
JAN 9, 2024
NEWS
TOP
ANALYSIS
INTERVIEW:
SENIOR ASSOCIATE AT THINK TANK, E3G
E3G has become one of the most prominent and vocal climate change think tanks in Europe and the U.S. This year, the organization plans to get more involved in Japan, continuing on its mission to encourage government and corporate decision-makers to scale up funding for the energy transition and cease public financing for fossil fuels. Hanna Hakko, a Senior Associate with E3G, spoke with Japan NRG about its aspirations for Japan’s energy space.
INTERVIEW:
CEO OF INDUSTRY GROUP, FUTURE COAL
Coal ignited the industrial revolution in the UK about 250 years ago but its combustion is now seen as the leading threat to the Earth’s climate. However, it also powers over a third of the world’s manufacturing and supplies over half of Asia-Pacific’s electricity. The industry’s main voice, the World Coal Association, recently rebranded itself as “FutureCoal” arguing that coal has a place in the future of energy. Japan NRG spoke with its CEO, Michelle Manook, on her outlook for coal in Asia.
ASIA ENERGY VIEW
A wrap of top energy news that impacts other Asian countries.
EVENTS SCHEDULE
A selection of events to keep an eye on in 2024.
PUBLISHER
K. K. Yuri Group
Editorial Team
Yuriy Humber (Editor-in-Chief)
John Varoli (Senior Editor, Americas)
Mayumi Watanabe (Japan)
Wilfried Goossens (Events, global)
Kyoko Fukuda (Japan)
Magdalena Osumi (Japan
Filippo Pedretti (Japan)
Tim Young (Japan)
Regular Contributors
Chisaki Watanabe (Japan)
Takehiro Masutomo (Japan)
Events
SUBSCRIPTIONS & ADVERTISING
Japan NRG offers individual, corporate and academic subscription plans. Basic details are our website or write to subscriptions@japan-nrg.com
For marketing, advertising, or collaboration opportunities, contact sales@japan-nrg.com For all other inquiries, write to info@japan-nrg.com
OFTEN-USED ACRONYMS
METI | The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry | mmbtu | Million British Thermal Units | |
MoE | Ministry of Environment | mb/d | Million barrels per day | |
ANRE | Agency for Natural Resources and Energy | mtoe | Million Tons of Oil Equivalent | |
NEDO | New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization | kWh | Kilowatt hours (electricity generation volume) | |
TEPCO | Tokyo Electric Power Company | FIT | Feed-in Tariff | |
KEPCO | Kansai Electric Power Company | FIP | Feed-in Premium | |
EPCO | Electric Power Company | SAF | Sustainable Aviation Fuel | |
JCC | Japan Crude Cocktail | NPP | Nuclear power plant | |
JKM | Japan Korea Market, the Platt’s LNG benchmark | JOGMEC | Japan Organization for Metals and Energy Security | |
CCUS | Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage | |||
OCCTO | Organization for Cross-regional Coordination of Transmission Operators | |||
NRA | Nuclear Regulation Authority | |||
GX | Green Transformation |

Japan, Saudi Arabia to expand clean energy ties with focus on hydrogen, ammonia, e-fuels
(Government statement, Dec 26)
TAKEAWAY: This was Minister Saito’s first mission abroad only 10 days after he assumed his new position. He’ll follow the energy policies of his predecessor, Nishimura, to strengthen clean and fossil energy supply chains, but his negotiation style won’t be the same. Nishimura was a “hard bargainer”, remembered for directly negotiating with Malaysia’s Petronas to continue LNG supply to Japan despite the 2022 force majeure. Japan NRG also noted that among the various focus areas, DAC was not included in this ministerial meeting.
Major bilateral clean energy projects to date
| Japan | Saudi Arabia |
Ammonia | Mitsubishi Corp, Mitsui & Co., JOGMEC, IEEJ | Saudi Aramco |
Green hydrogen | JERA | Public Investment Fund |
E-Fuel | ENEOS, Idemitsu Kosan | Saudi Aramco |
Tokyo govt to launch green hydrogen user certification system in April
(Government statement, Dec 25)
Green hydrogen user category
On-site | Renewables and hydrogen are produced and used at a site in Tokyo |
Renewable energy supplies of third parties are used to produce hydrogen in Tokyo and consumed at the site | |
Off-site | Green hydrogen is produced elsewhere in Japan and transported to Tokyo via an FCV or EV |
TAKEAWAY: The differences in the Tokyo and central Japan approaches may be a good case study to gain insights on effective certification schemes. Japan seeks to lead in international standardization around hydrogen (and other new technologies). So, it’s crucial for these two (or more) H2 schemes to come to a compromise so that Japan can form a common standard. The more ambitious approaches, such as the Tokyo scheme, may be seen as “forerunners” at first, but they could lose traction if their ideas are deemed to be impractical. Presently, Japan has only two green hydrogen producers — in Yamanashi and Oita — with a combined annual production of about two tons. New producers will emerge as demand rises in Tokyo.
ENEOS, Sumitomo to partner with SEDC for hydrogen generation in Malaysia
(Company statement, Dec 18)
JX Nippon Exploration to study underground hydrogen production in U.S.
(Japan NRG, Dec 26)

Yokohama City, Maersk, Mitsubishi Gas sign MoU on green methanol
(Government statement, Dec 27)
METI to launch environmental survey for floating offshore wind farms near Hokkaido
(Nikkei, Jan 4)
Japan sets up fusion power organization with companies, govt and academia
(Nikkei, Dec 25)
Honda, Tokuyama and Mitsubishi to cooperate in data center decarbonization
(Company statement, Dec 25)
Mitsubishi Shipbuilding, Mitsui and Mitsubishi ink MoU on LCO2 carriers
(Company statement, Dec 27)

Marubeni and VinFast sign MoU to repurpose used EV batteries for Vietnam
(Company statement, Dec 19)
Japan firm develops world’s first high-performance sulfur-based additive from algae
(Company statement, Dec 22)

Japan to offer biofuel tech to Ukraine
(Tokyo Shimbun, Jan 3)

Earthquake cripples Hokuriku region, power stations suspend operations temporarily
(Japan NRG, Jan 6)
Affected facilities
Name | Status | |
Hokuriku Electric; thermal power | Rikuden Nanao Ota Unit 1 (500 MW); Unit 2 (700 MW) | Suspended after suffering damage |
Toyama Shinko Unit 1 (250 MW); Unit 2 (250 MW) | Running at a reduced rate of 300 MW combined | |
Erex; thermal power | Itoigawa (147 MW) | Suspended but due to restart soon; no damage reported |
Hokuriku Electric; nuclear | Shika No. 1 and No. 2 nuclear power plants | Oil leaks due to transformer damage; reactors not operating at time of quake |
Gas | 1 LP gas retailer (Fukui Pref) | Gas leakage due to damage in an underground pipe; Leakage stopped |
Gasoline service stations | 53 closed | About 500 service stations opened but some ran out of supplies |
One of Japan’s largest offshore wind farms began operation in Hokkaido
(Company statement, Jan 4)
Akita City seeks designation of its southern offshore part for wind power generation
(NHK, Jan 3)


TechLab builds new CFRP plant for parts for lens wind turbines
(Nikkan Kogyo Shimbun, Dec 28)
NRA lifts operational ban on TEPCO’s Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPP
(Nikkei, Dec 27)
TAKEAWAY: The restart of its only operable NPP is essential for TEPCO to reduce operating expenses, but the utility has faced a litany of problems around this facility, not least due to internal issues. Recently, shares in TEPCO rose due to the plant’s expected restart. With Japan’s LNG imports expected to decrease 8.6% for FY2024, the NPP restart is seen as a way to reduce fossil fuel consumption; thus, it’s a matter of importance at the national level. However, the final decision on the restart rests with local (city and prefectural) consent. And while the Jan 1 major earthquake off the coast of the nearby Ishikawa area did not cause any notable damage to the country’s NPPs, it did spark some alarmist comments, including from former PM Hatayama. Public opinion will play a major role in the restart of this NPP.
Chubu Electric to request NRA to delay decommissioning of Hamaoka NPP
(Japan NRG, Dec 31)
TAKEAWAY: Chubu Electric has agreed to retire two older units, but has three more at the Hamaoka NPP site, which were opened between 1983 and 2000. The three younger units in total amount to about 3.5 GW of capacity, which is significant. Their restart alone could ease the capacity crunch around the Japanese capital, but despite the utility spending billions of yen on new equipment and safety upgrades, the future of this station remains uncertain.
Yokohama Bank grants Pacifico Energy loan for solar plant in Yamaguchi
(New Energy Business News, Jan 5)
Japan court rejects lawsuit over solar power farm in Kagawa Pref
(Japan NRG, Dec 28)
TAKEAWAY: Local opposition to projects involving renewable power generation are not uncommon. The residents have claimed, since before the start of construction in 2020, that the operator had not given them a satisfactory explanation on how it would act in an emergency. However, the court pointed out that community members purchased the adjacent land aware of a possibility of inflow of soil and sand from the construction site. The operator is Hiroshima-based solar power company Japan Housing Service.
Sumitomo signs partnership for hydropower in Mozambique
(Company statement, Dec 14)
Sumitomo retires coal-fired power plant in Iwaki City
(Company statement, Dec 26)
Power forecast provider TESLA acquired by U.S data specialist Yes Energy
(Company statement, Jan 4)

Japan and Saudi Arabia to invest in critical raw materials for the energy transition
(Japan NRG, Jan 4)
TAKEAWAY: Japan supports Saudi Arabia’s shift away from fossil fuels while also recruiting strong partners to jointly develop the critical raw materials that are needed for clean energy alternatives. Japan has signed similar agreements around critical raw materials supply chains with the U.S. and the EU last year. Security of supply for these elements is important not only for national security but also business competitiveness. Today, many clean energy technologies like wind turbines, solar panels and EV batteries, are reliant on China-controlled supply chains. China is both the dominant supplier of many rare earth elements and the biggest manufacturer of equipment used at renewable energy facilities.
JERA signs agreement with AOTS for LNG adoption in Philippines
(Company statement, Dec 25)
Opinion: Australia, Japan should rethink their energy relationship beyond coal and LNG
(Nikkei Asia, Dec 26)
Nippon Steel buys stake in Canadian coal producer
(Company statement, Jan 4)
BY YURIY HUMBER
Exclusive Interview: Hanna Hakko, a Senior Associate with Think Tank E3G

E3G is an independent climate change think tank with offices in London, Brussels, Berlin and Washington DC, as well as associates in countries that include Japan. The organization has become more involved in Japan over the last few years.
E3G has successfully encouraged government decision-makers to scale up funding for the energy transition and cease public financing for fossil fuels. It provides secretariat support for a number of international energy transition initiatives such as the Powering Past Coal Alliance and the Energy Transition Council. Hanna Hakko, a Senior Associate with E3G, spoke with Japan NRG about its aspirations for Japan’s energy space.
JAPAN
E3G has become one of the most prominent environmentalist voices globally in recent years. The think tank covers a lot of ground and topics. But when did the team start specifically looking at Japan and what drew your attention?
Given Japan’s size and influence in the world, understanding its stance on climate and energy has always been important for E3G. We have had dedicated, Japan-focused staff in the country since 2018. One focus has been the need to end coal power in order to align with global climate goals. We publish a constantly updated tracker of OECD and EU countries’ progress on coal phaseout. Another product that has received attention in Japan is our earlier G7 Coal Scorecard series, comparing how these major economies have progressed in their transitions away from coal. Unfortunately, Japan has consistently fared poorly in these rankings.
We have also worked with other civil society organizations to help end international public finance to coal projects, an area that was once dominated by China, Japan and South Korea. A breakthrough was finally achieved in 2021 when the three countries announced their respective decisions to end overseas coal finance.
Today, E3G’s work includes analysis of the detrimental aspects of Japan’s coal-ammonia co-firing strategy and its broader overseas financing of fossil fuels, as well as an assessment of the public banks as regards their alignment with the Paris Agreement.
What about Japan’s energy space (policy / industry / markets) needs tackling first? What specific changes would you like to see implemented either at government or industry level?
Japan has made several climate and energy commitments at the G7 and COP28 that it must now deliver on. There is the opportunity to do this via the 7th Basic (Strategic) Energy Plan in 2024. The policy update should provide answers on how Japan will:
Academic research shows Japan has great potential to ramp up renewable energy capacity, thereby improving energy security. Also, the G7 agreed that the use of ammonia and hydrogen in the power sector must be aligned with the group’s objective of fully or predominantly decarbonized power sector by 2035. So, Japan needs to proceed with a strategic rethink and regulation to achieve this.
What kind of action do you plan in Japan in 2024? What would you like to achieve?
In 2024, E3G will continue to work with civil society, diplomats and government, academia and business to support the acceleration of Japan’s energy transition. This will include research collaboration on particular issues; dialogue on policy recommendations, including towards the Basic (Strategic) Energy Plan review; and thought leadership on how best Japan can step up its domestic energy transition and better support international momentum.
E3G will make recommendations on areas where Japan and other G7 governments can strengthen policies towards decarbonizing their power sector by 2035. Coal phase-out continues to be central to this, and the pressure on Japan to take action is steadily increasing. This is especially true now that the U.S., which has the world’s third biggest coal fleet, decided to join the Powering Past Coal Alliance, making Japan the last G7 country not to sign up.
One domestic issue that we will also monitor is the government’s approach to implementing Prime Minister Kishida’s promise at COP28 to end construction of new unabated coal power plants. There is currently one pre-permit, pre-construction coal project, the Genesis Matsushima project, which plans to build a new facility inside an old plant, essentially giving it new operating life. If this proceeds, it risks going against Japan’s commitments at COP28 and the G7.
Which industries / entities or individual companies do you think set the right example for Japan’s energy transition? And which do the opposite?
We are concerned about whether Japanese power companies and related industries have fully grasped the required scale and pace of the energy transition. Analysis by Bloomberg NEF and others shows that major policy changes are needed, first and foremost in the power sector, to meet Japan’s 2030 and 2050 climate targets.
To match those changes, many power companies will need to make rapid strategic changes to prioritize already commercialized and deployable clean energy technologies. The current overemphasis on over-the-horizon options like coal-ammonia co-firing risks making the transition more complicated and expensive, and could prolong the use of coal plants and see Japan miss its targets.
Recommendations from non-state actors like the Japan Climate Initiative and Japan Climate Leaders’ Partnership offer valuable insights on what the government could do better and faster.
ASIA
Asia’s well-known reliance on coal has been hard to shift over the years because countries don’t want to sacrifice economic growth or stability and energy security? How do you tackle this mindset and change people’s thinking?
Things are changing already. Real progress on diminishing construction of new coal, as well as pledges made at COP28, suggest many Asian countries increasingly recognize that clean energy is an opportunity to improve economic and energy security, as well as air quality.
At COP28, Asian countries including Japan, South Korea, Brunei, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia, Bangladesh and Bhutan signed the Global Renewables and Energy Efficiency Pledge in support of tripling global renewables and doubling the rate on energy efficiency improvements by 2030. The pledge also recognizes that this action needs to be accompanied by a phase down of unabated coal and ending investment in unabated coal-fired power plants.
Even before this COP, many countries in Southeast Asia actively began considering how to achieve a coal phaseout. It’s critical that Japan and other wealthy countries continue supporting that through means such as the Asian Development Bank’s Energy Transition Mechanism (ETM) and Just Energy Transition Partnerships (JETP).
GLOBAL
What were your impressions of COP28 and its achievements, and what do you expect next?
Our overall assessment is quite positive. COP28 concluded with countries agreeing to transition away from fossil fuels and to triple global renewables capacity, deliver on global targets on adaptation, and take new steps to scale up finance for climate action, including setting up a new ‘loss and damage’ fund. There was room for improvement, but the fact that over 130 countries signed the Global Renewables and Energy Efficiency Pledge managed to send a historical signal that the end of the fossil fuel era is starting.
When looking at Japan’s announcements at COP28, our evaluation is less positive. While it is good that Japan signed the Pledge, its G7 peers took a much more proactive role, including the U.S., by joining the Powering Past Coal Alliance and France by championing the Coal Transition Accelerator. In comparison, Japan’s promise to end construction of new coal, while welcome, was very modest.
It is also concerning that the outcomes for the Japan-led Asia Zero Emission Community (AZEC) initiative meeting, convened immediately after COP28, did not reflect the latter’s positive signals. Going forward, the AZEC agenda will need to reform from a fossil-heavy focus to one that prioritizes renewables.
BY JOHN VAROLI
Exclusive Interview: CEO of FutureCoal, Michelle Manook

Coal is one of the most contentious energy sources in recent years. The fuel that helped ignite the industrial revolution in the UK about 250 years ago is now seen by many as the leading threat to Earth’s climate through its CO2 emissions. However, it is also a fuel that powers over a third of the world’s manufacturing and still supplies over half of the electricity in the Asia-Pacific.
Promoting coal as an energy source today is no easy task. And yet the industry’s main voice, the World Coal Association, has not only embraced the challenge, it has rebranded itself as “FutureCoal: The Global Alliance for Sustainable Coal,” arguing that this fossil fuel has a place in the future energy mix of many countries, such as Japan. Last month, Japan NRG spoke with the CEO of FutureCoal, Michelle Manook, on the group’s outlook and prospects in Asia.
GLOBAL INDUSTRY GOALS
The G7 nations are leading an aggressive push to close coal capacity. The IEA says fossil fuels need to be phased out. But the World Coal Association has rebranded as FutureCoal, indicating you believe the industry has a strong future. What is the aim of the rebrand?
FutureCoal exists to ensure a balanced, rational and science-based approach to the debate about the necessary role coal must play in driving growth, providing energy security, and delivering a lower emissions future.
The launch of FutureCoal has not been a sudden decision. It’s been three years in the making as part of our Evolving Coal strategy, which aims to lift the knowledge among governments, regulators, financiers and other external stakeholders of coal’s total contribution to solving today’s pressing global issues. We call this “raising the coal IQ”. It is up to us and the coal value chain to demonstrate that coal can deliver economically and environmentally.
After 38 years of the World Coal Association, a structural shift was needed to signal a new era and demonstrate our openness to emerging and developing markets within the global coal value chain. Previously, the World Coal Association was primarily recognized as an organisation centred in Western countries and for coal producers.
You describe your mission as following a “Sustainable Coal Stewardship (SCS) philosophy”. What does this mean in practice?
SCS describes our commitment to advocating for and embracing the diverse abatement opportunities within the coal value chain. We see three main areas for change. The first is pre-combustion, which involves the adoption of efficient and innovative mining processes, practices, and equipment.
The second area is combustion. This will rely on the range of efficiency technologies that exist and can abate and capture up to 99% of emissions. The third area is beyond combustion. This embraces a vision where future business opportunities focus on transforming coal into new higher value products, such as Coal-to-Liquids (CTL), hydrogen, agriculture, steel, cement, aluminium, and critical minerals.
JAPAN’S ROLE IN THE COAL SECTOR
Japan is often shamed at international climate conferences for continuing to rely on coal-fired generation. How do you view Japan within the coal industry?
Japan is a flagbearer for a coal value chain that has embraced innovation to deliver abatement technologies and novel coal applications that extend beyond its role in combustion. Abatement is the future of coal and Japan serves an example to the world of what is possible when engineering trumps ideology.
Prime Minister Kishida told COP28 that Japan will only build new coal power plants that abate emissions. Japan already has one of the most efficient coal fleets in the world, so the Prime Minister’s comments send a strong message that there is ample room for coal innovation in a modern economy if governments and financiers are willing to fund the development of technologies across the coal value chain.
Japan focuses on extracting more value per tonne of coal, extending value beyond the coal used in the power sector or producing steel. This approach is aligned with our Sustainable Coal Stewardship (SCS) philosophy that believes coal’s versatility can contribute to many innovative applications, such as hydrogen.
Is your organization active in Japan?
We collaborate with key stakeholders, including the Japan Carbon Frontier Organisation (JCOAL) who share the belief in coal’s total contribution and role in the clean energy transition. With the launch of FutureCoal, we will work with Japan’s coal value chain innovators to advance the important role coal will play for many decades to come.
FutureCoal’s outlook for Japan’s energy markets envisions a continued significant role for coal through 2030 and 2050. The forward-thinking approach of Japanese stakeholders towards coal abatement technologies, such as “high efficiency low emissions” (HELE), and beyond combustion uses such as hydrogen and co-firing with ammonia, highlights their understanding of coal’s total contribution and long-term view of coal’s role in the clean energy transition.
Why do you support Japan’s efforts to shift coal power plants to co-fire with ammonia?
Ammonia co-firing in coal plants is proven to reduce carbon emissions. Activists’ opposition to ammonia co-firing highlights an ideological obsession with eliminating coal rather than bringing down emissions.
Ammonia has several advantages including high energy density, low energy storage costs and well-established storage and transport infrastructure. It is particularly suitable for large-scale use in existing pulverised coal-fired power plants, allowing less coal to be used and delivering lower emissions.
Ammonia co-firing not only offers benefits for the coal value chain. The ammonia industry could stand to be a big winner from a possible $100 billion market by 2050 should the use of 10% ammonia co-firing drive a 50% increase in demand by mid-century.
Another example of Japan’s leadership in coal abatement technologies is the recent announcement that Japan’s top power generator, JERA, aims to demonstrate 20% co-firing at a large commercial power plant in central Japan in March 2024.
ASIAN MARKETS OUTLOOK
Asia accounts for about three-quarters of global coal power generation even as it’s being shunned in Europe and North America. Do you see a split forming geographically around coal or will Asia eventually follow the same policies as most G7 countries in this regard?
Coal will play a crucial role in addressing the energy trilemma encompassing security, reliability, and affordability, a reality that no nation can afford to ignore. Embracing this role entails finding a delicate balance between economic considerations and sustainability, recognising that there is no one-size-fits-all approach.
Based on my discussions with ministers and stakeholders across the world, especially in India and China, there is no attempt to slow down coal’s production. India and China have publicly stated their intention to ramp up coal production as they believe it is vital to their growing economies.
China, especially, is the leader in renewables manufacturing but the base of that manufacturing stems from the coal industry. Each turbine requires 260 tonnes of steel made from 170 tonnes of coking coal and 300 tonnes of iron ore.
So, Asia is locked in with coal for the long-term?
Asia for the foreseeable future views coal as a vital resource that will help with their clean energy transition. India’s main coal producing companies, including our Alliance member Coal India Limited, have planned to invest substantially, with $54.5 billion earmarked for abated coal projects over the next decade.
The approaches adopted by India and China align with our SCS philosophy, underscoring their recognition of the crucial role of coal abatement. This emphasises a shared commitment to mitigating the environmental impact and promoting sustainable practices within the coal sector.
India announced a major coal investment program just before the start of the COP28 summit. This felt almost like an act of geopolitical defiance. How do you see it?
India’s decision is less an act of geopolitical defiance than a display of energy self-determination. FutureCoal supports a sovereign nation’s right to make decisions that best suit their energy needs and development path.
India’s commitment acknowledges that coal will retain an indispensable role in providing affordable, reliable, and secure power. India plans to produce 1.4 billion tonnes of coal by 2027 and over 1.5 billion tonnes by 2030. These vital resources are needed to build an additional 80 GW of electricity capacity by 2030, which is greatly needed in an economy destined to become the world’s fourth largest in coming years.
Despite the vital role set to be played by coal in lifting living standards in India, biased views against the coal value chain have seen traditional sources of funding dry up for coal abatement technologies. This will require the Indian government to work closely with the private sector to ensure funding so that India can get on with the task of growing its economy and lowering its emissions.
Securing funding for India and Asia’s development and energy security must align with the reality that coal will play a lasting role in the coming decades. This approach should be agnostic, acknowledging and accelerating the positive contributions of SCS across pre-combustion, combustion, and beyond combustion.
BY JOHN VAROLI
This weekly column focuses on energy events in Asia and the Pacific, and all that impact markets in the region.
Bangladesh / Coal power
Coal-powered electricity generation tripled to a record 21,000 GWh in 2023, up from 7,900 GWh in 2022, said the Bangladesh Power Grid Company. This helped the country deal with the worst power shortages in over a decade.
Bangladesh / Rooftop solar
Installing 2 GW rooftop solar capacity will help Bangladesh save up to $1 billion annually, said the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis. However, the country’s rooftop solar sector is lagging due to lack of awareness, high import tariffs, etc.
China / EVs
BYD, China’s leading EV company, said that in Q4 of 2023, sales surpassed Tesla for the first time and the company took over the world’s No. 1 spot. In 2023, BYD had cumulative EV sales of 3.02 million units.
China / LNG imports
China was the world’s No. 1 LNG importer in 2023, surpassing Japan. Shipments rose 12% to almost 71 Mt. China will see a 20% rise in demand over the next two years, with the annual total reaching 84 Mt in 2025, possibly hitting 136 Mt by 2030, said Rystad Energy.
India / Solar and wind power
Adani Green Energy launched its 1 GW venture with TotalEnergies, which contributed an equity investment of $300 million. AGEL added operational 300 MW, under construction 500 MW, and 250 MW of under-development solar and wind power projects.
Indonesia / Wind power
PT Barito Wind Energy and ACEN Investments inked a deal to acquire the late-stage wind assets of UPC Renewables Asia Pacific Holdings in Indonesia (320 MW). Barito Wind will hold a 51% stake, whilst ACEN will own the remaining 49%.
Nepal / Hydroelectric power
A deal was inked where Nepal will export 10 GW of hydroelectricity to India over the next 10 years. Nepal’s rivers have the potential to generate about 42 GW of electricity, but, due to the lack of technical know-how and funds, the country produces less than 3 GW.
Russia / LNG exports
Despite U.S. sanctions, Russia’s biggest LNG venture, the Arctic LNG 2, began production; first shipments are expected in Q1. Located above the Arctic Circle, the project is key for Russia to triple its LNG production to 100 Mt by 2030.
Saudi Arabia / Green hydrogen
The kingdom’s ACWA Power inked a deal to invest $4 billion as part of the second phase for a major green hydrogen project in Egypt; (target annual capacity 2 Mt). This follows a previous deal in late 2022 for the project’s first phase, (annual capacity 600,000 tons).
Singapore / Hydrogen power
Natural gas-dependent Singapore seeks to develop its National Hydrogen Strategy for use across industrial, maritime, and aviation sectors. As far as the power sector, hydrogen is expected to supply half of Singapore’s needs by 2050.
A selection of domestic and international events we believe will have an impact on Japanese energy
|
January |
|
|
February |
|
|
March |
|
|
April |
|
|
May |
|
|
June |
|
|
July |
|
|
August |
|
|
September |
|
|
October |
|
|
November |
|
|
December |
|
Disclaimer
This communication has been prepared for information purposes only, is confidential and may be legally privileged. This is a subscription-only service and is directed at those who have expressly asked K.K. Yuri Group or one of its representatives to be added to the mailing list. This document may not be onwardly circulated or reproduced without prior written consent from Yuri Group, which retains all copyright to the content of this report.
Yuri Group is not registered as an investment advisor in any jurisdiction. Our research and all the content express our opinions, which are generally based on available public information, field studies and own analysis. Content is limited to general comment upon general political, economic and market issues, asset classes and types of investments. The report and all of its content does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell, subscribe for or underwrite any product or physical commodity, or a financial instrument.
The information contained in this report is obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith. No representation or warranty is made that it is accurate or complete. Opinions and views expressed are subject to change without notice, as are prices and availability, which are indicative only. There is no obligation to notify recipients of any changes to this data or to do so in the future. No responsibility is accepted for the use of or reliance on the information provided. In no circumstances will Yuri Group be liable for any indirect or direct loss, or consequential loss or damages arising from the use of, any inability to use, or any inaccuracy in the information.
K.K. Yuri Group: Hulic Ochanomizu Bldg. 3F, 2-3-11, Surugadai, Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 101-0062.
NEWS
・Japan, Saudi Arabia to expand clean energy ties with focus on hydrogen, ammonia, and e-fuels
・Earthquake cripples Hokuriku region, power stations suspend operations temporarily
・One of Japan’s largest offshore wind farms began operation off Hokkaido’s coast