
ANALYSIS
MITSUBISHI’S EXIT FROM WIND PROJECTS HAS GOVT SCRAMBLING TO IMPROVE CONDITIONS
JAPAN MULLS NEW MID-TERM POWER MARKET TO PUSH RETAILERS TO SECURE SUPPLY
ASIA PACIFIC REVIEW
This column provides a brief overview of the region’s main energy events from the past week
NEWS
WIND POWER AND OTHER RENEWABLES
CARBON CAPTURE & SYNTHETIC FUELS
EVENTS
Sept 9-12 Gastech 2025, Milan
Sept 15-19 IAEA General Conference 2025
Sept 16-18 APAC Wind Energy Summit @ Melbourne, Australia
Sept 17-19 Smart Energy Week Autumn 2025 / EV-HV-FCV Expo / Green Factory Expo / H2 & FC Expo / PV Expo / Battery Japan / Smart Grid Expo / Wind Expo / CCUS Expo / Decarbonization Expo / Circular Economy Expo @ Makuhari Messe
Oct 8-9 Innovation for Cool Earth Forum @ Westin Hotel Tokyo IEA World Energy Outlook 2025 Release
PUBLISHER
K. K. Yuri Group
Editorial Team
Yuriy Humber (Chief Editor)
John Varoli (Senior Editor, Americas)
Kyoko Fukuda (Data, Events)
Magdalena Osumi (Renewables & Storage)
Filippo Pedretti (Thermal, CCS, Nuclear)
Tetsuji Tomita (Power Market, Hydrogen)
George Hoffman (Sales, Business Development)
Tim Young (Design)
SUBSCRIPTIONS & ADVERTISING
Japan NRG offers individual, corporate and academic subscription plans. Basic details are our website or write to subscriptions@japan-nrg.com
For marketing, advertising, or collaboration opportunities, contact sales@japan-nrg.com
For all other inquiries, write to
info@japan-nrg.com

Govt discusses selection of data center hub sites
(Government statements, August 22 & 25)
METI begins soliciting proposals for GX Strategic Region
(Government statement, August 26)
Debt-servicing costs reach record high in FY2026 budget request
(Jiji Press, Nikkei, August 26)
Decarbonization efforts stall as steel, chemical firms scale back plans
(Asia Nikkei, August 26)
TAKEAWAY: There’s been a change in attitudes to net zero in the past year, in part due to the strong pro-oil / gas stance of the Trump administration. But it’s not the only factor. The price gap between fossil fuels and clean alternatives, especially those related to hydrogen, remains large – as seen in the recent green hydrogen trial on the Tokyo Exchange. Competition with Chinese companies also remains acute and Japanese manufacturers are reluctant to embark on clean energy projects unless clients pay a premium to cover these investments or there are state subsidies. Still, some firms are eagerly pursuing a switch to hydrogen and renewables – see examples below. The start of the carbon credits program next year will also help.
Sony urges suppliers to adopt 100% renewable energy by 2030
(Asia Nikkei, August 30)
Japan faces record heat with stable power supply, spot prices capped at ¥50
(Denki Shimbun, August 26)
Govt is close to “preparatory phase” for launch of simultaneous market
(Government statement, August 28)
TEPCO EP enters balancing market by utilizing a water electrolysis system
(Company statement, August 28)
TAKEAWAY: At the Yamanashi Energy Storage Technology Research Site, a P2G facility conducts field tests for producing, storing, transporting, and using green hydrogen. In March 2023, the Next-Generation Energy System R&D Village (Nesrad) was set up as a hub for global experts in hydrogen and fuel cells, aiming to foster new industries and regional growth. Leveraging solar, hydrogen, and other resources, along with collaboration among resident institutes, the site supports next-gen energy system R&D. As a hub for such research, it is expected to drive further development of green hydrogen-related technologies.
Japan expected to soon pick CdD winners; may import from China
(Rystad Energy, August 18)
TAKEAWAY: As CfD winners have yet to be announced, it’s too early to say whether some projects will utilize Chinese or Indian fuel, even though at least one U.S. project is likely to get the green light. The cost of transporting the fuel from China could be an advantage, but with huge domestic demand on the horizon, it’s unclear if Chinese suppliers would be able to offer more than minor volumes to Japan.
Tsubame BHB inks MoU with Mizuho Bank for green hydrogen projects in Africa
(Company statement, August 26)
JSE carries out third-party allocation for liquefied H2 supply chain development
(Company statement, August 28)
Mitsubishi Electric inks deal with JAXA to develop PSCs for satellites
(Company statement, August 21)

Taiwan’s HDRE to launch grid battery in Sapporo by late 2025
(Japan NRG, August 19)

Japan Benex adds first battery to solar plant in FIP transition
(Company statement, August 26)
Restar enters grid-scale BESS business
(Company statement, August 29)
Smart Energy sets up new firm to acquire and operate small-scale solar
(Company statement, August 29)
OF holds demo for drone-based cable theft prevention at solar facilities
(Company statement, August 21)
Tochigi Gov calls for stronger environmental surveys on PV project
(Government statement, August 18)
‼️Mitsubishi’s Exit From Offshore Wind Has Govt Scrambling to Improve Conditions
Mitsubishi Corp-backed wind power project in Laos launches
(Nikkei, August 29)
Nyuzen launches local production-consumption electricity plan from offshore wind
(Company statement, August 28)
KEPCO to expand donations to towns hosting NPPs in bid to bolster local support
(Nikkei, August 25)
TAKEAWAY: KEPCO is also exploring new reactor construction, making this program a potential model for regional engagement in national nuclear policy. This effort is clearly a way to bolster support for nuclear energy among local communities, many of which are reluctant to support reactor restarts.
TAKEAWAY: With nuclear restarts expanding due to rising power demand, the need for spent fuel storage is dire. Chugoku Electric reported to Kaminoseki Town that it seeks to build an interim storage facility for spent nuclear fuel. The work should be in cooperation with Kansai Electric, which could make it the final destination for spent fuel. If realized, this would be Japan’s second such facility.
Japanese firms invest in U.S. nuclear fusion startup
(Nikkei, August 28)
TEPCO to remove fuel from Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Unit 7 after restart delays
(Nikkei, August 28)
TAKEAWAY: Besides technical issues, TEPCO still needs approval from locals. Niigata Pref will conduct a public opinion survey by mid-to-late September. The Governor’s decision on whether to approve the restart will come only after reviewing the survey results.
Alberta considers investing in Japan’s oil refinery sector to boost exports
TAKEAWAY: Canada’s PM Carney is backing new infrastructure projects to expand crude exports to Asia and position Canada as an energy superpower. The Trans Mountain pipeline expansion already opened new routes to Asian markets, and narrowed the price gap between Western Canadian Select and U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude. Still, analysts estimate it could take five years for Canada to diversify its markets. If successful, the U.S. could face reduced access to Canadian oil and higher energy prices. Yet, new pipelines could face opposition from environmental groups and Indigenous communities.
Govt surveys current status of regional gas operators
(Government statement, August 27)
TAKEAWAY: Renewables and nuclear are the main decarbonization levers in the power industry, but the gas sector must replace LNG with synthetic and low-carbon fuels, while maintaining stable supply. The roadmap aligns with METI’s long-term strategy, but it highlights industry-specific tools. They mention methanation, biogas, and CCUS; and need large-scale demo and cost reduction before becoming viable.
Tokyo Gas in talks with Venture Global LNG for long-term contract
(EnergyNow Media, August 25)
Shikoku Electric to expand LNG storage and regasification for new power plant
(Nikkei, August 26)
July Oil/ Gas/ Coal trade statistics
(Government data, August 28)


LNG stocks up from previous week, up YoY
(Government data, August 27)
Sekisui Chemical and Velocys to co-develop tech for e-SAF production
(Company statement, August 21)
ANALYSIS
BY MAGDALENA OSUMI
Mitsubishi’s Exit from Offshore Wind Has Govt Scrambling to Improve Conditions
Immediately after Mitsubishi Corp announced a shock exit from Japan’s offshore wind sector METI Minister Muto vowed to re-auction the trading house’s three projects “as soon as possible,” while officials pledged measures to improve business conditions.
The ministry has a lot at stake – more than the writedowns and reputational hit taken by Mitsubishi and its partners, including Chubu Electric. Japan’s top trading house had been expected to lead the creation of an offshore wind industry that METI saw growing to 30-45 GW by 2040 – surpassing the domestic nuclear fleet’s capacity.
The three Mitsubishi-led projects, totalling 1.76 GW, were expected to pave the way to rebuild Japan’s wind power supply chain, to contribute to the aggressive CO2 cuts promised to the UN, and encourage further investment in the nascent sector. Indeed, two more auction rounds followed with three international firms joining Japanese partners to develop projects.
As the remaining offshore wind developers look on with concern, the debacle may yet have a silver lining in highlighting the need for stronger government support for the sector. METI has so far avoided making big changes to the conditions of already auctioned projects, in part fearing it would lead to higher electricity prices. But the government cannot afford further cancelations.
The sector’s future, the CO2 targets, the industrial supply chain development – as well as regional revitalization plans – are all on the line. What happens next will be critical for the struggling sector’s fate. Japan NRG reviews.
How Mitsubishi won and lost
In 2021, Mitsubishi together with Chubu Electric stunned Japan’s power sector by sweeping the country’s first bottom-fixed offshore wind auction.
The consortium secured:
Only a year earlier, most industry players were telling the government that for a completely new sector to emerge, offshore wind pricing should begin in the ¥30s/ kWh. Mitsubishi bid less than ¥12/ kWh for one of the projects. Its highest bid – for the Choshi site – was ¥16.5.
Beyond a price level that stunned rivals, it was clear why METI entrusted the first three big projects with Mitsubishi. The trading house has financial muscle, political ties, connections with domestic and overseas supply chains, and was seen as a loyal business that would raise the profile of the offshore wind sector and attract major companies as buyers of green electricity. Indeed, Kirin Holdings and Amazon were among the partners announced by Mitsubishi, hinting at their future interest in signing PPA deals with the wind projects.
But optimism quickly unraveled and by February 2025 Mitsubishi had booked ¥52 billion ($344 million) in impairments; Chubu took another ¥18 billion. Project costs skyrocketed well beyond early assumptions, forcing the partners to reconsider.
Mitsubishi bid aggressively low at a time when Japan was in its third decade of a deflationary environment. Central banks rates were negative. The yen traded at close to 100 to the USD.
In the aftermath of Covid and global energy markets turmoil that followed the war in Ukraine, macroeconomic shocks followed one after another. Global inflation soared. The yen weakened by around 50%. Interest rates climbed – even in Japan. Meanwhile, a surge in energy projects globally led to supply chain disruptions; add to that local challenges such as labor shortages and regulatory delays.
Mitsubishi had some experience in offshore wind overseas, but when it came to managing the projects in Japan it came upon a number of problems. The sea area surveys for the bids reportedly had to be redone, which took time and money, and initial engineering plans had to be redrawn.
Mitsubishi’s biggest missteps, however, may have been delays in locking in pricing for major components, such as turbines, and for construction work contracts. Mitsubishi planned to use 134 GE Vernova Haliade-X units across the three projects and to assemble nacelles domestically with Toshiba. The prices were agreed, but final commitments were not locked in.
When Mitsubishi finally came back to GE on firm orders, the price environment had changed substantially, effectively crippling the project economics. In fact, GE was no longer keen to sell the turbines at all due to a global strategic decision to take a pause on supplying the wind sector due to the cost environment. Negotiations to get the American supplier on board in recent months failed.
The story was repeated with the general contractor – Kajima Corp, the exit of which was finally leaked to the media just days before Mitsubishi’s final announcement.
Mitsubishi will now lose its ¥20 billion security deposit for the projects and be barred from participating in the upcoming Round 4 wind auction.
Policy fallout
Offshore wind was meant to deliver gigawatts of new capacity in the 2030s — a central pillar of Japan’s decarbonization strategy. Mitsubishi’s exit has undoubtedly sent a warning: even Japan’s biggest firms cannot absorb the sector risks unless business conditions improve.
The government insists “offshore wind power is a vital source for making renewable energy the mainstay of Japan’s energy mix,” said Fukuoka Noriyoshi, head of wind energy at METI. He added the government “will continue to make every effort” to realize its goals of up to 50% renewable energy, and 30-45 GW of offshore wind power, by 2040. The government “will revise relevant systems where necessary”.
The original auction rules for offshore wind tenders focused on cost, rewarding low bids over project viability and speed of execution. This was in part due to METI’s experience of offering lucrative FIT prices to early solar projects, which drew criticism for being overly generous to developers at the expense of electricity consumers.
Mitsubishi saw that the Round 1 tender awarded half the scoring points to price and, in accordance, bid aggressively low, sweeping all three sites. In fact, its original agreements with GE and Kajima, among others, were predicated on a discount from a bulk order from all three projects.
But the price-heavy scoring system created a trap: it left the winners with little to no buffer to cover unexpected cost increases, and also didn’t strongly penalize late commissioning. In subsequent rounds, METI revised the rules to put more weight on project feasibility.
Other rule changes have been proposed for the next auction, Round 4, as industry players called for better terms to encourage future investment. These include extending seabed lease periods, improving the scoring system, again, and strengthening domestic supply chains to ensure project realization.
METI is also considering allowing cost pass-through to power prices, and extending site-use periods beyond 30 years to improve project economics. But it now needs to decide whether to extend the subsidy periods or alter project timelines.
Other changes need to be made to alleviate cost burdens on Round 2 and 3 projects, as well as future developments, according to industry players. The government needs to be less focused on price – at least at this stage of the sector’s development, which would avoid the situation where companies bid low to score a win but cannot execute on the terms once the macro or other factors go against them.
Other options could be to introduce government-backed PPAs to reduce financing risk or two-way Contracts for Difference (CfDs) to provide stable, bankable revenue streams for developers. Additional state support around transmission infrastructure or port investments, as well as debt guarantees or tax relief could also help.
While the government considers what it can offer without triggering an increase in electricity prices, one area it can tackle is regulation. Japan NRG has concluded in previous studies that the environmental impact assessment for offshore wind projects in Japan takes 3-4 years on average, which affects the start of construction and other preparatory works.
Re-auction
With Mitsubishi’s withdrawal, there is a possibility that second-best bids from Round 1 are rewarded. In reality, that is highly unlikely. The second-best bids included TEPCO and Ørsted for the Chiba project, Renova for Yurihonjo, and Obayashi for Noshiro-Mitane-Oga. Yet with most of these firms having since scaled back or left the sector. METI Minister Muto has also signaled a determination to re-auction the sites.
How soon the re-auction takes place is unclear, with METI and Mitsubishi explaining that there are various wind-down procedures that need to take place, especially at local level in the townships that were to host the facilities. However, the ministry cannot wait too long or investor morale will sink.
Still, new bidders will take a close look at the current price, regulatory and supply chain environment, and this is where METI and the rest of the government has much to do.
Japan does not have its own wind turbine manufacturers and GE’s cooling on the sector has left Toshiba stranded. Other domestic manufacturers, however, are speaking with international turbine players to create joint ventures. It’s notable also that METI has signed MoUs in recent months with major western turbine players.
These moves must come quickly. Already, some suppliers in Japan are giving up. Bearing manufacturer NTN plans to close one of its factories for wind power by March 2027 due to the dominance of Chinese rivals.
Lacking a strong domestic supply chain, Japan’s projects are vulnerable to currency moves. Also, METI continues to insist on a 60% share of domestic components in offshore wind farms for energy security reasons. This has led to some calls for the government to directly invest in rebuilding a domestic supply chain for wind power.
The Big Picture and next frontiers
While Japan’s offshore wind ambitions stumble and falter, this year China will install nearly three out of every four of the world’s new offshore turbines, according to BloombergNEF. Such neighborly competition, however, should serve as an inspiration.
Despite pessimistic headlines, the impact of Mitsubishi’s exit on Japan’s overall energy balance is limited — the three projects would have displaced less than 1% of LNG imports. The greater risk lies in credibility: repeated delays, rule changes, and high costs are testing both investors and supply chains.
The turmoil around Mitsubishi has affected other projects and project developers. There are questions around ports, supply chains, and how to price offtake agreements. The Round 4 auction has also been delayed.
So far this year, METI has tried to show its enduring commitment to offshore wind by passing the EEZ Law that should allow project development in deeper waters. For the first time, it added promotion zones off Hokkaido; and the Tokyo government is keen to open up new areas of its own. Subsidies continue to pour into floating offshore wind technologies, and discussions about bringing floating projects into upcoming auction rounds are heating up.
The pivot to deep waters and floating wind is certainly welcomed. But investors will judge the government on the measures it takes in the coming months to provide relief for developers that are already involved with Round 2 and 3. That’s where revisions to port fees and lease durations, among other items, will make an impact.
Minister Muto said that Mitsubishi’s exit delays the rollout of offshore wind in Japan and is “deeply regrettable”. He now needs to act, showing how the various steps proposed by the government are part of a wholesale effort to drive the next phase of sector development.
ANALYSIS
BY JAPAN NRG TEAM
Japan Mulls New Mid-Term Power Market to Push Retailers to Secure Supply
In Japan’s electricity market, many retailers shop for power as if buying dinner ingredients on the way home from work: they head to the store, basket in hand, hoping prices are kind. Most of the time everything is fine. But when the price of ‘eggs’ – or, in this case, LNG – soars, they have to either swallow the cost or exit the business. The government now wants electricity retailers to stock their ‘pantries’ instead.
The latest discussions inside the energy agency point to the potential creation of a new electricity market and a system under which retailers would be mandated to secure large parts of their customers’ projected power demand several years in advance. The aim is to smooth bills, bolster investment in power plants, and prevent the sort of panic-buying that has at times left Japan’s electricity shelves half-empty.
The reform targets two weaknesses that have become glaring since Japan’s power market was fully liberalised in 2016. First, too many of the 700+ retailers are small, asset-light sector newbies without the means or knowhow to structure long-term contracts, and who rely on the liquidity of the electricity spot market with all the volatility that this entails. Second, this short-termism leaves power generators with inadequate demand signals about future sales, dampening their incentive to invest in new capacity or secure long-term fuel supply.
This is where the so-called Mid- to Long-Term Electricity Market (MLEM) comes in. Japan’s energy planners hope that the mechanism will help to shift the retail industry from “just-in-time” procurement to mature and more stable purchasing, pointing to similar schemes overseas. But will stricter oversight of electricity retail – one of the directions endorsed by the 7th Basic Energy Plan – work in the Japanese context? Or, will it favor the larger industry players and potentially weaken price signals in a liberalized market?
Top 10 new power firms in Japan by sales
(as per March 2025 results)
Policy steps
Discussions on this topic, which was also raised in the Power System Reform Review in March 2025, are driven by the Next Generation Electricity and Gas Infrastructure Subcommittee at ANRE. The committee only started work in June, but has already met four times.
As energy planners see it, the retail industry has become over-reliant on the short-term spot market to secure electricity it supplies to end-users. Many retailers procure the majority of their share on JEPX; spot prices are volatile and sensitive to fuel price swings; and in periods of extreme supply-demand tightness, such as during the 2021-22 fuel shortage, prices surged quickly, pushing some retailers to exit the business and even declare bankruptcy. That had a dramatic impact on the rest of the market, reversing the trend that had hitherto seen new entrants (shin denryoku or “PPS”) steadily take market share of sales away from major power utilities (EPCOs).
JEPX spot market volumes have risen from 2% of total power demand in 2016 to over 27% in 2024 – even after the gross bidding system was phased out. And yet, according to ANRE, the minimal load in each grid area has never dropped below 50% since full market liberalization, which suggests there’s a substantial baseload requirement that could be met through long-term contracts. In France, ANRE argues, retailers must hedge at least 97% of their forecast demand.
For power generators that run on imported fuel, this situation is less than ideal. While Japan’s capacity (kW) market system provides some future guidance, it does not ensure that retailers secure a certain electricity volume (kWh) over time. This makes thermal power plant owners anxious about how much fuel they should secure on long-term contracts or invest in new capacities.
As such, the committee proposes that METI changes the system. The idea is for retailers to lock in at least half of expected demand three years ahead, rising to 70% a year before delivery. For retailers with small trading volumes, the target would be 25% three years ahead, and 50% a year before. The system would start with deliveries in FY2030, to be in addition to existing kW-based capacity obligations.
Currently, JEPX operates a baseload market and a forward market, which allow for mid- to long-term power procurement. But, there are issues with this setup, such as a lack of options to secure supply capacity in the shorter term.
Under the proposed new framework, retailers would retain flexibility over their contract type to preserve competitive variety. Compliance would be verified through retailers’ annual supply plan filings, and if a company is found to be below the required procurement levels, the regulator would issue a corrective order. Continued non-compliance could trigger orders under the Electricity Business Act, with potential deregistration for repeated breaches.
In short, the energy agency wants to ensure that retailers take more direct responsibility for energy supply, not just peak capacity. But to ease the burden on smaller retailers, experts suggest METI to be flexible on implementation or phased-in targets.
New market to support procurement
To help retailers meet these new obligations, the expert committee suggests creating an expanded mid- and long-term trading markets to make such hedging feasible. This Mid- to Long-Term Electricity Market (MLEM), planned to start operation in FY2028, would work alongside the existing JEPX and OCCTO platforms (kWh and kW).
The new market may focus on standardized contracts with delivery periods extending multiple years into the future. The idea is to address the weaknesses of existing markets, such as infrequent auctions or low volumes, as well as trades often done close to delivery.
Japan’s current forward and baseload markets have limited trading beyond one-year contracts. In FY2024, for example, no two-year baseload contracts were traded, and the overall forward market covered less than 0.01% of monthly demand. This lack of long-term liquidity is a major barrier to stable procurement.
The new market segment aims to solve this by offering transparent long-term price signals. Contracts will be designed to support a variety of load types (base, mid, peak), with product offerings aligned to seasonal and operational needs.
The goal is to develop a widely referenced long-term price index that can guide investment and provide retailers with better planning tools. However, some retailers, especially smaller firms without generation assets, have expressed concern about the cost and flexibility of entering multi-year contracts. They warn that rigid obligations could limit innovation and create entry barriers. Energy policy talks indicate that officials have acknowledged these concerns and are exploring whether a phased rollout or partial exemptions could help balance regulatory goals with market diversity.
Additionally, the government is considering mechanisms to strengthen the bilateral trading environment, including clearer rules for electricity brokers and possibly publishing price benchmarks to increase transparency in over-the-counter transactions.
Next steps and considerations
So far, this is a discussion that will require much work on market product design, trading methods and formats, as well as ideas on how to ensure there is adequate liquidity to make the new platform a success. How MLEM’s price formation will align with long-term investment planning is also an issue that will take time to clear.
Once these are decided, legislative work to amend the Electricity Business Act will be required. Options to combine the new platform with an existing one – say, the JEPX – are also on the table.
Also importantly, the government will need to convince industry participants that the promotion of longer-term thinking is not at odds with support for spot and balancing markets, which are key components of the solar, wind and battery businesses. The implementation of any price stability measures is something that battery developers in particular will likely want to follow closely.
As METI sets its sights on creating a better investment environment for power capacity, the ministry will also need to consider how various sectors will respond. Officials want to see more predictable and stable power and fuel procurement. This could reduce the threat of price shocks. It’s also crucial not to stifle more immediate price signals, or overcomplicate an electricity market that already has several platforms and is in the process of adding yet others.
BY JOHN VAROLI
A brief overview of the region’s main energy events from the past week
Australia / Natural gas
Santos said key natural gas projects are closed to completion. These include Pikka phase 1, Darwin LNG and the Barossa floating production, storage, and offloading.
Australia / BESS
UK-based Pacific Green Technologies has secured an AU$77 million debt facility for BESS projects in Australia.
China / Natural gas
PetroChina proposed buying three natural gas storage companies for 40 billion yuan. China’s natural gas demand is expected to rise 40% through 2050, said the IEA.
China / Offshore wind
This year China will install nearly three out of every four of the world’s new offshore turbines, according to BloombergNEF
India / Natural gas
India is exploring use of gas-fired power plants only to meet electricity demand surges in peak months of May and June, said the power ministry.
Indonesia / Energy transition
The Lowy Institute said western pledges to support SE Asia’s energy transition “have yet to translate into more projects”. Meanwhile, Chinese companies are expanding across Indonesia’s green-energy value chain such as solar and hydropower.
Pakistan / LNG
Pakistan will ask Qatar to delay delivery of LNG supply over the next five years due to weak demand and mounting import costs. This concerns two LNG shipments per month in 2026, to be rescheduled to after 2031.
Taiwan / Corruption
Green Energy Industry Promotion official Cheng Yi-Lin is accused of using bank accounts under relatives’ names to accept bribes from Tungwei Construction and HD Renewable Energy as “consulting fees”.
Thailand / LNG
Economic expansion is powering a rise in electricity demand. Gas will retain a dominant share in the power mix, accounting for more than 60% of generation.
Vietnam / Ethanol
Vietnam plans to switch completely to ethanol-blended gasoline, opening up the possibility to import more ethanol and corn from the U.S.
Disclaimer
This communication has been prepared for information purposes only, is confidential and may be legally privileged. This is a subscription-only service and is directed at those who have expressly asked K.K. Yuri Group or one of its representatives to be added to the mailing list. This document may not be onwardly circulated or reproduced without prior written consent from Yuri Group, which retains all copyright to the content of this report.
Yuri Group is not registered as an investment advisor in any jurisdiction. Our research and all the content express our opinions, which are generally based on available public information, field studies and own analysis. Content is limited to general comment upon general political, economic and market issues, asset classes and types of investments. The report and all of its content does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell, subscribe for or underwrite any product or physical commodity, or a financial instrument.
The information contained in this report is obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith. No representation or warranty is made that it is accurate or complete. Opinions and views expressed are subject to change without notice, as are prices and availability, which are indicative only. There is no obligation to notify recipients of any changes to this data or to do so in the future. No responsibility is accepted for the use of or reliance on the information provided. In no circumstances will Yuri Group be liable for any indirect or direct loss, or consequential loss or damages arising from the use of, any inability to use, or any inaccuracy in the information.
K.K. Yuri Group: Hulic Ochanomizu Bldg. 3F, 2-3-11, Surugadai, Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 101-0062.
NEWS:
・Govt discusses selection of data center hub sites
・METI begins soliciting proposals for GX Strategic Region
・As Japan’s debt-servicing costs climb, METI asks for major increase in GX funding for next year
・Sony urges suppliers to adopt 100% renewabl