
NEWS
TOP
ENERGY TRANSITION & POLICY
ELECTRICITY MARKETS
OIL, GAS & MINING
TWO VIEWS OF ENERGY
THE YEAR 2021 AND COP26 SHOWED US THAT…
❶ THE FUTURE BELONGS TO RENEWABLES, BUT
JAPAN CONTINUES TO BUCK GLOBAL TREND
Tomas Kåberger, the Chair of Executive Board of Renewable Energy Institute (Japan), argues that the global progress in renewable energy is making fossil fuels obsolete, while the growing trend in carbon tax and similar instruments will make traditional energy uncompetitive with green sources. Japan’s current approach is betting on the wrong energy strategy.
❷ RUSHING THE GREEN AGENDA WILL BACKFIRE;
JAPAN EMBRACES ENERGY PRAGMATISM
Former COP negotiator, Arima Jun, now a professor at the University of Tokyo’s Graduate School of Public Policy, and Tezuka Hiroyuki, Chair of the WG on Global Environment Strategy at Keidanren (Japan Business Federation), say that the energy transition cannot occur at any cost. They explain how the climate agenda can be furthered without rushing, and possibly derailing, the overall process.
GLOBAL OUTLOOK 2022
To start the year, our Global Wrap column takes a look at all the main energy sources and sectors, and paints a brief outlook of their prospects for this year. With the world economy expected to see elevated growth after two years of pandemic-induced restrictions, fossil fuel usage in particular looks likely to stay strong.
JAPAN OUTLOOK 2022
A look at what this year holds in store for Japan care of the nation’s leading energy think tank: The Institute of Energy Economics in Japan (IEEJ).
EVENT CALENDAR FOR 2022
Key political and business events in Japan and abroad.
PUBLISHER
K. K. Yuri Group
Editorial Team
Yuriy Humber (Editor-in-Chief)
John Varoli (Senior Editor, Americas)
Tom O’Sullivan (Japan, Middle East, Africa)
Regular Contributors
Mayumi Watanabe (Japan)
Daniel Shulman (Japan)
Takehiro Masutomo (Japan)
Art & Design
22 Graphics Inc.
Events


SUBSCRIPTIONS & ADVERTISING
Japan NRG offers individual, corporate and academic subscription plans. Basic details are our website or write to subscriptions@japan-nrg.com
For marketing, advertising, or collaboration opportunities, contact sales@japan-nrg.com
For all other inquiries, write to info@japan-nrg.com
OFTEN USED ACRONYMS
METI The Ministry of Energy, Trade and Industry
MOE Ministry of Environment
ANRE Agency for Natural Resources and Energy
NEDO New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization
TEPCO Tokyo Electric Power Company
KEPCO Kansai Electric Power Company
EPCO Electric Power Company
JCC Japan Crude Cocktail
JKM Japan Korea Market, the Platt’s LNG benchmark
CCUS Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage
mmbtu Million British Thermal Units
mb/d Million barrels per day
mtoe Million Tons of Oil Equivalent
kWh Kilowatt hours (electricity generation volume)

Japan, China to launch joint clean-coal technology project in Shaanxi province
(Japan NRG, Dec. 27)
TAKEAWAY: While bilateral ties in clean and green energy grow, PM Kishida’s government wants to regulate trade with China more closely by legislating the Economic Security Act. This will allow the government to check if components used for power and telecommunication infrastructure are sourced from suppliers with economic security implications.
The proposed act is expected to impact solar power operators as China has a dominant share in the production of panels, mounts and other components. The move may curb Chinese investment in Japan’s renewable sector. China’s Suntech runs 18 solar plants in Japan; total capacity of 37 MW.
Japan aims to introduce carbon capture technology before FY2030: Minister
(Nikkei, Jan. 7)
METI to set safety standards for ammonia and hydrogen-fired power by September 2022
(Japan NRG, Dec. 21)
Parliament approves 2021 supplementary budget
(Japan NRG, Dec. 20)
|
¥90 billion |
Oil price rise measures |
|
¥47 billion |
Fukushima nuclear plant waste water release |
|
¥137 billion |
Fostering EVs, build charging stations and relevant facilities |
|
¥100 billion |
Storage battery manufacturing |
|
¥31 billion |
Renewable energy |
|
¥2 billion |
R&D on nuclear power |
|
¥4 billion |
Preliminary CCUS studies |
|
¥7 billion |
Ammonia/hydrogen storage centers |
METI launches studies on power market reforms
(Japan NRG, Dec. 28)
TAKEAWAY: While the review doesn’t cover capacity auctions, Prof. Yumiko Iwafune of Tokyo University pointed out that the October capacity auction level was alarmingly low and may trigger plant closures.
METI Minister, US Energy Secretary agree to strengthen cooperation on nuclear
(Japan NRG, Jan. 6)
Japan restarts experimental nuclear reactor
(Nikkei, Jan. 5)
Surplus power from nuclear plants to produce hydrogen
(NHK, Dec. 23)
Toyota Tsusho to test hydrogen derived from manure as truck fuel at U.S. port
(Asia Nikkei, Dec. 22)
Idemitsu reorganizes agri-bio business for faster growth
(Japan NRG, Dec. 21)
Two municipalities delist from Fukushima radioactivity monitoring areas; 86 remain
(Japan NRG, Dec. 27)
TAKEAWAY: Radioactivity is measured 50-100 cm above ground using gamma ray instruments. Underground water, dioxin, sulfuric acid, and dust around waste treatment facilities are also monitored. The total population of the 86 municipalities under surveillance exceeds 1 million.
New garbage trucks to run on rubbish
(Newswitch, Dec. 24)
Challenergy eyes cyclones as energy source
(Nikkei, Dec. 20)
Sony to set up mobility company for EV push
(Asia Nikkei, Jan. 5)
12,000 companies in Japan obliged to set targets on adoption of green energy
(Yomiuri Shimbun Nikkei, Jan. 6)
One-Dot Wrap

Mitsubishi the big winner in Japan’s first commercial offshore wind tenders
(Japan NRG, Dec. 24)
819 MW Yurihonjo City wind farm offshore Akita Prefecture
No. of bidders: 5
Winning consortium: Mitsubishi Corporation Energy Solutions Ltd., Venti Japan Inc., C-Tech Corporation, and Mitsubishi Corporation
Project partners: Amazon.com, Inc, NTT Anode Energy Corporation, Kirin Holdings
Planned start of operations: December 2030
Winning tariff price: ¥13.26/ kWh
479 MW Noshiro City, Mitane Town, Oga City project, Akita Prefecture
No. of bidders: 5
Winning consortium: Mitsubishi Corporation Energy Solutions Ltd., C-Tech Corporation, and Mitsubishi Corporation
Project partners: Amazon.com, Inc, NTT Anode Energy Corporation, Kirin Holdings
Planned start of operations: December 2028
Winning tariff price: ¥11.99/ kWh
391 MW Choshi City project off Chiba Prefecture
No. of bidders: 2
Winning consortium: Mitsubishi Corporation Energy Solutions Ltd., C-Tech Corporation, and Mitsubishi Corporation
Project partners: Amazon.com, Inc, NTT Anode Energy Corporation, Kirin Holdings
Planned start of operations: September 2028
Winning tariff price: ¥16.49/ kWh
TAKEAWAY: These results raised many eyebrows for different reasons. Some in the industry noted that handing the entire first batch of projects to the same two companies, moreover firms who have not built a single watt of offshore wind capacity in Japan or neighboring countries, smelled of favoritism. Especially since experience in developing offshore wind in Japan was supposed to be one of the selection criteria.
Price was one reason for picking the same winner. When tender conditions were first announced, the upper ceiling was set at ¥29/ kWh. Privately, some Japanese companies complained it was too low. Yet Mitsubishi and Chubu Electric won with proposed rates at less than half that level. Firms such as TEPCO and Obayashi Corp. envisaged much higher rates and must now reconsider how to compete. TEPCO hopes to develop at least 2 GW of offshore wind in Japan and overseas by FY2030.
The reason Mitsubishi and Chubu won at lower prices may well lie in their ability to lock in early off-site PPAs or secure other premiums from buyers such as Amazon, which believes they can pass on costs to their clients.
Also, Mitsubishi and METI believe that sourcing three projects at once brings economies of scale. It’s interesting that all three projects will use GE’s Haliade-X turbines. This both reduces costs and at the same time conveniently places an order for 1.7 GW of capacity to both GE and its new Japanese partner, Toshiba.
Incidentally, Toshiba is embroiled in a scandal over shareholder dealings which is at least partly the work of METI. Toshiba’s future is on the line. Winning a large bulk order as GE’s strategic partner to manufacture the turbines partly in Japan is potentially METI’s way to repay and support Toshiba, and as an extension, support the building of a domestic wind turbine supply chain led by GE-Toshiba.
Top European offshore wind operators that made bids will wonder why their know-how was ignored. They and others considered favorites, such as TEPCO and Renova, will get a chance later this year in a tender for a single area off the coast of Happo Town and Noshiro City in Akita Prefecture. However, they will need to pay attention to the winning price of the first three auctions.
Surprisingly, a few Japanese media described the winning rates as higher than expected. One way that could make sense is when we remember that METI has said several times that it hoped to bring the price of offshore wind to ¥8/ kWh by FY2030, just one-two years after these projects come online. The same media then suggested that the ¥8 level is now expected by 2035, subtly shifting the government narrative.
This means bids in new METI tenders that start around 2030 will still be accepted above the ¥8 level. The message seems to be: bid in the low 10s or walk away. So, the number of interested players will likely shrink.
It’s clear that METI wanted to deal with one familiar set of players to iron out any kinks before wider deployment of offshore wind. METI also needs to show that its efforts in renewables are on track and it’s not repeating the early years of Feed-In Tariff largess.
We expect competition for this year’s tender to be intense.
Local solar tax is a first for Japan
(Smart Japan, Dec. 23)
Japan’s spot power prices hold stable compared to Europe
(Japan NRG, Dec. 27)
Sport power prices, monthly average (Yen/ kWh)

OCCTO releases October capacity auction results
(Japan NRG, Dec. 23)
JERA temporarily restarts old thermal power plant to meet demand during winter
(Nikkan Kogyo Shimbun, Jan. 4)
TEPCO struggles to keep up with demand as Tokyo hit by snow
(ITmedia News, Jan. 6)
Hokkaido Electric to start direct trading of electricity futures by April
(Jiji News, Jan. 6)
JERA’s focus on fuel switch for thermal power offers Asia third way to decarbonize
(Nikkei Business, Jan. 5)
JERA signs accord to establish floating offshore wind firm with two French partners
(Denki Shimbun, Jan. 7)
Shikoku Electric under fire over Vietnamese coal project
(NHK, Dec. 24)

METI to set new rare earth mining licenses and expand JOGMEC functions
(Japan NRG, Dec. 21)
TAKEAWAY: Among the 34 critical mineral resources in the national stockpile, the so-called battery metals — cobalt, lithium and nickel, and rare earths — are the focus in building stronger supply chains. Copper and rare earths are priority recycling items.
Japan Asks Indonesia for Immediate Coal Export Ban Removal
(Various, Jan. 5)
Osaka Gas becomes first Japanese firm to enter city gas business in India
(Company statement, Dec. 20)
Oil company CEOs pessimistic about gasoline demand
(NHK, Dec 27)
Further restructuring unavoidable in petrochemical sector
(Asahi Shimbun, Jan. 2)
Toho Gas to supply carbon free gas to KIOXIA
(Denki Shimbun, Dec. 24)
Asian LNG prices plunge 30% as Europe supply worries ease
(Asia Nikkei, Jan. 6)
BY TOMAS KÅBERGER

The Future Belongs to Renewables, but
Japan’s Policies Continue to Buck Global Trends
Many felt disappointed by the outcomes of the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26) held last November in Glasgow. To me, the conference and 2021 as a whole only reinforced the strength of the decarbonization movement and the shift to renewables. The optimism of the COP26 meeting exceeded that of any previous COP summit.
There are several important trends to note from last year:
Let’s look at some numbers behind these trends.
In 2020, the International Energy Agency (IEA) called solar electricity the cheapest in history. In 2021, Saudi Arabia achieved a new record low when electricity from a solar farm was offered at only $0.0104/ kWh (about ¥1.16/ kWh). Even if countries in Europe, North America and Northeast Asia, where solar radiation is only half as intense as in Saudi Arabia and costs are double as a result, the price is still low enough to start outcompeting thermal power plants.
Not only solar has become cheap. Investments in wind generation have brought down costs to the point where onshore and offshore projects in Europe can compete without subsidies. Costs are around ¥3 to ¥4 per kWh and could fall further.
The most important achievement of renewable electricity is that its total cost now runs below the price of energy contained in crude oil. Renewable electricity is often cheaper per unit of energy than natural gas and, sometimes, can be a more profitable substitute to coal in industrial use. Thus, we can conclude that even without subsidies and taxes, electricity from renewable sources can start to replace fossil fuel systems. We already see this happening in the transport sector and, increasingly, in manufacturing.
Transport and Industry
For electricity to replace fuels, we inevitably need batteries or power to be stored in hydrogen or liquid fuels. The market share of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) is in the double-digits in several countries already; it is approaching 100% in Norway, which has also employed wind and hydro power to generate nearly all of its electricity.
Steel is often given as an example of a product that’s impossible to make without fossil fuels. In June 2021, Sweden’s Hybrit delivered the first sponge iron made from iron ore with electricity that came from renewable sources. In the ironmaking process, Hybrit (a joint venture of SSAB, LKAB and Vattenfall) replaced coal with green hydrogen. In August, SSAB had converted that sponge iron into steel, and in October, Volvo had used that steel to build a vehicle.
These advances in batteries and hydrogen systems make the task of replacing fossil fuels in power generation easier. Car batteries and hydrogen are examples of energy storage that could be topped up during times when renewable energy generation is abundant and cheap. In the hours of the day when the sun is not shining or the wind is blowing less, batteries aren’t charged and hydrogen is not produced. So, vehicles and industries operate with the energy stored. This basic concept makes it easier to phase out fossil fuels as a whole rather than just replacing them in the power sector.
COP26 and Carbon Pricing
At the COP26 summit a Coalition of First Movers and other industrial initiatives committed to go ahead and, in various ways, demand CO2-free supply chains from their vendors. They did this to prove their social responsibility and because they saw an opportunity to gain competitiveness as renewable energy becomes cheaper. But they also did this to reduce the risks for investors during the shift to new technologies.
In July 2021, the EU Commission adopted a proposal for a new Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism that will put a carbon price on imported products. This is done to avoid putting first movers in decarbonization and adopters of carbon pricing at a competitive disadvantage.
Carbon pricing now exists in an increasing number of countries and this kind of mechanism will make it more difficult for others to continue with their fossil fuel systems, even if they are still cost-competitive domestically with renewable alternatives.
Japan’s Implausible Gambit
Japanese industry was once a leader in developing solar PV technologies. Japanese firms have been providing batteries for customers all over the world, and the country was where the idea of hydrogen as an energy carrier evolved.
Today, however, the political leadership in Tokyo seems lost when it comes to deciphering the global developments as described above.
Newly elected Prime Minister Kishida delivered a speech at COP26 that won yet another “Fossil of the Day” award from the Climate Action Network. The reason: His economically implausible idea that it’s fine to build more thermal power plants, because at some point in the future they can be fueled by imported hydrogen or ammonia, both of which could also be derived from fossil fuels while being offset with carbon capture and storage technology to reduce emissions. The premise seems dead from the start. When electricity from renewables is cheaper than from thermal generation, seeking to manufacture even more expensive fuels in order to burn them in power plants at home cannot be an economically credible solution.
In Japan, the cost of renewable power is coming down thanks to a build-up of industrial experience and the efforts of hundreds of companies.
If Japanese manufacturing is to stay cost-competitive on a global basis, the government has to remove administrative barriers to renewables and truly open up the power grid and the power market to new, progressive actors.
Deliberately wedding Japan to future imports of coal, LNG, uranium and expensive hydrogen or ammonia instead of utilizing cheap domestic renewable resources seems like a recipe for economic demise.
Such a policy seems to be diametrically opposite to the atmosphere of technological and economic progress that we saw at COP26.
Tomas Kåberger has been the Chair of Executive Board of Renewable Energy Institute (Japan) since its foundation in 2011. He is professor in International Sustainable Energy Systems at the International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics at Lund University, and currently an affiliate Professor of Industrial Energy Policy at Chalmers University of Technology. He also serves on the Board of Directors of Vattenfall. He was also a member of the Swedish Climate Policy Council between 2018 and 2021.
BY JUN ARIMA AND
HIROYUKI TEZUKA


Rushing the Green Agenda Will Backfire!
Japan Embraces Energy Pragmatism
The message regularly put out by most developed western nations in 2021 was that the world must move towards a green energy transition at all costs. The economic reality, however, showed us that it cannot happen at any cost. If climate change is to be tackled in a truly global fashion, the solutions and processes cannot ignore current and future global needs. In this sense, the COP26 summit in November was a perfect example of how the message is starting to run away from the context.
We are not pessimistic about the challenge of carbon neutrality. Yet, as with all problems, we must be candid about the current situation and set realistic targets. We should also acknowledge that decarbonization will be an expensive and long-term process that much of the developing world cannot currently afford. Forcing a rushed climate agenda would likely backfire and there is already evidence for that.
Global Policy Rushes to Cancel Coal
The UK, EU and the U.S. have expedited the climate agenda in the last year, which has yielded more results than many realize. In the summer, as host of the G7, the UK succeeded in cementing the idea that global average temperatures should be restrained to an increase of 1.5°C. This was included in a G7 Summit Communiqué for the first time. Other firsts included a net-zero-emissions target by 2050 and an agreement to move away from “unabated” coal-fired generation. Calls by Western nations for G7 members to halt financing for coal projects abroad were also heeded.
The UK planned to have similar messages reflected in the G20 Leaders’ Declaration, yet its ideas were met with strong opposition from China, India, Saudi Arabia, Russia, and other countries. In the end, the G20 summit only reconfirmed the temperature targets of the Paris Agreement. The G20 did not agree to phase out domestic coal-fired capacity.
Despite the resistance at the G20, the UK pushed through the more ambitious targets at COP26 in November. The Glasgow Climate Pact adopted at COP26 includes:
Most importantly, the Glasgow agreement includes the wording: “to accelerate the…phasedown of unabated coal power and phase-out of inefficient fossil fuel subsidies…” While toned down from the originally proposed “phase out,” this is the first time that such wording targeted a specific energy source.
The Cost of Expediting Net Zero
The proactive approach of the UK and like-minded western politicians has significantly altered the nature of the Paris Agreement, part of the appeal of which was its delicate balance between a top-down approach of setting global temperature targets and a bottom-up approach through which each country could set targets based on its own specific circumstances.
What does that mean in practice? By aiming for a 45% cut by 2030 and net zero by 2050 all around the world – at once – the scene is set for a fierce battle between the developed and developing nations over a limited carbon budget. It’s no wonder that India asked rich nations for $1 trillion in annual contributions. That’s the cost of expediting decades of development in the weaker economies while at the same time raising the NDCs.
Now that “coal phaseout” is officially accepted, the next global policy war will focus on the date by which this must be completed. The debate could well expand to setting similar dates for other fossil fuels. At COP26, we already saw over 40 countries, including the U.S. and EU, issue a joint declaration to end public financing for the entire fossil fuel sector. But such messages are disconnected from energy reality.
The ongoing energy crisis in the UK, parts of Europe and elsewhere is to a large extent caused by the supply-demand imbalance in fossil fuels that resulted from stagnant upstream oil and gas investment. So, while green policies call for an end to fossil fuels and claim that GHG cuts are the utmost priority, the top item on the daily agenda of many governments is cooling record high energy prices.
It seems clear that when there’s a risk to secure and affordable energy supply, which is the fundamental policy requirement, then the climate agenda can easily be set aside.
Why Japan is Not Rushing into Renewables at Full Speed
Last April, former Prime Minister Suga declared that Japan will cut GHG emissions 46% by FY2030, compared to the FY2013 level. It was a highly ambitious target since 85% of Japan’s energy currently comes from fossil fuels.
Between 2013 and 2018, Japan reduced CO2 emission 12%. How? Japan restarted nine nuclear reactors, which contributed 2.4 percentage points. The rollout of renewable energy, mostly solar that was supported by a Feed-In Tariff (FIT), offered the same. In total, nuclear restarts and renewables offered a 5% reduction in emissions. But the 2030 target requires Japan to cut another 38% from the 2018 level.
The good news is that Japan still has 18 reactors waiting for a restart. As well as cutting emissions, nuclear plants can suppress the increase in electricity cost caused by building more solar and other renewables through the FIT tariffs — the nation’s expenses on FIT jumped to ¥2.4 trillion, or ¥2.9/ kWh in 2018. That number inched up to ¥2.7 trillion in 2021 and if the share of renewables doubles over the next decade, as per the instruction from the new Basic Energy Plan, then the FIT number will swell to about ¥4.7 trillion.
Even at 2018 levels, the FIT surcharge translates into a carbon price of around $70/ ton of CO2. It could get much worse economically since the restart of reactors in Japan is currently a highly political and unpredictable process.
There are other constraints to renewables in Japan. The country already has the highest solar-panel cover density among major countries; twice the density of Germany when comparing flat land surfaces. This is one of the reasons for many local issues that plague the development of solar power and the growing local resistance to new projects.
Onshore wind farms face the same space issues, while offshore the relatively deeper ocean floor and 30% lower wind flow, compared with the North Sea in Europe, leads to cost disadvantages for Japan.
The cost of energy, electricity in particular, impacts competitiveness for Japan’s industry, which produces globally traded, energy-intensive products. According to a study by European think-tanks[1], Japan’s electricity cost for industry was among the highest in 2015. It is three times more expensive than the U.S. and Canada and almost double that of China and Korea. The study also revealed that the electricity cost in Germany was significantly reduced to the levels of France, where cheap nuclear is a major source of electricity, by exempting most of the policy charges such as EEG (the equivalent of FIT in Japan) and tax levies.
Therefore, we can suppose that high energy costs are one of the reasons for stagnant wages in Japan.
As things stand, Japan’s commitment to doubling its renewables quota to 36-38% of the energy mix by 2030 will inevitably push up the cost of electricity. Asking for an even higher percentage, with the current technologies and conditions, creates the risk of backfiring in the same way that developing nations pushed back against the G7 agenda in 2021.
What Japan needs most is a strategic industrial energy policy that looks to ensure global competitiveness for its industry, while also improving the environmental footprint. Ignoring the former to pursue the latter eliminates the vital connection between climate and the economy.
Jun Arima is a Project Professor at the Graduate School of Public Policy at the University of Tokyo, is a former METI official, and a former member of Japan’s COP negotiation team
Hiroyuki Tezuka is Chair of the Working Group on Global Environment Strategy at Keidanren and is a Fellow at JFE Steel Corporation
BY JOHN VAROLI
In the Chinese tradition, 2022 is the Year of the Tiger. How fitting, because the global energy sector seems set to roar, especially in China whose economy grew 8% in 2021 and electricity consumption at 10%. The country is making large investments in renewable energy, as well as in nuclear power and the reactivation of coal-fired plants.
As demand increases, critical energy shortages are pushing many nations to put climate promises on hold. Greta Thunberg will be disappointed in 2022 — fossil fuels and nuclear power will enjoy a good year, if not a good several years. Fossil fuels and renewables will have to coexist and cooperate longer than environmentalists had hoped for.
Covid, of course, is the big unknown that could throw a wrench into the machinery of the global economy. However, pandemic fatigue is reaching a critical point, and governments will be pressured to invigorate the global economy rather than shut it down again.
Let’s take a look at each major energy sector and its prospects for 2022.
Nuclear
Since the Fukushima nuclear accident in 2011, nuclear power’s future has been bleak. But much has changed in the past six months. Many countries signed up to ambitious climate goals, and that’s unlikely to happen without carbon-free nuclear power. While Germany closed three of its remaining six nuclear plants on Dec 31, 2021, about half a dozen EU countries plan to build new reactors. The U.S. is also supportive of nuclear power to meet net-zero goals, while China’s nuclear program beguiles the mind — to build 150 reactors in the next 15 years. For its part, Japan is developing SMRs, most notably a GE-Hitachi project in Canada, and a $5 billion nuclear reactor with TerraPower in the U.S.
Oil
It’s going to be a good year for fossil fuels. As people get back on the road, oil demand will remain robust. The price of oil is a key indicator of national happiness in the U.S. and will impact the midterm elections in November. Thus, the Biden administration will do its best to keep oil prices stable. He’ll have to call on favors from OPEC countries and also make concessions to Big Oil at home. Oil prices are expected to stay within a range of $65 to $80 per barrel. What the oil companies do with those profits, however, will be a contentious issue. Will they invest in new fossil-fuel projects or finance the green energy transition?
LNG/ Gas
Likewise, LNG and natural gas will see another good year. Prices will remain high but likely stable. While natural gas faces condemnation from environmentalists, the European Union plans to classify some gas-fired plants as “transitional” under certain strict conditions. This is crucial for the EU’s leading economy, Germany, which more than ever is heavily dependent on gas. In general, about 25% of the EU’s total energy currently comes from gas, and replacing that capacity with renewable energy will take a decade or more. In Asia, countries such as South Korea are switching coal-fired power plants to gas. East Asian demand for LNG will grow this year and beyond.
Coal
Even though the U.S. and many West European countries are shutting their coal-fired power plants, global coal demand will hit another high this year — reaching 8,025 Mt in 2022, the highest ever. China and India will lead consumption growth, which will more than outpace the declines in other markets. Motivated by the need to power its industry, China is ignoring climate change impact for now and reigniting many of its coal-fired plants. Regarding coal, Japan is closer to China and India than Europe, but Tokyo vows to push on with developing co-firing generation that should see thermal plants also run on ammonia as well as coal to cut total emissions. In addition, China and Japan are planning to launch a “clean-coal” technology pilot project in China’s Shaanxi province.
Hydrogen
Despite setbacks to meeting net-zero targets as described above, the clean energy sector will continue to grow in giant leaps and bounds in 2022, especially in the hydrogen space. For example, Australia is fast-tracking the $10 billion, 10-GW Desert Bloom green hydrogen project that will use solar and wind. Economies of scale and improved technology have lowered the cost of hydrogen fuel cells by 60% over the past decade. What more, green hydrogen, which relies on renewables such as solar and wind, seems to be one of the few energy sources that makes everyone happy — from environmentalists to giant legacy energy companies eager to enhance their environmental credentials.
Solar
Solar will continue to shine in 2022, with an estimated 44 GW coming online globally,
nearly double 2021′s projected 23 GW, according to S&P. This increase in solar capacity is driven by the expansion of state-mandated renewable requirements and more tax credits. Energy storage is key for intermittent power sources like solar and S&P expects 8 GW of storage to be installed in 2022, around 600% more than in 2020. But there are bumps on the road to this bright future. Rystad Energy says that more than half of 2022′s global solar infrastructure projects will be hindered by rising raw material costs and supply chain woes. This means that 56% of an anticipated 90 GW of new utility-scale solar projects could face delays or be canceled.
Wind
New installed wind turbine capacity in 2022 will easily surpass the annual record of 16 GW set in 2020 and could be as much as double that number. This year, the UK will complete the world’s largest offshore wind farm — the 165 turbines of Hornsea Two, (8.4 MW each). The IEA believes that offshore wind has the potential to power all of global demand. Meanwhile, wind farms are bigger than ever. Four years ago, wind farms typically utilized 7- and 8-MW turbines with 70- to 90-meter-long blades. Soon, market leader Vesta plans to start selling 15-MW turbines with 115-meter-long blades.
Geothermal
While a niche, the global geothermal electricity market is expected to grow about 9%, from $5.5 billion in 2021 to $6 billion in 2022. The World Bank will loan Turkey $300 million to support its Geothermal Development Project to build 380 MW of capacity by tapping heat sources deep in the ground. There’s strong enthusiasm for more geothermal energy in Japan and Southeast Asia, as well as parts of Africa, though the technology’s application is of course limited by location and its complexity. One project in the U.S. is already bogged down in lawsuits. Last week, conservationists and tribal leaders sued the U.S. government to block construction of two geothermal plants in Nevada’s high desert that they say will destroy a sacred hot spring.
Biomass
The global biomass energy market will remain marginal but its value is forecasted to grow 10%, from $33.6 billion in 2021 to $37 billion in 2022. At the end of December, the UK government pledged £26 million to boost the use of materials such as grasses, hemp and seaweed as green energy solutions. One drawback with biomass fuels is that they can’t easily be scaled. Meeting demand for low-carbon aviation fuel offers much potential, but meeting that demand is problematic. For example, only about 26.4 million gallons of low-emission, sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) is produced annually, which is a fraction of the 18 billion gallons of fuel burned by U.S. carriers alone.
Green Finance
Sustainable finance, also known as green finance, will accelerate in 2022. Bloomberg predicts that this year about $2.5 trillion of green and ESG-oriented debt will be issued, up from $1.5 trillion in 2021. For the first time since the Paris Climate Accord in 2015, financial institutions are earning more fees from green-related bond sales and loans, a total of $3.4 billion last year; which slightly surpasses what they earned raising money for fossil-fuel companies: $3.3 billion. In 2020, those figures were $1.9 billion for green deals, and $3.7 billion for fossil fuel deals.

IEEJ Energy Forecasts for Japan for 2022: Zero-Emissions Power Sources Exceed 30% for the first time since 2011 and Household Energy Expenditures to hit $130 billion
The Institute of Energy Economics in Japan (‘IEEJ’) has released their domestic energy forecasts for FY2022. With the kind permission of the IEEJ, we’re providing a summary below.
The IEEJ is Japan’s leading non-profit energy think-tank with over 100 member firms. In 2020 the University of Pennsylvania ranked the IEEJ as a top three energy and resource policy think-tank in the world.
Japan Energy and Economic Forecasts for 2022



We are deeply grateful to Mr. Toshiyuki Sakamoto, Board Member, IEEJ and Mr. Ryo Eto, Senior Economist, for giving us permission to reprint these forecasts.
A selection of domestic and international events we believe will have an impact on Japanese energy
| January | OPEC quarterly meeting;
JCCP Petroleum Conference – Tokyo; EU Taxonomy Climate Delegated Act activates; Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) Trade Agreement that includes ASEAN countries, China and Japan activates; Indonesia to temporarily ban coal exports for one month; Regional bloc developments: Cambodia assumes presidency of ASEAN; Thailand assumes presidency of APEC; Germany assumes presidency of G7; France assumes presidency of EU; Indonesia assumes presidency of G20; and Senegal assumes presidency of African Union; Japan-U.S. two-plus-two meeting; Japan’s parliament convenes on Jan. 17 for 150 days; Prime Minister Kishida visits Australia (tentative) |
| February | Chinese New Year (Jan. 31 to Feb. 6);
Beijing Winter Olympics; South Korea joins RCEP trade agreement |
| March | Renewable Energy Institute annual conference;
Smart Energy Week – Tokyo; Japan Atomic Industrial Forum annual conference – Tokyo; World Hydrogen Summit – Netherlands; EU New strategy on international energy engagement published; End of 2021/22 Japanese Fiscal Year; South Korean presidential election |
| April | Japan Energy Summit – Tokyo;
MARPOL Convention on Emissions reductions for containerships and LNG carriers activates; Japan Feed-in-Premium system commences as Energy Resilience Act takes effect; Launch of Prime Section of Japan Stock Exchange with TFCD climate reporting requirement; Convention on Biological Diversity Conference for post-2020 biodiversity framework – China; Elections: French presidential election; Hungarian general election |
| May | World Natural Gas Conference WCG2022 – South Korea;
Elections: Australian general election; Philippines general and presidential elections |
| June | Happo-Noshiro offshore wind project auction closes;
Annual IEA Global Conference on Energy Efficiency – Denmark; UNEP Environment Day, Environment Ministers Meeting – Sweden; G7 meeting – Germany |
| July | Japan to finalize economic security policies as part of natl. security strategy review;
China connects to grid 2nd 200 MW SMR at Shidao Bay Nuclear Plant, Shandong; Czech Republic assumes presidency of EU; Elections: Japan’s Upper House Elections; Indian presidential election |
| August | Japan: Africa (TICAD 8) Summit – Tunisia;
Kenyan general election |
| September | IPCC to release Assessment and Synthesis Report;
Clean Energy Ministerial and the Mission Innovation Summit – Pittsburg, U.S.; Japan LNG Producer/Consumer Conference – Tokyo; IMF/World Bank annual meetings – Washington; Annual UN General Assembly meetings; METI to set safety standards for ammonia and hydrogen-fired power plants; End of 1H FY2022 Fiscal Year in Japan; Swedish general election |
| October | EU Review of CO2 emission standards for heavy-duty vehicles published;
Chinese Communist Party 20th quinquennial National Party Congress; G20 Meeting – Bali, Indonesia; Innovation for Cool Earth TCFD & Annual Forums – Tokyo; Elections: Okinawa gubernational election; Brazilian presidential election; |
| November | COP27 – Egypt;
U.S. mid-term elections; Soccer World Cup – Qatar; |
| December | Germany to eliminate nuclear power from energy mix;
Happo-Noshiro offshore wind project auction result released; Japan submits revised 2030 CO2 reduction goal following Glasgow’s COP26; Japan-Canada Annual Energy Forum (tentative); Tesla expected to achieve 1.3 million EV deliveries for full year 2022 |
Disclaimer
This communication has been prepared for information purposes only, is confidential and may be legally privileged. This is a subscription-only service and is directed at those who have expressly asked K.K. Yuri Group or one of its representatives to be added to the mailing list. This document may not be onwardly circulated or reproduced without prior written consent from Yuri Group, which retains all copyright to the content of this report.
Yuri Group is not registered as an investment advisor in any jurisdiction. Our research and all the content express our opinions, which are generally based on available public information, field studies and own analysis. Content is limited to general comment upon general political, economic and market issues, asset classes and types of investments. The report and all of its content does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell, subscribe for or underwrite any product or physical commodity, or a financial instrument.
The information contained in this report is obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith. No representation or warranty is made that it is accurate or complete. Opinions and views expressed are subject to change without notice, as are prices and availability, which are indicative only. There is no obligation to notify recipients of any changes to this data or to do so in the future. No responsibility is accepted for the use of or reliance on the information provided. In no circumstances will Yuri Group be liable for any indirect or direct loss, or consequential loss or damages arising from the use of, any inability to use, or any inaccuracy in the information.
K.K. Yuri Group: Oonoya Building 8F, Yotsuya 1-18, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 160-0004.
NEWS
・Mitsubishi and Chubu Electric unit snag all three offshore wind tenders in preliminary round; Amazon part of winning group
・China and Japan to launch joint “clean-coal technology” project;
China-based facility will utilize green hydrogen
・Japan aims to introduce carbon capture tech before FY2030 and is monitoring U.S. experience with older nuclear plants: Minister