JAPAN NRG WEEKLY
August 24, 2020
NEWSTOP Coal-fired plant closures will hurt more than the utilities Gloves are off in battle to build first offshore wind farm Tepco confirms CEO’s responsibility for nuclear accidents OIL & GAS Japan’s move away from coal will swing it towards LNG Gasoline prices fall for first time in 14 weeks Mauritius oil spill latest: Captain of ship arrested Tokyo Gas buys shale, solar to enact vision Tokyo Gas likely to be LNG supplier for Yokohama project POWER & NUCLEAR Town mulls hosting Japan’s long-term nuclear waste Rival ministries join forces to champion nuclear power Extreme temperatures led to electricity price volatility Hitachi considers restarting UK nuclear project Tohoku Electric to issue “green bonds” KEPCO scandal continues: documents refer to hush money RENEWABLES & OTHER Japan to add more EV charging points Japan could generate 45% of power form renewables: REI Government looks at buying forests to fuel biomass power Idemitsu selected as first supplier for Tokyo energy plan WEBINAR WRAP We hosted our first event, an online seminar to discuss the current state of nuclear power in Japan and its potential development in the future. CONTACT US |
ANALYSISHYDROGEN: JAPAN HAS A PLAN, Japan has taken an active role in engaging to build both a domestic and an international supply chain for hydrogen. That said, all efforts are as yet at a demonstration stage. There is also little progress on so-called green hydrogen, which puts into question the goals of the entire project. COMPANY PROFILE: JERA, THE FORMING OF JAPAN’S NEW ENERGY COLLOSSUS The biggest LNG buyer in the world also owns power assets which equal half the power capacity of the African continent. As the company moves towards an IPO, we consider its strengths and challenges. HOUSE VIEW Two global events over the last week will greatly affect Japan: the California power grid’s failure and BHP’s exit from coal. The former, sparked by an aggressive move into renewables without systemic capacity for backup when the sun sets, will bolster the position of Japan’s incumbent utilities. They will push for either more nuclear power restarts or a government and public acceptance of rising power bills. The second global event is another possible boon for nuclear power in Japan, but it poses a major challenge to Mitsubishi Corp, among other Japanese trading firms. The traders co-invest with global mining majors to secure the nation’s supplies of coal. Now, they will need to consider if it’s worth to do so alone. |


Japan’s move away from coal will swing country towards gas and jack up its price (Takeuchi Junko, International Environment and Economy Institute, August 18)
Gasoline prices fall for first time in 14 weeks (Nikkei Shimbun, August 19)
Mauritius oil spill latest: Captain of ship arrested (Nikkei Shimbun, various, Aug 21)
Tokyo Gas buys solar, North American shale gas to enact its 2030 vision (Nikkan Dempa Shimbun, August 18)
Tokyo Gas likely to be LNG supplier for Yokohama LNG bunkering project (Rim Intelligence, August 21)
| No. of operable nuclear reactors | 33 | ||
| of which | applied for restart | 25 | |
| approved by regulator | 16 | ||
| restarted | 9 | ||
| in operation today | 4 | ||
| able to use MOX fuel | 4 | ||
| No. of nuclear reactors under construction | 3 | ||
| No. of reactors slated for decommissioning | 27 | ||
| of which | competed work | 1 | |
| started process | 4 | ||
| yet to start / not known | 22 | ||
Source: JANSI and JAIF, as of August 23, 2020
Coal plant closures plan could give utilities a sweetener, but hurt industry (FACTA, September Issue)
TEPCO confirms CEO’s legal responsibility for nuclear accidents (Chunichi Shimbun, August 21)
Town mulls putting hand up to host Japan’s long-term nuclear waste facility (NHK, Aug 13)
Rival ministries join forces to fight emissions, pick nuclear as their champion (Diamond Online, August 21)
From heat to stove: Extreme temperatures boost electricity price volatility (Yuri Invest Research, Aug 23)
Hitachi considers restarting UK nuclear project based on new financing model (Kyodo, Aug 17)
Tohoku Electric Power Company to raise ¥10 billion in second “green bond” issue (Kankyo Business Online, August 20)
KEPCO document refers to hush money (Asahi Shimbun, August 18)


The gloves are off in the battle to build Japan’s first offshore wind farm (Diamond Online, August 18)
Japan to add more electric vehicle charging points to reduce wait times (Mainichi Shimbun, August 19)
Japan could generate 45% of electricity from renewables by 2030—Renewable Energy Institute (Mega Solar Business/Nikkei BP, August 18, 2020)
Government discusses purchase of forests to fuel biomass power generation (Tokyo Shimbun, August 19)
Idemitsu Green Power selected as first supplier for Tokyo government’s energy plan (Jiji, August 21)
| Japan is Gingerly Moving Into Hydrogen: How serious is it? | |
| KUMIKO SHIBAOKA,HEAD OF RESEARCH,SHULMAN ADVISORY | Much activity – and much hype – has surrounded the push towards the adoption of hydrogen as a key fuel in Japan. We look at how much progress has actually been made.
POLICY In December 2017, Japan’s “Basic Hydrogen Strategy” was approved by the Cabinet. It has two main goals. 1) Reduce dependence on imported energy sources. Cost of imported fuels for energy skyrocketed after the 2011 Fukushima disaster, while the country’s level of energy self-sufficiency sank to the 6 – 7% range in the post-Fukushima decade, putting Japan second to last in the list of 34 OECD member countries. 2) Achieve carbon emissions reduction targets. The government has vowed as part of the Paris Agreement to cut the nation’s FY2030 emissions by about 25% compared with FY 2005 levels. MAIN PROJECTS AND COSTS Japan has taken an active role in engaging to build both a domestic and an international supply chain for hydrogen. That said, all efforts are as yet at a demonstration stage. On the domestic front, Japan unveiled the world’s largest electrolytic hydrogen production site in February of this year. The Fukushima Hydrogen Energy Research Field (FH2R) facility is primarily powered by on-site solar panels. The pilot project was meant to supply hydrogen for the now postponed 2020 Tokyo Olympics flame, as well as for the various fuel cell vehicles and stationary fuel cell power supply systems that were slated for use at the games. Internationally, Japan kicked-off its hydrogen efforts by teaming up with Australia back in 2015. The two countries plan to build hydrogen production, gasification and loading facilities in Australia, and receiving facilities in Japan. The production facilities will run on brown coal, utilizing an Integrated Coal Gasifier Combined Cycle (IGCC). First shipments to Japan are due this fall. Japan has even created the world’s first dedicated hydrogen tanker. Japan is testing a different hydrogen strategy via a project in Brunei. Last year, Japan received the first shipment of hydrogen in the form of methylcyclohexane (MCH). That compound, which combines hydrogen with toluene, can be shipped via conventional tankers. However, it requires processing on arrival in Japan to extract the hydrogen. As all the projects start to ramp up, Japan expects prices for hydrogen to fall. There is some evidence for that already. In 2017, Japan procured about 200 metric tons of hydrogen at a price of ¥100 / Nm3. The 2030 target is to procure 300,000 tons at a price of about ¥30 / Nm3, with the longer-term target of bringing that down to 20 yen. By comparison, the price of natural gas, when adjusted to the calorific value of hydrogen, currently stands at about ¥16 / Nm3.
Vehicles Japan set ambitious targets for the proliferation of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (FCV) and supporting infrastructure throughout the country. In 2018, about 3,000 FCVs were registered in Japan. They can fill up at 132 fueling stations. The government wants FCV numbers to jump to 200,000 by FY 2025 and 800,000 by FY 2030. This is expected to cut the price difference between FCVs and hybrid vehicles (HV) from the current average of ¥3 million to about ¥700,000. The strategy sees the gap shrinking due to the lower cost of components and more FCV auto models, with appeal to the mass market. In line with greater public use of FCVs, Japan wants to bolster hydrogen station numbers to 320 stations by FY 2025 and 900 by FY 2030. The idea is that by reducing the cost of construction of hydrogen stations from ¥350 million to ¥200 million and cutting their operating costs by more than half by FY 2025, these facilities will be able to operate as fully commercial ventures independent of state support by the second half of the 2020s. Power Generation In 2018, Japan turned on the world’s first heat and power hydrogen-fired facility in an urban area with the launch of a test project in the city of Kobe. The plant used 100% hydrogen fuel. Work to improve the plant’s efficiency is ongoing. Meanwhile, major engineering firm Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems has developed a generation plant that can flexibly use hydrogen and natural gas together. The major challenge here is cost of electricity. As of 2019, the unit price for electricity produced in hydrogen-fired plants in Japan was ¥52 / kWh. The government aims to bring it down to ¥17 / kWh by 2030, and subsequently to bring it down to parity with other forms of thermal power. EXPORT POTENTIAL Japan sees hydrogen-related technologies as something that could grow into an export industry. The dedicated liquefied hydrogen tanker in the Australia-Japan demonstration project was built by Kawasaki Heavy Industries. Hydrogen is cooled even further than LNG. The former’s temperature has to be brought down to minus 253° C for transport on a ship. The resulting liquid hydrogen is just 1/800 the volume of hydrogen in its gaseous form. On the power generation side, Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems this year recorded a sale of its hydrogen-enabled combined cycle gas turbine plant technology. The buyer, a US IPP, initially plans to keep the fuel ratio at 30% hydrogen and 70% natural gas. If all goes well, the plant will shift to 100% hydrogen-generation by 2045. The ability to run both fuels is a risk-hedge for utilities, with future energy economics unclear. TAKEAWAY Taken at face value, Japan appears to be moving aggressively towards its goal of “realizing a hydrogen society”. The government targets are aggressive and industry appears to be on board. However, as most Japanese investment is in plants overseas that work only on a demonstration level, it’s hard to accept this as a serious effort. The goal of the hydrogen strategy was to improve energy independence. This will require a rollout of large-scale domestic hydrogen production. Equally, the other target of using hydrogen to cut emissions requires Japan to secure so-called green hydrogen. There does not appear to be an aggressive plan for that. Meanwhile, Japan is logging extra carbon emissions from the transport of hydrogen. |
| Company Profile: JERA,
Japan’s New Power Colossus Paving its Way to an IPO | |
| TOM O’SULLIVAN,DIRECTOR,K.K. MATHYOS | Company OutlineJapan’s JERA was born in 2015 as a 50/50 joint venture between Chubu Electric Power (‘Chubu EPC’) and Tokyo Electric Power (‘TEPCO’) to create a separate thermal power generation operating conglomerate, and to consolidate LNG and coal purchasing power in a single entity. JERA was established in the aftermath of the devastating 2011 Tohoku earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear accident that crippled Japan’s nuclear power industry and seriously damaged the reputation of Japan’s largest electricity company, TEPCO.The creation of JERA, which may have been initiated by the Ministry of Economy Trade & Industry (‘METI’), broke TEPCO into a ‘bad bank’ and a ‘good bank,’ with the ‘bad bank’ retaining the inactive nuclear portfolio, and the residual thermal generation portfolio switching to JERA.After only five years JERA is already Japan’s largest supplier of electricity and bigger than most national state electricity systems, with 26 separate generating stations and a combined domestic and international generation capacity of 76 GW, which equals almost 50% of the power capacity of the African continent. It currently produces around 200 TWhs of power per annum, comprising almost one fifth of Japan’s overall electricity demand.It is also the largest acquirer of LNG in the world at 35 metric tons per annum, buying from 17 different countries and operating 18 LNG vessels. JERA owns eight LNG receiving terminals and controls 40% of Japan’s LNG tank capacity. JERA’s interests span from upstream natural gas investments to renewable energy generation. It is invested in five natural gas upstream projects. In Australia JERA is invested in Wheatstone, Ichthys, Gorgon, and Darwin LNG, and in the US, in the Freeport LNG terminal. JERA still owns 10GW each of legacy coal and oil generation capacity. In renewable energy JERA is expanding into wind power and is also investing in power storage capacity. Financials JERA, which is mainly a B2B business, has revenues of $34 billion, a balance sheet of $36 billion, and expects to generate a profit of close to $2 billion by 2025. It also expects to increase its operational renewable energy generation assets to 5GW over the next five years. ![]() The market capitalization of Chubu EPC and TEPCO is now respectively $9.3 billion and $4.6 billion. JERA might be expected to command a valuation of between $10 billion and $15 billion if it were to IPO. TEPCO is now over 50% owned by the Japanese government and hence JERA is 25% state-controlled. Floatation on the Japan Stock Exchange would monetize some of the Japanese government’s stake in TEPCO. JERA’s Revenue Split ![]() International Footprint Overseas, JERA operates in Singapore, Thailand, Netherlands, Australia, the US, and more recently in Bangladesh, where it has just secured $700 million of funding from Japanese financial institutions for an LNG–to-power project located 40 km from the capital, Dhaka. Domestically, JERA operates thermal power plants in eight Japanese prefectures: Niigata, Fukushima, Ibaraki, Chiba, Kanagawa, Tokyo, Aichi, and Mie. The largest thermal power plant in the portfolio has a capacity in excess of 5GW. ![]() Management Toshiro Sano from TEPCO serves as chairman and Satoshi Onoda from Chubu EPCO serves as president. JERA has recently appointed David Crane, former NRG Energy CEO, to its Board of Directors. Crane is expected to bring experience gained in the US and UK energy markets that saw increased competition as a result of deregulation. Crane is now a self-confessed renewables evangelist. Other non-Japanese members of the JERA board are Hendrik Gordenker, a former White & Case Lawyer, Mike Winkel, a former member of the E.ON Management Board, and David McFarlane, a former EdF Trading executive. Challenges The strategic issues for JERA as we see them are as follows: 1. It is locked into long-term natural gas procurement contracts at a time when natural gas prices are very low. 2. It has 20GW of oil and coal generation capacity, which may need to be decommissioned in the short to medium term. 3. Most of its power is sold B2B to TEPCO and Chubu. 4. Its renewable energy portfolio is too small and overall RE aspirations might be too narrow. 5. Its thermal plant portfolio may be too concentrated in an era when electricity is becoming more distributed and decentralized. 6. It may have too much Australian exposure. 7. The lack of a retail business means that its retail data and digital reservoirs are limited, inhibiting its ability to cross-sell. On the positive side, JERA is building an aggressive international portfolio of assets. But, going forward, and prior to any IPO, the company will need to ensure that its portfolio addresses risk from the Five ‘D’s: 1). Decarbonization 2). Decentralization 3). Digitalization 4). Depopulation 5). Disaster |
Summary of the Webinar: “Outlook for Nuclear Power in Japan”
Hosted on 20 August 2020
NRG Weekly on Aug. 20 hosted its first webinar on the outlook for nuclear power in Japan, building on interest in the topic that arose from commentaries in our Aug. 17 and Aug. 11 editions.
NRG Weekly presented an analysis of the history of nuclear power in Japan, current status of re-starts, factors that are impacting re-starts, and our assessment of the government’s plans for nuclear power in 2030, the next target date for Japan’s revised energy mix.
Four leading experts on energy and nuclear power joined the webinar to add their views.
Nobuo Tanaka (Former Head of International Energy Agency and former Chairman of the Sasakawa Peace Foundation);
Vincent DuFour (General Representative Japan & Korea for EdF, which is the largest operator of nuclear plants in the developed world);
Tomas Kaberger (Board Member of Vattenfall, the Swedish utility that operates several nuclear power plants, and Chair of the Board of the Renewable Energy Institute); and
Shaun Burnie (Senior Nuclear Specialist, Greenpeace)
Webinar participants included nuclear energy experts from the UK, France, and the United States, all of which have significant investments and dependencies on nuclear energy in their respective national electricity mixes. All G7 countries with the exception of Italy are invested in nuclear energy.
There was an extensive discussion between the guest experts on decarbonization of the energy mix, existing and new nuclear technologies, the nuclear fuel cycle, spent fuel storage capacity, impacts on the nuclear industrial base, international cooperation, economics of nuclear power, and an assessment of Japan’s national energy policies with respect to nuclear power.
With the 10th anniversary of the 2011 Fukushima Nuclear Accident only seven months away, Japan is facing unique energy challenges – only four nuclear reactors are currently operating, two in Kyushu and two in Kansai,. To meet the government’s nuclear energy targets at least another 20 reactors may need to be restarted over the next decade. Japan is also struggling to meet its decarbonization goals as defined in the Paris Agreement.
Recently, Japan’s Nuclear Regulation Authority gave approval to new safety measures put in place at the Rokkasho complex in the north of the country, which many saw as one of the final steps to begin the reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel in Japan. The complex has been blighted by cost and scheduling delays to the point where it is almost a national embarrassment. And yet, the day after we hosted the webinar, the operator of Rokkasho announced a 25th delay to its operating schedule, putting back the starting date by another 12 months.
For further information on the Aug. 20 webinar and future NRG Weekly events please feel free to reach out to Yuriy Humber or Tom O’Sullivan directly, or contact us at nrgnews@yuri-invest-research.com .
| As of close on August 21, 2020 | Ticker | Market Cap | 1W (%) | MTD (%) | YTD (%) | |
| billions of yen | ||||||
| Energy | ||||||
| COSMO ENERGY HOLD. | 5021 JP | 136.99 | -3.92 | -32.34 | -1.82 | |
| ENEOS HOLDINGS INC | 5020 JP | 1,307.62 | -2.95 | -16.27 | 3.19 | |
| IDEMITSU KOSAN CO LTD | 5019 JP | 691.34 | -1.53 | -20.93 | 0.30 | |
| INPEX CORP | 1605 JP | 964.69 | -2.71 | -40.90 | -0.63 | |
| JAPAN PETROLEUM EXPL. | 1662 JP | 100.76 | -4.55 | -39.50 | -5.67 | |
| Industrials | ||||||
| CHIYODA CORP | 6366 JP | 71.33 | -1.08 | -3.18 | -2.84 | |
| JGC HOLDINGS CORP | 1963 JP | 301.99 | -4.51 | -32.70 | 2.37 | |
| MITSUBISHI CORP | 8058 JP | 3,432.02 | -0.06 | -18.07 | 2.08 | |
| MITSUI & CO LTD | 8031 JP | 3,030.69 | -0.42 | -6.99 | 7.72 | |
| Utilities | ||||||
| CHUBU ELECTRIC POWER | 9502 JP | 998.67 | -0.04 | -13.16 | -0.87 | |
| KANSAI ELECTRIC POWER | 9503 JP | 965.96 | -1.20 | -16.96 | -1.81 | |
| KYUSHU ELECTRIC POWER | 9508 JP | 447.63 | -0.84 | 1.58 | 3.40 | |
| J-POWER | 9513 JP | 294.16 | 0.31 | -38.25 | -5.41 | |
| TOKYO GAS CO | 9531 JP | 1041.27 | -0.70 | -10.23 | -9.50 | |
| OSAKA GAS CO | 9532 JP | 872.94 | 0.14 | 1.39 | -0.43 | |
| TOHO GAS CO | 9533 JP | 506.38 | 0.10 | 8.08 | -5.61 | |
| SAIBU GAS CO | 9536 JP | 91.33 | -2.07 | -2.13 | -3.61 | |
| SHIZUOKA GAS CO | 9543 JP | 66.82 | -0.79 | -6.97 | 0.92 | |
| TOKYO ELECTRIC POWER | 9501 JP | 496.57 | -1.90 | -33.83 | -2.83 | |





SOURCES: the Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI), Ministry of Finance, and the Petroleum Association of Japan






SOURCES: the Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI), and the Ministry of Finance.






SOURCES: the Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI), and the Japan Electric Power Exchange
DISCLAIMER
This communication has been prepared for information purposes only, is confidential and may be legally privileged.
This is a subscription-only service and is directed at those who have expressly asked Yuri Invest Research Ltd. or one of its representatives to be added to the mailing list. This document may not be onwardly circulated or reproduced without the prior written consent of Yuri Invest Research Ltd., which retains all copyright to the content of this report.
Yuri Invest Research Ltd. is not registered as an investment advisor in any jurisdiction. Our research and all the content of our reports express our opinions, which are generally based on available public information, field studies and own analysis. Content is limited to general comment upon general political, economic and market issues, asset classes and types of investments. The report and all of its content does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell, subscribe for or underwrite any product or physical commodity, or a financial instrument.
Recipients of this report should ensure that they fully understand the legal, tax and accounting implications before making an investment decision and independently determine that the transaction is appropriate based on their own objectives, experience and resources.
The information contained in this report is obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith. No representation or warranty is made that it is accurate or complete. Opinions and views expressed are subject to change without notice, as are prices and availability, which are indicative only. There is no obligation to notify recipients of any changes to this data or to do so in the future. No responsibility is accepted for the use of or reliance on the information provided.
In no circumstances will Yuri Invest Research Ltd. or its partner K.K Yuri Group be liable for any indirect or direct loss, or consequential loss or damages including without limitation, loss of business or profits arising from the use of, any inability to use, or any inaccuracy in the information.
Yuri Invest Research Ltd.: Room 602, Wah Yuen Building, 149 Queen’s Road Central, Central, Hong Kong.
K.K. Yuri Group: Oonoya Building 8F, Yotsuya 1-18, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 160-0004.
JAPAN NRG WEEKLY August 24, 2020 NEWS TOP Coal-fired plant closures will hurt more than the utilities Gloves are off in battle to build first offshore wind farm Tepco confirms…