
November 16, 2020
OIL & GAS
POWER & NUCLEAR
RENEWABLES, OTHER
In the summer, the government announced bold plans to close most of Japan’s coal-fired plants and lead the nation to carbon neutrality by 2050. In subsequent talks with domestic industry, however, that progressive tone on coal has notably weakened. On Oct. 30, the key ministry for energy policy rolled out a new regulatory framework for power utilities and non-utility operators of “inefficient” coal-fired power plants. It asked utilities to submit annual reports detailing plans to move away from coal. There was no such request for steel, cement, paper and chemical manufacturers, as well as others that operate 80 coal-fired power plants in Japan. Non-utilities will likely be exempt.
COMPANY PROFILE: KANSAI ELECTIC
The story of Kansai Electric shows how tricky energy transition will be for Japan’s regional power utilities. Kansai Electric, the dominant supplier in Japan’s No. 2 industrial region, currently cannot use a fifth of its capacity due to multiple nuclear energy issues. One-sixth of its generation is coal-fired, and for over a year it has been embroiled in a scandal that has raised big questions about its corporate culture and way of doing business. As Prime Minister Suga asks the nation to decarbonize, the Co. needs to quickly find a new identity and strategy for an era in which its market position is no longer protected and guaranteed tariffs are on the way out. How the Co. will look a decade from now – whether it even exits in its current form – may depend on M&A and some recent initiatives.
GLOBAL VIEW
Investments in renewable energy by oil and gas firms will jump tenfold within the next five years, according to the IEA. Russia’s top oil firm forecasts losses. And France is reneging on solar contracts. See details on these and other political and business events in our regular Global View column.
Editorial Team
Yuriy Humber (Editor-in-Chief)
Tom O’Sullivan (Japan, Middle East, Africa)
John Varoli (Americas)
Contributors
Mayumi Watanabe
Daniel Shulman
Art & Design
22 Graphics Inc.

SUBSCRIPTIONS & ADVERTISING
Japan NRG offers individual, corporate and academic subscription plans. See details here.
For further details, or to discuss marketing, advertising, or collaboration opportunities, please contact one of the Editorial Team members or write to info@japan-nrg.com
Disclaimer
This communication has been prepared for information purposes only, is confidential and may be legally privileged. This is a subscription-only service and is directed at those who have expressly asked K.K. Yuri Group or one of its representatives to be added to the mailing list. This document may not be onwardly circulated or reproduced without the prior written consent of Yuri Group, which retains all copyright to the content of this report.
Yuri Group is not registered as an investment advisor in any jurisdiction. Our research and all the content of our reports express our opinions, which are generally based on available public information, field studies and own analysis. Content is limited to general comment upon general political, economic and market issues, asset classes and types of investments. The report and all of its content does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell, subscribe for or underwrite any product or physical commodity, or a financial instrument.
The information contained in this report is obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith. No representation or warranty is made that it is accurate or complete. Opinions and views expressed are subject to change without notice, as are prices and availability, which are indicative only. There is no obligation to notify recipients of any changes to this data or to do so in the future. No responsibility is accepted for the use of or reliance on the information provided. In no circumstances will Yuri Group be liable for any indirect or direct loss, or consequential loss or damages including without limitation, loss of business or profits arising from the use of, any inability to use, or any inaccuracy in the information.
K.K. Yuri Group: Oonoya Building 8F, Yotsuya 1-18, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 160-0004.
Japan Oil Price: $46.20 / barrel
Japan (JLC) LNG Price: $5.39 per Mbtu
JERA considers LNG contracts tied to Japanese electricity prices instead of oil-link
(Bloomberg, Nov. 9)
(Bloomberg, Nov. 9)
TEPCO faces difficult decisions over gas unit as breakup looms
(Diamond, Nov. 11)
Gasoline stations hit by languishing sales
(Nikkei, Nov. 12)
| No. of operable nuclear reactors | 33 | |||
| of which | applied for restart | 25 | ||
| approved by regulator | 16 | |||
| restarted | 9 | |||
| in operation today | 1 | |||
| able to use MOX fuel | 4 | |||
| No. of nuclear reactors under construction | 3 | |||
| No. of reactors slated for decommissioning | 27 | |||
| of which | completed work | 1 | ||
| started process | 4 | |||
| yet to start / not known | 22 | |||
Power Utilities’ LNG Imports Vs Stockpiles
Source: Company websites, JANSI and JAIF, as of Nov. 15, 2020
Towns hosting TEPCO’s nuclear plant held elections that could impact reactor restart
(Japan NRG, Nov. 16)
(Nikkei, Nov. 6)
TAKEAWAY: A sign-off from the local governments is all that stands in the way of the restart at the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPP, the only operable nuclear facility owned by TEPCO. The company secured the permit for a restart of Units 6 and 7 of the facility back in Dec. 2017. However, that local sign-off has taken so long to procure that earlier this month the company filed another application to the regulator, the NRA, to confirm that it can go ahead with the restart. TEPCO’s record as operator of the disaster-struck Fukushima Dai-Ichi NPP continues to weigh heavy on the brand and rumors persist that its remaining nuclear assets will pass to another entity, or even a state entity.
These local elections are unlikely to lead to an immediate restart of Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPP, however, as TEPCO still needs to get the sign off from the Niigata governor. Still, with the local vote on its side, the company will feel that it is in a strong position to persuade the governor to cast his weight behind them. The utility clearly feels that there is positive momentum for its first restart of a nuclear facility since the 2011 Fukushima accident. Fuel has already been loaded into parts of the NPP, an unusually forward step.
A shrewd move from a public relations viewpoint would be for TEPCO to delay the restarts until after the 10-year Fukushima anniversary, in March 2021, and even after the 2020 Tokyo Olympic Games, which are due to take place in July 2021. However, TEPCO has rarely been an astute practitioner of public relations and the company is probably rushing to restart the NPP as soon as it can so that it can then move onto the Higashidori nuclear construction project. The next six months will be critical for TEPCO and its survival in the current form.
(Too Nippo, Nov. 14)
METI Minister Kajiyama Vows Support for Ammonia-Coal Co-Firing
(Japan NRG via ADIPEC Virtual 2020 Conference, Nov. 9)
Kyushu Electric brings forward Sendai nuclear reactor restart by a week
(Nikkei Shimbun, Nov 14)
TAKEAWAY: Should all go as planned, Kyushu Electric will have all four of its nuclear reactors back online by the end of this year. Even if one of the unit restarts is delayed, this would already triple the output of nuclear generation in the country. Another reactor due to be back online in the next couple of months is the Takahama-3, operated by Kansai Electric. The latter is facing a number of trust issues with the local population. For an in-depth look at Kansai Electric, see our profile of the company in this week’s Analysis section.
J-Power sees loophole to secure coal financing despite pressure over ESG
(Sentaku, Nov. 2020 edition)
Miyagi Governor gives green light to restarting Onagawa reactor
(Jiji, Nov. 10)
TAKEAWAY: Onagawa NPP is an unusual case in Japan. The station has now won the local political approval for a restart, but it has yet to secure the final green light from the industry regulator, the NRA. As detailed in a recent Japan NRG report on the state of nuclear energy in the country, Tohoku Electric has clashed with regulators on the readings of seismic motion underneath the facility. The geological assessment of the Onagawa site is complete, but the seismic motion evaluation is not. In an October announcement, the NRA said it wants to review another geological fault recently detected to the east of the facility. That will be a “major discussion point”, according to the NRA. In that sense, Tohoku Electric is lucky in not planning the actual restart of Onagawa Unit 2 until 2022. The utility is conducting work to upgrade the facility. If the restart schedule is to be maintained, the company has a little over a year to convince the NRA that the NPP is safe. That will not be an easy feat.
Carbon-neutral policy is a catalyst for consolidation in the power industry
(Diamond, Nov. 12)
Why is Toshiba withdrawing from coal and betting on renewables?
(Nikkei, Nov. 11)
(Asia Nikkei, Nov. 10)
Dominance of the big 10 regional power utilities already a thing of the past
(Diamond, Nov. 11)
Carbon-free policy not necessarily good news for nuclear reactor manufacturers
(Diamond Online, Nov. 13)
Spot Electricity Prices (24h)
Spot Electricity Prices (2020)
Key Japan decarbonization body identifies which energy sources should be supported
(Japan NRG, Nov 15)
(Denki Shimbun; Nov. 11, 2020)
Japan to promote carbon-reduction through tax-breaks and establish fund for green tech
(Nikkei, Nov. 12)
TAKEAWAY: We have discussed the details of this issue in several earlier editions of Japan NRG. In short, the govt. would feel much more comfortable supporting solar and wind power if the country had manufacturers that supplied the relevant equipment. Most solar panels and related tech are imported from China or South Korea. In wind, Japan boasts just one manufacturer (MHI), and even that company outsources much of its turbine work to its Danish business partner (Vestas). In previous years, other Japanese manufacturers exited the wind turbines market, citing low profitability. For now, it is not clear which major manufacturers would be tempted by the tax breaks. Toshiba, for example, has declared its intention to enter the grid and Virtual Power Plant space. Toyota is heavily invested in batteries and storage, as are Panasonic and Murata. More will need to come forward to create a vibrant renewables supply chain in the domestic market.
Erex and ENEOS may build world’s biggest biomass-fired plant in Niigata
(Nikkei, Nov. 10)
Bids in sixth solar feed-in-tariff tender drop to an average of ¥11.5/kWh
(Smart Japan, Nov. 11)
TAKEAWAY: Earlier this year, METI made a presentation to renewable energy investors hinting that it saw FIT pricing heading down to ¥12 / kWh. That drew gasps from the audience, yet it has obviously been absorbed by the industry as the price levels of the latest bids show.
Hokkaido government inviting submissions for 1 GW offshore wind farm at Ishikari
(City of Sapporo, Nov. 13)
Toshiba to build carbon-capture unit for Sekisui Chemical waste-to-ethanol plant
(New Energy Business News, Nov. 13)
Japanese EV autos chase Chinese, South Korea rivals with new storage batteries
(Asia Nikkei, Nov. 7)
Shinsei Bank, Daiwa Energy to provide ¥40 billion of mezzanine finance for renewables
(Nikkei BP, Nov. 2)
Asahi joins RE100, pledges to transition to 100% renewable energy by 2050
(New Energy Business News, Nov. 9)
Starts to Soften as Non-Utility Users Push Back
Since the summer, the government has announced bold plans to close most of Japan’s coal-fired plants and lead the nation to carbon neutrality by 2050. In subsequent talks with the domestic industry, however, that progressive tone on coal has notably weakened.
On Oct. 30, the key ministry for energy policy, the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), rolled out a new regulatory framework for power utilities and non-utility operators of “inefficient” coal-fired power plants. It asked utilities to submit annual reports detailing plans to move away from coal. There was no such request for steel, cement, paper and chemical manufacturers, as well as for major trading houses that operate some 80 coal-fired power plants in Japan. According to METI, non-utilities are likely to be exempt.
INFO BOX
| Japan has 150 power plants or units that utilize coal. Of these, 114 fall under the “inefficient” label as it was initially explained by METI in July 2020. These 114 units account for 16% of Japan’s power generation capacity as of fiscal 2018, according to METI data. | |
| What is deemed “efficient” is important since that’s the basis for Japan determining which coal-fired plants have to be retired. The original METI announcement called for the retirement of subcritical and supercritical coal-fired technologies, while classifying ultra-supercritical (USC) plants as “efficient”. These terms refer to the heat and pressure level at which a plant operates in relation to the critical point of water; higher temperatures tend to allow for better energy efficiency. As such, Japan could be said to have 29 “efficient” coal power plants since they are of the USC class and boast 41%-43% energy efficiency. The remainder of Japan’s coal units are Integrated Coal Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) plants, which score 46%-50% energy efficiency. | |
| According to METI calculations, “efficient” coal plants account for 13% of Japan’s power generation capacity and could make up 20% of total in the foreseeable feature. |
To be fair, the bulk of Japan’s coal-fired assets is owned by the regional electricity companies (EPCOs), which count 70 units with a generation capacity of about 39 GW. The 80 plants owned by non-utilities have a capacity of 9 GW. Still, the majority of that capacity in the hands of manufacturers is old, relatively small-scale and not efficient.
Steelmakers, which as an industry are Japan’s biggest greenhouse gas (GHG) emitters after the power sector, run 26 coal units. Most are 10-20 years old and either of the sub-critical or supercritical rank. Initially in summer, METI said that Japan would keep only coal-fired units that use ultra-supercritical technology. Since then, the ministry has suggested that the efficiency percentage may be more important than the base technology
The oldest coal plant run by a non-utility is the 75 MW station in Niihama City that’s owned by a unit of Sumitomo Chemical. The station went online in 1959.
Japan’s steelmakers have pushed back hard against the government on coal plant closures. In a presentation to METI on Aug. 25, the Japan Iron and Steel Federation argued that its members run coal-fired technology for a good reason. These power plants re-use methane, hydrogen and other gases released from blast furnaces and coke ovens, according to the federation. The plants also need to burn coal because various gases with volatile properties could not be stable fuel sources.

Furthermore, Japanese steelmakers argued that they are already the greenest among global peers and have the best energy efficiency records. The industry federation urged METI to drop plans to increase their energy reduction targets.
The pleas seemed to have worked. METI’s response in the October presentation was to say that further new measures are unlikely to follow. At present, non-utilities are only required to report their energy efficiency records to METI if they consume more than 1,500 kiloliters of fossil fuels.
Source: The National Institute for Environmental Studies via the Asia Nikkei
Note: the chart does not include transportation, oil refining or power generation
UTILITIES ASK FOR TIME TO EXIT COAL
Japanese power utilities have also argued against a rapid exit from coal. Still, the power industry seems more prepared to move away from the fuel. Since the 2009 introduction of the Structural Upgrading Act for Energy Supplies, utilities have been under pressure to lower emissions. The Act also mandated a decrease over the long-term for coal, oil and LNG use.
That decade-old legislation asked that by 2030 Japanese utilities should source at least 44% of their electricity from non-fossil fuel sources. METI has been conducting periodic checks on compliance and the latest results, published in October, show that 19 of 46 power utility operators have achieved their fossil-fuel reduction targets.
With less than 10 years left, METI does not seem to display any urgency to hurry the rest of the utilities to comply. “The question is, should there be new regulation that reinforces [the Act via] a reduction in coal-fired power in particular?” METI wrote in its Oct. 30 update. The ministry’s own answer was to “continue consultations” with utilities on what coal-specific regulations might be necessary.
For now, utilities have asked METI to allow them time to phase out coal-fired assets. To get a sense of how much time is required, utilities stated that “around a decade” is required to build a new power plant from scratch.
Utilities also asked METI for a methodology that would “reward” their shift to green energy by reflecting their increased use of renewables in the energy portfolio.
NEXT STEPS
To promote a faster move away from coal, METI has said it will implement:
The first power capacity auction was held earlier this year, as featured in the Oct. 26 edition of Japan NRG Weekly. The results were met with dismay by many electricity retail firms that argued the auction’s high prices supported thermal generation, such as coal-fired capacity, at the expense of renewables and the consumer.
As such, METI said it will now study whether there is a rationale in putting equal value on coal and non-coal capacity. The ministry wants experts to consider if a mechanism that discounts coal capacity could work in the current auction and market conditions.
A final recommendation based on expert opinions is due to be presented and implemented before the 2021 capacity auction.
METI OFFERS COAL OPERATORS PRIVACY
In what is perhaps the oddest softening of stance, METI also said it wants to offer coal-fired plant operators protection from public scrutiny.
The ministry plans to bundle reports from individual companies into a single document before public disclosure, which will redact the names of operators.
The ministry said that this was appropriate since identification of a coal facility owner may affect their competitive strength and relations with the local community, and potentially create unanticipated challenges to coal phase-out plans.
Struggling for Identity and Strategy in Post-Carbon World
The story of Kansai Electric Power Co. (KEPCO) shows how tricky energy transition will be for Japan’s regional power utilities. The dominant supplier in Japan’s No. 2 industrial region, KEPCO currently cannot use a fifth of its capacity due to multiple nuclear energy issues. One-sixth of its generation is coal-fired. And, for over a year it has been embroiled in a scandal that has raised big questions of its corporate culture and way of doing business.
As Prime Minister Suga asks the nation to decarbonize, KEPCO needs to quickly find a new identity and strategy for an era in which its market position is no longer protected and guaranteed tariffs are on the way out. How KEPCO will look a decade from now – whether it even continues as the current entity – will depend on recent initiatives in electrification and a burgeoning wave of industry consolidation.
The last 12 months have not been kind to Japan’s second-largest power company by market capitalization. Earlier this month, KEPCO closed Unit 4 at its Ohi nuclear station in Fukui Prefecture for maintenance. This left the firm’s entire reactor fleet offline for the first time in over three years.
Some of KEPCO’s seven reactors were due to be restarted by this point. However, gaining approval for the restarts from local politicians (considered a social must), has so far proved impossible since a bribery scandal around KEPCO’s nuclear division erupted last year.
The utility is being sued by shareholders based on revelations that the late, former deputy mayor of Takahama city, which hosts one of KEPCO’s nuclear stations, made payments to senior KEPCO officials. Since 1987, money and gifts worth over ¥300 million were sent over a 30-year period. In return, firms with which the deputy mayor was affiliated won work contracts.
The case led the nation’s biggest newspaper, Yomiuri Shimbun, to slam KEPCO in an editorial, a very rare occurrence. In September, the governor of Fukui said that public confidence in KEPCO has been lost.
Without nuclear, KEPCO faces a massive challenge in responding to the recent government pledge to make Japan carbon neutral by 2050. While JERA and Tokyo Gas, two of the biggest utilities, quickly unveiled their own roadmaps to net-zero emissions, KEPCO has so far kept quiet.

Burning coal and gas generated around 60% of KEPCO’s output last year, resulting in 39 million tons of CO2, or 0.33 kg of C02/kWh. A few years ago, KEPCO pledged to cut CO2 emissions in half by 2030, but used 2013 as the benchmark year. In that year, KEPCO’s CO2 emissions were at a peak due to a shutdown of most nuclear assets in the aftermath of the Fukushima disaster. Compared to pre-Fukushima 2010 numbers, 2013 emissions were up 56%.
In other words, KEPCO’s emissions pledge was mainly predicated on being able to restart all their nuclear units.
Kansai Electric’s CO2 Emissions (at the bottom) Plotted against NPP Utilization (grey triangles)

Source: KEPCO 2019 CSR report
COMPANY OVERVIEW
KEPCO, headquartered in Osaka City, serves a $1 trillion economy in Western Japan with annual power generation needs of 120 billion kWh. That is 15% of Japan’s total, bringing the utility annual revenues of almost $30 billion.
KEPCO’s home territory is adjacencies with three other EPCOs: Hokuriku Electric to the north; Chubu Electric to the east; and Chugoku Electric to the west.
KEPCO operates 170 power-generation facilities. Of those, renewables energy capacity stands at just 4 GW. By 2030, KEPCO’s current goal is to expand that to 6 GW, which seems to be modest by multiple orders of magnitude.
Without nuclear, KEPCO relies on LNG and coal, imported mainly from Australia and Indonesia. The company’s fuel costs in FY2019 were $5 billion.
In addition, KEPCO had to buy around $4.7 billion of power from other producers and the wholesale power market in 2019 to meet demand.
KEPCO operated three nuclear facilities – the Mihama NPP, Ohi NPP and Takahama NPP, all in the Fukui region. The stations have a total of 11 reactors, however four are being decommissioned. Three of the remaining seven had their life cycles extended beyond the initial 40 years. The book value of KEPCO’s nuclear facilities was $3.5 billion at the end of FY2019.

Source: Kansai Electric
Most recently, KEPCO reported negative free cash flow of $1.5 billion in H2 FY2020 due to capital expenditure outlays, many of those related to mandated upgrades at nuclear plants. As of September, KEPCO had accumulated debt of almost $40 billion. This dwarves the company’s $9 billion market capitalization.
The stock has doubled since the Fukushima accident in 2011, yet it is still down 75% since a market peak in 2007. It trades at close to 50% of book value. Chubu Electric, headquartered in Nagoya, is now the largest Japanese utility by market capitalization at $9.5 billion.
KEPCO paid dividends of $360 million in FY2019, an important attribute for its retail investors. Government and domestic financial institutions own over 40% of the company, with foreign ownership around 25%.
Also, KEPCO has 2.8 GW of overseas assets in 11 countries including the U.K., Indonesia, Laos, Philippines, Taiwan, and Myanmar.
POST-DEREGULATION, NEW BUSINESS CHANCE
The government fully deregulated the domestic retail electricity market in April 2016, resulting in significant competition for the indigenous power companies including KEPCO. As part of the deregulation, KEPCO separated its transmission and distribution business from generation and retail. Since then, KEPCO has lost 10% of its regional retail market. However, it now sells electricity also in the Tokyo area to around 190,000 households.
The government also deregulated the domestic retail gas market in 2017, which prompted KEPCO to enter the gas distribution business. It now generates around $2 billion in revenues from gas sales.
In gas, KEPCO has strategic cooperation agreements with Tokyo Gas. For renewables, KEPCO’s partner has often been Kyocera.
Since the unbundling of the gas and power industries, incumbent utilities have looked for new business areas. One field that KEPCO has explored is transport electrification. The company committed to developing a fully electric ship to feature at the 2025 World Expo, which will be hosted by KEPCO’s home city of Osaka.
More power demand will come from greater use of electric cars and other road transport. What’s more, SBI one of Japan’s leading investment banks, is pushing for the creation of a financial services hub in the Kansai region, which would be another tailwind for power demand and KEPCO.
On a positive note, KEPCO is diversifying its domestic business lines by entering home security, healthcare and leasing businesses. Internationally, the utility is expanding to onshore wind energy investments in Finland and the U.S. This May, KEPCO’s first U.S. greenfield project, the Hickory Run 1,000 MW thermal plant in Pennsylvania, started commercial operation.
Below are some of last week’s most important international developments monitored by the Japan NRG team because of their potential to impact energy supply and demand, as well as prices. We see the following as relevant to Japanese and international energy investors.
Last Tuesday the International Energy Agency (IEA) issued its global ‘Renewables (RE) 2020–Analysis and Forecasts to 2025 Report’.
IEA findings included:
Oil:
IEA and OPEC both revised downward oil consumption forecasts to a YoY decrease of 9 & 10 mbpd, respectively, for 2020. OPEC also revised downward its 2021 forecast by 300,000 bpd.
However, the vaccine announcement by Pfizer pushed oil prices up by $5 last week, with WTI reaching $40 and Brent $43. Energy stocks in the U.S. were up 20% last week.
Covid-19:
Infection rates in the U.S. have exceeded 100,000 cases for nine consecutive days and on Thursday exceeded 150,000 cases, dampening the outlook for fuel consumption in the U.S.
China:
Twenty bulk carriers carrying Australian coal are anchored off the Chinese port of Jingtang, Hebei Province due to the ongoing diplomatic spat between China and Australia.
ASEAN:
Annual ASEAN and East Asian Summits are underway this month where oil and gas exploration in the South China Sea may be discussed. Vietnam, Philippines, Malaysia, and Brunei all have exploration and territorial disputes with China in the South China Sea. Most of Vietnam’s electricity is generated from South China Sea-sourced natural gas. Japan’s Prime Minister Suga attended the ASEAN summit last Thursday, committing to $19 billion of port and railway infrastructure investments.
Philippines:
Typhoon Goni disabled six power plants on the island of Luzon last week causing significant power outages in 125 cities and towns. Goni, which may have been the strongest tropical cyclone in history, caused 16 fatalities and resulted in half a million people evacuated.
Malaysia:
Petronas, the state-run oil and gas monopoly, has set a target to achieve net-zero carbon emission by 2050.
Australia:
The country’s top science body, CSIRO, and its Bureau of Meteorology, issued its bi-annual State of the Climate report on Friday warning of further significant climate change impacts similar to the bush fires in 2019 and 2020 that caused $7 billion of damage. The country’s economy relies heavily on coal and natural gas exports to Japan and North Asia.
Myanmar:
The gas-rich ASEAN country held a general election on Nov. 8, the result of which is being disputed by the military-backed opposition parties.
Russia:
The country’s largest oil and gas company, Rosneft, is now forecasting a loss for the current fiscal year due to low oil prices. Europe’s BP has a $10 billion stake in Rosneft.
Middle East/Africa:
The World Bank is now forecasting that the dual shock of low oil prices and Covid-19 will cost the MENA region $230 billion of output in 2020.
Zambia is expected to be the first African country to default on sovereign debt obligations post Covid-19.
EU:
1). The French government is reneging on solar power contracts signed between 2006 and 2010 that it says are generating excessive profits for investors. Savings of E600 million are expected for the French government.
2). At a meeting in Paris on Wednesday, 450 global public development banks signed a declaration committing to align lending policies with the Paris Agreement, but stopped short of ruling out loans for fossil fuel investments. The Asian Development Bank, which is run by Japan’s Asakawa Masatsugu, declined to sign the declaration.
UK:
Prime Minister Johnson is expected to make a major set-piece policy speech next week outlining how the UK will meet its net-zero 2050 CO2 pledge. The UK will exit the EU in seven weeks, and the issue of electricity and gas transmission between the EU and UK is now part of Brexit negotiations.
Americas:
1). Peabody Energy, the largest coal producer in the U.S., may be forced to file bankruptcy for a second time due to a collapse in coal prices.
2). The Keystone and Dakota Access oil pipelines may be early targets of the incoming Biden administration, which plans a return to climate change commitments.
3). Latin America’s largest oil producer, Brazil, is holding municipal elections this month in a major test for President Bolsonaro. Outcomes may impact the country’s energy and climate policies.
| As of close on Nov 13, 2020 | Ticker | Market Cap | 1W (%) | MTD (%) | YTD (%) | |
| billions of yen | ||||||
| Energy | ||||||
| INPEX CORP | 1605 JP | 786.73 | 7.60 | -51.80 | 0.00 | |
| JAPAN PETROLEUM EXPL. | 1662 JP | 100.14 | 3.55 | -38.99 | 2.22 | |
| ENEOS HOLDINGS INC | 5020 JP | 1178.41 | 0.36 | -22.38 | -1.41 | |
| IDEMITSU KOSAN CO LTD | 5019 JP | 652.92 | 1.86 | -23.36 | -0.63 | |
| COSMO ENERGY HOLD. | 5021 JP | 142.33 | 5.13 | -29.70 | 7.22 | |
| Industrials | ||||||
| MITSUBISHI CORP | 8058 JP | 3700.19 | 3.17 | -9.38 | 1.36 | |
| MITSUI & CO LTD | 8031 JP | 3058.16 | 3.37 | -4.14 | -0.81 | |
| JGC HOLDINGS CORP | 1963 JP | 241.33 | 4.26 | -46.22 | 1.31 | |
| CHIYODA CORP | 6366 JP | 63.26 | 4.74 | -14.13 | 0.41 | |
| Utilities | ||||||
| TOKYO ELECTRIC POWER | 9501 JP | 461.21 | 2.14 | -38.54 | -2.38 | |
| CHUBU ELECTRIC POWER | 9502 JP | 962.28 | 0.99 | -14.73 | 2.59 | |
| KANSAI ELECTRIC POWER | 9503 JP | 933.66 | 1.62 | -17.80 | -0.34 | |
| KYUSHU ELECTRIC POWER | 9508 JP | 433.40 | 1.44 | 0.14 | -1.72 | |
| J-POWER | 9513 JP | 274.21 | 2.25 | -41.21 | 0.20 | |
| TOKYO GAS CO | 9531 JP | 1144.36 | 4.55 | -0.13 | 10.25 | |
| OSAKA GAS CO | 9532 JP | 907.53 | 6.82 | 6.67 | 10.06 | |
| TOHO GAS CO | 9533 JP | 661.10 | 5.39 | 41.82 | 19.24 | |
| SAIBU GAS CO | 9536 JP | 113.98 | 9.97 | 23.66 | 20.10 | |
| SHIZUOKA GAS CO | 9543 JP | 75.74 | -1.78 | 5.44 | 8.87 | |
Japan Oil Price
Crude Imports Vs Processed Crude
Monthly Oil Import Volume (Mbpd)
Monthly Crude Processed (Mbpd)
Domestic Fuel Sales
SOURCES: the Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI), Ministry of Finance, and the Petroleum Association of Japan
Japan LNG Price
LNG Imports: Japan Total vs Gas Utilities Only
Total LNG Imports (M t)
LNG Imports by Gas Firms Only (M t)
City Gas Sales – Total (M m3)
City Gas Sales by Sector (M m3)
SOURCES: the Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI),
Ministry of Finance
Japan Total Power Demand (GWh)
Current Vs Historical Demand (GWh)
Day-Ahead Spot Electricity Prices
Day-Ahead Vs Day Time Vs Peak Time
LNG Imports by Electricity Utilities
LNG Stockpiles of Electricity Utilities
SOURCES: the Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI), and the Japan Electric Power Exchange
JAPAN NRG WEEKLY NOVEMBER 16, 2020 JAPAN NRG WEEKLY November 16, 2020 NEWS TOP Japan decarbonization body identifies which energy sources must be supported; govt. holds meeting to outline key…