
APRIL 22, 2024
NEWS
TOP
ANALYSIS
HOW JAPANESE STEEL IS TURNING
GREEN: PART 1
Japan has great expectations for the steel sector, and domestic firms are set to receive the biggest slice of state R&D financing for clean tech. As the top industrial emitter, the steel sector could make the biggest difference in efforts to meet national CO2 emission reduction goals. Changing how steel is made could drive a shift in many other industries and help deliver on economic growth. Japan NRG put together a roadmap for the sector, noting what’s required to transition to new technologies and potential bottlenecks.
MARKET PLAYERS CALL ON METI TO INDUCE CAPACITY MARKET TOWARD RENEWABLES
Recent changes in Japan’s energy trading sector have drawn a strong response from major players who now call on the government to make the market more suitable for renewable energy sources. In response to METI’s review of current electricity trading platforms, these major players have told the ministry to either scrap the capacity market or revise it in a way that will stimulate the construction of clean energy generation capacity.
ASIA ENERGY VIEW
A wrap of top energy news that impacts other Asian countries.
EVENTS SCHEDULE
A selection of events to keep an eye on in 2024.
PUBLISHER
K. K. Yuri Group
Editorial Team
Yuriy Humber (Editor-in-Chief)
John Varoli (Senior Editor, Americas)
Mayumi Watanabe (Japan)
Wilfried Goossens (Events, global)
Kyoko Fukuda (Japan)
Magdalena Osumi (Japan
Filippo Pedretti (Japan)
Tim Young (Japan)
Regular Contributors
Chisaki Watanabe (Japan)
Takehiro Masutomo (Japan)
Events

SUBSCRIPTIONS & ADVERTISING
Japan NRG offers individual, corporate and academic subscription plans. Basic details are our website or write to subscriptions@japan-nrg.com
For marketing, advertising, or collaboration opportunities, contact sales@japan-nrg.com For all other inquiries, write to info@japan-nrg.com
OFTEN-USED ACRONYMS
|
METI |
The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry |
mmbtu |
Million British Thermal Units | |
|
MoE |
Ministry of Environment |
mb/d |
Million barrels per day | |
|
ANRE |
Agency for Natural Resources and Energy |
mtoe |
Million Tons of Oil Equivalent | |
|
NEDO |
New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization |
kWh |
Kilowatt hours (electricity generation volume) | |
|
TEPCO |
Tokyo Electric Power Company |
FIT |
Feed-in Tariff | |
|
KEPCO |
Kansai Electric Power Company |
FIP |
Feed-in Premium | |
|
EPCO |
Electric Power Company |
SAF |
Sustainable Aviation Fuel | |
|
JCC |
Japan Crude Cocktail |
NPP |
Nuclear power plant | |
|
JKM |
Japan Korea Market, the Platt’s LNG benchmark |
JOGMEC |
Japan Organization for Metals and Energy Security | |
|
CCUS |
Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage | |||
|
OCCTO |
Organization for Cross-regional Coordination of Transmission Operators | |||
|
NRA |
Nuclear Regulation Authority | |||
|
GX |
Green Transformation |

JERA launches global renewables firm based in London, sets 20 GW goal by 2035
(Company statement, April 15)
TAKEAWAY: JERA was started as a collection of ‘cast-off’ coal and gas-fired power assets of TEPCO and Chubu Electric. It was created partly to help TEPCO separate its thermal fleet from the liabilities of the Fukushima disaster, but also with the idea that the parent companies would have more scope to focus on other, cleaner forms of energy. And yet, less than a decade since its founding, it is JERA that is moving aggressively into clean energy (without abandoning its coal and gas plants). TEPCO and Chubu Electric’s forays into renewables, nuclear and other forms of clean energy sources have been far less pronounced.
Over the past few years, JERA has forged partnerships with a number of leading energy companies in allied nations in North America and Europe, as well as in India and Southeast Asia; cooperating in a wide range of clean energy activities that hold the most potential, ranging from ammonia production to offshore wind.
For Japan to claim that it’s among the leaders of the decarbonization movement, it needs its top power companies to have global scale and global clout. JERA is making a claim that it can play that role better than the utilities that seeded it.
MLIT revises guidelines for climate-related financial disclosures in real estate sector
(Nikkan Real Estate Economic News, April 15)
Academics urge Paris Agreement exit strategy, depending on U.S. elections results
(Group statement, April 16)
TAKEAWAY: Debates will become more colorful as various political forces become more assertive. This year, METI will publish the Seventh Basic Energy Plan that outlines policy directions based on long-term outlook, updated every three years. As gaps between the Sixth Plan and reality widen, the next version will include new goals and reset directions. For example, Nikkei reported the next plan will include a 2035 national target to cut emissions by 66% from 2013, and a 2040 energy mix scenario.
MoE includes CO2 removal by concrete in 2022 report: a world first
(Government statement, April 12)
TAKEAWAY: The MoE says the figures show that the country is on track with its 2030 goal of a 46% GHG reduction. However, the shift away from fossil fuels is still the core net zero solution and the govt needs to show how it is reinforcing this pathway or how other approaches can work at scale.
Panasonic Energy has new Li-on facility, to constitute Japan’s largest R&D battery center
(Company statement, April 11)

(Panasonic Energy’s new Li-on production facility)
NEDO awards Nippon Steel hydrogen steel project with ¥23 bln over five years
(Government statement, April 15)
TAKEAWAY: Nippon Steel, JFE Steel and Kobe Steel have worked together on other Green Investment Fund steel projects. However, Kobe Steel’s affiliate in the U.S. is a global leader of DRI, and JFE Steel will launch DRI field studies this year. See this week’s Analysis section for further details on ‘green steel’ developments in Japan.
KEPCO, American WiTricity, etc set up council to promote wireless power transfer
(Company statement, April 17)
Mitsubishi joins DAC project in the U.S. that’s led by Shell Gas & Power
(Company statement, April 16)
Iwatani to hike price of hydrogen by 36% amid rising costs
(Bloomberg, April 17)
Kawasaki Heavy begins work on 8 MW hydrogen co-fired generator
(Japan NRG, April 15)
TAKEAWAY: In theory, these KHI generators accommodate 100% hydrogen firing, but technical skills are required to successfully and safely run them. The next milestone is to run a fully hydrogen-fueled 30 MW system this year at its affiliate RWE Generation in Germany.
MoE seeks proposals for JCM hydrogen projects
(Government statement, April 15)
Diamond Electric’s ammonia ignition system hits world record
(Company statement, April 16)
Nippon Life Insurance chairman tapped to lead GX promotion body
(Government statement, April 19)

KEPCO’s electricity generation from nuclear in FY2024 expected to be highest since 2011
(Company statement)
TAKEAWAY: The amount of electricity that these seven units will generate in FY2024 will likely be the highest since 2011 when the country’s nuclear fleet was shut down following the Tohoku earthquake and Fukushima disaster. Importantly, higher utilization rates will likely help KEPCO cut their operating costs and lead to lower electricity prices in the region. That can be used by nuclear proponents to argue for more reactor restarts in other regions.
EEX adds TTF and JKM gas derivatives to LNG futures to mitigate price risk
(Japan NRG, April 15)
JERA-affiliated Hokkaido offshore wind farm inked deal to supply power to data center
(Company statement, April 15)
Vena Energy begins construction of largest wind farm in Fukui Pref
(Company statement, April 12)
J-Power to acquire full stake in Australian renewables firm
(Company statement, April 12)
TEPCO to test safety equipment, load fuel at Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPP Unit 7
(Company statement, April 15)
TAKEAWAY: While there’s been a surge in TEPCO’s stock due to expectations of the reactor restarting, TEPCO still needs local consent. Niigata Pref has not yet given its approval, with the governor’s decision crucial. TEPCO has heavy debt related to the Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident, and thus, many investors remain cautious.
IAEA starts review at Mihama NPP Unit 3
(Company statement, April 16)
MOL to acquire Japan’s first carrier to transport offshore wind components
(Company statement, April 15)
NTT Anode Energy releases environmental assessment for solar plant in Hyogo
(Company statement, April 18)
Taisei and Kaneka set up JV to expand use of exterior power generation system
(Company statement, April 15)

Example of solar modules fitted on a skyscraper
Source: Taisei

Osaka Gas, Sumitomo, etc invests in India’s gas networks through Singapore fund
(Company statement, April 15)
Mitsui, Mitsubishi and Sempra to produce LNG with a 90% reduction of CO2 emissions
(Nikkei, April 12)
Idemitsu increases stake in Fuji Oil, buys shares from JERA
(Company statement, April 16)
March oil imports slide 4.5%, thermal coal even more, but LNG steady
(Government data, April 17)
|
Imports |
Volume |
YoY |
Value (Yen) |
YoY |
|
Crude oil |
12.5 million kiloliters |
-4.5% |
972.8 billion |
2.8% |
|
LNG |
5.6 million tons |
-3.0% |
532.6 billion |
-9.5% |
|
Thermal coal |
7.6 million tons |
-10.4% |
180.2 billion |
-50.8% |
LNG stocks little changed from previous week, down by a third from last year
(Government data, April 17)
BY MAYUMI WATANABE
How Japanese steel is turning green
Part I : A Blast from the Past
The government has great expectations for the steel sector – perhaps the greatest of all industries in Japan. And it’s putting money behind those expectations. Domestic steel firms are set to receive the biggest slice of state R&D financing for clean tech: At least 20% of the entire Green Innovation Fund.
As the top industrial emitter, the steel sector could make the biggest difference in the country’s efforts to meet CO2 emission reduction goals. But that’s not all. Steel is often defined as one of the four pillars of modern civilization. Changing the way steel is made could drive a shift in a number of other industries and, the government hopes, deliver on economic growth in the net zero era.
So far, details on how the sector has responded to the challenge of revamping almost its entire manufacturing and supply chain have been scant. There is a widely mentioned government target for Japan to forge 10 million tons of “green steel” by 2030, but little explanation around how that label will be applied and what is needed to achieve it.
Based on some recent demonstration projects by Japanese steel firms, and analysis of corporate actions and strategies, Japan NRG has put together a roadmap for the sector, noting what the companies say they require to transition to new technologies and what the bottlenecks may be. Our conclusion is that the government targets are possible, but the conditions required are far from straightforward.
This is the first of a two-part series that delves into “green steel” in Japan.
Worst emitter after electricity generation
In FY2022, the Japanese steel sector emitted 113.8 million tons of CO2 and produced 83.5 million tons of steel. That is 11% of the nation’s emissions of 1,031 million tons, the largest share after the electricity sector. The figures do not include methane and other GHGs.
The biggest reason for emissions in steelmaking is the use of coking coal, which is used in a process known as “reduction” because it removes oxygen from iron ore. This causes 80% of steelmaking’s carbon footprint because as the coal is heated, it releases gases including carbon oxides. In a blast furnace, the gases combine to strip away oxygen from the metallic iron.
As it reacts with oxygen, carbon also releases heat, which melts the iron into a material known as “pig iron”. This takes place in a blast furnace that runs at 900-1,800°C. Next, the pig iron is placed in a rotating furnace to remove silicon, sulfur and phosphorus, before the metal is rolled and shaped into bars, plates and sheets.
This is the process that most of Japan’s steelmakers deploy, but there is an alternative technology to blast furnaces. About 23% of Japanese steel is produced by recycling steel in electric furnaces, which releases half the carbon of a blast furnace. The process required high electricity input, but this isn’t the only challenge. While recycling rates in Japan are high, there isn’t enough scrap to replace iron ore.
Scope 1 emissions from a blast furnace are 1.2 tons per ton of steel. Including emissions from iron ore and coal shipping, as well as the pre-treatment of iron ore (called sintering) needed before it can be added to the blast furnace, the Scope 1 and 2 emissions of one ton of steel comes to around 2 tons of CO2 equivalent.
Low hanging fruit
Like the other industries, Japanese steelmakers first looked to reduce emissions by improving the existing processes using legacy infrastructure. The companies are exploring the possibility of replacing some coal gases with zero-emission hydrogen, and connecting a carbon capture and separation unit to blast furnaces.
Hydrogen as a replacement for coal was a natural choice as the sector’s top players Nippon Steel, Nisshin Steel (now part of Nippon Steel), JFE Steel and Kobe Steel have already spent many years researching new iron reduction technologies using hydrogen or hydrogen-rich natural gas. Some of the R&D goes back more than 20 years, before climate concerns became the global issue that they are today.
The companies were originally driven by the need to diversify feedstock supply sources and to create more flexibility around their technologies. In 2020, these studies were elevated to the status of national projects with state funding, and were dubbed the “CO2 Ultimate Reduction System for Cool Earth 2050” (Course50).
With closer government involvement, there was a push to set more concrete targets. One of the key goals for the Course50 program was to oversee a 30% reduction in emissions in blast furnaces. METI pushed for this to occur by 2030 with the commercialization of techniques that would replace part of the coal gases volume with hydrogen (leading to a 10% CO2 cut) and by installing a carbon separation unit (20% reduction).
This initial limit on hydrogen input – the 10% cap – was decided for technological reasons rather than price considerations. Inside a blast furnace, hydrogen absorbs heat rather than maintaining it like carbon oxides. This requires higher furnace temperatures to compensate and can affect the quality of pig iron production.
Next step
The initial Course50 program is supposed to evolve in time to adapt to a higher hydrogen input. At the stage Super Course50, the idea is to have hydrogen both replace some coal gases in the blast furnace (10%) and at other stages of the manufacturing process inside the steel plant (10%), combining for a 20% emissions reduction. This stage requires more hydrogen supplies to be available and assumes that total emissions could be cut by 50% from present levels.
All these numbers seemed speculative given the lengthy R&D process to date and lack of visible results, but in February this year Nippon Steel announced an encouraging breakthrough. The nation’s top steel producer said that it had managed to install and test a Super Course50 process at its Kimitsu Works in Chiba Prefecture over the last two months of 2023. It ran a test at a 12 m3, 34/ day capacity pilot line in the factory and recorded a 33% cut in emissions compared with the regular blast furnace process.
Source: The Japan Iron and Steel Federation

Technologies to reduce CO2 emissions | COURSE50 | The Japan Iron and Steel Federation

The pilot line was connected to a carbon capture and separation unit with a 30 ton / day capacity. According to the company, this was a world record for the size of CO2 reduction achieved in a blast furnace. It cited factors such as better heat management and improved air flow control in the furnace.
In short, Nippon Steel heated hydrogen to the point at which it still performed the role of separating the metal core from the oxygen without losing control of the process.
Time will tell
Based on this success, Japanese steel-makers believe they can now move onto the next stage of the technological shift. Their target is a 50% reduction in emissions at a bigger-sized furnace. The deadline: commercial operations of the technology by 2040.
The timelines don’t gel with the government’s 2030 emission reductions. But if the companies were able to accelerate their actions, or the government subsidized their technological shift so that it took place before it was deemed commercially viable, then we believe the following scenario would be required.
At least two and likely three or more steelmaking units in Japan would need to shift to the Super Course50 technology by 2030, and at least two DRI shaft furnaces would need to make the switch also.
Details on this, and the cost-side of the equation, will be in the second part of this series.
Japan NRG Scenario for 2030 “Green Steel” in Japan
|
Super Course50 blast furnaces |
Nippon Steel’s 5.7 mln tons/ year Kimitsu plant |
JFE Steel and/or Kobe Steel 6-10 mln / year plant |
|
DRI shaft furnace |
Several steelmakers that run a couple facilities each with an approximate 1 mln / year capacity | |
Disclaimer: This is a simplified scenario based on available information. It is subject to change depending on how technologies and markets develop.
BY MAGDALENA OSUMI
Market Players Call on METI to Induce Capacity Market Toward Renewables
Recent changes in Japan’s energy trading sector have drawn a strong response from major players who are now calling on the government to make the market more suitable for renewable energy sources.
In response to METI’s review of current electricity trading platforms, these major players have told the ministry to either scrap the capacity market or revise it in a way that will stimulate the construction of clean energy generation.
The purpose of METI’s review is to find ways to amend and improve existing markets by synchronizing some of the platforms. In one step towards electricity market optimization, the Agency for Natural Resources and Energy (ANRE) proposed a bidding system in which electricity supply (spot market) and adjustment (balancing market) are simultaneously contracted. The proposal is based on the British nodal scheme adopted in 2022 under which prices are determined on a node-by-node basis, taking into account grid congestion.
Another model that METI is also considering is a “Three-Part Offer” that takes into consideration three key factors in securing electricity in the market: availability of capacity; availability of volume; and the cost and time involved in acquiring this electricity so that it’s at hand and ready to be consumed. To some extent, this model mirrors the North American PJM and NYISO mechanisms.
While discussions on market reform continue, METI’s website contains a selection of comments from market players on its revision plan; albeit the comments were made anonymously, and there are also responses to those comments.
One view echoed by a number of market players was that the current main capacity market appears to be well suited to preserving the operations of existing thermal power plants, and does little to stimulate building new renewables capacity. Such an opinion goes on to say that this fails to meet Japan’s objective of marching towards 2050 net zero goals and to increase the share of green electricity in the national energy mix.
Such a view reflects concerns that were raised by the Organization for Cross-regional Coordination of Transmission Operators (OCCTO) which in its major report in 2020 stressed that: “In the wholesale energy markets, rules must account for the variable availability of renewable resources and the distinct properties of storage and demand response resources.”
The report summarized discussions on development of the capacity market and stressed that it should be open to all energy resources. It also added, however, that: “Capacity market rules now must reflect the actual ability of these new resources to contribute to system reliability.”
Market participant feedback also included suggestions to reduce bid capacity for the main auction, to ban power sources that are 11 years or older from participating, and to increase the amount of credits tied to the FIT system.
They pointed out that bidding capacity is 15-16% more than the maximum power capacity, which includes factors such as severe weather response, contingent supply and demand fluctuations and additional capacity. In other words, the bidding capacity duplicates the role that should be performed in the supply-demand adjustment markets, creating a situation in which participating power sources are unable to function effectively in any of those.
The respondents suggested introducing ways to favor renewables in the main capacity auction, saying that the recently introduced Long-Term Decarbonization Capacity Power Source Auction, which was designed to promote investment in new power sources, is still flawed.
The new Auction is supposed to include non-FIT/FIP renewables and batteries, as well as other energy storage systems such as pumped hydro. However, when the first FY2023 Long-Term Decarbonization Power Source Auction was launched in January, of the 4 GW on offer, batteries and pumped hydro energy storage options were capped at 1 GW. Meanwhile, the Auction is open to LNG-fired capacity if it vows to replace dirtier coal-fired generation. Thus, contrary to the industry members’ expectations, the market structure has become more supportive of existing power sources.
What’s more, market players have told METI that the main auction’s benchmark price (Net-CONE) has remained unchanged, based on the assumption of 40 years of gas combined cycle thermal (CCGT) operation. They requested that the government review whether the capacity market is consistent with the system’s original intent.
“The capacity market is not a solution to global warming, as it supports old fossil fuel-fired power generation,” said one comment.
Before the launch of the Long-Term Decarbonization Power Source Auction, industry players had high hopes that it would be a game changer for BESS. However, the public feedback revealed growing concerns that under the new auction system much of the cost burden could fall on new power market entrants while favoring incumbents such as the EPCOs.
Feedback to METI asked the ministry to re-examine the scheme to ensure fair access to power sources so that new power companies are not forced to pay capacity contributions that include those power sources to which they don’t have access.
METI responded to the comments by saying that the purpose of the capacity market is mainly to secure power supply in advance, and also to support new investment in power facilities. The ministry said it believes that this objective should help secure “the necessary adjustment capacity for the mass introduction of renewable energy.”
METI’s main goal is to foster a market mechanism that will stabilize business operations in the power sector, and, therefore, electricity prices. Achieving that goal still requires much work, and so METI has vowed to continue its review of the market systems and to address what has been pointed out as significant flaws that are in need of solutions.
BY JOHN VAROLI
This weekly column focuses on energy events in Asia and the Pacific
Australia / BESS
Quinbrook Infrastructure Partners began building the first stage of a 250 MW / two-hour battery energy storage system (BESS) in Queensland; it invested around A$325 mln in the project that’s part of a A$2.5 billion battery and data center facility at South Pine.
China / Clean energy goods
U.S. Treasury Secretary Yellen said China’s investments in manufacturing of clean energy goods creates an unfair playing field that puts U.S. businesses at risk. And from a supply chain standpoint, she “thinks it creates risks that we’re clearly seeking to mitigate”.
Data centers
By 2030, the world’s data centers are expected to use more electricity than India. AI’s voracious need for computing power is threatening to overwhelm energy sources, said Arm Holdings CEO Rene Haas, adding that a solution must be found.
Energy Transition
High interest rates will “disproportionately affect” renewables, nuclear power and new technologies, and could slow the energy transition, reports Wood Mackenzie. In contrast, companies in the metals, oil and gas sectors will be less impacted due to their low gearing.
Indonesia / Oil
Shares of Indonesia Energy Corp surged more than 100% last week, but then dropped, though still trading above the April 11 mark of $2.74. On April 15, shares surged to $6.08, settling at $5.26 on April 20. These movements reflect growing concern that the price of oil might skyrocket if there’s a major war in the Middle East.
Malaysia / Electricity markets
The govt approved establishment of Energy Exchange Malaysia (Enegem) to facilitate the sale of renewable electricity to neighboring countries. An auction will begin with a pilot run of 100 MW, utilizing the existing interconnection between Singapore and Malaysia.
SE Asia / Energy transition
Southeast Asia is “woefully off track” on green investments to reduce emissions, and needs new policies and financial mechanisms to bridge the gap, said consultancy Bain. While green investment grew 20% last year, it falls short of the $1.5 trillion required this decade.
Thailand / EV batteries
Two major EV battery producers in China are showing interest in producing power cells in Thailand, with a possible combined first phase investment at over 30 billion baht, said the Board of Investment. Thailand has attracted significant foreign investment in EV production.
Vietnam / Energy transition
Vietnam and Australia agreed to collaborate on climate and energy development to boost sustainability. Australia also committed A$105 mln to support development in sustainable infrastructure in Vietnam, with a focus on clean energy.
A selection of domestic and international events we believe will have an impact on Japanese energy
|
January |
|
|
February |
|
|
March |
|
|
April |
|
|
May |
|
|
June |
|
|
July |
|
|
August |
|
|
September |
|
|
October |
|
|
November |
|
|
December |
|
Disclaimer
This communication has been prepared for information purposes only, is confidential and may be legally privileged. This is a subscription-only service and is directed at those who have expressly asked K.K. Yuri Group or one of its representatives to be added to the mailing list. This document may not be onwardly circulated or reproduced without prior written consent from Yuri Group, which retains all copyright to the content of this report.
Yuri Group is not registered as an investment advisor in any jurisdiction. Our research and all the content express our opinions, which are generally based on available public information, field studies and own analysis. Content is limited to general comment upon general political, economic and market issues, asset classes and types of investments. The report and all of its content does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell, subscribe for or underwrite any product or physical commodity, or a financial instrument.
The information contained in this report is obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith. No representation or warranty is made that it is accurate or complete. Opinions and views expressed are subject to change without notice, as are prices and availability, which are indicative only. There is no obligation to notify recipients of any changes to this data or to do so in the future. No responsibility is accepted for the use of or reliance on the information provided. In no circumstances will Yuri Group be liable for any indirect or direct loss, or consequential loss or damages arising from the use of, any inability to use, or any inaccuracy in the information.
K.K. Yuri Group: Hulic Ochanomizu Bldg. 3F, 2-3-11, Surugadai, Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 101-0062.
NEWS
。JERA launches global renewables firm based in London, sets 20 GW goal by 2035
・KEPCO’s electricity generation from nuclear in FY2024 expected to be highest since 2011
・Osaka Gas, Sumitomo, etc invest in India’s gas networks through Singapore fund