
NEWS
TOP
ANALYSIS
MISHAP WITH USE OF CHINESE LOGO AT REI TRIGGERS UPROAR
Ohbayashi Mika, director of the Renewable Energy Institute, resigned from a state task force on the energy transition after the unauthorized appearance of a Chinese energy firm’s digital logo prompted questions over unfriendly foreign influence. Ohbayashi’s digital presentation somehow used documents with a watermark of the State Grid Corporation of China that was then sent to Japanese expert panels and bodies such as METI. Officials are investigating.
WHAT’S THE OUTLOOK FOR JAPANESE-AUSTRALIAN COLLABORATION ON CCS?
Japan is betting big on Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) to help reduce GHG emissions in hard-to-abate industries such as cement and steel production. However, Japan faces challenges in CCS deployment — its geology has limited storage potential and is vulnerable to high seismic activity. Enter Australia, which has ambitions to become a top CCS player in Asia-Pacific. Despite the potential, Japan and Australia face significant obstacles in terms of economic viability and legislation, especially over rules for seaborne transport of liquid CO2.
ASIA ENERGY VIEW
A wrap of top energy news that impacts other Asian countries.
EVENTS SCHEDULE
A selection of events to keep an eye on in 2024.
PUBLISHER
K. K. Yuri Group
Editorial Team
Yuriy Humber (Editor-in-Chief)
John Varoli (Senior Editor, Americas)
Mayumi Watanabe (Japan)
Wilfried Goossens (Events, global)
Kyoko Fukuda (Japan)
Magdalena Osumi (Japan
Filippo Pedretti (Japan)
Tim Young (Japan)
Regular Contributors
Chisaki Watanabe (Japan)
Takehiro Masutomo (Japan)
Events
SUBSCRIPTIONS & ADVERTISING
Japan NRG offers individual, corporate and academic subscription plans. Basic details are our website or write to subscriptions@japan-nrg.com
For marketing, advertising, or collaboration opportunities, contact sales@japan-nrg.com For all other inquiries, write to info@japan-nrg.com
OFTEN-USED ACRONYMS
|
METI |
The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry |
mmbtu |
Million British Thermal Units | |
|
MoE |
Ministry of Environment |
mb/d |
Million barrels per day | |
|
ANRE |
Agency for Natural Resources and Energy |
mtoe |
Million Tons of Oil Equivalent | |
|
NEDO |
New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization |
kWh |
Kilowatt hours (electricity generation volume) | |
|
TEPCO |
Tokyo Electric Power Company |
FIT |
Feed-in Tariff | |
|
KEPCO |
Kansai Electric Power Company |
FIP |
Feed-in Premium | |
|
EPCO |
Electric Power Company |
SAF |
Sustainable Aviation Fuel | |
|
JCC |
Japan Crude Cocktail |
NPP |
Nuclear power plant | |
|
JKM |
Japan Korea Market, the Platt’s LNG benchmark |
JOGMEC |
Japan Organization for Metals and Energy Security | |
|
CCUS |
Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage | |||
|
OCCTO |
Organization for Cross-regional Coordination of Transmission Operators | |||
|
NRA |
Nuclear Regulation Authority | |||
|
GX |
Green Transformation |

METI plans index for avoided and reduced emissions, to be based on Scope 1, 2 and 3
(Government statement, March 27)
TAKEAWAY: Scope 3 includes all indirect emissions from a company’s activities that fall outside its direct operations. They are a large part of its carbon footprint, often exceeding 75%. Addressing Scope 3 emissions is important for assessing a company’s environmental impact. Yet, managing and indexing these emissions is particularly difficult. There are challenges in collecting data across the value chain and reduction methods.
Cabinet to launch Nuclear Fusion Council to accelerate business creation
(Denki Shimbun, March 25)
TAKEAWAY: Studies of microwaves for metal smelting at low temperatures is gaining traction. Last year, Osaka-based Microwave Chemical and Tokyo-based Pacific Metals studied nickel production using microwaves instead of furnaces and kilns powered by electricity.
Sekisui Chemical, Senko to test wall-installed PSC modules
(Japan NRG, March 27)
TAKEAWAY: If film-like PSC modules are easy to install on walls, roofs, cars, etc, then they could be a success. Sekisui claims it took just six hours to install the module films on a protective frame, put it on the wall and connect to power cables. Another issue is building safety because the modules will release heat that may erode walls, depending on what they’re made of. This is included in the Sekisui-Senko studies.
METI aims for domestic aircraft production by 2035, will support R&D
(Nikkei, March 27)
TAKEAWAY: Presently, Japan imports aircraft. By 2025, METI plans to set up standardization task forces for electric aircraft, hydrogen aircraft and lightweight materials. The ministry aims to strengthen Japanese competitiveness in composite materials, components, and engines through the localization of aircraft production.
JERA, ExxonMobil ink deal on world’s largest ‘blue’ hydrogen / ammonia project
(Company statement, March 25)
TAKEAWAY: As big as the project itself is the size of the offtake contract that JERA is considering. There are very few commercial contracts of that size for ammonia outside of its use to make fertilizer. However, JERA’s demand picture requires big volumes. The Japanese utility has just started co-firing ammonia at one of the units of its Hekinan coal power plant at a ratio of 20%-ammonia-80%-coal, and for that alone it had put out a contract offer in 2022 for 500,000 tons/ year.
JAEA successfully conducts safety demo test at HTTR gas-cooled reactor
(Company statement, March 28)
TAKEAWAY: The HTTR technology is one of Japan’s most eye-catching nuclear power innovations, but its progress was stalled after the Fukushima accident. This technology is also said to be highly suitable for powering hydrogen production. Still, the speed at which HTTR could enter commercial operation is moot. METI’s most recent nuclear sector roadmap does not see the start of construction of a larger scale HTTR unit until the end of this decade, and forecasts operations to begin at an undefined point “in the 2030s”. For all that, this is the most advanced timetable of all the next-gen reactor technologies METI is promoting.
Niterra develops compact solid oxide cell system, commercialization set for 2025
(Company statement, March 27)
TAKEAWAY: Compact SOCs are in high demand from railway and construction companies that have operations in off-grid areas. Businesses plan to introduce FC systems to reduce carbon footprints; they also want to test with compact systems first. The challenge is securing and carrying water for electrolysis. This system might not be useful in dry remote locations.
MUCC and Osaka Gas to study CO2 capture and reuse in cement industry
(Company statement, March 28)
JX and Petronas to develop carbon-neutral gas field with CCS

(Company statement, March 26)
JAEA startup to improve EV battery recycling rate by five-fold
(Nikkei, March 28)
TAKEAWAY: JAEA actively licenses its technologies to businesses and more startups to commercialize its R&D results are likely to emerge. Last year, it announced the development of a vacuum system which would not require any power sources, eyeing its application in the transport of liquefied hydrogen.
IHI, Yara ink MoU to build marine ammonia transport systems
(Company statement, March 22)
Tokyo Gas plan to decarbonize 50% of its gas and electricity sales by 2040
(Company statement, March 22)

Group with JERA subsidiary Parkwind wins 1.5 GW offshore wind project in Norway
(Company statement, March 20)

Image of OOW’s original semi-submersible floating wind foundation Deepsea Star™
Shizen Energy partners with Stonepeak on onshore wind power in APAC
(Company statement, March 26)
Fukushima Pref to study offshore wind power potential, including in EEZ
(Government statement, March 27)
SMFL completes first stage of 121 MW aquaculture solar power project in Taiwan
(Company statement, March 22)


TAKEAWAY: Taiwan’s growing renewable energy market has attracted big players such as JRE, as well as financial support from major Japanese banks such as MUFG Bank, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking and Mizuho Bank.
Over 40% of municipalities face solar power equipment installation troubles
(Government statement, March 26)


India’s hydropower provider NHPC secures $130 mln loan from Japanese banks
(Nikkei, March 30)
TOCOM, JEPX one-stop trading plan to boost liquidity by linking futures with spot deals
(Denki Shimbun, March 26)
TAKEAWAY: As covered in last months issues of the Weekly, an expert group under METI is charged with reviewing all the power industry reforms and electricity market platforms that are in place today, and suggest improvements. One of the themes that keeps emerging from these discussions is the desire by the govt and those it has drafted in as expert advisors to combine / syncronize the various market platforms. The result may create a more efficient system for the bigger market players. However, the thinking seems to ignore that there are now two futures platforms in Japan, with TOCOM currenrly by far the smaller of the two. Also, there are other platforms that provide aggregation services for the Japanese market. So, while the consolidation of spot and futures bids on the TOCOM may help traders and also big utilities, it also raises questions over competition in the business of power market platforms.
July-Sept power reserve rates set to clear threshold even in worst case scenario
(Government statement, March 29)
Regional reserve rates in summer (%)
Regional reserve rates in winter (%)
|
Dec |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar | |
|
Hokkaido |
22.4 |
10.7 |
11.2 |
11.2 |
|
Tohoku |
24.3 | |||
|
Tokyo | ||||
|
Chubu |
12.3 |
18.5 | ||
|
Hokuriku | ||||
|
Kansai | ||||
|
Chugoku | ||||
|
Shikoku | ||||
|
Kyushu | ||||
|
Okinawa |
65.0 |
40.2 |
43.6 |
50.1 |
|
|
July |
Aug |
Sept |
|
Hokkaido |
4.4 |
10.5 |
16.2 |
|
Tohoku |
8.2 |
8.7 |
11.9 |
|
Tokyo |
5.7 | ||
|
Chubu |
10.3 |
10.6 | |
|
Hokuriku | |||
|
Kansai | |||
|
Chugoku | |||
|
Shikoku | |||
|
Kyushu |
13.2 |
14.8 |
14.5 |
|
Okinawa |
34.0 |
35.8 |
35.1 |
Kashiwazaki and Kariwa councils urge an early restart of NPP
(Nikkei, March 25)
Hokkaido Electric to build a seawall at Tomari NPP prior to restart
(Company statement, March 22)
Hitachi Energy to accelerate introduction of HVDC tech to strengthen US power grid
(Company statement, March 22)
Research team develops off-grid ORC power generation system with highest efficiency
(Organization statement, March 19)
Chubu Electric, NGK Insulators begin commercial operation of self-sufficient microgrid
(Company statement, March 22)

Mitsui invests $560 mln in south Vietnam gas field; production to start in 2026
(Nikkei, March 30)
Fuel oil subsidies extended; but power and gas subsidies will end in May
(Government statement, March 29)
LNG stocks decline for the fourth week, down 35% YoY
(Government data, March 27)
Middle East retains grip on oil exports to Japan; Asia Pacific dominates LNG, coal trade
(Government data, March 28)



BY MAGDALENA OSUMI
Mishap Over Use of Chinese Logo at REI Triggers Uproar
A senior energy researcher has resigned from a government-appointed task force on Japan’s energy transition after the unauthorized use of a Chinese energy firm’s digital logo prompted questions over unfriendly foreign influence.
On March 27, Ohbayashi Mika, director of the Renewable Energy Institute (REI), a Tokyo think tank that promotes renewable energy, announced her resignation from the Cabinet Office-led panel that’s supervised by Minister for Digital Transformation Kono Taro.
Ohbayashi found herself in hot water after it emerged that during her digital presentation she somehow used documents with a watermark of the State Grid Corporation of China and subsequently reused the documents as REI’s template on numerous occasions. These documents were sent to government expert panels and bodies such as METI and the Financial Services Agency.
While REI is not an official advisory body under the Cabinet Office, its opinions and research may be taken as official advice that can influence the implementation of government energy policies.
The fact that Ohbayashi’s Chinese blunder went unnoticed for so long is rather disturbing. This has led many pundits and experts to question the competence of the national task force on Japan’s energy transition.
Ohbayashi is REI’s founding member and had previously worked for the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). Her mishap only became widely known last week when it went viral in public forums such as X, (formerly known as Twitter), which is one of Japan’s most popular social media platforms. It has also since been covered by media outlets ranging from right-wing Sankei Shimbun to left-wing Asahi Shimbun.
During a news conference in Tokyo on March 27, Ohbayashi apologized but said that she was not aware of the Chinese logo in question, claiming that the incident caught her by surprise upon return from an overseas trip on March 25.
On March 26, REI had issued a statement saying that the logo of the SGCC was originally included in presentation materials for a workshop on international power grids that REI hosted in Seoul in 2016. The SGCC was among guests invited to the event by Mongolia’s energy ministry.
The same year, REI set up a study group for a pan-Asia power grid consisting of domestic energy experts. The documents with the SGCC’s logo were used in discussions held by REI’s study group on the power grid. The institute said that Ohbayashi used a map provided by the SGCC and deleted the logo from the header but hadn’t noticed the watermark.
Even though Ohbayashi and REI claim that the use of the SGCC’s logo was a careless mistake, since 2016 the organization has pushed the pan-Asia grid idea in what could be interpreted as the ideal solution for Japan, China and other regional neighbors.
In 2020, a presentation with Ohbayashi’s name was submitted to the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. It described the so-called Asia Super Grid that would enable several Asian countries to share both their infrastructure and renewable energy across the region.
Ohbayashi explained that the idea was to connect Japan with China, South Korea and Russia via an international power grid using solar and wind power generated in Mongolia as the main power supply. The content is still available for viewing with the logo in question.
Ohbayashi, however, rebuffed the theory of REI’s potential link with China. “The institute’s policy recommendations do not reflect the wishes of the Chinese government, but were purely aimed at solutions to decarbonize Japan and the world,” she says.
Nevertheless, such a connection would be highly beneficial for China, which dominates the global solar PV supply chain as well as the production of essential rare earths. REI said its involvement with the SGCC is through the Global Energy Interconnection Development and Cooperation Organization (GEIDCO), an international organization comprising energy research institutes, universities and other prominent organizations.
According to REI, the group proposed building an international power grid in Asia as a measure to address Japan’s energy problems in the wake of the March 2011 earthquake and Fukushima Daiichi NPP disaster. The Asian grid idea was conceived by Son Masayoshi, founder of Softbank Group, and also founder of REI.
Although REI remained a member of GEIDCO’s board of directors, its connections with the SGCC grew weak after the start of the Covid-19 pandemic in early 2020. REI even decided to withdraw from GEIDCO to avoid any misunderstandings.
Also, another matter that has sparked controversy is that three of the nine energy transition task force members represent REI. Ohbayashi said that when she was appointed to the task force, she had been recommended by Minister Kono. The two remain close.
Known for his anti-nuclear stance, Kono’s expertise on energy has also faced scrutiny since he’s never been in charge of Japan’s energy policy. Also, in autumn 2021, Kono was in the race against Kishida to be prime minister and is still seen as a likely future PM.
The REI controversy has prompted political experts to voice concerns over Japan’s energy security, which, of course, is national security. While the use of China’s logo may have been a mere mistake, experts point out that regardless of whether it was intentional or not, Ohbayashi “has undoubtedly brought in China’s agenda to Japan’s strategy on energy security.” Indeed, the issue may further undermine Ohbayashi and REI’s credibility.
Professor Iida Yasuyuki of Meiji University’s School of Political Science and Economics told President Online magazine that “the logo mixing is considered a ‘clerical error,’ but this is not such a small incident.”
Ohbayashi’s error has also drawn strong reactions from lawmakers, especially those in opposition parties. Tamaki Yuichiro, member of Democratic Party for the People, said that if foreign governments were allowed to get involved in debates over national energy policies, “it would have a tremendous effect from an economic security perspective.”
On March 28, Chief Cabinet Secretary Hayashi Yoshimasa said that an investigation will be conducted into Ohbayashi and the documents in question, including whether there had been any improper influence by the Chinese government.
The results of such an investigation won’t have a major impact on Japan’s energy transition policies, but one thing is highly likely – Ohbayashi’s credibility and influence, as well as that of REI, will wane and might not recover their previous authority for some time. 
A slide with a conceptual map of an international power grid from Europe to East Asia in the China National Grid document from the May 26, 2016 workshop.
Source: Renewable Energy Institute was highlighted, along with several other examples.
Screenshot of a website with Ohbayashi’s presentation from 2020 on the pan-Asia power grid.Available on UNESCAP’s website.

BY FILIPPO PEDRETTI
What’s the Outlook for Japanese-Australian Collaboration on CCS?
No other country among the G7 nations is betting so big on Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) as Japan to help reduce GHG emissions in hard-to-abate industries such as cement and steel production, as well as power generation.
However, Japan faces challenges in CCS deployment within its borders due to a domestic expert assessment that says its geology has limited storage potential and is vulnerable to high seismic activity. Enter Australia, which has ambitions to become the top CCS player in the Asia-Pacific after China, and wants to partner with Japan in developing this fledgling industry.
Australia’s advantageous geological storage basins, strategically located near emitting industries, provide a significant asset for CCS implementation. The country plans to deploy about 175 million tons per annum (mtpa) of CO2 storage capacity by 2035 and has identified CCS as a high priority within its national emissions reduction plan. Australia, much like Japan, is also keen to lead the way in creating international legislation for the new sector.
Despite the potential for the two countries, realizing a CCS value chain between Japan and Australia is not straightforward. There are significant obstacles in terms of economic viability and legislation, especially over liabilities and rules for seaborne transport of liquid CO2. Integrating CCS technology with other clean energy initiatives will be key in developing a Japanese-Australian partnership in this sector.
Current projects
A few CCS projects involving Japanese companies have emerged in Asia Pacific. One is the INPEX CCS Darwin Project in Australia, which is still in early stages of development and slated for operation by 2026. INPEX will invest up to ¥100 billion, aiming to integrate CCS technology into the Ichthys LNG export projects in north Australia. This entails injecting 2 million tons of CO2 annually from Ichthys. The project has a Greenhouse Gas Storage Assessment Permit in the Bonaparte Gulf.

Australia’s basins ranked for CO2 storage potential.
Source: Geoscience Australia
The Woodside Angel project is another commercial CCS facility in the early development phase. Led by Woodside Energy, the project also involves BP and Japan Australia LNG (a JV between Japan’s top two trading houses, Mitsubishi Corp. and Mitsui & Co). FEED studies are underway for this CCS Hub.
These studies focus on assessing the technical and commercial feasibility of capturing CO2 emissions from industries in the Karratha and Burrup Peninsula areas. The chosen storage site is the depleted gas field of Angel in the Northern Carnarvon Basin that’s offshore Western Australia.
Finally, there’s the Sumitomo Hydrogen Energy Supply Chain (HESC) project in Victoria, which is undergoing evaluation for operational readiness. Spearheaded by Japan Suiso Energy, the HESC initiative selected J-Power and trading house Sumitomo Corp as producers of hydrogen. The fuel is to be made using coal mined in Latrobe Valley, but with the addition of carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) in the Bass Strait.
The project secured funding of ¥220 billion from Japan’s Green Innovation Fund. With an initial goal of producing 30,000 to 40,000 tons of hydrogen annually, the project envisions future expansion to 225,000 tons per year. Pilot hydrogen production is due in the late 2020s, with plans for liquefaction and shipping of the fuel to Japan.
Recently signed MoUs
Late 2023 and early 2024 saw a number of CCS agreements concluded between major Japanese and Australian companies. This flurry of CCS activity is indicative of Tokyo’s determination to find a large-scale solution for GHG emissions that can be applied to hard-to-abate industries such as steel, cement, ceramics, and glass production, which also employ a significant portion of the nation’s manufacturing workforce.
On December 19, Woodside Energy inked a non-binding MoU with Sumitomo Corp, JFE Steel, Sumitomo Osaka Cement, and Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha to explore a CCS value chain between Japan and Australia, targeting CO2 emissions from Setouchi and Shikoku regions. The plans call for transportation and injection in Australia.
The day before, on December 18, Santos unveiled expansion plans for the Moomba CCS project in partnership with ENEOS and JX Nippon Oil & Gas Exploration (JX). This entails a feasibility study for transporting captured CO2 from Japan. An MoU was signed for the potential importation of up to 5 mtpa of CO2 by 2030, to be raised to 10 mtpa by 2035, and 20 mtpa by 2040, likely via Port Bonython in South Australia and/or Gladstone in Queensland.
Additionally, Santos Energy Solutions, with Tokyo Gas and Osaka Gas, is exploring e-methane production in the Cooper Basin. E-methane is produced using green hydrogen and captured CO2. The Moomba project aims to store 1.7 mtpa of CO2, and mostly captures CO2 separated from natural gas at the Moomba Gas Plant (South Australia).
Plans also include storing CO2 captured from other sources and support for hydrogen production. CO2 injection trials started in 2020, and the Cooper and Eromanga Basins are estimated to offer potential storage capacities of more than 20 mtpa of CO2 over 50 years.
In late February, the first phase of the project was reported to be 80% complete, with Santos aiming for about US$24 per ton lifecycle breakeven storage costs.

Moomba CCS project.
Source: Santos.
On January 25, 2024, Nippon Steel, Mitsubishi Corp, and ExxonMobil Asia Pacific also inked an MoU to explore CCS value chains in Asia Pacific. This initiative focuses on capturing CO2 emissions from Nippon Steel’s Japanese steelworks. Storage sites under consideration are located in Australia, Indonesia, and Malaysia.
The value chain plans are an extension of the Oceania CCS project announced by JOGMEC in June 2023 as one of Japan’s first seven potential CCS hubs. The Oceania CCS project envisions storing 2 mtpa of CO2 in Australia. The CO2 would come from industries in the Nagoya and Yokkaichi ports vicinity.
Finally, on February 5, Mitsui O.S.K. Lines (MOL) and JX inked an MoU to develop a CCS value chain between Japan and Australia through marine transport of CO2. The plan involves capturing CO2 emissions from ENEOS refineries and other industrial sites in Japan.

Subsequently, the captured CO2 will be transported via a specially outfitted carrier to Port Bonython, where it will be injected and stored. MOL will select a CO2 carrier while evaluating factors such as transport distance, volume, and associated costs. Meanwhile, JX will assess the cost of running the value chain.
Source: MOL
Challenges and opportunities
Despite Australia’s advantageous position in terms of geophysical traits, challenges persist in establishing the necessary CCS infrastructure. Most concerning is the substantial absence of long-term subsidy support for the industry. The limited funding, provided, for example, by the Australian Renewable Energy Agency, is primarily directed towards small-scale pre-operational projects.
A partial alleviation of this financial burden may come from funds such as “Powering the Regions” (a little over A$400 million), or initiatives like the CCUS Hubs and Technologies program (A$250 million).
Furthermore, most operational CCS projects focus on Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR), a method involving CO2 injection into existing oil fields to boost their output. As for the transportation of CO2 by ship, things are at a more exploratory stage. Building that to a commercial level will require creating large-scale CO2 liquefaction, storage and transportation infrastructure – all within economically feasible parameters.
At the moment, transporting CO2 incurs costs without significant returns for operators. Discussions about regulatory frameworks and technological advancements are ongoing to ensure economic viability in CO2 handling.
In terms of a legal framework, in 2023 a bill passed by Australia’s parliament proposed changes in sea dumping regulations, a significant step facilitating the nascent industry. The success of the international CO2 movement, however, hinges on frameworks set up by Australia with emitting countries to facilitate CO2 export, import, and geological sequestration. In short, bilateral agreements are needed to develop CO2 sea-transport as a commercial business.
Currently, most offshore CCS projects in Australia assume that the CO2 would be stored on the nation’s territory, but recently signed MoUs such as the Oceania CCS project are aimed at cross-border CO2 movement under long-term contracts. For that to work, CO2 will need to become a useful commodity, a feedstock for other materials or products, rather than merely waste to be disposed of.
In short, both Australia and Japan will need to simultaneously work on creating a CCS value chain and develop a new economy based on CO2 feed, such as through the proliferation of synthetic or carbon-neutral fuels. These combine CO2 with other elements, such as hydrogen, putting a value on the carbon. Just how soon this new demand arrives will likely determine the pace of CCS development.
Incidentally, Australia’s first synthetic fuel plant is due to come online in 2026.
BY JOHN VAROLI
This weekly column focuses on energy events in Asia and the Pacific, and all that impact markets in the region.
Australia / LNG
Woodside Energy plans to increase LNG purchases from North America, as rising costs and other issues make procurement in its home market more difficult. By 2029, Woodside expects to source 4.7 mln tons of LNG annually from North America, five times the current levels and equal to almost half the capacity of the production rights it holds in Australia.
Hydropower
Global hydropower generation reached a record 4.36 TWh in 2020, according to the Energy Institute. Since 1965, global generation rose at an annual rate of +2.9%, with China (+7.7% annually) posting the fastest growth. In 2020, China accounted for 30% of global generation.
Indonesia / Renewable energy
The National Energy Council will trim the target for renewables in the national energy mix to 17%-19% in 2025, and 19%-21% by 2030. The original target was to have 23% in 2025. While setting an ambitious goal of 70% renewables by 2060, the Council claims that the original target is not realistic.
Malaysia / Hydropower
The oil and gas region of Sarawak seeks a new identity as a green energy powerhouse. Sarawak is betting on hydropower and estimates a potential of 20 GW over about 50 sites, of which 3.45 GW has already been developed.
Philippines / Solar power
Aboitiz Solar Power will partner with AFRY to build a 172 MW-peak solar PV plant in the Negros Occidental province. It will occupy around 143 hectares of “relatively flat terrain” and will start sending power to the grid by late 2024.
Sri Lanka / Oil refinery
The world’s largest refiner, China’s Sinopec, plans to start work on a refinery in Sri Lanka by June. Sinopec will double the refinery’s capacity from the original proposal. Work will begin by June 2024 on the $4.5 billion facility.
South Korea / Electricity
Reliance on fossil fuel especially LNG, along with a delayed energy transition, hiked electricity prices since 2022, resulting in an additional $17 billion in electricity costs, said tInstitute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis. LNG comprised 27.5% of the country’s energy mix in 2022, declining to 26.8% in 2023.
Taiwan / Floating solar power
Aster Renewable Energy secured $258 financing with MUFG Bank to fund the development of floating solar and battery energy storage systems projects in Changhua, Taiwan. The global floating solar industry is expected to grow at a rate of 15% between 2022 and 2031, with Asia Pacific expected to lead in its deployment.
Thailand / Nuclear energy
Thailand plans to launch its first nuclear reactors by the next decade, which would be Southeast Asia’s first. In September, Thailand will unveil a national energy plan through 2037 that’s expected to incorporate small modular reactors (SMRs). The govt will look into sites; the SMRs could account for 70 MW in capacity.
Vietnam / Coal power
CO2 emissions from coal-fired power plants jumped to a new high for the first month of 2024 as the country’s power producers increased output to avert a repeat of 2023’s power outages. So far this year, Vietnam has nearly doubled imports of thermal coal YoY as the govt seeks to reassure foreign businesses that power supplies will remain uninterrupted.
A selection of domestic and international events we believe will have an impact on Japanese energy
|
January |
|
|
February |
|
|
March |
|
|
April |
|
|
May |
|
|
June |
|
|
July |
|
|
August |
|
|
September |
|
|
October |
|
|
November |
|
|
December |
|
Disclaimer
This communication has been prepared for information purposes only, is confidential and may be legally privileged. This is a subscription-only service and is directed at those who have expressly asked K.K. Yuri Group or one of its representatives to be added to the mailing list. This document may not be onwardly circulated or reproduced without prior written consent from Yuri Group, which retains all copyright to the content of this report.
Yuri Group is not registered as an investment advisor in any jurisdiction. Our research and all the content express our opinions, which are generally based on available public information, field studies and own analysis. Content is limited to general comment upon general political, economic and market issues, asset classes and types of investments. The report and all of its content does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell, subscribe for or underwrite any product or physical commodity, or a financial instrument.
The information contained in this report is obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith. No representation or warranty is made that it is accurate or complete. Opinions and views expressed are subject to change without notice, as are prices and availability, which are indicative only. There is no obligation to notify recipients of any changes to this data or to do so in the future. No responsibility is accepted for the use of or reliance on the information provided. In no circumstances will Yuri Group be liable for any indirect or direct loss, or consequential loss or damages arising from the use of, any inability to use, or any inaccuracy in the information.
K.K. Yuri Group: Hulic Ochanomizu Bldg. 3F, 2-3-11, Surugadai, Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 101-0062.
NEWS
・METI plans index for avoided and reduced emissions, to be based on Scope 1, 2 and 3 figures
・Group that includes JERA subsidiary Parkwind wins 1.5 GW offshore wind project in Norway
・Mitsui invests $560 mln in gas field in south Vietnam; production to start in 2026