
APRIL 25, 2024
NEWS
TOP
ANALYSIS
ENERGY TRANSITION: NORWAY AND JAPAN BET BIG ON OFFSHORE WIND
Last week, a delegation of Norway’s major offshore wind companies visited Tokyo to meet with METI officials and leading energy companies to showcase Norwegian technology and solutions. Japan and Norway share a number of approaches in energy. Both committed to net zero policies but also will continue exploring hydrocarbon resources. Offshore wind power, however, is their most prominent touchpoint, and both countries are determined to forge ahead with ambitious plans for cooperation.
HOW IDEMITSU’S AMMONIA-FUELED NAPHTHA CRACKER IMPACTS NET ZERO
Japan’s interest and demand for ammonia as a clean-burning fuel has been focused on power generation. But another major user of ammonia in Japan has emerged. In February, Idemitsu Kosan announced Japan’s first success running a naphtha cracker facility with a fuel mix that was 20% based on ammonia. This was largely unexpected. Such a use case is years ahead of the government’s net-zero roadmap for the sector that’s vital for the chemicals industry.
ASIA ENERGY VIEW
A wrap of top energy news that impacts other Asian countries.
EVENTS SCHEDULE
A selection of events to keep an eye on in 2024.
PUBLISHER
K. K. Yuri Group
Editorial Team
Yuriy Humber (Editor-in-Chief)
John Varoli (Senior Editor, Americas)
Mayumi Watanabe (Japan)
Wilfried Goossens (Events, global)
Kyoko Fukuda (Japan)
Magdalena Osumi (Japan
Filippo Pedretti (Japan)
Tim Young (Japan)
Regular Contributors
Chisaki Watanabe (Japan)
Takehiro Masutomo (Japan)
Events
SUBSCRIPTIONS & ADVERTISING
Japan NRG offers individual, corporate and academic subscription plans. Basic details are our website or write to subscriptions@japan-nrg.com
For marketing, advertising, or collaboration opportunities, contact sales@japan-nrg.com For all other inquiries, write to info@japan-nrg.com
OFTEN-USED ACRONYMS
| METI | The Ministry of Economy,
Trade and Industry | mmbtu | Million British Thermal Units | |
| MoE | Ministry of Environment | mb/d | Million barrels per day | |
| ANRE | Agency for Natural Resources and Energy | mtoe | Million Tons of Oil Equivalent | |
| NEDO | New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization | kWh | Kilowatt hours (electricity generation volume) | |
| TEPCO | Tokyo Electric Power Company | FIT | Feed-in Tariff | |
| KEPCO | Kansai Electric Power Company | FIP | Feed-in Premium | |
| EPCO | Electric Power Company | SAF | Sustainable Aviation Fuel | |
| JCC | Japan Crude Cocktail | NPP | Nuclear power plant | |
| JKM | Japan Korea Market, the Platt’s LNG benchmark | JOGMEC | Japan Organization for Metals and Energy Security | |
| CCUS | Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage | |||
| OCCTO | Organization for Cross-regional Coordination of Transmission Operators | |||
| NRA | Nuclear Regulation Authority | |||
| GX | Green Transformation |

Kishida, Biden deepen security ties, seek new synergies in energy transition
(Government statement, April 10)
TAKEAWAY: The bilateral commitment to SAF and ethanol feedstock growth was toned down compared to the 2022 joint statement that said Japan plans to double bioethanol demand by 2030. The statements on China’s activities in the South China Sea and critical mineral supplies were more or less similar.
MLIT to designate Aomori and Sakata ports as offshore wind hubs
(Government statement, April 8)
Green Innovation Fund doubles next-gen aircraft project funding
(Government statement, April 9)
MoE suspends research work with REI over Chinese logo scandal
(Japan NRG, April 10)
NYK to issue transition bonds and green bonds this month
(Company statement, April 10)
TAKEAWAY: LNG-fueled vessels are seen as low-carbon, intermediate solutions on the path to developing zero-emission ships. Thus, funding through transition bonds is an option. The conversion of vessels from running on LNG fuel to ammonia fuel requires extra costs and modification of ship tanks and ventilation systems. Thus the two bond categories can be said to work together, offering different scopes but connected by a single trend narrative.
Sekisui begins study of floating perovskite PV that lacks water-proofing
(Japan NRG, April 9)
TAKEAWAY: Many solar operators are looking for offshore potential since Japan has limited land. However, commercializing a floating PSC system may be more challenging than PSC-integrated buildings, due to difficulties maintaining systems on water and direct exposure to moisture.
World’s first ammonia-fueled ship to sail near Yokohama
(Japan NRG, April 11)
TAKEAWAY: Ammonia lags behind methanol in the race to replace fossil ship fuel. The world’s first methanol-fueled vessel was built in Europe in 2023. Japan’s first methanol ship will be delivered to Nihon Shipyard in 2026.
MOL to build hydrogen-producing ship, Wind Hunter, by 2026

(Japan NRG, April 11)
Govt to standardize hydrogen train safety rules
(Nikkei, April 10)
ENEOS, Haneda airport aim for hydrogen energy system
(Japan NRG, April 10)
Suntory makes whiskey using hydrogen-fueled distillation system
(Company statement, April 11)
KEPCO will join field study for CO2 transportation by ship
(Company statement, April 8)
Mitsubishi Shipbuilding wins ammonia fuel system contracts
(Company statement, April 10)
JX and Sumitomo Corp partner on SAF and BECCS project in Louisiana
(Company statement, )
Audi to open new EV charging hub, first outside of Europe
(Nikkei, April 5)
TAKEAWAY: Audi chose Japan because it sees high demand in urban areas, where many apartment complexes cannot install charging stations.
MHI Low Carbon Solutions awarded FEED for Edmonton CCUS Project in Alberta
(Company statement, April 11)

Electricity consumption may increase 40% by 2050 due to expansion of generative AI
(Nikkei, April 11)
TAKEAWAY: Japan’s current net zero strategy by 2050 was drafted on the assumption that electricity demand won’t increase dramatically. Now, the discussion will shift to whether the stable supply of electricity can be met only by expanding the use of renewables and restarting nuclear power plants.
ANRE looks to abolish “partial supply” system amid expansion of wholesale market
(Government statement, April 9)
ENEOS Power installs one of Japan’s largest BESS
(Company statement, April 8)


February spot price oversupply reflects warm winter
(Japan NRG, April 12)
Liberaware uses drones to investigate inside of Fukushima NPP
(Company statement, April 5)
Toyota Tsusho sets up JV for renewable energy development in Africa
(Company statement, April 5)
Concrete maker Aizawa to lead group that produces floating wind power equipment
(Nikkei, April 8)
Kyoto Fusion Engineering secures ¥1.56 billion in funding
(Company statement, April 11)
Mitsubishi Power to provide equipment for Lamma Power Station in HK
(Company statement, April 9)
Hokuriku Electric investigates smoke at Tsuruga Power Station
(Nikkei, April 8)

Osaka Gas, Sumitomo, etc invest $370 mln in urban gas company in India
(Company statement, April 8)
Coal exports from U.S. to drop following Baltimore bridge collapse
(Nikkei, April 10)
TAKEAWAY: Ever since Japan decided to phase out coal imports from Russia, imports from other countries (notably Australia) have grown. In recent months, coal imports from the U.S. were about 7-9% of the total, thus it’s unlikely that a decrease in U.S. coal exports will have a major impact on Japan.
Hitachi Zosen, M.O.L., etc claim 93.8% methane slip reduction for LNG-fueled ships
(Company statement, April 11)

LNG stocks rose just over 8% in a week
(Government data, April 10)
BY JOHN VAROLI
Energy Transition Focus: Norway and Japan Bet Big on Offshore Wind
Last week, a delegation of Norway’s major offshore wind companies visited Tokyo to meet with METI officials, the Japan Wind Power Association and leading energy companies such as TEPCO Renewable Power, Tokyo Gas, Kansai Electric, etc, in order to showcase Norwegian technology and solutions.
This high profile meeting came just several months after Norway’s Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre visited Tokyo to meet Prime Minister Kishida Fumio and discuss ways to expand cooperation in renewables and clean energy technologies.
Japan and Norway share a number of approaches in energy. Both have committed to net zero policies, but also firmly believe in the right to continue exploring hydrocarbon resources for the sake of energy security. The two countries are also in lockstep when it comes to subsea mining, a practice that targets raw materials below the seafloor that are critical for clean tech such as EV batteries and more.
During his Tokyo visit, PM Støre conveyed to PM Kishida Norway’s interest in cooperation in decarbonizing the countries’ maritime sectors, developing hydrogen fuel for hard-to-abate industries, as well as ramping up battery production, and carbon capture and storage projects.
But perhaps the most prominent and immediate touchpoint between the two countries will be in wind power. Among a flurry of recent Japan-Norway energy deals, the most significant deal was JERA’s subsidiary, Parkwind, joining a European consortium last month to develop a 1.5 GW wind farm off Norway’s southern coast.
Even the offshore wind capacity targets of Norway and Japan are similar: the former seeks 30 GW by 2040; the latter — 35 to 45 GW by the same deadline.
Leaving oil and gas behind
Norway and Japan are mountainous countries with some of the longest coastlines in the northern hemisphere. Both have long been maritime powers that are highly dependent on trade and shipping.
Situated at opposite ends of the Eurasian landmass, Norway and Japan are also bound geopolitically through alliances with the U.S., especially in wake of current efforts to contain and weaken Russia through a myriad of sanctions especially targeting Moscow’s energy sector. While Norway is energy self-sufficient, Japan is highly dependent on energy imports, including natural gas from Russia.
Norway’s economic miracle of the past 60 years has come in large part thanks to crude oil and natural gas production, which accounts for nearly half of the country’s export revenue and about 24% of its GDP. But the need to find alternatives to oil and gas and transition to sustainable energy is leading the country to seek like-minded allies to navigate the shift in a pragmatic way. During that December 2023 meeting in Tokyo, PM Støre described offshore wind power as “an obvious opportunity” for collaboration.
Norway is investing heavily to develop offshore wind and other clean energy tech. The country will allocate licenses for a potential 30 GW of offshore wind by 2040, which is about 75% of the capacity of the current Norwegian power system. Japan is slated to become a major partner in these efforts.
Norway, however, has competition; it’s not the only suitable partner for Japan. In October 2023, the Danish PM visited Tokyo to meet PM Kishida. The two countries said they’ll also cooperate on floating offshore wind power generation, and want to come up with global standards for the sector. Home to giants like wind turbine maker Vestas, and Orsted, the world’s leading wind turbine operator, Denmark is an offshore wind powerhouse that also seeks to develop cooperation with Japan.
Norway’s offshore wind power
Last week, April 8-11, Norwegian Offshore Wind (NOW), a trade group with almost 400 members, visited Japan. Gunnar Birkeland, the NOW chair and CEO of Source Galileo Norway, sees “huge potential for Japan-Norway cooperation specifically in future floating wind projects.”
Kishida’s government agrees and it’s eyeing the vast waters of the country’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) to tap into the potential of floating wind power. In January, METI and the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism wrote a draft framework for managing stakeholder interests in EEZ offshore wind projects. While floating offshore wind platforms will be located further from shore than stationary offshore wind farms, allowing them to harness more powerful winds, the technology is still experimental and in its nascent stage.
Norway hopes that floating offshore wind will help cut emissions at sites of oil and gas production by replacing gas turbines as a source of power supply. For example, in 2023, Hywind Tampen, the world’s largest floating wind farm, was launched by Equinor, INPEX Idemitsu and Wintershall Dea. Anchored to the sea floor at depths of almost 300 meters, the project’s 11 floating turbines have a total of 88 MW capacity that should meet about 35% of the power needs of Equinor’s oil and gas fields in the North Sea.
Another significant development came in early March, when state funding to the tune of 2 billion Norwegian crowns ($193 million) was granted to GoliatVind in the Barents Sea. The project consists of five 15 MW turbines that will supply power to the Arctic town of Hammerfest. GoliatVind is owned by Irish renewables developer Source Galileo and Odfjell Oceanwind, a Norwegian firm developing floating foundations for offshore wind turbines.
Late last year, Kansai Electric (KEPCO) joined GoliatVind when it signed an agreement to invest in Odfjell Oceanwind. KEPCO is not the only Japanese shareholder; earlier in 2023, Mitsui O.S.K. Lines also acquired a stake in Odfjell Oceanwind.
Currently, however, the most lucrative opportunity is in fixed-bottom offshore wind farms. Japanese firms are finding opportunities for collaboration on such projects in Norway. In March, offshore wind developer Ventyr, which is an alliance of Parkwind, IKEA-linked Ingka Investments, and NorSea Group, won a bid to develop the 1.5 GW Southern North Sea II project. The first turbines are expected to be operational by 2030.
Parkwind is Belgium’s largest offshore wind platform, operating four offshore wind projects in that country, totaling 771 MW. JERA acquired Parkwind in July 2023 from Virya Energy.
Japan’s offshore wind sector
Similar size opportunities exist in Japan’s sector, where the government seeks to distribute licenses for 10 GW of wind capacity by 2030 and up to 40 GW by 2040.
With an eye to expand in Japanese waters, Norway’s legacy oil and gas company Equinor is teaming up with JERA and power utility J-Power, which is Japan’s second largest wind power producer. J-Power has operated onshore wind power projects in Akita for several years and was awarded the Kitakyushu Hibikinada 220 MW offshore wind project in 2017.
Equinor opened its Tokyo office in 2018 betting on Japan as a growth market with high potential for both bottom fixed and floating offshore wind. With nearly 20 years of offshore wind experience, Equinor already has a strong offshore wind portfolio with assets in key markets including the UK, Poland, Germany and South Korea.
Breaking into Japan’s burgeoning offshore wind industry, however, is as yet proving difficult. Round 1 results didn’t see a single international firm among the winners. Equinor had teamed up with JERA and J-Power to bid on two offshore wind farms (819 MW Yurihonjo City, and 479 MW Noshiro City) in Akita Prefecture. However, they lost to a consortium led by Mitsubishi Corp, which vacuumed up all the fixed-bottom licenses in the Round 1 tenders.
In Round 2, Germany’s RWE was part of a winning consortium for one of the wind farms – the 684 MW wind farm auction off the coast of Murakami-Tainai in Niigata Pref. Spain’s Iberdrola was part of the group that won the tender for a 375 MW project off the coast of Happo-Noshiro in Akita prefecture.
With so much in common in terms of geography and energy transition needs, Norway and Japan are slated to become key partners in each’s plans to decarbonize their economies, especially since companies from both countries are also deeply involved in ammonia / hydrogen projects, and have common interests in the contentious niche of subsea mining.
This is where reciprocity is likely to play a role in the bilateral relation. JERA’s success in Norway’s offshore wind sector makes one wonder if Tokyo may feel obliged to respond in kind. The Round 3 offshore wind tender in Japan is already open, with results expected towards the end of this year.
A failure to award at least one contract to a group involving a Norwegian player might be construed as a snub, and could stall other bilateral projects in clean energy.
BY MAYUMI WATANABE
How Idemitsu’s Ammonia-fueled Naphtha Cracker Impacts Net Zero
In the past two years, Japan’s interest and demand for ammonia as a clean-burning fuel has been squarely focused on the power generation sector. But another significant user of ammonia in Japan may have recently emerged.
In February, oil refining major Idemitsu Kosan announced the country’s first success at running a commercial naphtha cracker facility with a fuel mix that was 20% based on ammonia. The development was largely unexpected. Such a use case is years ahead of the government’s net-zero roadmap for the sector that’s vital for the chemicals industry.
Now that one industrial facility that requires very high temperatures has been shown to work on an alternative to fossil fuel-derived gases, what’s stopping other industrial furnaces from making the switch? High heat is usually produced by burning methane, and other hydrocarbons. But Idemitsu’s trial shows that ‘hard-to-abate’ industries may not be as far away from decarbonization solutions as their moniker suggests.
More importantly, the result positions Japan among the leaders in cleaning up the chemicals and plastics sector, which accounts for a significant part of the economy and is one of the nation’s top employers. Although domestic consumption of petrochemicals has declined, Japan’s refining companies have long since expanded into regional markets and have plants all over Southeast Asia. Thus, the reach of the solution – and the impact on ammonia demand – could be significant.
Life in plastic, not so fantastic
In the 1990’s, Japan’s production of ethylene – a basic feedstock of plastics made from naphtha, which is originally made from crude oil – hit a record high of above 7 million tons per year, thanks to robust exports to Asia.
Presently, annual ethylene output is under 6 million tons. Competition with China and Southeast Asia, as well as climate change and possible carbon import duties overseas, are forcing the sector to rethink its strategy and find new ways to survive.
Japan is keen to protect its domestic chemicals sector much like it does the automotive companies. The chemicals and plastic products industries employ close to 800,000 people, or about a tenth of all manufacturing jobs in the country. However, it’s clear that a shift away from fossil fuels will require a strategy based on a transition to new clean materials, and high value-added products with little or no carbon footprint.
One highly aspirational example of this strategy is a sports car built with components made from plant-derived cellulose fibers. The Nano Cellulose Vehicle (NCV) project backed by MoE funds produced a concept car in 2019 that boasted a number of parts, including the hood, that could be recycled. Among the firms involved were those that make plastics from crude oil (via naphtha and ethylene, etc.).

Source: Govt of Japan’s Kizuna magazine
Until the costs to make such materials are reduced, the petrochemicals sector will have to find other ways to manage its CO2 footprint. In FY2022, petrochemical emissions (excluding cement) were 55 million CO2-equivalent tons, or about 22% of Japan’s non-power industrial emissions. The sector was the worst emitter after power generation and steel.
One approach to combat emissions is to subsidize the installation of CCS technology at petrochem plants. But the government is asking industry to come up with structural solutions: shift its energy sources to clean-burning ammonia/hydrogen from fossil fuels; develop new chemical feeds to replace ethylene; establish a chemical recycling ecosystem; and focus on niche products where Japan can retain high market shares.
Out of the 55 million tons CO2e that the chemical sector emits, 10 million tons are from producing ethylene (the foundation block for most household and industrial chemicals). Ethylene is made by breaking up naphtha molecules through a process called “cracking”. The latter requires a furnace that’s heated to 850ºC. The fuel most commonly used to achieve this temperature today is methane, which when released into the atmosphere is multiple times more damaging than CO2.
Japan’s naphtha market
There are 12 naphtha crackers owned by six business groups in the country, with a total ethylene output capacity of around 61 million tons / year.
Naphtha cracker capacities as of July 2022 (thousand tons / year)
| Company | Ethylene output capacity (location) |
| Maruzen Petroleum | 690 (Keiyo Ethylene, Chiba) |
| 480 (Chiba) | |
| Mitsubishi Chemical Group | 485 (Kashima) |
| 496 (Mizushima) | |
| 493 (Yokkaichi) | |
| Idemitsu Kosan | 623 (Tokuyama) |
| 374 (Chiba) | |
| Resonac | 618 (Oita) |
| Mitsui Chemical | 455 (Osaka) |
| 553 (Chiba) | |
| ENEOS | 404 (Kawasaki) |
| 491 (Tonen General, Kawasaki) |
Source: Japan Petrochemical Industry Association
Idemitsu’s ammonia test
Idemitsu Kosan has been a strong ammonia proponent, even as its domestic peers focused on other hydrogen carriers: ENEOS – methylcyclohexane (MCH); Cosmo Oil – liquefied hydrogen.
Idemitsu wants to turn its Tokuyama refinery (Yamaguchi Pref) into an ammonia supply base, importing 1 million tons a year from the U.S. Oil product storage tanks would be converted into ammonia tanks and pipelines installed to deliver ammonia to consumers.
Other ammonia advocates are Mitsui Chemicals and Maruzen Petrochemical that are studying ammonia as a full methane replacement in naphtha crackers. The government is funding ¥16.6 billion or 70% of the 100% ammonia-fueled naphtha cracking project cost through the Green Innovation Fund (GIF).
Idemitsu is not receiving GIF funds for its R&D into ammonia fuel in naphtha crackers, but it is logical for the company to explore this technology as it already has access to ammonia supply.
Over Feb 6-8, Idemitsu tested the operation of a naphtha cracker at its Tokuyama refinery fueled by 20% ammonia and the rest from “off gases”. The country’s second largest naphtha cracker had just undergone a major revamp, carried out by IHI Plant Engineering, which boosted its performance and energy efficiency. The work also included installing an ammonia burner to diversify the fuel mix.
According to Idemitsu, the final fuel mix had ammonia at above 20% but below 30% of the total. Unlike Mitsui Chemicals, Idemitsu is not looking to run its cracker on 100% ammonia fuel, because development costs would be higher, a company spokeswoman told Japan NRG. She added that 700 kg / hour of ammonia was used, but declined to give the actual consumption figure, or the cracker run rate during the test.
Idemitsu said the test was successful as the cracker operated normally despite the updated fuel mix. The NOx release from burning ammonia was also within environmental norms. Full details of the test, such as the composition of the off-gases, the amount of ethylene produced, etc, were not available. But the results imply that ammonia is good enough to start replacing some methane at naphtha crackers.
Rivals Mitsui Chemicals, Maruzen Petrochemical, Toyo Engineering and Sojitz Machinery are hoping to go one (or several) step better. They are focused on tech that would allow for the use of ammonia as the sole fuel, but this will require more time. At present, the group plans to create a test ammonia burner for a naphtha cracker that would produce 10,000 tons of ethylene a year by around 2025. This wouldn’t be upgraded to a commercial size furnace until 2030, which would mean that commercial operations of a full-size ammonia cracker may not be available until 2040.
Possible impact on ammonia demand
According to METI, 6.7 million tons / year of ammonia are required if three 1-million-ton-per-year naphtha crackers run at full capacity and use ammonia. That translates into 2.23 million tons of ammonia for each million tons of ethylene.
Japan NRG calculated the potential ammonia demand from existing naphtha crackers based on this figure, as shown in the table below. If by 2030 ammonia replaces cracker fuel entirely, the industry will require over 13 million tons / year of ammonia. If there is a 20% shift across plants, that demand level would still be at 2.75 million
tons / year.
If only Idemitsu’s Tokuyama shifts to 20% ammonia, demand would be around 280,000 tons / year.
Potential ammonia demand (million tons)
| Company | Capacity (location) | Ammonia demand (20% mix) | Ammonia demand (100%) |
| Maruzen Petroleum | 0.69 (Keiyo Ethylene, Chiba) | 0.31 | 1.54 |
| 0.48(Chiba) | 0.21 | 1.07 | |
| Mitsubishi Chemical Group | 0.485 (Kashima) | 0.21 | 1.08 |
| 0.496 (Mizushima) | 0.22 | 1.11 | |
| 0.493 (Yokkaichi) | 0.22 | 1.10 | |
| Idemitsu Kosan | 0.623 (Tokuyama) | 0.28 | 1.39 |
| 0.374 (Chiba) | 0.17 | 0.83 | |
| Resonac | 0.618 (Oita) | 0.28 | 1.38 |
| Mitsui Chemical | 0.455 (Osaka) | 0.20 | 1.01 |
| 0.553 (Chiba) | 0.25 | 1.23 | |
| ENEOS | 0.404 (Kawasaki) | 0.18 | 0.9 |
| 0.491 (ex-Tonen General, Kawasaki) | 0.22 | 1.09 | |
| TOTAL | 6.12 | 2.75 | 13.73 |
Disclaimer: Actual ammonia consumption may be lower than the METI scenario.
2030 naphtha cracker ammonia demand scenarios
| Scenarios | Ammonia demand projection (million tons / year) |
| All naphtha crackers shift to full ammonia fuel | 13 |
| All crackers use 20% ammonia | 2.75 |
| Mitsui Chemical’s Osaka cracker shifts to full ammonia fuel, Idemitsu’s Tokuyama cracker to 20% ammonia | 1.29 |
| Only Idemitsu’s Tokuyama shifts to 20% ammonia | 0.28 |
Conclusion
Japan NRG sent a questionnaire to companies running naphtha crackers to ask if they plan to shift to ammonia fuel. So far, ENEOS has replied they have no such plans. Idemitsu says there’s a “possibility” that 20% ammonia use could be introduced at its other cracker, in Chiba. Other firms were less forthcoming with answers.
According to METI’s scenario, ammonia demand in 2030 will triple to 3 million tons / year from the present 1 million ton / year, thanks to demand from power generation, shipping, industrial furnaces and fuel cell segments. The ministry, however, has not elaborated on exactly how much will come from each segment.
Idemitsu’s success has provided clarity to METI’s vague forecast. The power sector is seen generating the largest demand, of up to 1.3 million tons / year by 2030, provided there are two 1-GW-sized units co-firing at 20% and three smaller (100 MW) plants.
Naphtha cracking and other industrial furnaces could well be the second-largest demand center, with at least 200,000 tons / year. While concrete use cases in shipping and elsewhere are yet to appear, the chemical industry is starting to show more than potential – it is offering solid data and momentum.
BY JOHN VAROLI
This weekly column focuses on energy events in Asia and the Pacific, and all that impact markets in the region.
ASEAN / Energy demand
Energy demand in the ASEAN countries could increase 21% this year over 2021, with fossil fuels to dominate. The ASEAN Centre for Energy said oil will hold the largest share in energy consumption at 45.8%.
Bangladesh / Natural gas
Total electricity generation from natural gas is expected to grow to 93 TWh by 2032, up from 70 TWh in 2023. It will be driven by state plans to build more gas-fired power plants. The power sector is Bangladesh’s largest natural gas consumer, comprising 39% of total consumption last year.
China / Coal
The state planner finalized a rule to set up a domestic coal reserve system by 2027 in order to stabilize thermal coal prices and supplies to power plants. The rule calls for 300 MMT of dispatchable annual coal production by 2030, equal to about 6% of last year’s output.
Coal
In 2023, total global coal power plant capacity saw a net increase of 48.4 GW, the highest growth since 2016, bringing the total to 2.13 TW, said Global Energy Monitor. About 69.5 GW of coal power came online last year, two-thirds of which, or around 47 GW, were from China; meanwhile, 21 GW was retired during that period.
India / Hydropower
India has 15 GW of hydroelectric power projects under construction; if realized, it would increase the country’s total hydro capacity by over 50% to 67 GW by 2032, up from the current total of 42 GW.
India / Pumped storage
Pumped storage capacity might reach 55 GW by 2032, up from today’s 4.7 GW. India has 2.5 GW of pumped storage capacity under construction; an additional 48 GW of such projects are in the planning stage.
Indonesia / LNG-fueled station
PT Jawa Satu Power started operations of an LNG-fueled power plant (1.76 GW) that’s 100 km east of Jakarta. This is significant because Indonesia relies on coal-fired power generation to meet 60% of its energy needs.
Myanmar / Natural gas
Chevron has quit the Yadana natural gas field. Rather than being sold, Chevron’s 41.1% stake was redistributed to the other shareholders — Thailand’s PTT Exploration and Production and state-owned Myanma Oil and Gas Enterprise. PTTEP, the gas field’s operator, said its Yadana stake had increased to 62.96%.
Natural gas demand
By 2050, the global power sector will account for 40% to 50% of natural gas demand, with Asia to account for the largest growth, said McKinsey, adding that power sector demand growth is driven by increasing electrification requirements in building and industry.
Philippines / Power
Power company First Gen said it targets to reach 13 GW of total power capacity by 2030 but it will need investment of $20 billion; this includes work on the 1.2 GW Santa Maria natural gas power station in Batangas province.
A selection of domestic and international events we believe will have an impact on Japanese energy
| January |
|
| February |
|
| March |
|
| April |
|
| May |
|
| June |
|
| July |
|
| August |
|
| September |
|
| October |
|
| November |
|
| December |
|
Disclaimer
This communication has been prepared for information purposes only, is confidential and may be legally privileged. This is a subscription-only service and is directed at those who have expressly asked K.K. Yuri Group or one of its representatives to be added to the mailing list. This document may not be onwardly circulated or reproduced without prior written consent from Yuri Group, which retains all copyright to the content of this report.
Yuri Group is not registered as an investment advisor in any jurisdiction. Our research and all the content express our opinions, which are generally based on available public information, field studies and own analysis. Content is limited to general comment upon general political, economic and market issues, asset classes and types of investments. The report and all of its content does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell, subscribe for or underwrite any product or physical commodity, or a financial instrument.
The information contained in this report is obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith. No representation or warranty is made that it is accurate or complete. Opinions and views expressed are subject to change without notice, as are prices and availability, which are indicative only. There is no obligation to notify recipients of any changes to this data or to do so in the future. No responsibility is accepted for the use of or reliance on the information provided. In no circumstances will Yuri Group be liable for any indirect or direct loss, or consequential loss or damages arising from the use of, any inability to use, or any inaccuracy in the information.
K.K. Yuri Group: Hulic Ochanomizu Bldg. 3F, 2-3-11, Surugadai, Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 101-0062.
NEWS
・Kishida, Biden deepen energy security ties; seek synergies between GX Strategy and IRA
・Electricity consumption may increase 40% by 2050 due to expansion of generative AI
・ANRE mulls scrapping “partial supply” system amid expansion of wholesale market