
April 11, 2022
NEWS
TOP
ENERGY TRANSITION & POLICY
ELECTRICITY MARKETS
OIL, GAS & MINING
ANALYSIS
HYDROGEN’S DAY OF RECKONING IS APPROACHING;
WHICH TECH WILL WIN OUT IN JAPAN?
The next two years will make or break the fate of hydrogen in Japan, at least as far as the state-led hydrogen economy program plans to meet its 2030 targets. Booming interest in the hydrogen economy has revealed a plethora of technological solutions for both H2 and ammonia. But after years of testing and R&D, it’s decision time. Supply chains from production to transport and storage to consumption must be up and running well before 2030 for Japan to hit its goal of 1% hydrogen-fired generation in the mix. We review Japan’s current tech solutions in hydrogen and ammonia.
RENEWABLES OPERATORS MAY SEE SOME ASSET VALUES JUMP ON CHANGE IN GRID RULES
In some of Japan’s local power grids, developing renewable energy facilities has proved problematic with a lack of spare capacity often cited as the reason. To address the issue, a few years ago a new kind of “non-firm” contract was rolled out. It allowed new power assets to connect to the grid but limited their operations to times where there was spare capacity.
Now, with the government looking to give renewables priority access to the grid, bumping thermal and other CO2-emitting sources down the priority order, the group most likely to benefit could be those with “non-firm” contracts.
GLOBAL VIEW
Asia is leading global growth in floating solar installs. Spanish utility seeks to develop 1 GW of renewables in Colombia. Germany nationalizes Gazprom’s local unit. China buys Russian coal with yuan. Sweden gets funds to build Europe’s first large-scale negative carbon emissions plant. Details on these items and more in our global wrap.
PUBLISHER
K. K. Yuri Group
Events
Editorial Team
Yuriy Humber (Editor-in-Chief)
John Varoli (Senior Editor, Americas)
Mayumi Watanabe (Japan)
Wilfried Goossens (Japan, Events)
Regular Contributors
Chisaki Watanabe (Japan)
Takehiro Masutomo (Japan)
Daniel Shulman (Japan)
Art & Design
22 Graphics Inc.
SUBSCRIPTIONS & ADVERTISING
Japan NRG offers individual, corporate and academic subscription plans. Basic details are our website or write to subscriptions@japan-nrg.com
For marketing, advertising, or collaboration opportunities, contact sales@japan-nrg.com
For all other inquiries, write to info@japan-nrg.com
OFTEN USED ACRONYMS
METI The Ministry of Energy, Trade and Industry
MOE Ministry of Environment
ANRE Agency for Natural Resources and Energy
NEDO New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization
TEPCO Tokyo Electric Power Company
KEPCO Kansai Electric Power Company
EPCO Electric Power Company
JCC Japan Crude Cocktail
JKM Japan Korea Market, the Platt’s LNG benchmark
CCUS Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage
mmbtu Million British Thermal Units
mb/d Million barrels per day
mtoe Million Tons of Oil Equivalent
kWh Kilowatt hours (electricity generation volume)

Renewable expansion progress in 2021
(Japan NRG, April 7)
| New FIT capacity added in 2021 | Target capacity addition till 2030 | Measures | |
| Solar | 2.4 GW | 4-6 GW/year | Solar panels on public buildings, farms, railway stations and airports
Power purchase agreements outside FIT/FIP schemes |
| Onshore wind | 1.3 GW | Over 1 GW/year | Additional auctions if total bids exceeded 1.7 GW
Clarifying rules for properties without identifiable owners, easing forestry rules |
| Offshore wind | 1.7 GW | 3.3 GW till 2030 | Revising auction rules to improve transparency
Increased municipality involvement in projects to speed up decisions Streamline construction safety reviews |
| Geothermal | 0.05 GW | 0.9 GW till 2030 | JOGMEC to support exploration
14 national parks open for surveys |
| Small/medium hydro | 0.5 GW | 0.6 GW till 2030 | Fully utilize digital and AI for more accurate forecast of water flows |
| Biomass | 0.2 GW | 0.2 GW till 2030 | Set up third party review system of potential feeds |
METI discloses analysis of March 22 power shortage
(Japan NRG, April 7)
440 companies join GX League – precursor to Japan’s nationwide carbon market
(METI Statement, April 1)
TAKEAWAY: For a full article on what is the GX League and how it is part of Japan’s first nationwide carbon trading market which was launched earlier this month, see the March 28 edition of Japan NRG Weekly.
Chiyoda spreads hydrogen transport technology in Singapore
(Government Statement, March 31)
Overview of hydrogen carriage technologies
| Technology | Developed by | Partners | Ship |
| SPERA MCH | Chiyoda Corp. | Mitsubishi Corp., etc | Legacy oil and chemical tankers |
| LH2 (Liquid hydrogen) | Iwatani Corp., Kawasaki Heavy Industries | Marubeni, Kansai Electric, etc | Kawasaki Heavy’s dedicated vessel Suiso Frontier |
| Direct MCH | ENEOS | Chiyoda Corp. | Legacy oil and chemical tankers |
Mitsubishi Heavy and partner embark on $2 billion hydrogen project in U.S.
(Nikkei Asia, April 5)
Asahi takes delivery of the world’s first battery propelled tanker
(New Energy Business News, April 7)
TAKEAWAY: The fact that a battery-propelled ship is designed to carry heavy oil is a neat summary of the energy transition at this moment.
MHI unit wins approval to test carbon capture tech at a cement plant
(New Energy Business News, April 6)
Shipper Mitsui OSK to launch ocean thermal power plant in 2025
(Nikkei Asia, March 29)
Nissan unveils prototype factory for all-solid-state EV batteries
(Nikkei, April 8)
Sompo Japan starts to sell insurance for ammonia transportation
(Kankyo Business, April 5)
One-Dot Wrap

Erex competes construction of Japan’s first hydrogen-firing power plant
(Japan NRG, April 4)
METI boosts support for nuclear exporters
(Nikkei, April 6)
Manufacturing major Murata turns to multi-prong strategy in switch to renewables
(New Energy Business News, April 8)
TAKEAWAY: Murata is not a widely known consumer brand, but the maker of electronic modules and components is a major domestic manufacturer, and exactly the kind of company that will need to move to low-carbon sources for Japan to succeed in its net zero ambitions. It’s interesting to see the strategy Murata is taking as it seeks to consume up to 50% of its electricity from renewable sources by 2030.
TEPCO CEO change looks likely: Who takes over?
(Diamond, April 4)
Mitsui to invest in 1.3 GW of renewables in India
(Company Statement, April 6)
OPINION: Deregulation to blame for electricity shortages
(Shukan Diamond, April 16 edition)
Logistics operator GLP Japan enters renewables market, vows to become major player
(Kankyo Business, April 6)
Renova, Sumitomo and others begin construction of Japan’s largest onshore wind farm
(Various, April 4)
Renova plans 400 MW offshore wind project in Saga area
(New Energy Business News, April 6)
JERA plans 356 MW offshore wind power project in Akita area
(New Energy Business News, April 5)
Tokyo Gas and Hokuriku Electric join Sumitomo’s 112 MW biomass project
(New Energy Business News, April 4)
TOCOM power futures volumes rise in March
(TOCOM Statement, April 8)
Chubu Electric and NGK join capacity market
(Nikkei, April 5)
NEC Capital, Nissin invest in Okinawa startup to remotely control solar power plants
(New Energy Business News, April 8)
Kansai Electric nuclear capacity operating rates highest since 2011
(Denki Shimbun, April 7)
7 tons of copper cables stolen from solar power plant
(NHK, April 4)
Fisheries association vehemently opposed to tritium release
(NHK, April 5)

WAR IN UKRAINE:
Japan will phase out Russian coal imports in latest round of sanctions
(Nikkei Shimbun, April 8)
TAKEAWAY: PM Kishida continues to act quickly and largely in lockstep with Western allies in the G7. Russian coal accounts for only about 13% of Japan’s supply (but as much as a third in the thermal coal segment). It won’t be simple to replace these volumes because today’s market is very tight, coal prices are the highest in decades, and buyers tend to require particular grades of coal for their specific needs. Some goal grades are only suitable for power generation, for example, and power facilities also tend to be “tuned” to operation on coal that has specific characteristics in terms of energy, ash, moisture and other content. That means we’re unlikely to see all Russian coal supplies vanish from Japanese ports for four to six months.
In the meantime, Japan’s coal supplies will be at risk, despite the country’s ample stockpiles. Should Russia’s government decide to disrupt coal exports to Japan in retaliation for the embargo, problems will compound in the domestic and broader Asian markets. At the very least, we can expect continued increase in coal prices, and as a result further increase in electricity prices.
For some, the key comment from PM Kishida related to nuclear power. Yet as discussed previously, Japan’s central government does not have direct control over reactor restarts and there’s not yet enough evidence to suggest a pick-up in the pace of restarts.
Japanese buyers stick to Russian gas, but cast eye for alternatives
(Yomiuri Shimbun and Financial Times, Apr 8-10)
TAKEAWAY: Today’s global LNG market is like a zero-sum game. If Japan is pressured by Western allies to reject Russian supplies, it will need to secure similar volumes from elsewhere. At a time when the EU and the UK, among others, are seeking alternative suppliers to Russia, this simply adds more eager bidders for the same available LNG volumes. At some point, demands for a complete exodus from Russian natural gas will need to be seen in this context.
It’s also questionable how much Japan’s energy buyers can request earlier deliveries from non-Russian sources. Without a long-term storage facility, balancing the timing of deliveries is hard.
Global LNG market shortages are expected if Russian LNG volumes do not enter the market somewhere (for example: China or India, which could free up some of the volumes those buyers would have procured elsewhere).
We expect curtailment of industrial output to conserve gas to become an increasingly regular topic, if not a reality, going forward this year.
Prolonged period of high oil prices to push Japan into the red
(Nikkei Asia, April 9)
ENEOS develops carbon-neutral lubricant
(Chemical Daily, April 8)
Japan’s LNG stocks remain flat at 1.65 million tons
(Government Statement, April 6)
Pan Pacific Copper plans record high output for April-September
(Japan NRG, April 1)
Hanwa signs lithium carbonate offtake deal with Lake Resources
(Company Statement, April 1)
JGC to expand Taiwanese LNG terminal
(Nikkei, April 6)
BY MAYUMI WATANABE
Hydrogen’s Day of Reckoning Is Approaching in Japan;
Which Technologies Will Win Out?
The next two years will make or break the fate of hydrogen in Japan, at least as far as the state-led hydrogen economy program plans to meet its 2030 targets.
The goal is for hydrogen-fired power generation to have a nominal but noticeable place in the national electricity mix, at 1% of the total by 2030. Instead of building new power capacity oriented on hydrogen, most of that 1%, which is equivalent to 9-10 TWh of electricity, will come from so-called co-firing. This assumes that some gas power plants will add hydrogen into their fuel mix and some coal plants will do the same with its cousin, ammonia.
The challenges were, and remain, picking the most reliable, cost-effective, and environmentally clean technology. Booming interest in the hydrogen economy has revealed a plethora of technological solutions for both H2 and ammonia.
After years of testing and R&D, it’s decision time. Supply chains from production to transport and storage to consumption must be up and running well before 2030 for Japan to hit that 1% target. Here, we review some of Japan’s current solutions in hydrogen and ammonia.
Imports and domestic sources
Japan’s hydrogen economy program calls for the fuel, or ammonia, to account for 1% of national power generation and be used in manufacturing processes by replacing fossil fuels. The assumption is that hydrogen production costs will drop to ¥30/ Nm3 by 2030, from the current ¥170/Nm3 for hydrogen, and to ¥15-20/ Nm3 from ¥25-30/Nm3 for ammonia.
Most of Japan’s ammonia and hydrogen demand is expected to be met with overseas supply. While the government expects to initially use blue hydrogen that’s made from natural gas, after 2030 the outlook is for green hydrogen (made with renewables) to become more popular.
With few low-cost renewable energy facilities, Japan doesn’t expect to become a significant producer of green hydrogen. Since the hydrogen will originate from natural gas and be utilized by gas-firing power plants for co-firing, Japan plans to lean on its fossil fuel infrastructure.
According to oil refining major ENEOS, by 2030 Japan will require 300,000 tons of hydrogen for gas power plants’ co-firing. ENEOS will convert its refineries into hydrogen supply bases. The company’s desulfurization units could be used for dehydrogenation (turning hydrogen from liquid to gas); its port terminals, piers, pipelines and storage tanks can offload and store H2.
Crucially, seven ENEOS refineries are located on the Pacific coast, close to half of Japan’s gas-fired power plants. ENEOS has 12 crude oil tankers and 15 chemical tankers that can be adapted to carry hydrogen. The company favors MCH technology for transport, which it believes it can secure in large quantities from Saudi Arabia, Australia and Southeast Asia.
MCH (Methylcyclohexane), already a widely used compound, can also be produced when converting hydrogen into a liquid using an element called toluene. This turns hydrogen into a compound that’s relatively easy to transport.
Liquid or compound?
Five years ago, most efforts focused on finding ways to transport H2 in liquid form. Kawasaki Heavy Industries built the world’s first liquified hydrogen carriers, the Suiso Frontier, which set sail in 2021. Japan’s largest hydrogen producer, Iwatani Corporation, now uses the liquified form to transport locally produced hydrogen to fuel cell vehicle service stations.
Cooling hydrogen to the point of liquefaction (-253°C) is energy intensive. Initially, it was better because it had lower energy losses (25-35%) compared to MCH (35-40%). But MCH’s advantage is that it’s condensed by 500-fold; so, one liter of MCH can store 500 liters of hydrogen that can be transported at room temperature and pressure, avoiding the cost of cooling pure hydrogen.
MCH is also safe due to limited chemical reactions regardless of ambient pressure or temperature changes. Now, ENEOS says it found a way for MCH to make up the energy losses by developing a green hydrogen process it calls Direct MCH.

Source: ENEOS
At present, green MCH has two steps: water electrolysis powered by renewables to separate hydrogen from water, and then toluene hydrogenation. Direct MCH allows for a direct reaction of toluene with water instead of hydrogen, eliminating the need to store hydrogen in tanks before the next toluene hydrogeneration phase. As a result, the cost of MCH is halved.
The company believes the innovation will help achieve the ¥30/ Nm3 goal. It’s also developing MW-class large electrolyzers by expanding the electrode area and stacking cells. In 2021, ENEOS and Origin Energy conducted a trial run of Direct MCH in Australia. Solar powered the electrolyzer, producing 4 liters of MCH, then shipped to Japan to power a FC vehicle.

Source: ENEOS
Breakthrough ammonia technologies
Japan’s ammonia demand is 1 million tons/ year, which might triple by 2030. Ammonia is manufactured using the Haber-Bosche process. Japanese manufacturers have to pay license fees to European firms for the process, so they’ve looked for an alternative for years.
Recently, startup Tsubame BHB developed an electride catalyst that produces ammonia at a lower temperature and pressure than Haber-Bosche. It can produce the gas at 300-400°C and in a 3-5 MPa environment, compared to Haber-Bosch’s 400-500°C and a 20 MPa requirement.
So far, the catalyst has been used in smaller manufacturing plants with output of 500 to 50,000 ammonia tons/ year. Tsubame BHB has yet to find a way to apply the process to bigger facilities. The new catalyst raises cost issues, however. It contains platinum group metals that are expensive and not easy to secure, with Russia one of the major global suppliers. The process also generates nitrates and nitrites, which are toxic.

Graphic: Tsubame BHB
Another Japanese oil refinery major, Idemitsu, says it has a better solution — a process that will employ molybdenum instead of PGMs. Idemitsu’s catalyst is dinitrogen-bridged dimolybdenum, a combination of molybdenum dioxide and nitrogen. The company manufactures compounds with a similar composition for its oil products. Molybdenum is commonly found in copper ores and costs $20-30/ kg, a clear price advantage against the $10/ gram for ruthenium, a PGM.
Challenges still remain. Idemitsu needs to improve the energy efficiency of its ammonia production process and find a way to control the toxic substances generated as a byproduct. The oil refiner hopes to complete development by 2024 and to have a cartridge-based system that allows the scaling up of output by 2028. Tsubame BHB also hopes to develop a PGM-free version of its catalyst by 2024, and aims to be ready for pilot tests by 2027.
Japanese academics have stepped up research on new non-PGM catalysts. New possibilities include compounds composed of nickel, copper, manganese and others. Main challenges are improving the endurance and life cycle of the compounds, scaling up the process, as well as improving energy efficiency.
Catalyst technologies in academic development in Japan
| Nickel lanthalum oxide (NiLaN) | Tokyo Institute of Technology |
| Perovskite material (BaCeO3-xNyH2) | Tokyo Institute of Technology |
| Copper oxide on aluminum silicates and silica oxides (CuOz/3A2S) | Kumamoto University |
| Copper and nickel ions embedded in manganese dioxide compound | Yamaguchi University |
Build it and they will come
Despite all these advances and progress, industry insiders and experts are concerned that all efforts to create abundant hydrogen and ammonia suppliers will fall flat if the promised demand does not materialize. As one METI committee panel on the matter noted, nearly all the R&D in the space is heavily weighted towards production. There’s much less innovation among industries to actually deploy the hydrogen.
Consumers in the power sector, such as JERA, have committed to moving towards hydrogen and ammonia in the mid-to-long-term, but are still guessing on timelines and volumes. Much depends on the technical testing of co-firing, such as the one JERA started at its Hekinan coal-fired power station last year.
If it goes well, JERA hopes to accelerate full commercialization of co-firing before a self-imposed 2030 deadline. In fact, the power utility this February launched a global tender for “up to” 500,000 tons of ammonia per year from FY2027. But ultimately, JERA’s decision will depend on the cost of this ammonia, as well as the co-firing pilot projects.
Despite the many uncertainties, the window of opportunity to hit the 2030 net-zero targets is closing. In the next two years, Japan may simply need to take a leap of faith.
BY DANIEL SHULMAN
PRINCIPAL
SHULMAN ADVISORY
Renewables Operators May See Some Asset Values Jump
On Change in Grid Rules
In some of Japan’s local power grids, developing renewable energy facilities has proved problematic with a lack of spare capacity often cited as the reason. To address the issue, a few years ago a new kind of “non-firm” contract was rolled out. It allowed new power assets to connect to the grid but limited their operations to times where there was spare capacity in the transmission system.
As such, owners of “non-firm” contracts were the first in line to have their operations curtailed in times of weak demand or oversupply.
Now, with the government looking to give renewables priority access to the grid, bumping thermal and other CO2-emitting sources down the priority order, the group of power facilities likely to benefit the most could be those with a “non-firm” contract. Once owners of an arrangement that offered only a partial operating schedule, developers and investors behind plants with a “non-firm” contract could now see material upside in the value of their assets.
The change could also have a significant impact on coal and gas-fired power plants in areas with a large volume of such contracts. The Tokyo power grid, in particular, may see a strong shakeup in run rates among various power plants.
Fluctuation in firm capacity use and non-firm availability
How the system works today
With a big surge in interest from developers in building solar and wind power plants over the last decade, local transmission system operators, or TSOs, have struggled with how to accommodate the newcomers while reserving grid capacity for existing suppliers.
When a generation asset is brought into operation, a grid connection request must be addressed to the TSO in charge of the area. The TSO evaluates the grid connection costs, which include checks that the capacity of the network allows the new power source to be effectively transmitted and/or distributed, as well as the actual cost of connecting the asset to the correct voltage branch of the grid.
If there is not enough network capacity to accommodate the asset, two options are available to the TSO. It might consider upgrading the grid, especially if several generating assets were able to share the grid upgrade costs. Alternatively, it can offer the developer a non-firm contract.
Assets under a non-firm transmission contract can send power through the grid only when there is capacity left after other (firm contract) power sources have dispatched their power. This means that when grid capacity is reached, non-firm assets will be curtailed.
This system was originally applied to areas with a significant shortage of capacity, including the Tokyo area from September 2019, and Tohoku and Kyushu from 2020. From January 2021 it was deployed nationwide for the bulk power system of each area and soon after that was extended across all three levels of the grid.
Such an un interruptible transmission system was created to increase the amount of renewable assets connected to the grid. As much as 98% of the 855 connection requests in FY2020 were for renewable assets, and the period from April 2021 to end-September 2021 saw even more connection requests.
Instead of refusing the connection of some of these renewable assets, the TSOs offered non-firm contracts. Out of the 1409 connection requests during this period, 497 non-firm contracts were offered – a nationwide average of 35%, with considerable variation among regions.
In theory, such a system allows for the integration of more renewable power on the grid, but the increased curtailment risk means a project may not getting funded or commissioned.
Non-firm assets are also currently not allowed to participate in the capacity and balancing markets, reducing monetization options.
Under the current rule, coal assets under a firm contract could keep producing power during periods of grid congestion, while renewable assets under a non-firm contract are curtailed.
Reforms of the rules
METI is now changing the system to support growth in green power sources. From April 2022, only non-firm transmission contracts will be given to all forms of generating assets connecting to the bulk power system nationwide, and this will be extended to the local power system layer by the end of FY2022.
From December 2022 the curtailment order will be modified for non-firm assets as well as for adjustable power assets. From FY2023 these rules should be extended to all assets, including assets under firm-contract.
The new curtailment order will be as follows:
Within each category, plants with the highest marginal cost of generation will be curtailed first. This will have the added benefit of reducing the power wholesale market price as the price is equal to the marginal cost of the most expensive asset cleared for a given interval on the market.
In addition to the change in curtailment priority order, non-firm assets will be allowed to participate in both the capacity market (from this year for delivery in 2026) and the balancing market. METI plans to monitor and review the results of these changes in FY2022 and FY2023.
Impact
These changes should have several effects. Renewable assets developed over the last two years with non-firm contracts but not commissioned due to the associated risks are likely to move forward.
In future, curtailment of renewable assets will be reduced considerably from where it would have been under the old system – although as renewable penetration increases, curtailment risk is still expected to increase compared to recent years, apart from in the Kyushu area.
Finally, the economics of fossil fuel generation plants are going to be further squeezed as curtailment increases. These assets will have to find new sources of income, potentially through the balancing market.
For now, victory in the competition to grid access goes to renewable energy operators. But there is one eventuality that has yet to be explained by the government under the changing rules of the game. What will happen to fossil fuel generation plant curtailment orders when, or if, METI’s vision of ammonia fuel and/or carbon capture materializes?
If the premise for curtailment orders changes to include a plant’s environmental criteria, as well as its marginal costs, we may see another shift in grid access hierarchy.
Firm and non-firm transmission contracts in Japan (April – September 2021)

Source: METI
BY JOHN VAROLI
Below are some of last week’s most important international energy developments monitored by the Japan NRG team because of their potential to impact energy supply and demand, as well as prices. We see the following as relevant to Japanese and international energy investors.
Asia/ Floating solar power
Asia is leading global growth in floating solar installations, said Fitch Solutions. There are now 22 such projects, with expected total installed capacity of 10 GW, up 37.5% from early 2021. Among the leading projects is China’s 320 MW Huaneng Power International.
Colombia/ Renewables
Spanish solar developer Grenergy issued €52.5 million of green bonds to finance renewables projects. In total, Grenergy plans to invest more than $700 million in Colombia to develop a portfolio of 1 GW of renewable projects that are currently at different stages of development.
Europe/ Solar power
The EU has the potential to add 39 GW of solar power under an “accelerated high scenario” that in 2022 would add 23.3 GW of rooftop and 15.7 GW of utility-scale solar, said SolarPower Europe. This accelerated scenario could see global solar capacity reach 1 TW by 2030.
Germany/ Gas storage
Berlin nationalized Gazprom Germania, the local subsidiary of the Russian gas group that operates some of Germany’s largest natural gas storage facilities. The government cited the company’s alleged “unclear legal relationship and its violations of its reporting obligations”.
Global solar and wind power
Wind and solar generated 10.3% of global electricity in 2021, twice more than 2015, said Ember Research. Denmark and Luxembourg led electricity generation from renewables, at 52% and 43%, respectively. 50 countries now produce 10% of their electricity from wind and solar, up from 43 in 2020.
LNG/ Infrastructure investments
Miami-based I Squared Capital closed its $15 billion infrastructure fund. The LNG sector is said to be top on the fund’s priority list, as it hopes to capitalize on Europe’s need for alternative gas supplies from Russia, as well as Asia’s growing appetite for LNG.
Russia/ Coal exports
In March, several Chinese firms purchased Russian coal with yuan. The shipments will arrive this month and are the first commodity shipments purchased in China’s currency since the war in Ukraine began. According to the Bank for International Settlements, 90% of foreign-exchange transactions in 2019 were in U.S. dollars, compared to just over 4% for the yuan.
Sweden/ Carbon capture
The EU gave €180 million to Stockholm Exergi to build Europe’s first large-scale negative carbon emissions plant. When completed, the bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) at the company’s KVV8 bio-cogeneration plant will have an annual capture capacity of almost 800,000 tons of CO2.
Switzerland/ Carbon capture
Climeworks, the Swiss carbon capture startup, raised CHF 600 million. Financing was led by Partners Group , GIC, and Swiss Re, with participation from Baillie Gifford, Carbon Removal Partners, Global Founders Capital, and Climeworks’ anchor shareholder, BigPoint Holding.
Taiwan/ Renewables
The government and state-controlled companies will invest $32 billion through 2030 to develop renewable technologies, grid infrastructure and energy storage. The country plans to reach net-zero emissions by 2050. By 2026, it has a goal to produce 20% of power from renewables.
U.S./ Energy transition
NextEra Energy sold its 156-mile natural gas pipeline in Texas for about $200 million, and will invest the transaction proceeds “to acquire higher-yielding renewable assets,” said NextEra CEO John Ketchum.
Zimbabwe/ Coal power
RioZim Ltd, one of the country’s biggest mining and energy companies, had planned to work with China to build a major coal-fired power plant. Beijing, however, pulled out because it’s scaling back overseas funding, forcing nations in Africa and Asia to rethink energy plans.
Disclaimer
This communication has been prepared for information purposes only, is confidential and may be legally privileged. This is a subscription-only service and is directed at those who have expressly asked K.K. Yuri Group or one of its representatives to be added to the mailing list. This document may not be onwardly circulated or reproduced without prior written consent from Yuri Group, which retains all copyright to the content of this report.
Yuri Group is not registered as an investment advisor in any jurisdiction. Our research and all the content express our opinions, which are generally based on available public information, field studies and own analysis. Content is limited to general comment upon general political, economic and market issues, asset classes and types of investments. The report and all of its content does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell, subscribe for or underwrite any product or physical commodity, or a financial instrument.
The information contained in this report is obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith. No representation or warranty is made that it is accurate or complete. Opinions and views expressed are subject to change without notice, as are prices and availability, which are indicative only. There is no obligation to notify recipients of any changes to this data or to do so in the future. No responsibility is accepted for the use of or reliance on the information provided. In no circumstances will Yuri Group be liable for any indirect or direct loss, or consequential loss or damages arising from the use of, any inability to use, or any inaccuracy in the information.
K.K. Yuri Group: Oonoya Building 8F, Yotsuya 1-18, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 160-0004.
NEWS
・Japan to phase out Russian coal imports in new sanctions round; PM Kishida says more reliance on renewables, nuclear is needed
・440 companies join Japan’s carbon trading exchange project; some major emitters included in group that will set project rules
・Japan’s first hydrogen-fired power plant construction is complete; pilot facility will test technical viability and seek ways to cuts costs