
August 31, 2020
OIL & GAS
POWER & NUCLEAR
RENEWABLES, OTHER
JAPAN’S LNG PURCHASING STRATEGY NEEDS
A RETHINK: E-TRADING SHOWS ALTERNATIVES
Japan chronically overpays for its energy resources and nowhere has this been more blatant than in its LNG imports. This year, the Japan “premium” ran to over $6 MMBtu, with major losses on for the buyers. With the strong emergence of electronic trading in LNG, there is a chance to Japan to regain its price influence. With other nations embracing the trend, will Japan re-think its strategy?
JAPAN’S THERMAL COAL COSTS LOOK SET TO RISE
AS TRADING HOUSES GET THEIR CANARY MOMENT
A month after Japan said it would shut older coal-fired power plants, the world’s biggest mining firm said it would exit thermal coal production. The result will likely persuade Japanese trading firms to follow BHP out of that door, leaving thermal coal mines to less efficient players. Coal-fired generation is about to get more expensive, adding to the pressures on the sector.
HOUSE VIEW Shinzo Abe’s Legacy
In a bombshell announcement Friday Japan’s longest-ever serving prime minister and architect of Abenomics announced his resignation after almost eight years. Shinzo Abe took office the year after the Great Tohoku Earthquake that devastated a nuclear power plant in Fukushima and crippled the global nuclear power industry. This precipitated a significant overhaul of Japan’s energy policies. Since Prime Minister Abe came to power in 2012 … MORE

JAPAN OIL PRICE: $32.70 per barrel

JAPAN (JLC) LNG PRICE: $8.21 per million BTU
Fukushima’s new LNG terminal and gas-fired power station now online (Nikkei, August 25)
Honda to launch its first electric vehicle in October (Nikkei Shimbun, Aug 27)
Tokyo Gas repairs plan hits 100,000 subscribers (Denki Shimbun, August 28)
| No. of operable nuclear reactors | 33 | |||
| of which | applied for restart | 25 | ||
| approved by regulator | 16 | |||
| restarted | 9 | |||
| in operation today | 4 | |||
| able to use MOX fuel | 4 | |||
| No. of nuclear reactors under construction | 3 | |||
| No. of reactors slated for decommissioning | 27 | |||
| of which | competed work | 1 | ||
| started process | 4 | |||
| yet to start / not known | 22 | |||

POWER UTILITY LNG IMPORTS VS STOCKPILES
Source: JANSI and JAIF, as of August 23, 2020
J Power’s new vice president talks renewables, coal, and nuclear (Denki Shimbun, August 25)
Hitachi Zosen focus on developing CCUS, a CO2 recycle method (Nikkei, August 28)
Total cost of decommissioning Fukushima nuclear plant still unknown (Mainichi Shimbun, August 26)
Japan could employ efficiency tricks to retain some coal capacity (Nikkei Energy Next, August 24)
Tohoku Electric Power Network forced to buy power from TEPCO in sweltering heat (Kahoku Shimpo, August 29)
Institute of Applied Energy calls for better use of thermal energy storage (Denki Shimbun, August 24)
Japan has already been overtaken by South Korea in nuclear technology (Sunday Mainichi/Economist via Yahoo News, August 24)

HISTORICAL SPOT ELECTRICITY PRICES (24h)

SPOT ELECTRICITY PRICES (2020)
ENEOS and JERA open hydrogen filling station (Kabushiki News, August 26)
Tokyo Government invites applications from domestic solar suppliers (Nikkei, August 26)
COLUMN: We need an energy policy that’s serious about renewables (Nikkei Business, August 24)
Tokyo Gas acquires Singaporean Equis’ biomass ventures (Nikkan Kogyo Shimbun, August 27)
Idemitsu, Nihon Unisys, Scrum Ventures collaborate on smart city project (Kensetsu Tsushin Shimbun, August 28)
HONG CHOU HUI, FOUNDER,
HUI’S CONTENT HUB
That stoicism was severely tested when the gulf between spot and long-term rates widened to USD 6 per MMBtu this summer. Even in the short-term market, Japan appeared to overpay. Spot LNG prices in Asia for June deliveries went as low as $1.85/MMBtu, almost half the average $3.80/MMBtu Japan paid for short-term deals in the same month.
While Japan’s Inpex reportedly sold cargo from its Australian LNG plant for as little as $1.70-$1.75 (DES) earlier this year, Japanese importers via mostly long-term contracts paid on average $8.21 per MMbtu in June, according to official data.
This has had a large impact on the profits of Japanese buyers. The biggest Japanese LNG importer, JERA, alone posted more than 10 billion yen ($90 million) in losses from the resale of LNG cargoes when it announced financial results in July.
JERA and Japan’s ministry responsible for energy (METI) spent a lot of time during this summer calling for more “creativity” and flexibility in long-term contracts. Much of Japan’s LNG imports are locked in via contracts of ten years or more; these agreements have a price formula traditionally pegged to oil prices with little or no destination flexibility and no option for buyers to divert cargoes.
At a recent industry summit, JERA’s executive office Hitoshi Nishizawa appealed to LNG sellers to understand that if Japanese buyers are hurt by the current LNG contract terms, they will find it hard to promote further usage of the fuel in the domestic market.
Mr. Nishizawa wasn’t bluffing, either. With Japan’s July announcement of plans to shutter most of its older coal-fired capacity, a portion of the country’s energy mix is up for grabs. It could go to renewables, nuclear, cleaner-burning coal, hydrogen even, or perhaps LNG.
Turning to LNG could mean an extra 1 million tons or more a year of purchases over the next decade. Yet, it’s hard to see LNG taking over from “old” coal if the terms of long-term contracts remain inflexible. And it’s unlikely that many Japanese buyers will follow the lead of Osaka Gas, which at the start of the year moved an Exxon Mobil-led LNG joint-venture to arbitration in a bid to get lower rates.
Japan could better pressure LNG sellers if it pursued an active role in the growing electronic trading marketplace. A proliferation of new trading platforms has improved transparency and brought much needed liquidity to the sector.
The Covid-19 crisis could be Japan’s best chance to diversify its LNG purchasing portfolio. In utilizing the trading platforms, Japan would become a nimbler buyer, better attuning its purchases to domestic demand. Most importantly, it could regain some of the influence it had when more of the global LNG market was based on long-term contracts.
Last year Japan retained its spot as the biggest LNG buyer, but its sway over Asian LNG pricing, once benchmarked against the Japan Crude Cocktail (JCC), started to give way as early as 2016 on the back of Brent crude crashing below $30/bbl from more than $100/bbl two years earlier. The widely used Platts spot benchmarks now reflect purchases by Taiwan, South Korea, and China, as well as those of Japan.
ELECTRONIC TRADING IS CHANGING THE GAME
Trading a spot liquefied natural gas cargo usually involves a week-long process where talks begin on a Monday before a deal is inked on Friday. This process was shrunk to seconds thanks to a recent proliferation of electronic LNG trade platforms. Nearly 120 million tons of spot and short-term LNG was traded on such platforms in 2019. This made up 34% of global volumes, which have doubled in the last decade.
Physical transactions executed within a 90-day window comprised over a quarter of global LNG sales last year, an uptick from 17% in 2016, according to GIIGNL statistics.

The market took off around 2016 when, GLX, an Australian startup led by former Shell lawyer, Damien Criddle, announced its intentions to set up an electronic trading platform. The venture promised LNG deals that would forgo the hassle of long flights, meetings, phone calls and late nights. This is becoming even more important in the post-Covid world.
GLX’s successful foray into the domain of trading physical cargoes via an electronic platform, a traditional Platts stronghold, roused the US firm PRA to launch its LNG eWindow with the Intercontinental Exchange, or ICE on 26 July last year. It was used by Vitol to conclude a sale with PetroChina by the month’s end. Earlier the same year, Paris-headquartered data and analytics provider Kpler said it would work with the Powernext, part of Europe’s biggest wholesale electricity bourse, to set up Spark Commodities and its own spot trading platform. Kpler made its product available in the last quarter of 2019 but differentiated it from the earlier two platforms by focusing on LNG freight rates.
Our survey of 32 market participants – buyers, producers, traders and intermediaries – across Asia saw nearly three-quarters are backing Platts to become the trading platform of choice over GLX. Over a third thought Kpler’s product distinctive enough and occupying a niche space in an industry that’s highly reliant on vessels but some felt the product wouldn’t be able to survive competition from Platts, and could eventually be swallowed up by the American PRA or even GLX in a bid to stay competitive.
TAKEAWAY: Electronic trading of LNG is now at a stage of maturity and about half of the market is likely to coalesce around a common electronic marketplace and benchmark within the next five years, according to our survey of market participants. Japan needs to jump into this market before it’s too late or it will be lamenting losses on long-term contracts for many more years to come.
YURIY HUMBER, DIRECTOR,
YURI INVEST RESEARCH
Cost of Japan’s Thermal Coal Likely to Rise as BHP Exit Pushes Trading Houses to Reconsider the Fuel
A month after Japan’s government announced plans to cull older, less efficient coal-fired generation, this energy segment is potentially facing a hit on its supplies. The cost of Australian coal, which makes up over 60% of Japan’s thermal coal imports, is likely to rise after BHP Group followed rival Rio Tinto in announcing an exit from mining the mineral.
The news will also likely hasten a restructuring of coal assets at Japanese trading companies like Mitsui & Co., which co-invest with global mining majors to secure supplies of the fuel. Those Japanese utilities least able to switch from coal to gas or other sources, such as Okinawa and Hokkaido EPCOs, and to an extent Chugoku and Shikoku EPCOs, will face the brunt of rising coal costs.
Over the mid-term, the future of Japan’s coking coal supply will also be affected.
| Japan coal imports from Australia (volume) | over 100 million metric tons, three times the next-largest supplier (Indonesia), and over 60% of total, which was 186 million tons in FY2019 |
| Japan spending on coal | ¥2.53 trillion (USD 23.8 billion) |
| Of that, on thermal coal | ¥1.32 trillion |
| Mitsui thermal coal assets in Australia | A BMC venture with BHP (Mitsui owns 20%), which runs two mines in Queensland; Mitsui’s equity share of that was 2.1 million tons in FY2019 |
| Mitsui earnings from Australian coal mining | ¥48.5 billion |
| Mitsui thermal coal sales (annual) | 4.2 million tons (FY2019) |
| Mitsubishi’s exposure to Australian coal | 50% stake in BHP Mitsubishi Alliance (BMA) operates seven coking coal mines and a coal terminal in Queensland, Australia; BMA has 30% of global seaborne coal market and is the top producer in Australia. |
| Mitsubishi coal assets book value | ¥650 billion (as of March 31, 2020) |
| Mitsubishi profit sensitivity to mining | Mitsubishi’s Mineral Resource division, which contains BMA, brings in three times the earning of any of the trader’s other units |
| Itochu’s coal exposure | Potential output of over 55 million tons per annum in the five Australian and one Indonesian projects the Co. has invested in; Glencore and BHP are main mining partners |
BHP announced plans earlier this month to curtail its coal business and exit all assets that mine the fuel for power generation. These mines, which include two that are co-owned with Japan’s Mitsui will be sold or split off into a separate entity.
Similarly, Rio Tinto sold off its last thermal coal assets two years ago – including a mine in which Mitsui also co-invests (Kestrel).
Both BHP and Rio Tinto gave a nod to the environmental issues raised against thermal coal, yet they also both mentioned a business truth: the fuel is no longer a great investment and both firms see better opportunities elsewhere.
As BHP said in its Aug. 18 announcement: “Coal power is expected to progressively lose competitiveness to unsubsidized renewables on a new build basis in the developed world and in China.”
That should come as no surprise to Mitsui, which after all said in 2018 that it would “refrain” from further investments in thermal power and gradually reduce its coal-fired generation assets.
And yet, the exit of BHP is likely to spur Mitsui – and its rivals Itochu Corp., Marubeni Corp., and Sumitomo Corp. – to speed up their own divestments or restructuring of coal assets.
Mitsubishi Corp. has already sold out of thermal coal, after passing on stakes in its Australian assets to Glencore and Sumitomo, and in a separate deal to compatriot Sojitz.
BHP, however, also said that it would stop making significant investments in coking coal. If that stance were to harden, the economic impact on Mitsubishi, Itochu and other traders would be severe.
As it is, the cost structure of thermal coal is likely to rise as the industry passes from the hands of the world’s biggest mining firms, backed by top Japanese traders, to smaller, private firms.
COSTS RISING
Clearly, thermal coal volumes out of Australia would not immediately drop just because BHP exits the business. However, as the most efficient mining firms that can attract cheap capital pass on the assets to smaller, less diverse and often private entities, the cost of capital for the projects will rise.
The buying entities are also unlikely to have the marketing network or access to transport infrastructure that BHP and its peers do, which will also increase the costs of delivery.
Finally, with less global demand for thermal coal, some mines will need to close or shrink, dialing back on the economies of scale.
As Australian thermal coal costs rise, so will its price. And yet, Japanese utilities may not have the luxury of turning to other sources of supply. Japan’s plans to permit only USC coal-fired plants with 43 percent efficiency make it uneconomic to import and burn lower quality, high-sulphur coal.
With the price tag for coal generation rising, and natural gas expected to be depressed for several years, some Japanese utilities may well decide to quit on coal generation.

In a bombshell announcement Friday Japan’s longest-ever serving prime minister and architect of Abenomics announced his resignation after almost eight years.
Shinzo Abe took office the year after the Great Tohoku Earthquake that devastated a nuclear power plant in Fukushima and crippled the global nuclear power industry. This precipitated a significant overhaul of Japan’s energy policies.
Since Prime Minister Abe came to power in 2012 Japan has deregulated its electricity and gas markets with mixed results. The country has installed over 60 GW of solar power installations but continues to rely on the Middle East, Russia, and other energy suppliers for over 90% of its primary energy inputs, mainly oil, natural gas, and coal.
Growth in other renewables technologies has been anemic. Under Shinzo Abe, Japan signed the Paris Agreement in 2015 but Japan’s carbon emissions have stagnated due to a growing reliance on fossil fuels and delays in reactivating its nuclear fleet.
Japan has not yet committed to carbon neutrality by 2050 unlike some of its peer countries in the developed world. Its position on coal power stations is still ambiguous.
Japan’s critically important automobile industry is still trying to carve out a global leadership position in electric and fuel cell vehicles as EV and FCV developments in other geographies power ahead.
Japan continues to be an energy island with no pipeline or power links with its neighbors unlike the EU where energy transfers across national boundaries are commonplace.
It will fall to Shinzo Abe’s successors to reduce Japan’s external energy dependencies and re-commit to the goals of the Paris Agreement.
| As of close on August 28, 2020 | Ticker | Market Cap | 1W (%) | MTD (%) | YTD (%) | |
| billions of yen | ||||||
| Energy | ||||||
| COSMO ENERGY HOLD. | 5021 JP | 139.62 | 2.81 | -31.04 | 8.36 | |
| ENEOS HOLDINGS INC | 5020 JP | 1334.11 | 1.87 | -14.57 | 12.47 | |
| IDEMITSU KOSAN CO LTD | 5019 JP | 688.37 | 0.61 | -21.27 | 6.01 | |
| INPEX CORP | 1605 JP | 957.53 | -1.01 | -41.34 | 9.30 | |
| JAPAN PETROLEUM EXPL. | 1662 JP | 103.28 | 3.49 | -37.99 | 6.29 | |
| Industrials | ||||||
| CHIYODA CORP | 6366 JP | 69.51 | -1.11 | -5.65 | 6.37 | |
| JGC HOLDINGS CORP | 1963 JP | 297.06 | -0.87 | -33.80 | 7.71 | |
| MITSUBISHI CORP | 8058 JP | 3465.45 | -0.04 | -17.27 | 10.05 | |
| MITSUI & CO LTD | 8031 JP | 3061.60 | -0.11 | -6.04 | 13.28 | |
| Utilities | ||||||
| CHUBU ELECTRIC POWER | 9502 JP | 990.71 | -0.53 | -13.85 | 4.18 | |
| KANSAI ELECTRIC POWER | 9503 JP | 969.71 | 0.39 | -16.64 | 3.15 | |
| KYUSHU ELECTRIC POWER | 9508 JP | 443.36 | -0.21 | 0.61 | 5.77 | |
| J-POWER | 9513 JP | 289.40 | -1.00 | -39.25 | 10.17 | |
| TOKYO GAS CO | 9531 JP | 1024.68 | -0.62 | -11.66 | 3.83 | |
| OSAKA GAS CO | 9532 JP | 850.03 | -2.58 | -1.28 | 4.94 | |
| TOHO GAS CO | 9533 JP | 486.84 | -4.65 | 3.91 | 0.66 | |
| SAIBU GAS CO | 9536 JP | 91.30 | -1.29 | -2.17 | 9.31 | |
| SHIZUOKA GAS CO | 9543 JP | 65.68 | -0.69 | -8.57 | 2.01 | |
| TOKYO ELECTRIC POWER | 9501 JP | 499.78 | 0.65 | -33.40 | 11.07 | |
Japan Oil Price
Crude Imports Vs Processed Crude
Monthly Crude Processed (Mbpd)
Domestic Fuel Sales
SOURCES: the Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI), Ministry of Finance, and the Petroleum Association of Japan
Japan LNG Price
LNG Imports: Japan Total vs Gas Utilities Only
Total LNG Imports (M t)
LNG Imports by Gas Firms Only (M t)
City Gas Sales – Total (M m3)
City Gas Sales by Sector (M m3)
SOURCES: the Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI), Ministry of Finance
Japan Total Power Demand (GWh)
Current Vs Historical Demand (GWh)
Day-Ahead Spot Electricity Prices
Day-Ahead Vs Day Time Vs Peak Time
LNG Imports by Electricity Utilities
LNG Stockpiles of Electricity Utilities
SOURCES: the Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI), and the Japan Electric Power Exchange
This communication has been prepared for information purposes only, is confidential and may be legally privileged.
This is a subscription-only service and is directed at those who have expressly asked Yuri Invest Research Ltd. or one of its representatives to be added to the mailing list. This document may not be onwardly circulated or reproduced without the prior written consent of Yuri Invest Research Ltd., which retains all copyright to the content of this report.
Yuri Invest Research Ltd. is not registered as an investment advisor in any jurisdiction. Our research and all the content of our reports express our opinions, which are generally based on available public information, field studies and own analysis.
Content is limited to general comment upon general political, economic and market issues, asset classes and types of investments. The report and all of its content does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell, subscribe for or underwrite any product or physical commodity, or a financial instrument.
Recipients of this report should ensure that they fully understand the legal, tax and accounting implications before making an investment decision and independently determine that the transaction is appropriate based on their own objectives, experience and resources.
The information contained in this report is obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith. No representation or warranty is made that it is accurate or complete. Opinions and views expressed are subject to change without notice, as are prices and availability, which are indicative only. There is no obligation to notify recipients of any changes to this data or to do so in the future. No responsibility is accepted for the use of or reliance on the information provided.
In no circumstances will Yuri Invest Research Ltd. or its partner K.K Yuri Group be liable for any indirect or direct loss, or consequential loss or damages including without limitation, loss of business or profits arising from the use of, any inability to use, or any inaccuracy in the information.
Yuri Invest Research Ltd.: Room 602, Wah Yuen Building, 149 Queen’s Road Central, Central, Hong Kong.
K.K. Yuri Group: Oonoya Building 8F, Yotsuya 1-18, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 160-0004
JAPAN NRG WEEKLY JAPAN NRG WEEKLY August 31, 2020 NEWS TOP Japan unveils its biggest hydrogen filling station ENEOS and JERA launch the commercial site JERA also files plan for…