
April 18, 2022
NEWS
TOP
ENERGY TRANSITION & POLICY
ELECTRICITY MARKETS
OIL, GAS & MINING
ANALYSIS
FRIEND OR FOE? HOW COMPETITION AUTHORITIES
IN JAPAN VIEW THE ENERGY TRANSITION
One difficulty of an energy transition is that often incumbent market players enjoy outsized influence thanks to decades of growth and consolidation. The move to a low-carbon economy promises profound structural changes in the industrial, social and financial sectors. But, how to make sure this process does not unduly favor the current industry majors? This is the question Japanese antitrust authorities are starting to grapple with as the energy transition accelerates.
Japan NRG Weekly sat down with former Japan Fair Trade Commission officials to discuss developments in the oil, gas, hydrogen, and power sectors.
OCEAN ENERGY SHOWS PROGRESS AS PROJECTS MOVE TOWARDS THE MEGAWATT STAGE
Japan could generate nearly 170 TWh of electricity, or 20% of its annual needs, in the open seas through energy sources other than offshore wind power generation, according to government-backed research. After decades of theoretical analysis, close monitoring of water systems, R&D projects at home and abroad, Japanese marine energy tech is now maturing into sizable demonstration facilities, with a few aiming to reach commercial scale in the next two-three years. The strong push to develop offshore wind in Japan could also help to bring ocean energy into the mainstream.
GLOBAL VIEW
Global energy investments will reach a record $2.1 trillion this year. IEA updates oil market forecast to say no sign of major oil deficit this year. Denmark’s Orsted is boosting coal reserves ahead of next winter. Egypt asks Russia’s Rosatom to build its first nuclear power plant. South Korea reverses course on nuclear phase out. Details on these items and more in our global wrap.
PUBLISHER
K. K. Yuri Group
Events
Editorial Team
Yuriy Humber (Editor-in-Chief)
John Varoli (Senior Editor, Americas)
Mayumi Watanabe (Japan)
Wilfried Goossens (Japan, Events)
Regular Contributors
Chisaki Watanabe (Japan)
Takehiro Masutomo (Japan)
Daniel Shulman (Japan)
Art & Design
22 Graphics Inc.
SUBSCRIPTIONS & ADVERTISING
Japan NRG offers individual, corporate and academic subscription plans. Basic details are our website or write to subscriptions@japan-nrg.com
For marketing, advertising, or collaboration opportunities, contact sales@japan-nrg.com
For all other inquiries, write to info@japan-nrg.com
OFTEN USED ACRONYMS
METI The Ministry of Energy, Trade and Industry
MOE Ministry of Environment
ANRE Agency for Natural Resources and Energy
NEDO New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization
TEPCO Tokyo Electric Power Company
KEPCO Kansai Electric Power Company
EPCO Electric Power Company
JCC Japan Crude Cocktail
JKM Japan Korea Market, the Platt’s LNG benchmark
CCUS Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage
mmbtu Million British Thermal Units
mb/d Million barrels per day
mtoe Million Tons of Oil Equivalent
kWh Kilowatt hours (electricity generation volume)

Kishida enthusiastic on pan-Asian green initiative
(Nikkei, April 14)
TotalEnergies and ENEOS to explore Sustainable Aviation Fuel production in Japan
(New Energy Business News, April 15)
Japan faces record climate shareholder resolutions this year
(NPO Statement, April 13)
Climate business lobby meets with PM to promote renewables, carbon pricing
(Kankyo Business, April 8)
Japan to create bio jet fuel supply chain in clean energy push
(Nikkei Asia, April 14)
KDDI, mobile and data conglomerate, brings forward net-zero pledge by 20 years
(Kankyo Business, April 8)
Mitsui and Indonesia’s Pertamina to launch CCUS studies
(Company statement, April 7)
Major Indonesian CCUS projects with Japanese involvement
| Partners | Location | Schedule |
| Pertamina, ExxonMobil | Gundih | Operational in 2026 |
| J-Power, METI, NEDO, JANUS, Pertamina | 2021-2025 feasibility study, subject to JCM credits | |
| Mitsubishi, Inpex, JX, KG Mitsui, LNG Japan, Sumitomo, Sojitz, CNOOC, BP | Tangguh | 2020-2025 feasibility study, operational in 2026 |
| JAPEX, Pertamina, LEMIGAS | Sukowati | 2020-2025 feasibility study, 2025 project starts, 2028 carbon injection, subject to JCM |
| `Chiyoda, Pertamina | Unspecified | MoU signed in January 2022 |
Can carbon storage overcome cost hurdles?
(Nikkei, April 13)
Mitsui invests in French green hydrogen startup via convertible notes
(Company Statement, April 13)
Osaka Gas, Australia’s AQUA AEREM partner in hydrogen
(Japan NRG, April 12)
Kawasaki Heavy partners with Airbus to develop hydrogen fuel ecosystem
(Company Statement, April 12)
Fujitsu teams up with Icelandic startup to develop new ammonia production catalysts
(New Energy Business News, April 15)
Japan Bank for International Cooperation invests in U.S. nuclear startup NuScale
(Company Statement, April 4)
Honda to invest $40bn in EVs as it aims to go all-electric by 2040
(Asia Nikkei, April 12)
Sumitomo Corp sets up second renewables investment fund
(Kankyo Business, April 11)
Yamaha Motor to bring biofuel motorcycles to Asia
(Asia Nikkei, April 11)

OCCTO warns Tokyo’s power shortage will be more critical next winter
(Japan NRG, April 12)
Power reserve rate (%) in worst case scenarios
| July 2022 | August | January 2023 | February | |
| Hokkaido | 21.4 | 12.5 | 6 | 6.1 |
| Tohoku | 3.1 | 4.9 | 3.2 | 3.4 |
| Tokyo | 3.1 | 4.9 | -1.7 | -1.5 |
| Chubu | 3.1 | 4.9 | 2.2 | 2.5 |
| Hokuriku | 5 | 4.9 | 2.2 | 2.5 |
| Kansai | 5 | 4.9 | 2.2 | 2.5 |
| Chugoku | 5 | 4.9 | 2.2 | 2.5 |
| Shikoku | 5 | 4.9 | 2.2 | 2.5 |
| Kyushu | 5 | 4.9 | 2.2 | 2.5 |
| Okinawa | 31.6 | 34.3 | 42.0 | 43.6 |
| Name | Capacity | Operator |
| Haramachi No. 1 | 1 GW coal | Tohoku Electric |
| Shin Sendai 3-1 | 523 MW LNG | Tohoku Electric |
| Sendai Power Station | 112 MW coal | Sendai Power Station |
| Soma Coal Biomass | 112 MW coal | Soma Energy Park |
| Shinchi No. 1 | 1 GW coal | Soma Kyodo Power Station |
| Hirono No. 6 | 600 MW coal | JERA |
| Shinchi No. 2 (was offline during quake) | 1 GW coal | Soma Kyodo Power Station |
J-Power’s Isogo No. 2 coal power station to restart on Sept 30
(Japan NRG, April 12)
First ever solar curtailment orders from Shikoku Electric and Tohoku Electric
(Japan NRG, April 11)
Hokuriku Electric forecasts wind capacity to surpass solar in 2030
(Japan NRG, April 12)

Chubu Electric freezes new commercial subscriptions amid surging costs
(NHK, April 14)
Tokyo Gas offshore wind venture to build 500 MW project near Chiba
(New Energy Business News, April 14)
Green Power Investment plans 630 MW offshore wind project near Chiba
(New Energy Business News, April 15)
Renova plans 450 MW offshore wind project near Chiba
(New Energy Business News, April 14)
Kansai Electric explores building 676 MW offshore wind plant near Saga
(New Energy Business News, April 12)
Pacifico Energy starts 111 MW solar project and sells it to Kansai Electric group
(New Energy Business News, April 12)
Japan rail operator starts wireless, solar powered phone charging at station
(Company Statement, April 8)

Hitachi Energy wins Danish transmission lines contract
(NNA Europe; April 13)
Nuclear regulator pushes Hokkaido Electric to step up safety measures
(Japan NRG, April 13)
Nearly 100,000 Niigata residents sign petition demanding voice in nuclear restart
(NHK, April 11)

WAR IN UKRAINE:
Russia launches cruise missiles into Sea of Japan
(Nikkan Gendai, April 15)
Japan to push more upstream LNG investment: METI minister
(Japan NRG, April 15)
Japan can’t afford to be outbid on LNG: Kikkawa
(Nikkei Business, April 14)
DPFP calls for reinstatement of “trigger clause” or equivalent measures
(NHK, April 8)
Activist investor Murakami buys more Cosmo shares
(Nikkei; April 8)
JGC and Kawasaki Kisen to reuse old LNG tankers into floating LNG bases
(Nikkei Shimbun, April 13)
JX Nippon Mining to ‘dig’ for lithium in old batteries
(Asia Nikkei, April 14)
TAKEAWAY: Germany has an organized used battery collection system and has relatively large recyclable supplies. This is a main advantage for Germany-based recyclers, as vehicle batteries are heavy and costly to transport.
The EU plans to require a recycling quota for batteries to increase resource re-use, and Japan plans a similar regulation.
BY MAYUMI WATANABE
Friend or Foe?
How Competition Authorities in Japan View the Energy Transition
One difficulty of an energy transition is that incumbent market players enjoy outsized influence thanks to decades of growth and consolidation. The move to a low-carbon economy promises profound structural changes in the industrial, social and financial sectors. But, how to make sure this process does not unduly favor the existing players, thus replicating their domination in the clean energy sector?
This is the question Japanese antitrust authorities are starting to grapple with as the energy transition accelerates. Supporting any and all innovation that will help Japan reach carbon neutrality is seen as imperative. Yet allowing today’s top players to benefit the most simply due to their extensive resources would put into question the oft-stated goal of making the energy transition inclusive and fair.
The issue is especially pertinent in Japan, where energy corporations look to repurpose legacy fossil fuel infrastructure, such as oil terminals and thermal power plants, for hydrogen, ammonia and other constituents of a low-carbon economy. If Japan follows its gradual trajectory towards green energy, will it also mean that new players will be largely shut out from the transition? Or, will owners of existing fossil fuel infrastructure be made to compete on a level playing field?
Japan NRG Weekly sat down with former Japan Fair Trade Commission (JFTC) officials to discuss the developments in the oil and gas, hydrogen, and power sectors.
More consolidation in the oil sector?
In 1980, Japan had 17 oil refineries, but eventually they were consolidated inside three groups: ENEOS, Idemitsu and Cosmo Energy. The era of M&A within the sector looked over until this month. Earlier in April, an activist investment fund led by former state bureaucrat Murakami Yoshiaki acquired an 8.28% stake in Cosmo Energy, spurring talks of further industry consolidation.
METI’s most recent long-term oil demand forecast shows that industry is moving away from fossil fuels at a faster rate than expected, creating redundant refining capacity. The national fuel oil demand forecast is for a decrease of 7.1% by 2026 over 2021 levels, dropping to 142 million kiloliters. The previous five-year forecast was for a 5.7% demand decline by 2025 versus 2021.
The new forecast equals 2.4 million barrels/ day; yet, Japan’s refining capacity is 3.5 million barrels/ day. This means, within five years 1/3 of the nation’s refining capacity will be redundant; and by 2030, unused capacity will increase to more than half.
The 3.5 million barrels/ day breaks down as follows: 50% for ENEOS; 27% for Idemitsu; and 11% for Cosmo Energy. The remaining 12% is claimed by small local refineries – Fuji Oil, Taiyo Oil, and Seibu Oil.
The possibility of small independent refineries joining one of the bigger three would have negligible competition impact. Meanwhile, thoughts of a merger among any of the top three or even all three joining to form a single oil company, simply won’t be possible, experts say.
The JFTC, upon reviewing the merger plans of JX with Tonen General (to form today’s ENEOS) and Idemitsu with Showa Shell in 2016, warned that a decrease in the number of players will restrain oil market competition and harm consumers. The refineries are already in a commoditized market where differentiation is not easy.
In the end, the JFTC cleared the mergers mentioned above, but not unconditionally. The refineries had to commit to programs that foster competition. For example, in a bid to create alternative supply flows, they have to support outside traders and distributors when it comes to importing and stockpiling oil products.
Antitrust views on the hydrogen supply chain
Antitrust authority decisions are deeply impacted by how markets, potential substitutes and competition pressures are defined.
Five years from now, the emergence of renewable alternatives to gasoline and other oil products will likely revamp the market structures. Among the changes will be multiple hydrogen and ammonia co-firing pilot projects. Also, the first offshore wind projects are expected to begin operations in 2028.
This increase in the availability of substitutes to fossil fuels will impact JFTC decisions.
As co-firing generation takes off, import of hydrogen and ammonia is expected to pick up from 2028. Hydrogen from Australia and the Middle East will provide competition for locally sourced supply, and also to fossil fuel energy. Players like Iwatani Corp, the largest Japanese hydrogen producer, will do both – manufacture domestically and import from Australia, bolstering the number of supply options on the market.
ENEOS, Idemitsu and Cosmo plan to convert their oil desulfurization and processing units, tanks and terminals into hydrogen/ammonia supply bases, and their oil and chemical tankers into carriers of liquefied hydrogen. A dehydrogenation unit and an oil desulfurization unit could run side-by-side in a single refinery.
The refineries, however, aren’t evenly spread across the country. Rather, they’re concentrated in industrial zones such as the Tokyo, Sakai and the Yokkaichi bay areas. The islands of Kyushu and Hokkaido each have one refinery, run by ENEOS and Idemitsu, respectively.
So, this raises the question: If ENEOS, which doesn’t have a refinery in Hokkaido, reaches out to Idemitsu to use its facility to supply green hydrogen from Australia, will this cause competition issues? And will the move restrain other players from supplying hydrogen/ammonia to Hokkaido? How about Cosmo, which partners with the biggest Japanese hydrogen producer Iwatani – will it be able to join such initiatives?
A former JFTC official says it’s possible that refineries could be allowed to share facilities. The main concern, however, is that the alliance must be rigidly defined. Outside those alliances, the refineries and traders must continue to compete.
Antitrust authorities will need to see how the market develops before they can define what may constitute anti-competitive behavior. After all, being an oil refinery does not mean it will automatically take a major position in the hydrogen supply market, notes attorney Matsuda Serina.
Based on company disclosures, for example, it appears Iwatani is taking the lead in terms of hydrogen volumes, while ENEOS has the most diversified project pipeline. Meanwhile, the technologies to produce, store and transport hydrogen are still in development and the molecule supply chain structure will likely fluctuate for a while.
In an immature market, industry players hedge strategies. ENEOS is developing a proprietary Direct Methylcyclohexane (MCH) hydrogen transport process, but it’s also collaborating with Kawasaki Heavy Industries and Iwatani on supply chains based on transporting liquid hydrogen.
Selection of major hydrogen projects
| Tier 1 supplier (location) | Local supplier | Volume |
| Iwatani Corporation (Japan) | Iwatani/Cosmo | 10,000-11,000 tons/year |
| Stanwell/Iwatani/Kawasaki Heavy/Kansai Electric/Marubeni (Australia) | Iwatani, etc? | 30,000-40,000 tons/year by 2026 |
| Mitsubishi/Chiyoda (Brunei) | ENEOS | 40,000 tons/year by 2030? |
| Origin (Australia) | ENEOS | |
| Fortescue (Australia) | ENEOS | |
| SEDC/Sumitomo/ENEOS (Malaysia) | ENEOS/Sumitomo? | |
| Petronas (Malaysia) | ENEOS | |
| Saudi Aramco (Saudi Arabia) | ENEOS | |
| New Castle Port/Macquarie/Idemitsu (Australia) | Idemitsu? | NA |
| AQUA AEREM/Osaka Gas (Australia) | TBD | Up to 400,000 tons/year but not exclusively to Japan |
| Nel ASA/Itochu (US) | Itochu? | NA |
Antitrust view of the co-firing sector
JERA is now a key player in ammonia-coal co-firing after last year embarking on 20% ammonia co-firing trials and eyeing a commercial launch in 2024 in Aichi Prefecture. In February, JERA opened an international tender for up to 500,000 tons/ year of ammonia to be supplied from 2027 through the 2040s, thereby making the company Japan’s largest ammonia importer and supplier. JERA also has 30% of Japan’s coal-fired power capacity.
Rival J-Power, with a 20% coal-fired capacity share, plans to commercialize coal-biomass-ammonia co-firing by 2026, at its Matsushima power station. It’s also partnering with Chugairo, an ammonia burner maker, Osaka University, the Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry and government research institutes.
With co-firing processes at a very early stage, the industry approach in Japan is generally based on collaboration. Over time, this may need to change.
Japanese Antimonopoly Act guidelines generally ban joint research and development by two potential competitors as this could restrict future competition. Still, even a very concentrated field could be expanded through the entry of startups that offer new ammonia and related co-firing technologies. The startups themselves may become natural targets for the utilities, but such acquisitions have a chance of going through, provided the antitrust authorities see evidence that there are multiple entities with breakthrough technologies, said one lawyer.
Attorney Matsuda says there are several approaches the antitrust authorities could take to frame the market. One would be to see this as a technology development market. Or, officials could treat the operators of power services that employ ammonia-thermal co-firing as a separate market.
“The power generation market may not necessarily be defined as a single nationwide market,” she said.
In March, METI launched an energy and competition expert group to identify regulations that block the growth of a climate-resilient economy. This was a response to calls for more flexible competition rules to help companies to work together on carbon neutrality projects, specifically in building supply chain infrastructure for the manufacture, transport and storage of hydrogen and ammonia.
The group will first study regulatory trends overseas in order to better align Japanese policies with the global community, and may discuss specific issues at a later stage.
How lenient will the officials be?
In the past, a number of industries have asked authorities to be more lenient on competition rules in the face of structural challenges.
In November 2020, the regional bus transport and bank sectors were exempted from the Antimonopoly Act strictures, allowing flexible mergers and joint operations for a period of 10 years. Those sectors are essential for regional economies, many of which are facing a declining population.
So far, this is the only standout, despite regular lobbying for relaxed antimonopoly rules from several other industries. What would make a more lenient approach for the energy transition even more unusual is the fact that clean energy is a growing industry with bright prospects.
The questions that Japan’s antitrust authorities now face include: How will industrial growth policy and market competition policy interplay? And, if greater leniency is provided to players involved in decarbonization, how long should this last and what is the basis to end this approach?
The debates in government and business circles are just beginning, but they are certain to last months and years, and are sure to be closely followed – especially by new entrants in the power and energy markets. Renewable operators claim the unbundling of regional power monopolies was superficial, leaving legacy players with undue advantages in the liberalized electricity market. Will the same be true in the age of hydrogen and gigawatt-scale renewables?
BY YURIY HUMBER
Ocean Energy Shows Progress
As Projects Start to Move to the `Megawatt’ Stage
Japan could generate nearly 170 TWh of electricity, or 20% of its annual needs, in the open seas through energy sources other than offshore wind power generation, according to government-backed research suggesting the nation can do more to harness marine energy.
After decades of theoretical analysis, close monitoring of water systems, R&D projects at home and abroad, Japanese marine energy tech is now maturing into sizable demonstration facilities, with a few aiming to reach commercial scale in the next two-three years.
National strategy sees the application of generation systems that rely on ocean currents, tides and sea waves as naturally suited for smaller, remote parts of the Japan archipelago, which boasts over 6,000 islands.
The strong push to develop offshore wind in Japan, however, could also bring ocean energy into the mainstream as developers look at ways to maximize the effectiveness of their sea areas through hybrid, multi-technology arrays.
Background
Ocean energy is a renewable power source that’s seen little development despite decades of research. There’s only 517 MW of installed capacity globally among the 22 countries that form the International Energy Agency’s Ocean Energy Systems program (IEA-OES). Most of that capacity is from two tidal range dams: one in France and the other in South Korea.
Japan was one of the earliest members of IEA-OES, joining in 2002, but it doesn’t even provide regular updates for the group’s annual report, unlike other members that include the U.S., China, India, Denmark, the UK, and Singapore.
In part, this may be because after an initial wave of enthusiasm in marine energy following the 2011 Fukushima accident, progress stalled as more mature technologies such as solar and wind power caught the popular imagination. When Japan’s first Green Growth Strategy was announced in late 2020, ocean energy wasn’t even mentioned.
Since then, technical progress and innovation has revived business attention. In FY2018, state-backed research hub NEDO launched a three-year, grant funding program to accelerate R&D and set ocean energy on course to roll out commercially viable technologies by 2030. The program was succeeded by targeted funding for both startups and large companies.
A similar approach was taken by the Ministry of Environment (MoE), which secured funding for a 500-kW tidal current power generation project off the Goto Islands, Nagasaki Prefecture. The one-year project, started in 2021 and led by a unit of Kyushu Electric, involved installing, operating and decommissioning a tidal turbine shipped from the U.K.
Incidentally, the Goto area is also the site of Japan’s first commercial-scale floating offshore wind turbines tender awarded to a group of eight domestic companies. The group aims to deliver 16.8 MW of capacity, more than the size of current ocean energy projects, but considerably less than the established fixed-bottom offshore wind turbine technology.
As ocean energy projects gain in size and deliver positive results over long-term demonstrations in open seas, the sector could be in line to switch from the current grant-based model to tariff-based revenue support, much like the way solar, wind and biomass energy developed with the introduction of the Feed-In Tariff (FIT).
Main types of ocean energy pursued in Japan
Japan has spent decades surveying its waters. Data on wave, tide and seawater temperature patterns span at least two or three decades, and much of it can be accessed on government websites. Japan’s Basic Plan on Ocean Policy, last updated in 2018, focuses on ocean energy for remote islands, where electricity costs are high and supply options limited.
| Marine Power Type | How It Works | Annual Electricity Potential in Japan |
| Ocean Current | Strong ocean current in the open sea rotates turbine | 10 – 37 TWh |
| Tidal Current | Tidal flow in a strait, or similar water channel, turns turbine rotors | 6 TWh |
| Wave | Vertical motion of the wave pushes the rotor | 19 – 87 TWh |
| Ocean Thermal (Temperature Difference) Energy | Harness the difference in temperatures at the sea surface and in deep water, for example, by employing a device with liquid ammonia: the boiling point of the gas is raised by adjusting pressure; warm seawater is used to cause evaporation of the ammonia that turns the turbine; the steam is then cooled using cold seawater | 15 – 47 TWh |
Source: NEDO, Shin Energy Shimpo, IEA-OES, Japan NRG

Source: NEDO
We review several standout projects close to commercial use.
1. The startup Global Energy Harvest Co. (formerly SoundPower) is building a circulation-type wave power pumped storage. Toyo Denki said late last year that it received an order for a 300-kW system from the company, and that it’ll work with Austria’s Andritz Group on the project. Andritz has equipped some of the world’s biggest tidal power facilities.

Source: Global Energy Harvest

The system designed by Global Energy Harvest is said to be unique. It doesn’t directly use the energy from waves, but instead funnels the water into a pump which then releases it, and with that motion drives the generator. It’s similar to how hydropower-pumped storage systems release water from an elevated dam.
Combining pumping action with wave power avoids the need for multiple rotors that could interfere with sea life. It also makes the system more durable, and can even hold up in a typhoon, says Global Energy Harvest, which wants to launch a 332-kW circulation-type wave power pumped storage generation system by next year. The facility may be located in Kumejima Island, Okinawa Prefecture.
Global Energy Harvest believes its hybrid system could achieve a power generation cost of ¥20/ kWh, which would make it competitive with offshore wind projects. It’s also enough to recoup the invested money within four years, less than half the time for a solar project. Other advantages are that it can be installed near existing infrastructure, and it doesn’t require much maintenance, unlike most marine energy systems.
In the last two years, Global Energy Harvest has raised close to ¥300 million from companies including ENEOS, Daiwa House, Edge Labs, and Japan Green Power Development Co. The startup is also one of the recipients of NEDO ocean energy program funding.


Source: Bombora Wave Power
2. Mitsui OSK Lines (MOL), a shipping firm, will launch a large facility with ocean thermal energy conversion tech by around 2025. The 1 MW station will cost several billion yen. Before that, the company will conduct demonstrations in Okinawa Prefecture.
The shipping firm plans to use existing pipes built for fishing to lower the cost of creating a new ocean energy facility, which the company hopes will allow it to cut the cost to ¥20/ kWh by mid-decade. If the plans materialize, Mitsui OSK sees the potential to install more ocean energy plants in both Japan and abroad, such as in Indonesia.
The shipping firm also invested earlier this year in Bombora Wave Power, an Australian firm operating in the UK, which seeks to commercialize wave energy with a 1.5 MW validation project during 2022.
Aside from MOL, ocean thermal energy conversion systems are researched by the team at Saga University, which hopes to combine the electricity generation aspect of the technology with capability to desalinate seawater. The university will participate in an experiment of the Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) system in Malaysia around 2024.
3. NEDO’s initial three-year ocean energy project helped IHI hold a demo experiment of the world’s first floating type ocean current turbine called the Kairyu. The 100-kW turbine was lowered 50 m below sea level off the coast of Kuchinoshima Island in the path of the Kuroshio Current. The project did generate electricity, validating the concept and collecting key data, but saw its second phase delayed by the pandemic.

Source: IHI Corporation
4. The MoE funded a wave power generator developed by the Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo, which was installed in front of the Hiratsuka Shinko breakwater in Kanagawa Prefecture, and which was connected to the grid. Kawasaki Heavy Industries was one of the firms involved in the one-year demonstration project.
The ministry also selected Kyuden Mirai, a unit of Kyushu Electric, to run a tidal current power generation demonstration this year as part of its regional decarbonization funding program. The project will run a 1 MW generator, reaching the start of commercial scale.

Source: Mainichi Shimbun, image courtesy of Kyuden Mirai Energy Co.
Conclusion
Given the slow pace of technological development, in part due to the need to test long-term impact on the ocean environment, it can be easy to disregard ocean energy’s potential. Yet, a clear trend in renewable energy has been the stacking of different technologies within a project to maximize the total efficiency and returns. Ocean energy systems have the potential to do that for offshore wind power projects.
Finally, as a hallmark of how far the sector has come, one of Japan’s top insurers, Sompo, has begun to offer comprehensive insurance policies for tidal power generation. This apparently small detail is a strong indicator that the mechanics of ocean energy is no longer only an academic discussion.
BY JOHN VAROLI
Below are some of last week’s most important international energy developments monitored by the Japan NRG team because of their potential to impact energy supply and demand, as well as prices. We see the following as relevant to Japanese and international energy investors.
Argentina/ Renewable energy
Energy company Genneia will invest $200 million to build 1 GW of renewable capacity — 222 MW of solar and 878 MW of wind energy, to be distributed in 11 parks across the country. Over the last five years, Genneia invested $1.2 billion in renewable capacity.
Denmark/ Coal power
Power company Ørsted will boost its coal reserves in anticipation of increased usage of the fuel next winter. The move is a surprise because Ørsted is one of the world’s biggest developers of offshore wind farms and seen as a champion of green energy.
Egypt/ Nuclear power
The country’s first nuclear power plant will be built at El Dabaa on the Mediterranean Sea, in partnership with Russia’s nuclear power developer Rosatom. The 4.8 GW facility will start operation in 2028 and has a $60 billion total price tag.
Energy Transition
In 2022, global energy investment will reach a record $2.1 trillion, a level not seen since 2014, said Rystad Energy. Upstream oil and gas spending will grow 16%, or $142 billion; global green capacity will grow by 250 GW as spending rises 24%, or $125 billion. In 2021, renewables accounted for 38% of total global power, making up a record 81% of new global capacity, according to the International Renewable Energy Agency.
Germany/ Nuclear power
Energy company Eon won’t extend the life of its nuclear power plant, one of the country’s three remaining nuclear sites. “There’s no future for nuclear in Germany,” said CEO Leo Birnbaum. “It’s too emotional.” Eon’s Isar 2 plant will go offline at the end of 2022.
Italy and Algeria/ Natural gas
PM Mario Draghi visits Algeria next week to sign a gas deal. Algeria is Italy’s second-largest supplier, providing 21 billion c/m — 31% of annual gas consumption. The Trans-Mediterranean pipeline that links the countries is operating only at 66% of its annual capacity of 33 billion c/m.
India/ Renewable energy
Abu Dhabi-based conglomerate, International Holding Company (IHC), will invest $2 billion in green energy companies belonging to India’s Adani Group, which has diversified from ports and coal-fired power plants into renewable energy.
Oil
The International Energy Agency says the global oil market won’t have a major deficit this year because emergency stock releases and slower Chinese demand will offset lower Russian production. The world fuel consumption forecast is 99.4 million bpd, as opposed to the previous forecast of 99.7 million bpd before the war began in Ukraine.
South Korea/ Nuclear power
The new government will reverse an earlier plan to phaseout nuclear power. South Korea is one of the world’s top-five fossil fuels importers, but also the fifth-largest nuclear power producer. Nuclear accounted for 26% of its total electricity generation. South Korea has the world’s highest density of nuclear reactors, with most of its 24 reactors located at two complexes.
UK/ Electricity markets
Contracts worth over £1.5 billion were awarded for the NeuConnect project, which is an interconnector project linking Germany and the U.K. The project includes 725 km of subsea cables that will enable 1.4 GW of electricity to pass in both directions between the two countries.
U.S./ LNG
Excelerate Energy, which operates a fleet of floating natural gas import terminals around the world, raised $384 million in an IPO, valuing the Texas-based LNG company at about $2.5 billion. The deal was the first oil and gas IPO in more than a year.
Disclaimer
This communication has been prepared for information purposes only, is confidential and may be legally privileged. This is a subscription-only service and is directed at those who have expressly asked K.K. Yuri Group or one of its representatives to be added to the mailing list. This document may not be onwardly circulated or reproduced without prior written consent from Yuri Group, which retains all copyright to the content of this report.
Yuri Group is not registered as an investment advisor in any jurisdiction. Our research and all the content express our opinions, which are generally based on available public information, field studies and own analysis. Content is limited to general comment upon general political, economic and market issues, asset classes and types of investments. The report and all of its content does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell, subscribe for or underwrite any product or physical commodity, or a financial instrument.
The information contained in this report is obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith. No representation or warranty is made that it is accurate or complete. Opinions and views expressed are subject to change without notice, as are prices and availability, which are indicative only. There is no obligation to notify recipients of any changes to this data or to do so in the future. No responsibility is accepted for the use of or reliance on the information provided. In no circumstances will Yuri Group be liable for any indirect or direct loss, or consequential loss or damages arising from the use of, any inability to use, or any inaccuracy in the information.
K.K. Yuri Group: Oonoya Building 8F, Yotsuya 1-18, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 160-0004.
NEWS
・Japan to push for more upstream LNG investment, more coal from existing suppliers as substitutes for Russian commodities
・OCCTO: Tokyo power shortages will be more critical next winter; system operator stresses need to cut power consumption
・ENEOS and France’s TotalEnergies team up in bio fuel and solar; the two seek to commercialize SAF and invest in Asian solar farms