.K. Yuri Group or one of its representatives to be added to the mailing list. This document may not be onwardly circulated or reproduced without prior written consent from Yuri Group, which retains all copyright to the content of this report.
Yuri Group is not registered as an investment advisor in any jurisdiction. Our research and all the content express our opinions, which are generally based on available public information, field studies and own analysis. Content is limited to general comment upon general political, economic and market issues, asset classes and types of investments. The report and all of its content does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell, subscribe for or underwrite any product or physical commodity, or a financial instrument.
The information contained in this report is obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith. No representation or warranty is made that it is accurate or complete. Opinions and views expressed are subject to change without notice, as are prices and availability, which are indicative only. There is no obligation to notify recipients of any changes to this data or to do so in the future. No responsibility is accepted for the use of or reliance on the information provided. In no circumstances will Yuri Group be liable for any indirect or direct loss, or consequential loss or damages arising from the use of, any inability to use, or any inaccuracy in the information.
K.K. Yuri Group: Hulic Ochanomizu Bldg. 3F, 2-3-11, Surugadai, Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 101-0062.
NEWS
・Japan begins GX campaign by creating Sapporo-Hokkaido hub, seeking to raise ¥150 billion for the region’s energy transition
・Round 2 offshore wind tenders worth ¥1 trillion attract heavy interest with almost two dozen companies participating
・Toyota Motor teams up with Kyoto startup to develop next-gen Perovskite solar cells that could be used in EVs