
ANALYSIS
DYNAMIC DUO: JAPAN AND SINGAPORE DRIVE ENERGY IN EAST ASIA
BALANCING ACT FOR ENERGY PLANNERS CONTINUES A DECADE INTO REFORMS
ASIA PACIFIC REVIEW
This column provides a brief overview of the region’s main energy events from the past week
NEWS
WIND POWER AND OTHER RENEWABLES
CARBON CAPTURE & SYNTHETIC FUELS
EVENTS
Aug 27-28 Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation / Energy Ministerial Meeting @ Busan, South Korea
Sept 9-12 Gastech 2025, Milan
Sept 15-19 IAEA General Conference 2025
Sept 16-18 APAC Wind Energy Summit @ Melbourne, Australia
Sept 17-19 Smart Energy Week Autumn 2025 / EV-HV-FCV Expo / Green Factory Expo / H2 & FC Expo / PV Expo / Battery Japan / Smart Grid Expo / Wind Expo / CCUS Expo / Decarbonization Expo / Circular Economy Expo @ Makuhari MesseJAPAN NRG WEEKLY
PUBLISHER
K. K. Yuri Group
Editorial Team
Yuriy Humber (Chief Editor)
John Varoli (Senior Editor, Americas)
Kyoko Fukuda (Data, Events)
Magdalena Osumi (Renewables & Storage)
Filippo Pedretti (Thermal, CCS, Nuclear)
Tetsuji Tomita (Power Market, Hydrogen)
George Hoffman (Sales, Business Development)
Tim Young (Design)
SUBSCRIPTIONS & ADVERTISING
Japan NRG offers individual, corporate and academic subscription plans. Basic details are our website or write to subscriptions@japan-nrg.com
For marketing, advertising, or collaboration opportunities, contact sales@japan-nrg.com For all other inquiries, write to info@japan-nrg.com

FSA to postpone mandatory sustainability disclosures for small companies
(Nikkei, July 7)
MOL and Kinetics ink MoU for world’s first floating data center platform
(Company statement, July 7)
TAKEAWAY: The offshore model offers several advantages – independent of local electricity supplies; and avoids the need for expensive and limited land acquisition in metropolitan areas. Also, while a typical land-based data center may take four years to build, the conversion of a used vessel takes about one year. And the floating platform allows for mobility. And yet, while this offers respite for a while, it’s not clear how much scale such offshore centers can offer in the longer-term.
ANRE proposes mandating electricity retailers to secure supply
(Government statement, July 4)
TAKEAWAY: Requiring retailers to secure both capacity-based supply (kW) and energy-based supply (kWh) in an integrated manner should improve the predictability of electricity sales volumes for generators, and help foster a favorable environment for long-term fuel procurement contracts and encouraging investment in power sources. However, some retailers will see the new structure as locking them into a system that favors the bigger power producers as well as retailers with captive generating capacity. The energy agency will need to be wary of balancing its desire to support stable power supply with the need to allow market signals to play their role in a liberalized sector.
TOCOM power futures trading surges on geopolitical risks
(Exchange data, July 8)
Electricity intraday market sees trading drop despite rising demand
(Denki Shimbun, July 8)
June heatwave spikes spot electricity demand in Japan
(Exchange data, June 8)
Enaris and Shibaura Tech continue research for supply-demand market
(Company statement, July 10)
TAKEAWAY: The aim is to improve control precision and increase the volume of adjustable capacity that can be offered to the market. This should offer new balancing levers to TSOs, but will also make the calculations more complex.
METI revises plans and budgets of some hydrogen/ ammonia projects
(Government statement, July 7)
MHIET launches sales of gas cogeneration system with hydrogen co-firing
(Company statement, July 4)
IHI and Vopak to develop ammonia import terminal
(Company statement, July 11)
Bison Energy and Engelheart ink Japan’s first BESS 10-yr revenue deal
(Company statement, July 9)
iGrid starts service to expand corporate access to distributed solar
(Company statement, July 9)
Tokyo Metro Govt to invest in grid battery via renewables fund
(Government statement, June 20)
JPN Energy and Star Seeds to build grid-scale battery network
(Company statement, July 8)
Renova freezes new biomass development amid reduced subsidies, high costs
(Nikkei, July 11)
TAKEAWAY: According to METI, the amount of woody biomass power generation eligible for state subsidies has been decreasing year by year. In 2024, state subsidies for biomass power generation declined for the first time in four years, attributed to fewer new plans, project cancellations, and the closure of power plants.
Japanese firms take 50% stake in TotalEnergies’ Portugal portfolio
(Company statement, July 3)
Tokyu Land completes EIA for Matsumae 2 wind project
(Company statement, June 30)
Helical Fusion raises ¥2.3 billion to develop core equipment
(Company statement, July 11)
Mayor urges federal govt to take lead in selecting nuclear waste disposal sites
(Nikkei, July 9)
TAKEAWAY: The government has tried to utilize the ‘Scandinavian’ model of encouraging local governments to declare their interest in hosting a nuclear waste hub in return for ample subsidies. However, as the Suttsu mayor says, this has a number of drawbacks in Japan, where even small local opposition can derail huge infrastructure initiatives. Many look to and even expect the national government to take responsibility for a major facility such as a nuclear waste hub and it will likely require a more active Cabinet to bring to light. It should be noted, however, that one reason the national government tries to steer clear of this topic is the fear that it will be taken up as an issue by opposition parties and used to drive down government popularity.
Niigata Pref to survey public opinion on Kashiwazaki-Kariwa restart
(Nikkei, July 8)
TAKEAWAY: Last month TEPCO suspended efforts to restart Unit 7 due to delays in anti-terrorism facility construction, subsequently unable to meet the stated deadline. Thus, the utility decided to shift focus to preparing Unit 6, and it estimates two months are needed from the moment of approval to begin commercial operation. However, a new public opinion survey further delays any potential restart date, now unlikely to happen by year’s end.
This development also shows the ‘mastery’ of Gov Hanazumi, who has managed to delay and obfuscate the restart issue for years. He has always hinted at wanting to shift the responsibility for greenlighting the restart to the public and while his call for a referendum was denied by state officials, this public opinion survey is in fact a similar move.
Japan’s warning over Australia’s LNG politics, Cook visits Tokyo
(Financial Review, July 8)
INPEX advances Abadi LNG project in Indonesia
(Nikkei Asia, July 9)
Petronas ships first cargo from LNG Canada to Japan
(Company statement, July 8)
(Nikkei Asia, Japan NRG, July 8)
Chiyoda to shift away from megaprojects after LNG losses in the U.S.
(Nikkei, July 10)
LNG stocks down from previous week, up YoY
(Government data, July 9)
May Oil/ Gas/ Coal trade statistics
(Government data, July 2)


METI outlines safety measures for CO2 storage projects
(Government statement, July 10)
Sumitomo Corp to fund CO2 transport pipeline in UK
(Company statement, July 9)
MHI wins FEED contract for Japan’s largest CC plant
(Company statement, July 7)
Domestic SAF supplied at Haneda led by JGC
(Company statement, July 8)
TAKEAWAY: JGC aims to accelerate decarbonization in the aviation industry by more collaboration between companies and local governments, promoting the collection of waste cooking oil, and expanding the use of SAF in Japan. The Cosmo SAF refinery started trial operation in January 2025, becoming the first in Japan to produce SAF at a commercial scale.
ANALYSIS
BY JOHN VAROLI
Dynamic Duo: Japan and Singapore Drive Energy in East Asia
News and analysis about Japan’s foreign relations in the energy sector are often dominated by partnerships and deals with Australia, China, Qatar, the U.S., and UAE. Rarely does the bilateral relationship between Japan and Singapore garner much attention.
But these two countries, despite their differences, have developed a potent tandem that’s driving developments in regional and global energy markets in ways that don’t always grab headlines. While energy deals between the two countries don’t register in billion-dollar figures – as they do with Australia and the U.S. – Tokyo’s relationship with Singapore is a cornerstone of regional energy cooperation and development in East Asia.
Despite contrasting geographic profiles, both nations are resource-scarce and function with trade-dependent economies. As well as becoming energy hubs, Japan and Singapore also share a deep dependence on thermal power plants and, hitherto, a strong reliance on natural gas. Today, however, they are united in exploring alternatives in hydrogen, battery energy storage, and pioneering the energy transition in the region.
Japan’s technological prowess in CCS, hydrogen, and renewables complements Singapore’s financial, trading and logistical strengths. Japan NRG explores their collaborative efforts in a number of sectors and the impact across the Asia Pacific.
LNG and foundations of energy cooperation
The convergence of business needs – Japan as a major energy consumer and Singapore as a critical node in energy trade – is the bedrock of this half-century partnership. Singapore’s location along major maritime shipping lanes and its development of Jurong Island as a hub for energy and petrochemicals since the 1960s have made it a vital partner for Japan.
Despite determined efforts in greening its energy sector, Japan remains heavily reliant on LNG imports for power generation. In addition, Japanese companies are increasingly looking for LNG trading opportunities to countries across Asia. Singapore plays a pivotal role as a hub, hosting LNG trading operations for companies such as JERA, Japan’s largest utility, as well as global majors such as BP, and ExxonMobil.
In March, the city-state’s importance for Japan’s energy strategy was ramped up a notch when the natural gas and coal trading operations of JERA merged with France’s EDF to form the Singapore-based firm JERA Global Markets – 66.7% owned by JERA, with the remaining stake held by EDF Trading.
Investments in Singapore’s energy infrastructure
The second pillar of Japan-Singapore energy relations is the ownership and operation of Singapore’s energy assets, particularly in electricity generation.
In late 2008, Marubeni led a consortium that included Kyushu Electric, Kansai Electric, the Japan Bank of International Cooperation (JBIC), and GDF Suez (now Engie) to acquire Senoko Power from Singapore state-owned Temasek Holdings. The consortium, known as Lion Power Holdings, was controlled by Marubeni and Engie holding 30% each.
In late June, trading house Marubeni increased its stake in Senoko from 30% to 50% by acquiring the Lion Power shares from Kyushu Electric, KEPCO, and JBIC. Senoko, with its 2.6 GW capacity, supplies about 18% of Singapore’s electricity, making it the state’s second largest power provider.
That deal has positioned Marubeni as a 50/50 co-owner along with Sembcorp Utilities, a subsidiary of Singapore’s state-owned Sembcorp Industries. This deal highlights deepening trust and collaboration between firms from the two nations, leading to a symbiotic dynamic – meeting Singapore’s need for stable electricity with Japan’s constant pursuit of overseas investment opportunities.
Finally, Japanese investors in Singapore’s power sector are a counterbalance to Chinese firms. Huaneng Power International owns Tuas Power, the city-state’s largest power company, with a 20% market share.
BESS and AI boom in Japan
Both nations are investing heavily in renewable energy and energy storage. Singapore-based firms with backing from global investors – such as Peak Energy, Gurīn Energy, and Vena Energy – are making significant inroads into Japan’s renewables market, particularly in solar and battery energy storage systems (BESS).
The ambitions of Singaporean players align with Japan’s push to combine renewable energy with advanced technology, particularly as AI and digital services drive energy consumption.
In mid June, Peak Energy acquired a portfolio of ready-to-build, high-voltage solar farms in Tokyo and Tohoku, with a combined capacity of 48 MW. These facilities, equipped with BESS, are set to be operational between 2026 and 2028 and will supply power to corporate customers through long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs).
Also in mid June, Gurīn Energy, in collaboration with France’s Saft (a TotalEnergies subsidiary), said it is developing a project in Soma City, Fukushima Prefecture, that will provide over 1 GWh of storage capacity to integrate renewables into Japan’s grid.
In late May, Vena Energy added to its 1 GW of operating solar capacity in Japan, as well as wind and battery ambitions, by creating a data center subsidiary, Vena Nexus. The new entity has some Japanese assets in its pipeline and among these is a partnership with Tokyo-based startup Quantum Mesh, with whom Vena is developing small-scale, renewables-powered data centers for AI-driven and digital infrastructure.
Vena Energy’s ambitions extend beyond Tokyo, but the Japanese business is one of the firm’s largest.
Rooftop solar, transition finance and eye on India
Singapore’s role as a financial and operational hub underscores its importance as a springboard for Japanese players to connect with other Asian markets.
In early June, TEPCO, in partnership with Hong Kong’s ESR Group, secured ¥1.1 billion in financing from Taiwan’s Bank SinoPac for a 10 MW rooftop solar project in Singapore, with plans to expand to 40 MW through an additional ¥3.9 billion.
Supported by multiple corporate PPAs, this joint venture reflects TEPCO’s goal to deploy 100 MW of rooftop solar across the Asia-Pacific, leveraging Singapore’s favorable investment climate and demand for clean energy.
Japan’s Climate Transition Bonds (also known as GX Bonds) have been highlighted by the International Energy Agency (IEA) as a model for emerging economies, offering government-backed credit support to facilitate clean energy spending. As a global financial center, Singapore can play a role in facilitating the trading of GX Bonds.
The Japanese government aims to issue ¥20 trillion worth of GX bonds over the next decade to support decarbonization across multiple sectors. A significant portion of the proceeds (over 50%) is allocated to energy transition R&D.
Meanwhile, firms from Japan and Singapore are exploring joint investments in third countries to counterbalance the limitations and even shrinking in their domestic businesses. As part of Osaka Gas’s broader strategy to expand its energy business in emerging markets, Osaka Gas Singapore has invested in Singapore-based AG&P City Gas, which is developing 12 city gas distribution concessions in South India and Rajasthan. (The company’s subsidiary in India is known as AG&P Pratham.)
In 2024, AG&P secured exclusive gas distribution rights covering 10% of India’s land area, and targets annual sales of 3.5 billion cubic meters by 2030. Toward that goal, the company is laying a 100 km gas pipeline in Chennai. But it’s also expanding into renewables, planning to develop 400 MW solar and wind power capacity in India by 2028.
This robust international strategy, driven by Japan’s shrinking domestic market, saw Osaka Gas’s non-Japan revenue surge from ¥18.7 billion in FY2016 to ¥116.4 billion in FY2024.
CCS partnership
In August 2024, during the 2nd Asia Zero Emissions Community (AZEC) meeting in Indonesia, METI Minister Saito Ken and Singapore’s Second Minister for Trade and Industry, Dr. Tan See Leng, agreed to cooperate on carbon capture and storage.
Japan, a leader in CCS technology innovation, is well placed to support Singapore’s ambitions to decarbonize its energy-intensive industries, including power generation, chemicals, and waste management.
Constrained by limited land and domestic renewable energy potential, Singapore views CCS as a vital tool for reducing emissions while maintaining its role as a regional energy hub. The two countries will develop common standards for CCS, fostering a market for CCS solutions across the Asia-Pacific.
Conclusion
While only a city-state with a population of just under six million, nearly 21 times less than Japan’s 125 million people, Singapore occupies an outsized place in Japan’s regional energy strategy.
While much is said about Singapore’s geographic location, part of its allure for Japanese players is the state’s high levels of efficiency and services, and low levels of corruption. The stability of local business relations is another trait valued by Japanese firms. (Singapore ranks No 3 globally for least corruption; while Japan ranks 20th.)
Of course, Singapore has attracted investors from various locations due its finance and trade focus. That kind of international environment, and a cosmopolitan lifestyle, has endeared the city-state to many of Japan’s business and financial elite.
It is the similarity of Singapore’s approach to energy – the focus on security of supply and affordability, in addition to decarbonization – and the proximity to the fast-growing markets of Indonesia and Malaysia, for example, that has led Japanese energy companies to consider the city state a vital hub for their Asian business expansion.
ANALYSIS
BY TETSUJI TOMITA
The Balancing Act for Energy Planners Continues a Decade into Reforms
In late March, the energy agency (ANRE) published its long-awaited review of electricity market reforms carried out over the past decade, and set out future priorities. The results indicate success in achieving the main aims of ensuring a stable power supply, reigning in power rates, all while offering consumers more choice.
Yet beneath this positive headline lies a critical challenge: how to ensure sufficient capacity and stability in ever more sophisticated power markets without giving up on the energy transition?
ANRE’s review also underscored persistent vulnerabilities, especially around maintaining adequate supply and stable prices as Japan pushes ahead with the twin national strategies: digital transformation (DX) and green transformation (GX). These strategies aim for a rapid shift toward decarbonized infrastructure, but also place greater strain on Japan’s already tight electricity grid – a concern echoed in this year’s 7th Basic Energy Plan.
Japan NRG takes a deeper look at the agency’s concerns and how they relate to the main developments in the electricity sector and markets.
Supply capacity shortage
In recent years, a number of factors worry Japanese energy planners regarding available power supply and capacity. First, the decommissionings and suspension of aging thermal power plants has gained momentum. At the same time, the rollout of renewables and new thermal power sources has not kept pace with state targets, resulting in a discrepancy between supply and demand.
Over the past decade, Japan has reduced reliance on thermal power generation, with a net loss of about 21 GW of LNG, coal, and oil-fired capacity. Meanwhile, new solar capacity coming online has slowed, dropping to about 6 GW a year in 2022, from a high of nearly 11 GW in 2015. This is partly due to less land availability, rising costs, the phasing out of tariffs, and an intensifying grass-roots opposition in certain localities due to resident concerns.
Second, structural changes on the demand side have had an impact. Prolonged summer heat and winter cold, combined with economic recovery after the Covid pandemic, have led to rapid increases in electricity demand, making it more likely for peak demand to exceed initial projections. This has resulted in growing instances of a decline in reserve margins.
In summer 2024, for example, there were at least three incidents when large volumes of electricity had to be transferred quickly between the major regions into which Japan’s power system is split. On July 1, Kansai’s transmission system operator warned that its reserve margin was due to fall below 3%, a red line; Kansai received nearly 1.5 GW of power from the Chubu region to improve the power balance.
Third, there is a shortage of balancing capacity in the supply-demand adjustment market, the Electric Power Reserve Exchange (ERPX), that helps to cope with the output fluctuations of renewable energy. The rollout of flexible resources such as storage batteries is taking time, especially because of grid connection bottlenecks and trouble with raising project financing.
Meanwhile, the cost of expanding pumped hydro storage – where possible – is substantial. This has led to situations where sudden imbalances in power supply and demand cannot be promptly addressed.
The gaps in the EPRX market could be illustrated by tracking the procurement ratio for its various products. In other words, by considering how much certain power generation sources are underutilized while others are over-relied upon. Based on the procurement ratio for each EPRX product during FY2024, which is calculated by dividing the daily contracted capacity by the solicited capacity (i.e. required balancing capacity), we can see:
Balancing Capacity Procurement Ratio in the EPRX (FY2024) 
NOTE: The procurement ratio is calculated by dividing the daily contracted capacity by the solicited capacity (required balancing capacity).
|
Reserve Product |
Response Time |
Duration |
Typical Power Sources |
Usage |
|
Primary Reserve(FCR – Frequency Containment Reserve) |
Within 10 seconds |
≥5 min |
• Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) |
Automatic real-time frequency control |
|
Secondary Reserve (1)(S-FRR – Synchronized Frequency Restoration Reserve) |
Within 5 minutes |
≥30 min |
• BESS |
Balances within-settlement deviations |
|
Secondary Reserve (2)(FRR – Frequency Restoration Reserve) |
Within 5 minutes |
≥30 min |
• Conventional thermal generation |
Covers residual forecasting errors |
|
Tertiary Reserve (1)(RR – Replacement Reserve) |
Within 15 minutes |
3 hours |
• Thermal/hydro generators (slower-response) |
Economic dispatch, relieving secondary reserves |
|
Tertiary Reserve (2)(RR-FIT – Replacement Reserve for FIT) |
Within 45 minutes |
3 hours |
• DERs under FIT (PV curtailment, batteries) |
Balances renewable (FIT) generation forecast errors |
Source: Japan NRG (based on EPRX data)
The outcome of the above suggests there are opportunities to invest further in fast-response technologies like BESS that can support the consistently high and volatile secondary reserve categories, which offer drive price premiums and potentially attractive returns.
Measures for stable electricity supply
To ensure a stable electricity supply, the government is working on institutional measures, such as the capacity market, the long-term decarbonized power sources auction (LTDA), and development of short-term markets.
The current capacity market system is designed to secure future supply capacity through bidding and contracting four years in advance. However, incentives for suppliers are limited. In response, revisions are being made to enhance supply effectiveness, including commitments for dispatchable resources and differentiated treatment based on the results of effectiveness tests.
The LTDA was introduced to achieve secure, decarbonized supply capacity, thereby encouraging investment by providing long-term revenue stability for cleaner power sources expected to play a big part in future electricity supply (e.g., offshore wind, nuclear power, etc). The LTDA has so far held two rounds and a third is expected to begin in autumn.
For the short-term market, the introduction of a simultaneous market is under consideration, where supply capacity (kWh) and balancing capability (delta-kW) are contracted simultaneously. This enables optimal resource allocation based on information provided by power generators (such as startup costs, minimum output costs, and incremental cost curves), while taking into account transmission constraints.
Ensuring stability in both supply volume and price
Achieving a stable electricity supply requires a balanced approach to both volume and price.
Reliable supply capacity must be maintained over the medium to long term, and this involves promoting new power sources, extending the life of existing facilities, and expanding flexible resources such as storage batteries and demand response mechanisms.
On the other hand, according to the ANRE review, extreme fluctuations in power prices pose risks for both consumers and businesses. Japanese power officials worry that the current power market design relies too heavily on spot market price signals, which has in the past three years or so led to the collapse of many electricity retailers when prices surged.
To address this issue, officials want to see retailers and other power participants utilize a broader range of contracting options. This includes making more use of the baseload market, futures contracts, and paying more attention to bilateral options such as PPAs.
Future discussions
Following the presentation of ANRE’s review in March, the “Subcommittee for the Development of Next-Generation Electricity and Gas System Infrastructure” was established to examine the future institutional framework, business environment, market structure, and competitive landscape for the electricity and gas industries.
Also, in June the “Working Group on Institutional Design Based on the Review of the Electric Power System Reform” was formed to engage in more detailed discussions on policy and system design.
The subcommittee and working group will grapple with the following eight issues.
Items 1, 4, and 6 are issues related to ensuring stability of power supply.
Conclusion
While electricity system reform has brought diversity and efficiency to the market, officials feel the fundamental issue of creating and maintaining stable power supply needs further measures.
Policy focus seems likely to double down on supporting new, and ideally flexible, capacity installations both over the short and the medium term, with subsidy mechanisms attuned to that. Market and regulatory designs will be geared toward encouraging new investment.
Many familiar with operations in mature power markets overseas continue to hope for more bold measures in market design, such as the introduction of negative pricing. ANRE’s focus on supply and price stability does not suggest the energy planners are keen to introduce such approaches in Japan as yet.
Still, with more and cleaner capacity required, an evolution in domestic energy policy is likely as long as the government feels confident that the changes will not pass along undue price volatility to the population.
ASIA ENERGY REVIEW
BY JOHN VAROLI
A brief overview of the region’s main energy events from the past week
Australia / natural gas
The govt plans to reexamine key measures introduced by previous administrations to help formulate its Future Gas Strategy, which maps the govt’s plan for how gas will support the economy’s transition to clean energy.
China / Nuclear
Brazil and China General Nuclear Power Group agreed to cooperate on energy transition efforts and the peaceful and sustainable use of nuclear mineral resources in Brazil.
China / Solar and wind
China is developing a total of 1.3 TW of utility-scale solar and wind capacity, according to Global Energy Monitor; this is 75% of all such capacity under construction globally.
India / Oil
India’s oil consumption totalled 122 Mt in the first six months of 2025 unchanged from the same period in 2024:
India / Solar and wind
India recorded an additional 21.9 GW of new solar and wind capacity in the first half of 2025, reflecting a 56% increase from last year.
Indonesia / Nuclear
The country’s chamber of commerce called on the govt to consider collaborating with Canada and South Korea on the development of NPPs.
Philippines / LNG
LNG imports are set to increase by 508% from 2025 to 2029, driven by the decline of domestic supply from the Malampaya gas field.
Singapore / Petrol
Aster Chemicals and Energy, a JV between Chandra Asri Group and Glencore, is in talks to buy ExxonMobil Corp’s petrol stations in Singapore in a $1.2 billion deal
Taiwan / Offshore wind
Ørsted raised a total of $3 billion for the 632 MW Greater Changhua 2 offshore wind farm, secured through 25 banks and five export credit agencies.
Disclaimer
This communication has been prepared for information purposes only, is confidential and may be legally privileged. This is a subscription-only service and is directed at those who have expressly asked K.K. Yuri Group or one of its representatives to be added to the mailing list. This document may not be onwardly circulated or reproduced without prior written consent from Yuri Group, which retains all copyright to the content of this report.
Yuri Group is not registered as an investment advisor in any jurisdiction. Our research and all the content express our opinions, which are generally based on available public information, field studies and own analysis. Content is limited to general comment upon general political, economic and market issues, asset classes and types of investments. The report and all of its content does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell, subscribe for or underwrite any product or physical commodity, or a financial instrument.
The information contained in this report is obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith. No representation or warranty is made that it is accurate or complete. Opinions and views expressed are subject to change without notice, as are prices and availability, which are indicative only. There is no obligation to notify recipients of any changes to this data or to do so in the future. No responsibility is accepted for the use of or reliance on the information provided. In no circumstances will Yuri Group be liable for any indirect or direct loss, or consequential loss or damages arising from the use of, any inability to use, or any inaccuracy in the information.
K.K. Yuri Group: Hulic Ochanomizu Bldg. 3F, 2-3-11, Surugadai, Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 101-0062.
NEWS:
・FSA to postpone mandatory sustainability disclosures for small companies
・MOL and Kinetics ink MoU for world’s first floating data center platform
・J-Power and Hitachi sign MoU for renewable-powered data centers