
Sept 4, 2023
NEWS
TOP
ENERGY TRANSITION & POLICY
ELECTRICITY MARKETS
OIL, GAS & MINING
ANALYSIS
BALANCING MARKET REFORM:
EPRX TO COMPLETE MAKEOVER IN 2024
One major change in the next 10 months will occur in the “balancing market”, which is used by power firms to buy additional volumes in case electricity demand surges above what’s expected, or the opposite. This ensures that power supply matches demand, preventing blackouts or wasted energy. METI recently provided more details about how exactly the new balancing market will look.
FINANCING JAPAN’S CCS ACTIVITIES
As Japan promotes CCS as a clean energy solution to the decarbonization of heavy industry, cost performance will need to improve. Also, companies need to create viable business models for a storage system that inherently stops generating income once it’s full. Announcing plans for future CCS projects is one thing, finding the financing and developing cost-efficient technologies is another.
GLOBAL VIEW
A wrap of top energy news from around the world.
EVENTS SCHEDULE
A selection of events to keep an eye on in 2023.
PUBLISHER
K. K. Yuri Group
Events
Editorial Team
Yuriy Humber (Editor-in-Chief)
John Varoli (Senior Editor, Americas)
Mayumi Watanabe (Japan)
Wilfried Goossens (Events, global)
Kyoko Fukuda (Japan)
Filippo Pedretti (Japan)
Regular Contributors
Chisaki Watanabe (Japan)
Takehiro Masutomo (Japan)
SUBSCRIPTIONS & ADVERTISING
Japan NRG offers individual, corporate and academic subscription plans. Basic details are our website or write to subscriptions@japan-nrg.com
For marketing, advertising, or collaboration opportunities, contact sales@japan-nrg.com For all other inquiries, write to info@japan-nrg.com
OFTEN USED ACRONYMS
|
METI |
The Ministry of Economy, |
mmbtu |
Million British Thermal Units | |
|
MoE |
Ministry of Environment |
mb/d |
Million barrels per day | |
|
ANRE |
Agency for Natural Resources and Energy |
mtoe |
Million Tons of Oil Equivalent | |
|
NEDO |
New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization |
kWh |
Kilowatt hours (electricity generation volume) | |
|
TEPCO |
Tokyo Electric Power Company |
FIT |
Feed-in Tariff | |
|
KEPCO |
Kansai Electric Power Company |
FIP |
Feed-in Premium | |
|
EPCO |
Electric Power Company |
SAF |
Sustainable Aviation Fuel | |
|
JCC |
Japan Crude Cocktail |
NPP |
Nuclear power plant | |
|
JKM |
Japan Korea Market, the Platt’s LNG benchmark |
JOGMEC |
Japan Organization for Metals and Energy Security | |
|
CCUS |
Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage | |||
|
OCCTO |
Organization for Cross-regional Coordination of Transmission Operators | |||
|
NRA |
Nuclear Regulation Authority | |||
|
GX |
Green Transformation |

Govt to extend multi-trillion-yen subsidies to mitigate hikes in electricity and gas bills
(Denki Shimbun, Sept 1)
Investor activist Market Forces calls on major banks to reconsider loans to JERA
(Bloomberg, Aug 30)
TAKEAWAY: Activist investors in the climate space have had limited success in Japan so far with all the climate resolutions proposed at this year’s company shareholders meetings rejected. However, targeting non-Japanese banks may lead to some degree of cooling in financing for JERA, which has said in the past that it wants to aim for a listing on a stock exchange.
Sendai City to tighten solar installation rules from Oct 1
(Government statement, Sept 1)
TAKEAWAY: Join a Japan NRG webinar on Sept 14, at 5pm Tokyo time, for an in-depth report and discussion of these developments in Miyagi. A sign-up link is available here.
Wakaya governor asks METI to amend or cancel Tokyu Fudosan wind project
(Government statement, Aug 25)
TAKEAWAY: Strong concern from local authorities can lead to the cancellation of a project, as happened to Sojitz Corp. in June of this year. The trading company walked away from plans to develop a 109 MW wind farm in Hokkaido after locals objected to the impact it may have on the local flora and fauna. Should the project in Wakayama also fall through, that will delete over 200 MW of capacity from Japan’s wind pipeline in a matter of a few months. The bigger risk is that project developers will simply decide that pursuing lengthy wind power developments onshore is not worth the trouble, hampering national renewables targets.
Osaka Gas, ENEOS to study project to produce 60 million m3/ year e-methane
(Company statement, Aug 29)
TAKEAWAY: Osaka Gas and ENEOS plan to convert hydrogen into MCH by reacting it with toluene and separating it back into hydrogen in a process called dehydrogenation. Legacy tankers and refinery dehydrogenation units can be used, but there are emissions released during dehydrogenation. Alternative transport options include converting hydrogen into ammonia or liquid hydrogen. Further options for hydrogen storage under research are the use of formic acid and magnetic refrigeration.
E-methane supply chain

TAKEAWAY: This initiative aligns with the MoC signed by the U.S. Department of Energy and METI that focuses on carbon capture, utilization, storage, conversion, recycling, and CO2 removal. However, it remains to be seen if e-methane will be recognized as a carbon-neutral fuel.
Mitsui, IHI and KEPCO to work on hydrogen and ammonia supply chains in Osaka
(Company statement, Aug 30)
METI seeks to double 2030 target for installed EV chargers nationwide
(Nikkei, Aug 28)
Panasonic starts glass-mounted PSC test at Fujisawa City
(Company statement, Aug 31)
TAKEAWAY: This issue will come down to whether the cost of generating electricity from PSC tech is lower than the ¥10-¥25/ kWh power utilities charge today. PSCs are expensive to make because gold or silver are used as electrodes, and other materials made via nano-level process controls are costly. There have also been questions about durability. Developers have reacted to some of these challenges by, for example, putting a protective layer on top of PSC layers to lengthen the product-life of film-based PSC. However, this has in turn further inflated costs and complicated the module production process, one university researcher told Japan NRG. So, Panasonic may be being more realistic by putting its focus on glass-mounted PSCs.
Thin-film PSC challenges and possible solutions
|
Challenges |
Possible solutions |
Drawbacks of the solutions |
|
Endurance |
A protective layer to block moisture |
Cost rises |
|
Aqueous lead solution as a raw material |
Power efficiency falls | |
|
Costs |
Substitute gold/silver electrodes with by graphite |
Application on film-based PSC is difficult |
|
Recycling of lead compounds used in PSC |
Substitute with copper or tin |
Power efficiency falls |
Power-generating glass
Source: Panasonic
Scientists develop new method for all-solid-state battery production
(Nikkei Asia, Aug 30)
Mitsui acquires stake in RNG company in the U.S.
(Company statement, Aug 31)
MOL to join feasibility study for CCS projects in western Japan
(Company statement, Aug 29)

Over 70% of graduated FIT solar power systems intend to continue generation
(Denki Shimbun, Aug 30)
Round 17 solar auctions: lowest bid under ¥9.00/ kWh for the first time
(Japan NRG, Aug 25)
TAKEAWAY: Compared to the previous auction, where there were 20 awarded projects for the full offered capacity of 105 MW, this auction saw a significant decrease in capacity but a doubling of the number of projects. This difference can be attributed to the fact that one single bid by Pacifico Energy was for 89.6 MW, which accounted for 85% of the total solicited capacity.
Country’s top power distribution firms set up new company to aggregate data
(Nikkan Kogyo, Sept 1)
Hokkaido Electric PN to increase capacity of main connection with Honshu
(Nikkei, Aug 31)
Japan Nuclear Fuel resumes uranium enrichment operation after 6-year hiatus
(Denki Shimbun, Aug 28)
Environmental concerns over GPI’s new wind power station in Shimane Pref
(New Energy Business, Sep 1)
Terras Energy plans a 38.7 MW wind power station in Fukui Pref
(Company statement, Aug 25)
Toshiba ESS, CO2OS and DEI to expand solar power business
(Company statement, Aug 24)
NRA to confirm TEPCO ability to operate Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPP, but restart delayed
(Nikkei, Aug 31)
TAKEAWAY: This is part of a very long process that may or may not lead to TEPCO operating a nuclear power generation facility again. Since all previous deadlines for the restart of Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPP have been blown apart, it’s anyone’s guess if this power plant will eventually be allowed to come back online and if TEPCO will be the nameplate operator at the time. What possibly doesn’t help TEPCO’s cause is the fact that the Tokyo area energy system has so far coped mostly well without the NPP’s contributions. Should that situation changes, the govt may be more invested in seeing a faster resolution to the saga around the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa restart.
KEPCO’s Takahama NPP Unit 1 resumes full operation; Unit 2 ready to start
(Company statement, media reports, Sept 3)
Baseload market: agreements in all areas for two-year products
(Various media, Sept 1)
Non-fossil, non-FIT certificates trade at minimum price
(Denki Shimbun, Sept 1)
Omron starts Power Juggling service to reduce electricity cost
(Company statement, Aug 23)


Toyofuji Shipping to introduce its first LNG-powered car transport ships by 2025
(Nikkei, Aug 31)


Australian LNG accounted for 45.6% of total in July
(Government data, Aug 30)
Saudi Arabian crude has 44.2% share in July
(Government data, Aug 30)
LNG stocks rise to 2.01 million tons
(Government data, Aug 30)
BY JAPAN NRG TEAM
Electricity Balancing Power Market Reform:
EPRX to Complete Makeover in 2024
As more renewables are brought online, the nation’s power trading is adjusting to reflect the new market dynamics. And one of the biggest changes in the next 10 months or so will occur in the supply-demand adjustment trading segment, also known as the “balancing market”.
Japan’s full liberalization of the power market in 2016 allowed a variety of new players to trade and sell electricity. This drew interest to the electricity wholesale market, or spot trading, and several years later two exchanges launched for futures contracts, as well as a new platform for power capacity auctions.
Amid all the changes, the “balancing system” is one electricity marketplace that has received little attention. This system is used by power firms to buy additional volumes in case electricity demand surges above what’s expected, or the opposite. This ensures that power supply always matches demand, keeping the grid stable and preventing blackouts or wasted energy.
As the role of variable energy sources like solar and wind generation has increased, so has the demand for flexibility and speed of response to balance the market. This is what drives the changes to Japan’s power supply-demand adjustment market that should be fully in place by fiscal year 2024.
METI recently provided more details about how the new balancing market will look.
Background
Before the electricity market liberalization, regional power utilities, or EPCOs (Electric power companies), maintained the balance of electricity demand and supply using their own power generation capacity, filling the gaps with energy sources such as pumped storage hydro. In worse cases, they requested large electricity consumers, such as factories, to curtail usage. This system was straightforward and efficient, helping Japan boast one of the world’s lowest blackout rates.
Once the power industry expanded to accommodate an influx of hundreds of new electricity retailers, balancing the market became more complex and more important. With the EPCOs told to unbundle their generation from transmission assets, it fell on the newly independent transmission and distribution (T&D) companies to secure balancing power volumes through open auctions.
The smaller volumes in the balancing market made it less attractive for new market entrants, however. Thus, relatively few companies participated in supply-demand adjustment trades. In all regions, the most active and even dominant traders of balance capacity are the long-established EPCO groups.
With prompting from METI, the biggest power industry players decided to shift away from an auction to a market system. This was to allow for the creation of a comprehensive system that covered the entire country (apart from Okinawa), making the process of balancing more efficient and more able to respond to short-term adjustment needs stemming from a greater reliance on solar and wind power.
In 2021, the nine T&D companies related to regional EPCOs, such as TEPCO Power Grid, Kansai Transmission and Distribution, and Kyushu Electric Power Transmission and Distribution, formed a new market system operator – the Electric Power Reserve Exchange (EPRX).
Since then, the EPRX has continuously worked to optimize the procurement of balancing power, leveraging the “merit order” to ensure power system stability at minimal costs. This transition dovetails with the planned integration of all EPCO power control centers in the late 2020s.
According to a recent METI briefing with market participants, changes at the EPRX should be completed in 2024.
“Merit order” refers to the sequence in which different power sources are dispatched based on their short-run marginal costs of production. It’s a system used by grid operators to prioritize the dispatch of power plants to ensure that the least expensive electricity is used first. The merit order is particularly relevant in the context of power markets and electricity supply-demand adjustments.
Renewable sources like wind and solar often appear first in the merit order “stack” because, once installed, their marginal costs are minor. Next might come nuclear and hydropower, followed by natural gas. So-called “peaking” power plants, which are usually gas-fired, are expensive to run but can be started quickly. Traditional thermal power plants that run on coal or oil take longer to start and have higher fuel costs.
The merit order effect becomes especially noticeable with a high penetration of renewable energy in the grid. On sunny and windy days, the influx of cheap renewable energy can push out more expensive sources, leading to lower wholesale electricity prices. However, this dynamic can also present challenges in terms of grid reliability and the financial viability of non-renewable plants, which may still be needed for periods when renewables volumes are low.
Balancing market system pre- and post-2021

New order
One of the biggest changes is the gradual introduction of new segments on the balancing market that correspond with the different conditions of various power sources.
The main balancing segments, or market products, are classified as “primary,” “secondary,” and “tertiary”. The former tends to refer to resources that can offer a near immediate response to power frequency deviations in real-time.
Secondary sources, such as natural gas peaker plants, can be called upon within a short period, often minutes, to adjust for more prolonged imbalances. Tertiary power corresponds to older thermal plants that run on coal or oil that require considerable time to restart, but which can be dispatched to manage long periods of imbalance in electricity supply and demand.
EPRX began its operations with two offerings:
Three more offerings are set to be introduced in 2024:
Each of the above categories has different requirements concerning the duration for which they should be supplied continuously and their control signals, LFC or EDC.
As per the current system, only Tertiary Balancing Power ② is traded on a daily basis, with the rest is traded weekly.

Split by frequencies
Japan’s unique power landscape, shaped over years with regional systems that are operated independently by EPCOs, presents challenges for the market’s evolution. Also, making a nationwide marketplace allows to integrate the trading of electricity, but it cannot overcome the physical challenges inherent in the power system.
The national power grid is bifurcated into 60 Hz and 50 Hz, and the capacity that can pass from one region to the next is limited.
Despite the liberalization and the establishment of EPRX, the primary suppliers for the upcoming 2024 offerings on the balancing market are projected to be the EPCO’s own generation companies. As noted earlier, most bidders for balancing auctions today are the EPCOs themselves.
While the reforms offer an innovative solution, METI will need to closely monitor, and when necessary, refine the balancing system to ensure the changes deliver a fair and competitive market, while also promoting the nation’s decarbonization policies.
But above all, the government and EPRX will need to ensure stability and efficiency in the power grid.

Source: METI
BY KYOKO FUKUDA
Paying for the Void:
Japan Looks for Business Model to Support CCS Projects
Japan spent around ¥100,000 ($686) per ton of CO2 to capture and store carbon emissions in this technology’s first trial a few years ago – five times more than the price of CO2 traded on any global carbon credits exchange. Luckily, the Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) tech demonstration off the coast of Tomakomai port, Hokkaido, was almost entirely state-funded.
As the nation looks this year to promote CCS as a realistic clean energy solution and a technology that’s vital to the decarbonization of heavy industry, such cost performance will need to improve. At the same time, companies will also need to create viable business models for a storage system that inherently stops generating income once it’s full.
For now, the burgeoning sector is creating a buzz in Japan and attracting a wide array of businesses, from utilities like J-Power to cement-makers and pulp & paper companies. This is in part driven by growing state commitments in terms of funding and other support measures.
Announcing plans for future CCS projects is one thing, finding the financing and developing cost-efficient technologies is another. With many details in this industry as yet unclear, Japan NRG has reviewed some of the calculations that will be involved in CCS development.
What is CCS?
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has been tapped as an integral part of Japan’s plan to achieve net zero emissions by 2050. It involves the capture of CO2 from power generation and industrial facilities that use fossil fuels or biomass as fuel; prominent among these are heavy industries like cement, steel or chemicals.
If not used on-site, the captured CO2 is compressed and transported by pipeline, ship, or rail for use in a range of applications, or injected deep into the ground. The two approaches are what separates CCS (i.e. storage only) from CCUS (in which the U stands for utilization).
Unless the carbon is re-used to make plastic, concrete or biofuels, in which it carries value as a raw material for a sellable product, carbon is essentially a cost. The expense of capturing, moving and then storing it has to be covered by the emitter or a third-party that’s invested in removing the CO2 from the atmosphere. In which case, the cost of CO2 could be covered by a carbon credit, which typically represents just that – one ton of CO2 removed from the air.
Credits are usually purchased by companies to offset CO2 emissions from their operations. In this sense, a buyer of carbon credits “sponsors” the removal of CO2 from the atmosphere.
The world’s biggest carbon credits system, the EU’s ETS mechanism, is also among the most expensive. Yet even on the ETS, the highest price to date is around 100 euros (¥15,864) per ton of CO2.
Japan’s carbon credits marketplace, being developed by the Japan Stock Exchange, is currently in test mode with full-scale trading not expected before 2026. In trials earlier this year, carbon credits derived from emission reductions in agriculture received the highest price of ¥50,000 (per 1 ton of CO2) but in very limited trading.
So, for the economics of CCS and CCUS to work, the price of CO2 as a feedstock or the cost of a carbon credit has to be higher than the cost of removing and processing the carbon.
Preparing the soil for CCS
In FY2021, Japan’s total CO2 emissions amounted to about 1.07 billion tons, or roughly 3% of the global total. CCS technology is believed to be capable of capturing an estimated 90% of CO2 emissions from power plants and industry. In fact, CCS is considered the only way to decarbonize Japan’s industrial sector without causing significant financial losses that would leave many industries unable to compete.
Between 2008 and 2020, Japan ran a trial to demonstrate the technical capabilities of CCS at the Tomakomai port on the island of Hokkaido. The experiment received ¥30 billion of state funds to capture and store 300,000 tons of CO2. The emissions were injected as far as 2.6 km below sea level between 2016 and 2019, after which the site was monitored. No leaks were found and the trial was deemed a success.
To follow up, the government has gradually sought to install a CCS regulatory framework:
Further details on the above can be found in last week’s Japan NRG Weekly report.
What are the costs involved?
Interestingly, the government spent as much R&D funds in FY2022 on developing business model configurations for CCUS as on development of its technologies, according to METI’s annual report on energy (published in June 2023).
Below are some of the cost estimates for the industry that METI has come up with through several working group meetings.
In October 2022, the working group worked out a cost estimation based on the assumptions made by Research Institute of Innovative technology for the Earth (RITE) as follows.
|
Yen / ton of CO2 |
Current |
2030 |
2050 |
|
4,000 |
< 3,000 |
< 1,000 |
|
2,600 (500 KtCO2/year) |
2,600 (500 KtCO2/year) |
1,600 (3 MtCO2/year) |
|
9,300 (500 KtCO2/year) |
9,300 (500 KtCO2/year) |
6,000 (3 MtCO2/year) |
|
6,200 (200 KtCO2/year) |
6,200 (200 KtCO2/year) |
5,400 (500 KtCO2/year) |
|
6,900 (200 KtCO2/year) |
6,900 (200 KtCO2/year) |
5,400 (500 KtCO2/year) |
|
TOTAL | |||
|
12,800 |
10,800 |
8,000 |
|
13,500 |
11,500 |
8,000 |
|
19,500 |
17,500 |
12,400 |
|
20,200 |
18,200 |
12,400 |
Reference: METI
The Ministry of Environment will finance development of separation and capturing CO2, which is expected to be the most costly part of CCS tech, along with sea transportation.
Further development of technologies to compress and liquefy CO2, and transport it safely, is required to lower costs, according to METI, which suggests that the government will also take on the bulk of the financing of these R&D efforts.
The total R&D expenses for technologies to transport CO2 by vessel alone are expected to be around ¥18.5 billion, according to METI. Companies involved in this R&D area began preparatory work in 2021 so that actual sea transport of liquid CO2 from the Maizuru thermal power plant (KEPCO) near Kyoto to Tomakomai in Hokkaido (about 1,000 km) can begin in 2024. The trial should lead to the establishment of a set methodology for the process by 2026.
Once this R&D succeeds, the construction cost for a CO2 tank onboard a transport vessel and at onshore facilities will drop to ¥4.1 billion, partly thanks to the scaling up of tank sizes.
Finally, there are the monitoring costs of CO2 once it’s stored underground. METI estimates these at about ¥600 to ¥800 million per year for each CCS site. Twice in five years, a 3D seismic assessment will be required, which increases the total annual cost of monitoring to ¥1 billion to ¥1.2 billion.
Should the industry succeed in its initial phases, and achieve technology breakthroughs, Japan expects that the overall cost of CCS will drop by up to 40% by 2050.
Funding the development
The financing and development of cost-efficient technologies is another major challenge. After all, CCS requires significant capital expenditures in order to develop its infrastructure.
Initially, the government has said that JOGMEC and other state actors will cover the cost of searching for new CCS sites and the geological inspections of candidate areas. Once it moves to a feasibility study stage, the costs will be shared between companies and the government.
JOGMEC has announced an initial five sites in Japan and two abroad to provide up to 13 million tons of CO2 per annum by 2030 in storage capacity, but it then aims to secure up to 20 to 25 sites by 2050 that could receive annually 120 million to 240 million tons.
The government also decided to provide 100% of the capital expenditures needed for the development and construction of CCS sites in Japan. If a project is financed by private sources, JOGMEC will be available to assist by providing funds as needed.
Once a CCS project is operational, state support will come via tax breaks or other voluntary credits. One likely form for the latter will be credits under the Joint Crediting Mechanism (JCM) that Japan has used to coin carbon credits abroad. METI said it also wants to support the launch of an international crediting system for CCS-derived emissions.
The biggest challenge that CCS businesses might face, however, could come at the end once the reservoir’s capacity is full. When there will be no new tonnage of CO2 coming in, the operating company will be deprived of income from its core business. Meanwhile, expenses associated with monitoring the site would remain.
How the business will work for the long-term and be financially sustainable – without state support – is yet to be resolved.
BY JOHN VAROLI
Below are some of last week’s most important international energy developments monitored by the Japan NRG team because of their potential to impact energy supply and demand, as well as prices. We see the following as relevant to Japanese and international energy investors.
Offshore wind
Europe slipped as the world’s largest offshore wind market. As a result of rising costs and supply chain disruptions, the Asia-Pacific region, led by China, is now the leader. In 2022, Europe accounted for about 47% of the 64 GW of total global offshore wind capacity, while Asia-Pacific surpassed it with almost 53%. China alone made up 49%.
EU/ Fossil fuels
Fossil fuels produced just 33% of the EU’s power in the first half of 2023, which is 17% lower YoY, and the lowest share on record since 1990. The main reason was lower electricity demand. Mild weather, consumption-cutting policies and high gas and power prices have encouraged industries and consumers to curb energy use.
EU/ Solar power
The EU has 40 GW of solar panels stored in warehouses due to various bottlenecks and barriers in the supply chain, including labor shortages, critical material delays and long interconnection queues. This is equal to the amount of solar capacity that the EU deployed in 2022. This figure might increase to 100 GW by year’s end.
India/ Net-zero
More than a dozen companies led by industrial conglomerate JSW Group wrote to G20 leaders to push for an end to fossil fuels use without emissions captured, as well as support for green vehicles and clean power. G20 leaders will gather in New Delhi on Sept 9-10.
LNG
In the past year, Germany, the Philippines, and Vietnam began importing LNG. The EIA also expects Australia, Cyprus, and Nicaragua to start importing LNG, and many other countries are in the final stages of developing LNG import capacity. Global LNG import capacity is set to expand by 16%, or 23 bcfd, by late 2024.
Namibia/ Oil
Shell and TotalEnergies will develop a giant oilfield in the Atlantic Ocean off the African country’s coast. This year, Total will spend $300 million — half of its global exploration budget — in Namibia.
Russia/ LNG
In the first seven months of this year, Belgium and Spain were the second and third-biggest buyers of Russian LNG, behind China. Overall, EU imports of LNG were up 40% between January and July compared with the same period in 2021. Before the war in Ukraine, the EU did not import significant amounts of LNG due to its reliance on piped gas from Russia.
Saudi Arabia/ Nuclear power
Riyadh is speaking with China to build a nuclear power plant, a move that might be meant to pressure the U.S. to compromise on its conditions. U.S. nuclear aid is contingent on the Saudis agreeing to not enrich or mine their own uranium, which China doesn’t demand.
U.S./ Offshore wind
The first auction of offshore wind rights in the Gulf of Mexico ended with a single $5.6 million bid, reflecting meager demand in a region known for oil and gas. Germany’s RWE won rights to the site off Louisiana, while the other two areas in Texas received no bids.
U.S./ Power output
Total power generation from January to August 20 declined 2.1%, YoY. But the share of power generated from natural gas averaged 40.4% through mid-August, up from under 36% in the same period in 2022. This was due to low wind power output.
A selection of domestic and international events we believe will have an impact on Japanese energy
Disclaimer
This communication has been prepared for information purposes only, is confidential and may be legally privileged. This is a subscription-only service and is directed at those who have expressly asked K.K. Yuri Group or one of its representatives to be added to the mailing list. This document may not be onwardly circulated or reproduced without prior written consent from Yuri Group, which retains all copyright to the content of this report.
Yuri Group is not registered as an investment advisor in any jurisdiction. Our research and all the content express our opinions, which are generally based on available public information, field studies and own analysis. Content is limited to general comment upon general political, economic and market issues, asset classes and types of investments. The report and all of its content does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell, subscribe for or underwrite any product or physical commodity, or a financial instrument.
The information contained in this report is obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith. No representation or warranty is made that it is accurate or complete. Opinions and views expressed are subject to change without notice, as are prices and availability, which are indicative only. There is no obligation to notify recipients of any changes to this data or to do so in the future. No responsibility is accepted for the use of or reliance on the information provided. In no circumstances will Yuri Group be liable for any indirect or direct loss, or consequential loss or damages arising from the use of, any inability to use, or any inaccuracy in the information.
K.K. Yuri Group: Hulic Ochanomizu Bldg. 3F, 2-3-11, Surugadai, Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 101-0062.
NEWS
・Govt to extend multi-trillion-yen subsidies to mitigate hikes in electricity, gas and fuel bills
・Activist investor Market Forces calls on major banks to reconsider making loans to JERA citing climate concerns
・Over 70% of solar facilities plan to continue operations even after their FIT contract expires