
ANALYSIS
AFTER A STRONG FIRST YEAR, SALES OUTLOOK FOR JAPAN’S GX BONDS APPEARS MIXED
ENERGY JOBS IN JAPAN:
OPPORTUNITIES IN DIVERSITY
ASIA PACIFIC REVIEW
This column provides a brief overview of the region’s main energy events from the past week
NEWS
WIND POWER AND OTHER RENEWABLES
CARBON CAPTURE & SYNTHETIC FUELS
EVENTS
| Mar 5 | “REvision2025” International Symposium hosted by Renewable Energy Institute @ Tokyo, Japan |
| Mar 31 | End of Japan’s fiscal year 2024 |
| May 3-6 | May Golden Week Holidays |
SUBSCRIPTIONS & ADVERTISING
Japan NRG offers individual, corporate and academic subscription plans. Basic details are our website or write to subscriptions@japan-nrg.com
For marketing, advertising, or collaboration opportunities, contact sales@japan-nrg.com For all other inquiries, write to info@japan-nrg.com
JAPAN NRG WEEKLY
PUBLISHER
K. K. Yuri Group
Editorial Team
Yuriy Humber (Editor-in-Chief)
John Varoli (Senior Editor, Americas)
Kyoko Fukuda (Japan)
Magdalena Osumi (Japan)
Filippo Pedretti (Japan)
Tim Young (Japan)
Tetsuji Tomita (Japan)
Regular Contributors
Chisaki Watanabe (Japan)
Takehiro Masutomo (Japan)

OFTEN-USED ACRONYMS
METI | The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry | mmbtu | Million British Thermal Units |
MoE | Ministry of Environment | mb/d | Million barrels per day |
ANRE | Agency for Natural Resources and Energy | mtoe | Million Tons of Oil Equivalent |
NEDO | New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization | kWh | Kilowatt hours (electricity generation volume) |
TEPCO | Tokyo Electric Power Company | FIT | Feed-in Tariff |
|
KEPCO |
Kansai Electric Power Company |
FIP |
Feed-in Premium |
|
EPCO |
Electric Power Company |
SAF |
Sustainable Aviation Fuel |
|
JCC |
Japan Crude Cocktail |
NPP |
Nuclear power plant |
|
JKM |
Japan Korea Market, the Platt’s LNG benchmark |
JOGMEC |
Japan Organization for Metals and Energy Security |
|
CCUS |
Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage | ||
|
OCCTO |
Organization for Cross-regional Coordination of Transmission Operators | ||
|
NRA |
Nuclear Regulation Authority | ||
|
GX |
Green Transformation |
NEWS: GENERAL POLICY AND TRENDS

METI announces Cabinet approval of 7th Basic Energy Plan
(Government statement, Feb 18)
TAKEAWAY: The 7th Basic Energy Plan, the Plan for Global Warming Countermeasures, and the GX2040 Vision were all approved by the Cabinet at the same time and are seen as equal parts of the national energy strategy. They aim to simultaneously achieve stable energy supply, economic growth, and decarbonization. The numerical targets are strict, but serve as guidelines for achieving carbon neutrality by 2050. As the documents suggest, considerable further technology breakthroughs will be needed to achieve decarbonization.
PM to launch public-private council to develop data centers and power plants
(Government statement, Feb 20)
Emissions trading: revised bill approved by Cabinet
(Government statement, Feb 25)
NEWS: ELECTRICITY MARKETS

OCCTO taps Japanese group to build country’s longest undersea cable
(Japan NRG, Government statement, Feb 26)
TAKEAWAY: Japan requires a major upgrade of its transmission network in order to fully develop renewable energy systems. The subsea routes, such as the one between Japan’s north and central regions, face high costs and technical challenges. The govt will have to provide financial support. The appearance of an international bidder had sparked the possibility that the grid may be open to bidders outside of Japan’s major utilities. But by saying that only one bidder was deemed qualified, OCCTO seemed to suggest that subsea cables will remain a strategic infrastructure where the govt prefers to deal with domestic companies.
TAKEAWAY: The global undersea cable market is projected to grow from $2.7 billion in 2022 to $3.2 billion in 2028, fueled by the rise of AI-driven telecommunications.
ANRE eases requirements for reserve power supply
(Government statement, Feb 26)
TAKEAWAY: Until the latest round of public-private discussions, there was a reluctance on the side of the bureaucrats to change participation requirements for this system. Officials have partially agreed to accept utility demands but with conditions. Whether that is enough to draw bids for the next auction for backup power sources is unclear, but it seems unlikely.
ANRE expands scope of eligible power sources for next LTDA
(Government statement, Feb 26)
TAKEAWAY: Current LTDA auction bidders are undergoing government surveys to clarify their applications, with winners likely to be announced in mid April. LTDA has attracted interest from a broad range of energy sectors and stakeholders and is proving to be a catalyst for BESS, pumped hydro, nuclear and now possibly CCS projects. Many hope the auction system will continue and be expanded as a natural successor to the FIT framework.
Spot electricity trading rises for third consecutive month
(Denki Shimbun, Feb 25)
Hokuriku Electric might expand LNG use at Toyama Shinko power plant
(Denki Shimbun, Feb 28)
JERA fails to submit bids in wholesale power market due to system error
(Company statement, Feb 22)
Chubu Electric begins test of regional microgrid in Iida
(Company statement, Feb 25)
NEWS: HYDROGEN

Everfuel begins green hydrogen production, backed by Itochu and Osaka Gas
(Nikkei, Feb 28)
Toyota develops hydrogen engines for industrial vehicles
(Nikkei, Feb 25)
NYK and Seatrium secure AiP for ammonia-fueled bunkering vessel
(Company statement, Feb 25)
DNP and Yokohama Univ develop hydrogen leak detection system
(Company statement, Feb 25)
Denyo and Teijin develop portable hydrogen fuel cell generator
(Company statement, Feb 17)
NEWS: SOLAR AND BATTERIES

Marubeni inks deal on procurement and sale of non-FIT solar power plants for HEXA
(Company statement, Feb 19)
TAKEAWAY: HEXA Renewables has taken a collaborative approach to ramp up capacity in Japan’s renewable energy landscape. This is likely the effect of private equity ownership, which seeks an accelerated capacity build up and in Japan that requires multiple strategic tie-ups. HEXA is owned by I Squared Capital.
Yonden Engineering begins field test for PSCs on wind turbines
(Company statement, Feb 27)
Idemitsu Kosan to build lithium sulfide production facility in Chiba
(Company statement, Feb 27)
NEWS: WIND POWER AND OTHER RENEWABLES
Osaka Gas aims to nearly triple renewable energy capacity by 2040
(Nikkei, Feb 27)
JERA issues ¥12.2 billion transition-linked bond with 10-year maturity
(Company statement, Feb 20)
TAKEAWAY: The timing of JERA’s first transition-linked bond last year coincided with the first issuance of GX Bonds, the government’s climate transition bonds. (For an update on how well the GX fundraising program is going, see this week’s Analysis section).
Kansai Electric joins Hirakata Zero Carbon Promotion Project
(Company statement, Feb 26)
NEWS: NUCLEAR ENERGY

TEPCO’s Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPP faces further delays
(Company statement, Feb 27)
TAKEAWAY: These delays further complicate the situation at Kashiwazaki-Kariwa and, as a consequence, TEPCO’s financials. In theory, Unit 7’s restart is still possible this summer, but the reactor must stop when the regulatory deadline (Oct 13) for the facility’s completion passes. The utility (and the govt) will hope that they can push through a restart for Unit 7 before that Oct deadline to cover the peak power demand period during the summer months. But for that, they still need Niigata governor’s public sign up. Meanwhile, TEPCO will likely put more effort into restarting Unit 6, which should load nuclear fuel in June. As Unit 6 has more flexible regulatory deadlines, TEPCO would like to have it operating starting October 2025 when Unit 7 must shut down. As the next step, TEPCO hopes that Unit 7 will be back online in 2029 and substitute Unit 6 as the latter comes up against its own regulatory deadline. Both of the units would not be online simultaneously until Sept 2031 in a best-case scenario.
TAKEAWAY: Approval helps TEPCO in loading fuel and then restarting Unit 6, something the company sees as crucial due to the mandatory shut-down of Unit 7 in October.
Chugoku Electric restores monitoring equipment at Shimane NPP
(Company statement, Feb 22)
NEWS: TRADITIONAL FUELS

ENEOS to partially suspend ethylene production at Kawasaki refinery
(Jiji, Feb 26)
NTT Docomo enters the gas retail business
(Denki Shimbun, Feb 26)
LNG stocks down from previous week, down YoY
(Government data, Feb 26)
NEWS: CARBON CAPTURE & SYNTHETIC FUELS

Designation of a specific area for CCS off Hokkaido
(Government statement, Feb 21)
Govt to expand ‘blue carbon’ CO2 absorption by 2040
(Denki Shimbun, Feb 28)
ANRE proposes calculation method for non-fossil value of CCS
(Government statement, Feb 26)
MOL and KEPCO ink MoU for carbon credit business
(Company statement, Feb 27)
Cosmo Energy mulls SAF and biodiesel production
(Company statement, Feb 21)
BY WILL FEE
After a Strong First Year, Sales Outlook for Japan’s GX Bonds Appears Mixed
In February 2024, the Japanese government announced a bold plan to sell ¥20 trillion worth of bonds directly tied to funding a 10-year, ¥150 trillion GX (green transformation) agenda. The program is meant to accelerate the nation’s decarbonization drive to meet a legally mandated net-zero target by 2050.
After a year, about ¥3 trillion worth of the 5- and 10- year bonds, known as ‘GX bonds’ or ‘GX economic transition bonds’, have been sold over six separate rounds of auctions. That means 15% of the 10-year target has already been reached inside the first 12 months, putting the fundraising ahead of schedule.
But the strong start is showing signs of slowing down. Takeup from outside Japan (which was around 20% of GX bond sales) has been lower than hoped. It’s a sign that overseas investors are either unconvinced by the GX plan or simply oblivious to it. In the world of proliferating green, transition, sustainability and related finance, there’s been a lack of clear messaging around GX bonds or marketing of them internationally.
International fundraising for decarbonization has admittedly become more difficult since the re-election of President Donald Trump. The returning U.S. president has rolled back many of his predecessor’s climate initiatives and waged war on principles like ESG, instead calling on investors and businesses to recalibrate towards pure profits. The U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright has even dubbed 2050 net zero aspirations as a “terrible” idea that is costly and inefficient.
With recent elections in Germany suggesting a rebalancing in Europe’s energy stance, the collective move toward international decarbonization, once so assured, is on shakier ground.
All this could, despite the wider uncertainty, prove a tailwind for Japan and its green finance sector.
Despite a change of administration in October that resulted in a minority government, the country remains socially cohesive and politically stable. State spending on clean energy is at record levels. METI’s request at the end of last year for an additional ¥982 billion from the supplementary budget for the GX program speaks of a desire to uphold energy transition goals packaged under the GX banner by the previous Prime Minister Kishida.
As such, investors who wish to maintain their green energy goals could pivot away from unpredictable markets in North America and Europe towards Japan. But officials in Tokyo will need to amplify their GX messaging if they hope to capitalize on Japan’s status as a financial safe haven.
Headwinds
After a strong start, weaker sales of the GX bonds are projected over coming years. Only four auctions are scheduled for this coming fiscal year (April 2025 through March 2026) to raise ¥1.2 trillion, compared to six issuances for a total of nearly ¥3 trillion in the 12 months from February 2024. That’s a 60% dropoff.
GX Bond Auctions to Date
Date | Duration | Issue number | Nominal coupon | Amount raised (billion yen) |
February 14, 2024 | 10-year | 1 | 0.7% | 799.5 |
February 27, 2024 | 5-year | 1 | 0.3% | 799.8 |
May 28, 2024 | 10-year | 2 | 1.0% | 349.6 |
July 18, 2024 | 5-year | 2 | 0.5% | 349.6 |
October 22, 2024 | 10-year | 2 | 1.0% | 350.0 |
January 29, 2025 | 5-year | 2 | 0.5% | 349.8 |
Scheduled GX Bond Auctions
Date | Duration | Planned issue amount |
July 2025 | 5-year | Approx. ¥300 billion yen |
October 2025 | 10-years | Approx. ¥300 billion yen |
January 2026 | 5-year | Approx. ¥300 billion yen |
March 2026 | 10-years | Approx. ¥300 billion yen |
The scheduled bond sales will alternate between 5-year and 10-year maturities, and no sales are currently announced for FY2026, which will start in April 2026.
Assuming the average pace of GX bonds sales from the first two years is maintained, the government should meet its ¥20-trillion, 10-year fundraising target. However, should the sales mirror the pace planned for FY2025, then there would be a shortfall of almost 30%.
How government bonds perform affects financing by the private sector. The volume of green and other decarbonization related bonds by Japanese companies has already weakened.
NTT Finance, for example, was once Japan’s leading investor in green bonds. Out of a total of around ¥2 trillions raised in green finance, the company – a financial subsidiary of the formerly public telecoms monopoly NTT Corp – issued ¥600 billion in green bonds in 2023 alone. In 2024, that number dropped to zero.
The reasoning provided by companies like NTT is that certain financial products like green bonds are too restrictive. Green bonds, for example, apply specifically to investments in renewable energy, energy efficiency, wastewater management and similar. This limits the actions that businesses may want to undertake in other elements of ESG. In some cases, companies also want to invest in decarbonization technologies that are not currently accepted within the ‘green’ label.
Another reason for a slowdown in issuances has been waning investor enthusiasm due to the difficulty of re-sale. While a return on investment is possible with environmental bonds issued on the primary market, by the time they reach the secondary market, the chances of turning a profit are greatly reduced.
That is why a large chunk of the GX bond purchases so far, just like general Japanese government bonds, were made by the Bank of Japan (BoJ) and other government-affiliated entities. At the first auction last February, around 50% of the purchases were made by either the BoJ (35%) or the Government Pension Investment Fund (GPIF, 14%).
Given the perceived lack of a ‘greenium’ (green premium) – a lower yield, and therefore cheaper borrowing costs based on the issuer’s ability to meet its climate targets – Japanese state entities have experienced trouble reselling the bonds, particularly to overseas investors. A lack of international awareness of the GX program and scepticism among some in the green finance community about the merits of the GX strategy have also played a role.
Overseas Investment
The GX moniker was popularized by the previous Kishida administration to refer to the nation’s long-standing decarbonization efforts. It dovetailed with another state program, the DX (digital transformation) initiative, and was largely synonymous with the terms “net zero” and “decarbonization” in Japanese energy lexicon.
The GX bonds are meant to service a wide range of state initiatives in clean energy, which span renewables, the introduction of hydrogen and ammonia as fuels, synthetic fuels, and even a greater use of nuclear power. That broad reach places them into the category of ‘transition bonds’ rather than the stricter ‘green bonds.’ The ‘transition’ label allows for various technologies and applications as long as they deliver decarbonization benefits.
For many western investors, however, the ‘transition’ label feels fuzzy. It also allows for financing of more contentious technologies, such as the burning of ammonia or hydrogen alongside coal or natural gas (also known as co-firing). This technology is opposed by many environmental groups and consultancies such as BloombergNEF.
To add to the confusion, according to the Climate Bonds Initiative, the international organization that reviewed the issuance, GX Bonds do not allow for the allocation of funding to co-firing but they can be used to finance R&D into such technologies. The Climate Bonds Initiative says the GX Bond is, to all extents and purposes, a ‘green bond’. But given the R&D allowance and the broader remits of the GX program in general, investors find it tough to draw the lines.
With the pool of specifically ‘green’ financing much larger globally than ‘transition’ financing, Japan will need to either persuade international investors of the merits of the latter or create bonds that cater to international investor interests.
Looking Forward
The Trump administration’s anti-green energy turn has changed the calculus for global investors and corporations. Last year, BlackRock, the world’s largest investment firm, significantly scaled back its fund allocation to environmental and social issues. On February 27, BP said it would cut investments in renewables and return focus to oil and gas.
It’s possible that pressure from the Trump administration or elsewhere will persuade Japan to tone down its environmental policies and affect GX bond sales. But recent geopolitical developments could well prove a tailwind for the program. Amid major international shifts, the stability offered by Japan’s transition bonds will create a sizable niche.
After all, not all businesses are abandoning their environmental and sustainability goals. With brisk deregulation in the U.S., Japan’s more stable and steady approach could make the country appear as a safe haven for environmental financing.
What’s more, Japan’s commitments are deeper than top-level policy. Japanese regions are struggling with demographic and other socioeconomic challenges and are invested heavily in the GX vision as a driver of economic revitalization. The regions are boosting their own spending to attract companies working in GX-related products and services.
Areas such as Hokkaido and Kyushu are competing for the mantle of national GX leader, and global green finance leaders are more attentive than before to adjusting various categories to support this enthusiasm.
Last month, Kyoto City sold ¥6 billion in what were labeled as green bonds although the use of funds is labeled as climate adaptation-oriented riparian works. That area, often translated as “resilience,” did not get explicitly included in the ‘green’ bond framework until late in 2024, when the Climate Bond Initiative released an update to its green bond taxonomy. The update specifically addressed “climate resilience investment opportunities” as an area for financing.
The broadening of what is termed ‘green’ or what is designated as ‘climate-aligned’ will always be disputed and some of the GX approach may raise eyebrows. Still, at a time of uncertainty, Japan’s commitment to GX – and better marketing – could make for an attractive global proposition.
BY ANDREW STATTER
Energy Jobs in Japan: Opportunities in Diversity
Smart Energy Expo at Tokyo Big Sight has always been a major event covering the full energy and electricity value chains, but this year it was noticeably larger and more diverse.
The BESS sector has been flooded with new players, primarily from China looking to capitalize on the growing energy storage market. Hydrogen and ammonia technologies are having healthy growth of global and domestic technology players as METI’s CfD scheme sends positive signals to the market.
Grid technology has been clearly highlighted in both the GX and Strategic Energy Plan, which has led to clear growth in both hardware and software solutions in this space.
As we had previously shared, the new Strategic Energy Plan is shifting to an outlook where total energy demand will increase, and therefore moving toward a technology inclusive strategy with a sense of A+B rather than A or B as the path forward for Japan.
How does this play out in the human resource market?
More players, same talent = Supply & demand imbalance
Renewable and BESS developers, power trading firms, fuel cell technology companies, weather and load forecasting technologies, and hardware OEMs – All these are areas with more players now than just a couple of years ago. The first movers in any given area had the advantage to pick up the bilingual, experienced and qualified talent who were willing to take on a new challenge.
Today, in many segments that willing minority have already made their move, yet more players hunger for the same talent. The result? It’s the same as the imbalance in the supply and demand of electricity, we see a price spike. Companies looking to attract the top talent, those who are ready to ‘plug and play’, will have to pay a premium to attract them, and are likely to face competition to secure the best hires.
A key example of this imbalance is clear in electrical engineering talent that has an understanding of grid connection and operations. TSOs have traditionally had a large workforce of this type of professional, however this pool is being headhunted out to developers faster than TSOs can replace them – with talent enticed by flatter business models, higher salaries and more operational freedom. Not only does this affect the competition for this talent pool, but it also leaves the TSOs understaffed. With record-high grid connection requests, as PV solar development shifts to higher volume, the smaller scale projects and LTDA bids for BESS projects are increasing and the TSO grid teams are becoming overworked, creating a clear bottleneck beyond talent demand.
The next outside talent revolution?
In the early 2010s, with the wild west era of Japan’s lucrative FIT program for renewable energy projects, the same massive demand on a small talent pool was also clearly seen. The result was a highly diverse hiring strategy from developers keen to seize upon the opportunity that the FIT presented. People shifted primarily from sales and real estate to take on positions in land origination, project development, etc. For the Japanese talent pool, the focus was taken off industry experience and hard skills, and people were hired for potential to learn and soft skills such as communication and commercial sense. Global developers and EPC firms brought experienced people from overseas with hard skills and experience in solar project development, management, design and construction, regardless of language skills.
As we enter into a more diverse, data-driven and connected energy system, the current talent market already in the energy industry is again not enough to satisfy the demand of all players in the market. The need to attract and hire those with transferable skills from other industries, or bring in talent from energy markets abroad, is increasing again.
Clarity, attraction and education the keys to success
In order to hire from non-obvious talent pools, hiring companies will need to be clear on what core skills are necessary, and what is trainable. Can a commodity trader who understands trading, credit and merchant risk become an asset once you teach her the intricacies of the power market? How much value can a structural engineer with experience in European floating wind projects add if you invest in hiring an interpreter to work alongside him?
Next, the education and attraction pieces will need to go hand in hand. Ambitious talent flocked to the solar industry in the FIT boom for the simple chance to earn big. This was the world’s most lucrative FIT program at the time – the attraction piece was akin to a goldrush in colonial days. Now, with a more complex market and various business models, telling a clear story to talent and creating a strong unique selling point for your business is more important than ever.
Onboarding and education are key to making that new hire stick. Approximately 37% of employees who leave a company do so within their first year. The top reason cited for leaving during this period is a lack of career development, which could be mitigated by outlining a clear career roadmap and providing adequate training during the onboarding process. This is especially important in the current market landscape since competitors entering the market after you will most certainly have a target laser sighted on your employees.
Diverse opportunities + diverse talent the way forward?
As the energy market becomes more complex, with multiple asset types emerging as solutions, opportunities for talent become more diverse. Done right, increasing the mix of talent from both different industry and technical backgrounds fosters innovation, adaptability, and competitive advantage.
Diverse experiences bring fresh perspectives that drive problem-solving and the development of novel solutions. Employees from varied sectors introduce best practices, enhancing agility and helping companies identify new opportunities while avoiding industry blind spots. Decision-making improves as different viewpoints challenge deeply entrenched (and sometimes counterproductive) assumptions and reduce groupthink, leading to more balanced strategies.
Additionally, technical diversity enhances customer understanding, encourages cross-disciplinary collaboration, and fosters a culture of continuous learning. This not only broadens team capabilities but also boosts employee engagement and retention, ultimately creating a more resilient, innovative, and adaptable workforce.
Andrew Statter is a Partner at Titan GreenTech, an executive recruitment agency focused on the clean energy space.
ASIA ENERGY REVIEW
BY JOHN VAROLI
A brief overview of the region’s main energy events from the past week
Australia / Pumped storage
At “Pumped Storage: Powering Australia’s Energy Future”, New South Wales Minister for Energy Penny Sharpe called for long-duration pumped storage to support the energy transition and ensure grid stability.
China / Clean energy
China launched the world’s first 660 MW circulating fluidized bed (CFB) steam generator. Developed by Harbin Electric Corporation and located in Shaanxi, this project establishes a new global benchmark for efficiency and performance in power generation.
China / Nuclear fusion
China’s nuclear fusion reactor, the Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak, set a record for the longest sustained, stable nuclear fusion reaction – for 17 minutes 46 seconds, smashing its own previous 2023 world record of 6 minutes and 43 seconds.
India / Coal
India generated a record amount of electricity from coal, as net generation from coal and lignite increased by 5% to a record 1.36 TWh in 2024, from 1.29 TWh in 2023
India / Solar power
India increased its solar energy capacity by 25.2 GW in 2024, surging from only 8.3 GW added the previous year, reported Mercom.
India / Battery storage
Adani Green Energy won a bid for 1.25 GW energy storage capacity from pumped hydro storage projects. The bid was awarded by Uttar Pradesh Power Corp and will be located in Uttar Pradesh, and is expected to be completed by 2031.
Indonesia / Battery storage
The country launched its first and largest containerized battery energy storage system (CBESS) for solar power. SUN Energy said the project has a capacity of 644 kW-peak; the 1 MWh battery storage system is housed in a 20-foot container.
Philippines / New power projects
The Dept of Energy endorsed 11 new power projects, amounting to a total capacity of 4.5 GW, for System Impact Study approval by the National Grid Corp. The projects span various energy sources, including hydropower, wind, coal, and battery energy storage systems (BESS).
Singapore / Renewables
In its survey of more than 500 senior business leaders, 57% plan to invest in solar energy by 2030. Their other investment options were hydropower (40%), bioenergy (29%), mobile nuclear (26%) and wind energy (16%).
South Korea / Nuclear power
After an eight year hiatus, energy officials from South Korea and Vietnam have agreed to consider resuming the two countries’ nuclear energy ties.
Disclaimer
This communication has been prepared for information purposes only, is confidential and may be legally privileged. This is a subscription-only service and is directed at those who have expressly asked K.K. Yuri Group or one of its representatives to be added to the mailing list. This document may not be onwardly circulated or reproduced without prior written consent from Yuri Group, which retains all copyright to the content of this report.
Yuri Group is not registered as an investment advisor in any jurisdiction. Our research and all the content express our opinions, which are generally based on available public information, field studies and own analysis. Content is limited to general comment upon general political, economic and market issues, asset classes and types of investments. The report and all of its content does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell, subscribe for or underwrite any product or physical commodity, or a financial instrument.
The information contained in this report is obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith. No representation or warranty is made that it is accurate or complete. Opinions and views expressed are subject to change without notice, as are prices and availability, which are indicative only. There is no obligation to notify recipients of any changes to this data or to do so in the future. No responsibility is accepted for the use of or reliance on the information provided. In no circumstances will Yuri Group be liable for any indirect or direct loss, or consequential loss or damages arising from the use of, any inability to use, or any inaccuracy in the information.
K.K. Yuri Group: Hulic Ochanomizu Bldg. 3F, 2-3-11, Surugadai, Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 101-0062.
NEWS
• METI announces Cabinet approval of 7th Basic Energy Plan and related documents
• PM to launch council to coordinate development of data centers and power plants