
Aug. 21, 2023
NEWS
TOP
ENERGY TRANSITION & POLICY
ELECTRICITY MARKETS
OIL, GAS & MINING
ANALYSIS
HOW TO KEEP AMMONIA SAFE:
NEW STANDARDS IN THE CO-FIRING ERA
Japan will soon see the start of two ammonia-and-coal co-firing pilot projects. The two fuels will be burned side by side at gigawatt-scale power generation facilities. Today’s regulations are made for ammonia’s current use in agriculture and industry. New safety standards are needed for power generation. Co-firing is in an early adaptation phase, but there’s more work before large-scale commercial use becomes a reality.
EFFORTS TO ENGAGE MUNICIPALITIES ON GREEN ENERGY PLANS STYMIED BY RESOURCES GAP
About a year after the MoE began encouraging municipalities to designate areas for renewables development, progress has been slow. Meanwhile, opposition to new solar and wind projects is rising. Complaints range from solar panels on steep slopes, to tree logging to make space for wind turbines. The government needs to work with localities to re-engage with renewables development
GLOBAL VIEW
A wrap of top energy news from around the world.
EVENTS SCHEDULE
A selection of events to keep an eye on in 2023.
PUBLISHER
K. K. Yuri Group
Editorial Team
Yuriy Humber (Editor-in-Chief)
John Varoli (Senior Editor, Americas)
Mayumi Watanabe (Japan)
Wilfried Goossens (Events, global)
Kyoko Fukuda (Japan)
Filippo Pedretti (Japan)
Regular Contributors
Chisaki Watanabe (Japan)
Takehiro Masutomo (Japan)
Events
SUBSCRIPTIONS & ADVERTISING
Japan NRG offers individual, corporate and academic subscription plans. Basic details are our website or write to subscriptions@japan-nrg.com
For marketing, advertising, or collaboration opportunities, contact sales@japan-nrg.com For all other inquiries, write to info@japan-nrg.com
OFTEN USED ACRONYMS
|
METI |
The Ministry of Economy, |
mmbtu |
Million British Thermal Units | |
|
MoE |
Ministry of Environment |
mb/d |
Million barrels per day | |
|
ANRE |
Agency for Natural Resources and Energy |
mtoe |
Million Tons of Oil Equivalent | |
|
NEDO |
New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization |
kWh |
Kilowatt hours (electricity generation volume) | |
|
TEPCO |
Tokyo Electric Power Company |
FIT |
Feed-in Tariff | |
|
KEPCO |
Kansai Electric Power Company |
FIP |
Feed-in Premium | |
|
EPCO |
Electric Power Company |
SAF |
Sustainable Aviation Fuel | |
|
JCC |
Japan Crude Cocktail |
NPP |
Nuclear power plant | |
|
JKM |
Japan Korea Market, the Platt’s LNG benchmark |
JOGMEC |
Japan Organization for Metals and Energy Security | |
|
CCUS |
Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage | |||
|
OCCTO |
Organization for Cross-regional Coordination of Transmission Operators | |||
|
NRA |
Nuclear Regulation Authority | |||
|
GX |
Green Transformation |

Mitsui Fudosan to invest in U.S. tandem PSC tech firm Caelux that will boost solar efficiency
(Japan NRG, Aug 14)
TAKEAWAY: Mitsui Fudosan is the second Japanese entity after travel agency HIS’ founder, Sawada Hideo, to invest in non-Japanese PSC tech. Sawada invested into Poland’s Saule Technologies, the world’s first company to commercialize inkjet-printed solar modules. In 2018, HIS installed Saule’s building-integrated modules at a facility in the House Tenbosu theme park, but the modules were removed last year after the park’s sale to a Hong Kong fund. The company, however, told Japan NRG that it still plans to produce Saule’s modules in Japan. It’s still not clear if Mitsui Fudosan will also import the PSC tech into Japan.
TAKEAWAY: China leads the world in the development of PSC with carbon electrodes, replacing the metallic perovskite crystal layer (that consists of lead, iodine, titanium among others) with cheaper carbon. Japan has been pushing metallic PSC development because the country has large iodine deposits.
MHI and Heidelberg Materials cooperate on world’s first CCUS for cement industry
(Company statement, Aug 17)
ENEOS to launch VPP at oil refineries
(Japan NRG, Aug 17)

NTT Anode Energy, Kyushu Electric and Mitsubishi collaborate on energy storage
(Dempa Shimbun, Aug 15)
KEPCO and Toshiba to launch EV battery analysis service in FY2024
(Nikkei, Aug 18)
PM Kishida visits Fukushima, decision on treated wastewater release expected soon
(Japan NRG, Aug 20)
TAKEAWAY: The lifting of Japanese food restrictions in multiple nations is positive news for PM Kishida as Japan is poised to release treated water from Fukushima. This news reveals growing trust in Japan, contrasted with others — China, for instance — that persist in their disapproval.
JAPEX acquires shares in storage battery startup PowerX
(Company statement, Aug 17)

TOCOM power futures trading volume plummet, hedging demand wanes
(Denki Shimbun, Japan NRG, Aug 17)
TAKEAWAY: TOCOM has gained ground in the last six months or so after seeing EEX take a very dominant position in the electricity futures market. However, the summer lull has affected the former more than the latter. This may be partly due to the slightly different mix of trading participants on each exchange. Big domestic power utilities have tended to use TOCOM more.

Source: Denki Shimbun
Major utilities see special high-voltage contract number rise to highest since 2016
(Denki Shimbun, Aug 16)
Biomass specialist and power trader erex hit hard by drops in spot price
(Denki Shimbun, Aug 15)
Eurus Energy sets up fully-owned subsidiary in Vietnam
(Company statement, Aug 14)
Mayor welcomes Chugoku Electric, KEPCO research for spent nuclear fuel storage
(Nikkei, Aug 18)
Copper cable thieves arrested in Gunma Pref, such crimes on the rise
(NHK, Aug 14)
TAKEAWAY: There are 96 solar power operators in Gunma. This is less than the nearby Ibaraki and Fukushima Pref, which have over 150. The figures suggest that, on average, the Gunma operators have suffered ¥7.6 million in theft damages.
KEPCO’s Kanden Plant finishes first factory in Hyogo Pref
(Denki Shimbun, Aug 17)

Japan’s oil and gas self-sufficiency rate dips due to economic recovery and geopolitics
(Government data, Aug 15)
TAKEAWAY: It should be noted that Japan’s oil and gas demand is falling even faster than “the self-sufficiency rate”. Imports are down by over 10% in the last four years. This means an increasing share of Japanese uptake volumes is delivered to global markets, especially to its Asian neighbors. This puts into question the need for METI to stick to its 50-60% “self-sufficiency goals”.
METI, however, believes Asian consumers buying more fossil fuel from Japanese companies helps to strengthen the country’s energy value chain. Earlier this month, JAPEX (36% owned by the government), launched a feasibility study on LNG end-user applications in northern Vietnam. This symbolizes stronger emphasis on the downstream part of the gas value chain by Japanese businesses while seeking more upstream projects to cater to Asia’s LNG growing demand.
Key LNG value chain investments in Asia
|
Vietnam |
Toho Gas, JERA, Tokyo Gas, JAPEX |
LNG terminals, local distribution, gas-fired power plant and other end-user applications |
|
Thailand |
Tokyo Gas, Osaka Gas, Shizuoka Gas |
LNG terminals, local distribution, end-user applications |
|
India |
Osaka Gas |
Gas utility services |
|
Philippines |
Tokyo Gas |
LNG terminals |
|
Bangladesh |
Tokyo Gas |
LNG terminals |
Delfin Midstream and MOL to launch first FLNG facility in the U.S.
(Nikkei, Aug 17)
TAKEAWAY: FLNG plants help in capitalizing on gas reserves in remote or challenging regions, but there are disadvantages regarding automation and operational complexities. For instance, FLNG installations face issues related to restricted spatial availability, deterioration from weather conditions, capacity limitations due to vessel dimensions, and shorter leasing periods (10-12 years) compared to onshore LNG terminals. Also, FLNG projects often face rising costs and schedule delays.
ADNOC Gas and JAPEX sign 5-year deal on LNG supply
(Reuters, Aug 17)
July LNG imports rise above 5 mln tons as Sakhalin-2 closes for maintenance
(Japan NRG, Aug 17)
TAKEAWAY: Japan’s volumes were subdued this summer despite multi-month LNG stocks at below 2 million tons, tight coal supplies and Saudi Arabia’s output cuts. Also, Japan’s energy sector got a boost from more generation volume coming from nuclear power plants. However, Japan might have to step up LNG imports ahead of winter if Sakhalin-2 doesn’t restart as scheduled.
LNG stocks edge up to 1.98 million tons
(Government data, Aug 16)
BY MAYUMI WATANABE
How to Keep Ammonia Safe: New Standards in the Co-Firing Era
In the coming months, Japan will see the start of two ammonia-and-coal co-firing pilot projects. The two fuels will be burned side by side at gigawatt-scale power generation facilities. If all goes well, the utilities envision commercial operations beginning in 2027-2028.
The premise is massive. Japan is betting that gradually replacing coal with ammonia as the fuel of thermal power plants will lead to reduced emissions. Once coal is phased out entirely, and ammonia becomes the only fuel, the generation of electricity should be free of any CO2 footprint.
What’s more, switching existing coal-fired power plants to burning ammonia would allow utilities to retain legacy power stations and transmission lines operational, thereby saving costs, avoiding job losses and painful accounting write downs of major assets. And, unlike hydrogen, ammonia can be fed directly into boilers without conversion.
This neat vision for a CO2-free alternative to renewables energy does, however, carry several challenges. The ones often discussed by environmental groups are concerns over the cost of ammonia-fired generation and thus its ability to compete with renewables. Procuring clean ammonia in sufficient quantities, without impeding on existing demand for ammonia in farming, is another point of debate.
But there is another area that will need quick resolutions if Japan’s ammonia plans are to succeed. Today’s regulations are made for ammonia’s current use in agriculture and industry. The safety standards will need to evolve to encompass the new demand center in power generation. Co-firing is entering the phase of early adaptation, but there are more stairs to climb before large-scale commercial use can become a reality.
Current safety measures
The obstacles to growing the scale of the ammonia-coal co-firing industry are many, ranging from logistics to regulations and safety standards. For example, currently, Japan does not allow construction of ammonia tanks with storage capacity of over 40,000 tons due to safety concerns.
Power stations, however, would need larger tanks to manage operations. JERA, Japan’s biggest thermal power utility, has calculated that it requires about 500,000 tons of fuel ammonia a year to cover a 20% co-firing rate at Unit 4 (1 GW) of its Hekinan power station. The co-firing rate refers to 80% of the power output coming from burning coal and the rest from combusting ammonia.
Another risk for utilities is the scarce data available on ammonia’s impact when combusted with coal, because the fuel has not traditionally been used this way. Most ammonia today is turned into urea, which is one of the three key fertilizers for crops.
The biggest drawback for many, however, is the potential risk of handling ammonia, which is classified as a hazardous gas. It can cause health problems when inhaled or in direct eye or skin contact. In large doses, it can lead to death; it’s flammable and may explode in temperatures of 650°C or when reacting with a large dose of oxygen.
Hazardous substance communication standard requires anything containing over 0.2% ammonia to be clearly labeled. In contrast, hydrogen and methane don’t have this requirement.
That said, Japan’s power sector has been a long-time user of ammonia for other reasons.
Ammonia has long been used in a process called denitrification – breaking up nitrogen oxide (NOx) in the flue gas generated from thermal power generation. Some thermal plants use ammonia for boiler water treatment. The total usage volume is usually a few hundred tons/ year in total.
Japan already has over 15 regulations that spell out the safe handling of ammonia, covering everything from labor safety, fire control, and facility management to storage and transport. The Electricity Business Act Rulebook, and the High-Pressure Gas Safety Act are the most relevant to power utilities.
Still, the volumes currently processed by the power sector are miniscule compared to even today’s 1 million tons/ year of national consumption. And these volumes are due to at least double by 2030 and then grow several times larger in the following decade if the upcoming trials bear fruit.
Pilot projects
In 2017, Chugoku Electric held Japan’s first ammonia co-firing test at its 156 MW Mizushima power station, which is one of the country’s smallest coal power plants operated by an electricity company. The Mizushima site was chosen since it had a facility that treated boil-off gas released from LNG, and ammonia was used as its fuel. JERA and Kyushu Electric followed up with tests at bigger plants.
Due to a lack of co-firing safety standards, temporary expert panels were set up to review and approve safety plans. As the process was simply spraying a small amount of ammonia onto the burner in the boiler, co-firing was classified as a type of internal combustion where coal was the major fuel.
In December 2022, METI revised the Electricity Business Act Rulebook to adapt to larger scale co-firing demonstrations. The new rules clarify that co-firing is not “a self-propelled internal combustion.” This change and others mandate that power companies seeking to practice co-firing must:
The updated rules apply to any use in which ammonia or hydrogen is above 0% of total, which effectively means all and any co-firing processes.
Interestingly, bureaucrats also added mention of ammonia fuel cells to the scope of the new Rulebook, hinting at the upcoming development of solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC).
Co-firing test schedule
|
Time |
Power plant |
Capacity |
Ammonia ratio |
|
July 2017 |
Chugoku Electric Mizushima No. 2 |
156 MW |
0.6-0.8% |
|
April 2019 |
Chubu Electric Chita LNG plant |
300 kW |
100% |
|
October 2021- March 2022 |
JERA Hekinan Unit No. 5 |
1 GW |
0.02% |
|
June 2022 |
IHI Yokohama R&D facility |
2 MW |
100% |
|
Dec 2022 |
METI tightens ammonia safety rules | ||
|
April 2023 |
Kyushu Electric Reihoku Unit No. 1 |
700 MW |
20% |
|
Fall 2023 |
Kyushu Electric Matsuura Unit No. 2 |
1 GW |
20% |
|
March-April 2024 |
JERA Hekinan Unit No. 4 |
1 GW |
20% |
|
TBD |
Tohoku Electric Niigata Unit No. 5, Noshiro ? |
333-600 MW |
TBD |
|
2027-2028 |
JERA to commercialize co-firing operations |
1 GW? |
20%? |
In the next eight months, Kyushu Electric and JERA each plan a 20% co-firing run at coal power stations that have a capacity of 1 GW.
Chugoku Electric’s ammonia consumption was 450 kg/ hour for several hours over the July 3-9 testing period, which calculates as a few tons. JERA’s 2021 test consumed 200 tons of ammonia. For the 2024 pilot co-firing, JERA is building a larger 2,000 cubic meter tank that’s 18 meters high, capable of storing over 4,000 tons. It’s also building pipelines to transport ammonia offloaded from ships to the storage site.

Source: JERA website
Welding shut the risks
Asked by Japan NRG about its safety approach, a JERA spokesman said: “Blocking leakage, early leak detection and the prevention of its spread are at the core of pipeline construction. The pipe joints will be welded to eliminate any possibility of leaks; gas detectors will be installed and gas flow will stop in case of emergencies.”
For power utilities, ammonia slips pose a bigger threat than explosions. That’s because the chances of slips are likely to be higher than fire or explosion caused by unexpected electricity sparks.
Co-firing to trigger paradigm shift
Co-firing will possibly massively expand Japan’s ammonia demand, especially after 2027 when JERA is expected to commercialize co-firing. As already mentioned, JERA’s estimate for ammonia fuel volumes needed to maintain 20% co-firing at a 1-GW generator would by itself add 50% to Japan’s total ammonia consumption. Demand from the power sector alone is seen reaching 2 million tons by 2030.
Other hard-to-abate sectors, such as chemical manufacturers, are also looking into ammonia as fuel to run their plants. If three 1-million ton/ year capacity naphtha crackers started to use ammonia, about 6.7 million tons/ year of ammonia would be required, according to METI.
Shipping companies are also emerging as potential consumers. The first ammonia-fueled tug boat of NYK Line is set to sail in 2024, and by 2050 the government hopes ammonia will consist of around half of the fuel demand of ocean-going ships.
Safety approach comparisons
|
Power units |
Industrial complexes | |
|
Major risks |
Ammonia slips; Power generating units may trigger unexpected electricity discharge and temperature changes, which may cause ammonia to catch fire |
Explosions and fire from slips; Other flammable substances may be in use in the vicinity. |
|
Requirement for pipes |
Joints need to be welded |
Joints need to be welded and pipes double layered |
|
Tank locations |
No ammonia tanks allowed in nuclear power plant premises; Large tanks of several 10,000 cubic meters need to keep a 320 meter distance from another facility |
Equipment layouts are regulated if gas and oil units are in the same premise |
Currently, 10 to 30 ammonia incidents are reported every year. Most occur at chemical and food processing plants. In the last four years, none were in the power sector. However, as volumes rise, so will the likelihood of incidents.
In this context, METI, power utilities that utilize coal-fired stations, and all other relevant stakeholders will need to move fast to create and implement safety standards that take into account the greater quantities of ammonia that will be moved around Japan to cover electricity sector needs. METI is rewriting the co-firing Rulebook it updated in December last year, and the Japan Clean Ammonia Fuel Association and high-pressure gas sector organizations are working to identify the infrastructure requirements to ensure safety.
Since ammonia’s application in energy is new, there are many unknowns and reliable data still needs to be collected. Thus, complete safety guidelines cannot be created overnight, and will need to be developed in several stages.
A failure to write coherent rules through transparent discussions could result in consequences that will make further development of co-firing untenable. That would immediately put into question Japan’s CO2 emission cut targets and its technology export aspirations.
Japan NRG ammonia demand forecast
|
Total demand |
Details | |
|
Today |
1 mln tons |
Chemical manufacturing demand dominates; Power demand is at a few hundred tons |
|
2024-2030 |
Up to 2.3 mln tons |
1.3 million tons for 20% co-firing at two 1 GW plants and three 100 MW plants; the balance comes from non-power-sector demand; First ammonia-fueled ship may sail in 2024 |
|
2030 |
3-10 mln tons |
3 million tons/ year if 1% of Japan’s electricity is generated through ammonia co-firing; Additional 0-7 million tons/ year from the chemical and other sectors; SOFC in early commercialization phase |
|
2050 |
30-50 mln tons |
Minimum 30 million tons/ year if 10% of power is generated by ammonia; as much as 20 million tons of demand from the other sectors |
Note: This is a rough forecast adding up figures from public data
In Part II of this article, to be published next week, we outline the challenges in scaling up ammonia storage capacities and data collection, and how these are being addressed in Japan.
BY CHISAKI WATANABE
Rollout of Local Decarbonization Plans Has Been Slow;
Efforts to Engage Municipalities Faces Resources Gap
Originally, the program was designed to be part of the government’s sweeping regional decarbonization efforts to expedite the deployment of renewables. However, a year after the Ministry of the Environment (MoE) launched the initiative, which encourages municipalities to designate local areas for renewables development, progress has been slow.
The program aimed at a unique bottom-up approach, seeking to empower local areas to declare themselves as net-zero leaders. The idea was to have communities take charge of clean energy developments to balance out the top-down national decarbonization agenda.
More than a year after the start of the program, however, only 12 renewables promotion zones have been designated by municipalities. Meanwhile, community opposition to new solar and wind projects is on the rise.
Complaints range from solar panels placed on slopes that are too steep and too close to homes, to tree logging carried out to make space for wind turbines. The national government may now need to adjust its approach for localities to re-engage with new renewables development.
Program Terms
In April 2022, the MoE launched its program, “Regional Decarbonization Promotion Projects,” following an amendment to the Act on the Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures. Under this program, each municipality (city/town/village) can designate areas as “promotion zones (促進区域)” to welcome new clean energy projects.
The program emphasized that projects should “co-exist harmoniously” with host communities, seeking to address the tensions that have built up in some areas between the locals and developers. Applicable projects for promotion zones are classified under four broad categories:
A developer planning a renewables project in such a promotion zone must receive the municipality’s approval. Once approved, developers benefit from:
Designated promotion zones also provide benefits to hosting municipalities. These include:
Results so far
The program was introduced largely to promote the use of renewable electricity and cut Japan’s reliance on fossil fuels, thus also improving its energy security and meeting national decarbonization targets. But a year on, as of August 8, there are only 12 promotion zones.
There are 1,741 municipalities of varying population sizes across Japan. Almost all of the 12 promotion zones designated by municipalities so far involve solar, with plans to install panels on rooftops and public land. This underlines the limitations of public initiatives.
Parallel efforts to boost renewables
In June 2021, the national government adopted a roadmap for local decarbonization that set a target of creating more than 100 “decarbonization model areas” (脱炭素先行地域) by 2025. This is a parallel initiative, focused more directly on renewables power generation and energy efficiency measures for the residential and commercial sectors, and it seems to have fared better in attracting local government attention.
In this initiative, the MoE picks the so-called “decarbonization model area” via a public solicitation process. So far, 62 model areas have been selected after three rounds of solicitations.
The definition of “area” covered by this program is flexible and wide-ranging. It could cover an entire municipality, or just parts of a municipality such as a residential area, an airport, a natural park, or a cluster of facilities.
Many of the proposals for the first 46 areas picked last year were jointly submitted with partners such as NTT Anode Energy, universities, and utilities including TEPCO and KEPCO. During the third round of solicitation earlier this year, it became mandatory for proposals to be submitted jointly with commercial or academic partners.
Promotion zones in Japan
|
Municipality |
Renewables |
Areas, locations | |
|
1 |
Minowa town, Nagano |
Solar |
Rooftop of town facilities, town-owned site, industry hub |
|
2 |
Odawara city, Kanagawa |
Solar |
Designated areas in the city |
|
3 |
Karatsu city, Saga |
Solar, Wind, Small Hydro, Green hydrogen |
Public facilities and land |
|
4 |
Iruma city, Saitama |
Solar |
Public facilities |
|
5 |
Ena city, Gifu |
Solar |
Rooftop |
|
6 |
Fukuoka city, Fukuoka |
Solar |
Rooftop, public land |
|
7 |
Atsugi city, Kanagawa |
Solar |
Rooftop, other areas |
|
8 |
Misato town, Shimane |
Solar |
Rooftop (town-owned buildings), town-owned land, farming land |
|
9 |
Maibara city, Shiga |
Solar |
Part of business areas near Maibara Station |
|
10 |
Anan city, Tokushima |
Solar |
Public facilities and land |
|
11 |
Matsuyama city, Ehime |
Solar |
Areas near an airport, parts of islands, public land |
|
12 |
Toyama city, Toyama |
Solar |
Areas excluding landslide-prone areas and others |
Source: MOE presentation, municipal government websites
Local expertise shortage
These various MoE efforts are intended to strike a balance between the deployment of renewables and environmental protection. The ministry also wants local governments to get involved more in choosing future sites of new renewables facilities.
Municipalities, however, have been slow to follow national guidance due to the frequent problems of manpower shortages and a lack of expertise in making green action plans.
The compiling of such plans – which outline the local vision on how to reduce GHG emissions in two sections, one for government operations and the other for area-wide emissions – is actually stipulated by law, in Article 21 of the Global Warming Act. So far, most local governments have compiled plans to cut emissions at public facilities, but are yet to do the same for area-wide emissions.
As the table below shows, the smaller the municipality, the less likely it’s to compile an action plan for decarbonization. In addition to lacking staff, municipalities say they have a shortage of knowledge about climate change measures and face difficulty in securing budgets for measures that such an action plan would propose.
Breakdown of completion rate for local action plans by the size of local government
|
|
Govt operations Section (public facilities emissions) |
Area-wide Section | |||
|
1 Prefectures |
47 |
47 |
100% |
47 |
100% |
|
2 Designated cities |
105 |
105 |
100% |
105 |
100% |
|
3 Other municipalities with pop. 100,000 < |
176 |
175 |
99.4% |
121 |
68.8% |
|
4 < 100,000 |
486 |
478 |
98.4% |
187 |
38.5% |
|
5 < 30,000 |
455 |
410 |
90.1% |
81 |
17.8% |
|
6 <10,000 |
519 |
400 |
77.1% |
66 |
12.7% |
|
3 ~ 6 Total |
1,636 |
1,463 |
89.4% |
455 |
27.8% |
|
1 ~ 6 Total |
1,788 |
1,615 |
90.3% |
607 |
34% |
Source: MoE
Designating promotion zones is even tougher for municipalities. As of December 2022, a majority – 52.9%, or 860 of municipalities – have no plans to designate promotion zones in their jurisdictions, according to a survey by the MoE. Only 0.2% (4 municipalities) said they have determined a promotion zone. Another 6.2% (101) said they’re working on it and a further 40.6% (660) said they plan to work on designating zones but haven’t started yet.
The central government is in charge of setting national environmental standards for the zones, while each prefectural government sets regional environmental standards that are aligned with local natural and social requirements.
National response
Against this backdrop, in April the MoE started an expert panel to discuss how to accelerate regional decarbonization and improve the ministry’s programs in this area.
WWF Japan delivered a presentation to the panel in May, saying the system of state support programs and subsidies is too diverse and complex, complicating their use by municipalities. It suggested funneling everything through a one-stop shop and focusing support more on renewables projects developed by municipalities. Those projects are more likely to gain local acceptance and their profits would go back into the community.
The WWF also suggested creating a portal site for companies to express a willingness to source locally produced green electricity. This could give more clarity to municipalities about their business prospects. In the draft released in August experts suggested the government consider the following points:
The panel also suggested that further consideration be given to power grid development in the promotion zones.
In line with panel suggestions for a streamlined approach amid strained local resources, the MoE may go one step further and look to consolidate its own programs – the “promotion zones” and “decarbonization model areas” – or at least find ways for the two to work together better.
Encouraging municipalities to take charge of clean energy developments in their area makes sense because they know their communities best. The national government can help by taking upon itself all issues related to the administrative burden and provide municipalities with the IT and knowledge resources they need to make the green action plans work.
BY JOHN VAROLI
Below are some of last week’s most important international energy developments monitored by the Japan NRG team because of their potential to impact energy supply and demand, as well as prices. We see the following as relevant to Japanese and international energy investors.
Africa/ Oil
Carlyle Group will sell its Gabon-focused oil and gas company, Assala Energy, to French producer Maurel & Prom for $730 million. Carlyle International Energy Partners (CIEP), the fund’s non-U.S. energy arm, first invested in Assala in 2017 when it acquired Shell’s aging operations in Gabon for $628 million.
Brazil/ Oil
In August, Brazil is set to increase purchases of Russian petroleum products by 25% over July, with imports set to reach record levels this month, helping Russia overtake the U.S. as Brazil’s top foreign fuel supplier, said energy analytics firm Kpler. The discount on Russian diesel to Brazil is estimated at $10 to $15 a barrel.
EU/ Cleantech
EU cleantech startups have attracted less than half the investment as their U.S. counterparts since the $390 billion package of climate subsidies and tax credits was passed a year ago, (Inflation Reduction Act). The EU spent a total of $8.7 billion on startups in areas such as carbon storage and EVs; while $21.7 billion was committed to such projects in the U.S.
Indonesia/ Energy transition
Citing insufficient data, Indonesia has pushed back until later this year its plans to launch investments from a fund of $20 billion pledged by rich countries and global lenders to speed the energy transition. The initiative aims to help Indonesia close coal power plants, adopt green sources of power and reach peak emissions in 2030.
Ireland/ Critical raw materials
Dublin-based TechMet raised $200 million in equity that will go towards investment in mining for nickel, lithium and other metals that will help the West counter China’s dominance of critical minerals supplies for clean energy technologies and infrastructure.
Offshore wind power
Global targets to increase wind power installations five-fold annually by 2030 are unrealistic and would require $27 billion in investment in the supply chain by 2026, Wood Mackenzie said, adding that annual capacity is more likely to increase by 30 GW a year by 2030, well below the 80 GW per year target that’s been set by the global community.
Saudi Arabia/ Oil exports
Saudi Arabia’s crude oil exports fell for a third straight month in June to their lowest since September 2021, as big Asian buyers favor cheaper Russian oil. Saudi crude exports totalled 6.8 mbpd in June, down about 1.8% from 6.93 mbpd in May.
Venezuela/ Oil
Venezuela opposes a court-ordered auction of shares in the parent of Citgo Petroleum to pay creditors seeking $10 billion from expropriations and debt defaults. Some 20 creditors with arbitration awards or lawsuits against Venezuela’s state oil company PDVSA asked a Delaware court to register their cases so they can join the October auction.
U.S./ Carbon capture
Occidental Petroleum will buy startup Carbon Engineering for $1.1 billion, hoping to profit from its CCS technology at the Stratos project in Texas, which will be the world’s largest direct air capture plant by 2025.
U.S./ Oil and gas pipelines
Pipeline operator Energy Transfer will buy rival Crestwood Equity Partners for about $7.1 billion. This will give Energy Transfer a larger share of energy transport in three top shale basins. This year, consolidation in the oil and gas pipeline sector has accelerated as U.S. production grows.
A selection of domestic and international events we believe will have an impact on Japanese energy
Disclaimer
This communication has been prepared for information purposes only, is confidential and may be legally privileged. This is a subscription-only service and is directed at those who have expressly asked K.K. Yuri Group or one of its representatives to be added to the mailing list. This document may not be onwardly circulated or reproduced without prior written consent from Yuri Group, which retains all copyright to the content of this report.
Yuri Group is not registered as an investment advisor in any jurisdiction. Our research and all the content express our opinions, which are generally based on available public information, field studies and own analysis. Content is limited to general comment upon general political, economic and market issues, asset classes and types of investments. The report and all of its content does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell, subscribe for or underwrite any product or physical commodity, or a financial instrument.
The information contained in this report is obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith. No representation or warranty is made that it is accurate or complete. Opinions and views expressed are subject to change without notice, as are prices and availability, which are indicative only. There is no obligation to notify recipients of any changes to this data or to do so in the future. No responsibility is accepted for the use of or reliance on the information provided. In no circumstances will Yuri Group be liable for any indirect or direct loss, or consequential loss or damages arising from the use of, any inability to use, or any inaccuracy in the information.
K.K. Yuri Group: Hulic Ochanomizu Bldg. 3F, 2-3-11, Surugadai, Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 101-0062.
NEWS
・Mitsui Fudosan to invest in U.S. tandem perovskite tech firm Caelux that will boost solar power efficiency
・PM Kishida visits Fukushima seeking final buy-in for treated water release as the Swiss lift restrictions on Japan food imports
・Japan’s oil and gas self-sufficiency rate dips on the back of demand recovery and geopolitical conditions