
JULY 29, 2024
NEWS
TOP
ANALYSIS
HYDROGEN HUBS TO SHINE A LIGHT
ON JAPAN’S ‘GREEN’ FUTURE
Japan’s hydrogen strategy has had more emphasis on ‘blue’ hydrogen projects due to the speed and scale they can deliver. But this may change as the country’s regional hydrogen hub strategy picks up pace. Several green hydrogen production sites are expected to go online in the next few years. This analysis is Part 2 of our look into Japan’s major hydrogen projects.
MODERNIZING PORT INFRASTRUCTURE IS KEY TO JAPAN’S WIND POWER DEVELOPMENT
The success of offshore wind power projects can hinge on good port infrastructure. Japan has plenty of ports but few that can handle the logistics and transport required to receive, store, and assemble wind farm components, as well as to support the installation and maintenance of offshore wind facilities. The government is heeding industry calls for a revamp of domestic ports and what it will take to allow them to cope with today’s larger vessels, wind turbines, etc.
ASIA ENERGY VIEW
A wrap of top energy news that impacts other Asian countries.
EVENTS SCHEDULE
A selection of events to keep an eye on in 2024.
PUBLISHER
K. K. Yuri Group
Editorial Team
Yuriy Humber (Editor-in-Chief)
John Varoli (Senior Editor, Americas)
Mayumi Watanabe (Japan)
Kyoko Fukuda (Japan)
Magdalena Osumi (Japan
Filippo Pedretti (Japan)
Tim Young (Japan)
Regular Contributors
Chisaki Watanabe (Japan)
Takehiro Masutomo (Japan)
Events

SUBSCRIPTIONS & ADVERTISING
Japan NRG offers individual, corporate and academic subscription plans. Basic details are our website or write to subscriptions@japan-nrg.com
For marketing, advertising, or collaboration opportunities, contact sales@japan-nrg.com For all other inquiries, write to info@japan-nrg.com
OFTEN-USED ACRONYMS
|
METI |
The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry |
mmbtu |
Million British Thermal Units | |
|
MoE |
Ministry of Environment |
mb/d |
Million barrels per day | |
|
ANRE |
Agency for Natural Resources and Energy |
mtoe |
Million Tons of Oil Equivalent | |
|
NEDO |
New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization |
kWh |
Kilowatt hours (electricity generation volume) | |
|
TEPCO |
Tokyo Electric Power Company |
FIT |
Feed-in Tariff | |
|
KEPCO |
Kansai Electric Power Company |
FIP |
Feed-in Premium | |
|
EPCO |
Electric Power Company |
SAF |
Sustainable Aviation Fuel | |
|
JCC |
Japan Crude Cocktail |
NPP |
Nuclear power plant | |
|
JKM |
Japan Korea Market, the Platt’s LNG benchmark |
JOGMEC |
Japan Organization for Metals and Energy Security | |
|
CCUS |
Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage | |||
|
OCCTO |
Organization for Cross-regional Coordination of Transmission Operators | |||
|
NRA |
Nuclear Regulation Authority | |||
|
GX |
Green Transformation |

JSE to build liquefied hydrogen import terminal in Kawasaki by FY2028
(Japan NRG, July 25)
TAKEAWAY: This is an ambitious plan. Tank manufacturer Toyo Kanetsu, which is building a 5,000 m3 tank for liquefied hydrogen storage, said the biggest challenge in building larger tanks is securing the necessary raw materials to maintain temperatures at -253 C.
AT TOKYO inks PPA with TEPCO EP for renewable energy supply to data center
(Company statement, July 18)
Toyota to set up EV battery plant in Kyushu near its car factory
(Nikkei, July 26)
Govt mulls subsidies, tax cut incentives for decarbonized power
(Nikkei, July 23)
TAKEAWAY: Providing demand-side incentives hasn’t been a major part of the support ecosystem for renewable energy projects, although this is one of the main approaches driving the rollout of hydrogen. Demand-side incentives will certainly be welcome, although non-Japanese businesses that seek to buy green electricity often quote the availability of necessary volumes as the major issue, rather than the costs.
This news also chimes with the recent shift to a GX 2.0 energy policy that tries to marry development of clean energy with investment in new industrial capacities.
Kyoto Fusioneering secures ¥1 bln in latest funding round
(Company statement, July 23)
Tokio Marine to offer insurance for greenwashing claims
(Company statement, July 19)
Sekisui Chemical, Cosmo trial PSCs on tanks at industrial sites
(Company statement, July 19)
TAKEAWAY: The number of PSC trials is proliferating this year. This month, JGC Corp is another to trial the technology on the roof of a park facility in Enoshima, in collaboration with EneCoat Technologies. Most of the demos are for locations that would not necessarily be open to solar panels due to weight or uneven surfaces. This suggests that there is an understanding in the market that PSC is not coming to directly challenge existing polysilicon-based solar PV, but rather, is a potential option in new use cases. These trials should give an idea of how feasible PSC will be as a commercial technology in the coming years. In this context, the govt’s targets to have PSC operate on a commercial basis starting 2025 or 2026 might be overly optimistic.
Source: Cosmo Energy
JGC begins search for perovskite solar farm partners
(Japan NRG, July 24)
TAKEAWAY: Farmers are interested in wavelength-selective PV cells that are colorless and transparent. However, they tend to push back against solar modules that are colored black, as they think the modules will block plants’ photosynthesis. EneCoat products are black.
METI and Aomori discuss Mutsu interim spent nuclear fuel facility
(Jiji Press, July 23)
TAKEAWAY: The success of Mutsu’s facility is closely intertwined with the fate of Rokkasho’s reprocessing plant that’s expected to be the next place to store spent fuel after the Mutsu facility’s 50-year limit. However, many in the municipal and prefectural assemblies fear that the Rokkasho plant, which has already seen 26 delays, will face another delay as the operators try to fulfill the NRA’s requirements. Until the govt can secure a concrete plan and the proposed facilities are already operational for spent nuclear fuel, interim storage facilities will always be met with resistance by locals.
Tokyo Century will invest ¥20 bln in Sustainable Battery Holdings
(Company statement, July 23)
CCS site exploration rules take effect Aug 5
(Government statement, July 23)
Wind Association proposes relaxing forestry law
(JWPA statement, July 25)
TAKEAWAY: A number of prefectures have either passed a law or say they will try to do so restricting the cutting of trees for solar and wind power projects. It would be odd for the national govt to relax forestry law at a time when regional authorities are seeking to tighten regulation in this area. However, the wind industry lobby group may be able to use this approach to push the national govt to help find new areas where onshore wind projects are welcome, similar to the zoning for offshore wind.
Govt prepares plan for agricultural version of AZEC
(Japan NRG, July 24)
TAKEAWAY: Low-methane rice growing now being developed in Japan could be the hydrogen/ ammonia/ CCS equivalent technologies shared among AZEC members.
Marubeni leads testing used tires as battery material for street lighting
(Company statement, July 22)
Tokyo govt offers subsidies up to ¥100 mln for next-gen renewables demos
(Government statement, July 19)
Chubu Electric Miraiz to offer CO2-free electricity as part of tax gift
(Company statement, Japan NRG, July 19)

Hokkaido Electric aims to be first supplier of 100% ammonia-fired power
(Government statement, July 23)
TAKEAWAY: Ammonia applications are expanding and diversifying as they replace fossil fuels not only in the energy but in the manufacturing sectors. A gas inspector told Japan NRG that the safety regulations may need to be rewritten if small-scale ammonia burners begin to spread. Two ammonia slip incidents were reported so far this year due to errors by contractors. It seems that some ammonia users may not have the capacity to manage and train contractors, a local ammonia supplier said.
OCCTO to float first backup power auction in Aug-Sept
(OCCTO statement, July 24)
TAKEAWAY: On average, thermal power units are operating fewer hours as non-fossil power sources increase; but their total annual output has not declined since there are days when demand far exceeds forecasts.
METI highlights issues in EPRX market
(Denki Shimbun, July 24)
TEPCO Power Grid faces highest demand of the summer
(Denki Shimbun, July 23)
TAKEAWAY: The power retail market is in recovery mode after the tumultuous 2021/22 period that saw new power companies (shin denryoku) lose market share, face financial difficulties, and the former regional utilities take over many of the delivery contracts. At one point, new power entrants held about 22-23% of the market, and while their share is lower today it again seems to be on an upward trajectory.
Discrepancy in regional reserve ratios causes issues in balancing market
(Denki Shimbun, July 26)
METI’s July 22-26 forecast shows critical supply-demand in Tokyo, Tohoku
(Denki Shimbun, July 22)
Tohoku Electric updates supply plan including for Higashi Niigata Unit 6
(Company statement, July 23)
NRA chairman inspects Shimane NPP ahead of planned restart
(Nikkei, July 22)
NRA says Tsuruga NPP Unit 2 doesn’t meet new standards
(Nikkei, July 26)
TAKEAWAY: The debate over the fault under the Tsuruga plant has focused on two main issues. First, whether the “K fault” about 300 meters north of the plant is active; the NRA concluded at the end of May that it’s difficult to deny this. The second issue is whether the fissure extending from the fault to under the Unit 2 reactor should also be considered an active fault.
MHI gets KEPCO order to replace reactor internals in Takahama NPP
(Company statement, July 25)
Kyushu Electric applies to revise tsunami risk assessment for Genkai NPP
(Company statement, July 25)
JNFL’s Aomori reprocessing plant nears final stages of completion
(Nikkei, July 23)
JFE Engineering is first to focus electricity retail on geothermal generation
(New Energy Business News, July 25)

Toho Gas makes first foray into natural gas sales in Indonesia
(Company statement, July 22)
Australia awards offshore acreage for petroleum exploration and CCS
(Petroleum Australia, July 25)
TAKEAWAY: Australia is attractive for Japanese companies active in CCS because its govt promotes policies to develop the industry. Given Australia’s geological storage potential and its geography, more Japanese companies will likely take part in CCS projects there, if more permits are granted.
Chiyoda consolidated net profit falls, hit by LNG project
(Nikkei, July 26)
TAKEAWAY: Overall, Chiyoda’s financial performance showed resilience despite the challenges posed by Zachry’s bankruptcy. This is due to diversification of Chiyoda’s project portfolios. Yet, future profitability relies on solving issues surrounding Zachry’s departure and, most of all, the LNG project’s progress.
LNG stocks jumped 6.8% as hot summer boosts power demand
(Government data, July 24)
June oil / gas / coal trade statistics
(Government data, July 18)
|
Imports |
Volume |
YoY |
Value (Yen) |
YoY |
|
Crude oil |
9.1 million kiloliters |
-14.0% |
¥787.7 billion |
3.3% |
|
LNG |
4.6 million tons |
0.8% |
¥424.9 billion |
8.1% |
|
Thermal coal |
6.8 million tons |
-6.9% |
¥161.1 billion |
-28.6% |
BY MAYUMI WATANABE
Hydrogen Hubs to Shine a Light on Japan’s ‘Green’ Future
Until recently, Japan’s hydrogen strategy has been largely colorblind. If anything, there’s been more emphasis on ‘blue’ hydrogen projects due to the speed and scale that they can deliver in comparison to most of the production plans linked to renewable energy. However, this may change over time as the country’s regional hydrogen hub strategy picks up pace.
Several green hydrogen production sites are expected to go onstream in Japan in the middle of this decade, which adds some ‘craft’ supply for local economies, boosting their sustainability levels. All ‘blue’ hydrogen in Japan is expected to be imported.
This analysis is Part 2 of our two-article series looking into major hydrogen projects in the pipeline in Japan.
Yamanashi and Hokkaido, the green hydrogen hubs
Green hydrogen has been produced at a small scale of several hundred tons / year in total since 2020 at:
Because of the higher costs of domestic green hydrogen projects, they were labeled as dream / demo works with little or no market potential. The costs often cited for the above projects were 100 times or more above the 2030 national goal of producing hydrogen at ¥30 / NM3.
The FH2R facility, launched in time for the Tokyo Olympic Games 2020, enjoyed positive feedback when it opened. But the cost of transport and failure to attract industrial-scale users has made the FH2R uneconomic, operating more like a demonstration center for the technology than a business.
Despite this, in 2025, several new green hydrogen productions are coming on-stream: a 2,200 tons / year plant in the city of Hokuto, Yamanashi Prefecture; and a 10,000 tons / year plant in the city of Tomakomai, Hokkaido.
Municipal governments are driving the green hydrogen industry. They want to monetize excess renewables electricity, which is made redundant due to a lack of transmission cable bandwidth. From May to September, renewable operators in Japan are often asked to curb output as too much solar power is generated.
The municipalities also learned from the Namie example that green hydrogen by itself is not enough to attract end-users. They need to help set up workable means of transporting the fuel and support the development of new hydrogen applications.
YHC, a joint venture between Yamanashi Prefecture, Toray and seven other companies, has been a pioneer of not just green hydrogen production but also in creating demand. On the production side, it conducts R&D of PEM electrolysis technologies. On the demand side, it sells green hydrogen outside of Yamanashi’s boundaries. It’s also developing off-grid application of H2 at local farms, as well as exploring the potential for overseas sales.
The city of Sapporo in Hokkaido has unique plans, too. In June, it was awarded by the Financial Services Agency a special business zone status to attract foreign investment into clean energy. There will be new visa categories, support for opening bank accounts, relaxing bank rules for financing startups, local tax cuts and subsidy offers, and deregulation.
The Sapporo government seeks to attract operators of offshore wind turbine installation ships from overseas by relaxing ship ownership rules. It aims to speed up offshore wind projects along the Ishikari coast, and encourage green hydrogen production. To drive up consumption, it plans to relax rules on hydrogen storage, such as raising the storage volume limit.
The Hokkaido government decided to position Sapporo as the region’s clean energy hub, because the city has the island’s largest population. Sapporo, Tomakomai and Muroran comprise the core of the Hokkaido hydrogen supply chain, which is expected to be set up by 2030. The area will not only produce hydrogen but will also act as a demand center, with major local construction activity under way to build semiconductor plants and data centers.
In the Tomakomai region 50 km south of Sapporo, a consortium led by Sparx will bring onstream a new hydrogen production plant in January 2025. It will power electrolysers with solar panels and industrial waste. Also in Tomakomai, Hokkaido Electric, ENEOS and Idemitsu Kosan plan a 10,000 tons/ year green hydrogen plant.
In Chitose, which lies between Sapporo and Tomakomai, a consortium of Mitsubishi Corp, Takasago Thermal Engineering, Hokkaido Electric and Air Water Hokkaido have launched green hydrogen supply chain feasibility studies.
In May, the city of Muroran began a trial run of green hydrogen supply services, using power from the 500 kW Shukutsu wind power station owned by the city. The aim is to spread hydrogen use to homes and small customers by repurposing the wind station without new capital investment into infrastructure, such as pipelines.
Green hydrogen projects
|
Location |
Key Players |
Description |
Status |
|
Cities of Kofu, Hokuto, etc. (Yamanashi Pref) |
Yamanashi Hydrogen Co, Yamanashi Pref, TEPCO, Toray, Suntory, Toshiba, Tomoe Shokai |
Producing solar-derived green hydrogen, attracting industrial users to the prefecture, developing hydrogen applications |
Green hydrogen production started in June 2021; Construction of a 16 MW (2,200 tons/ year) electrolyzer plant started in 2024 |
|
Namie Hydrogen Supply Chain for Homes and Industries (Fukushima Pref) |
Fukushima Hydrogen Energy Research Field (FH2R), Hitachi |
Delivering compressed hydrogen to homes, supplying hydrogen-generated power to power utilities |
FH2R has been producing green hydrogen since 2020. Its capacity is 200 tons/ year. Hitachi has completed studies on hydrogen transport and applications in April 2024. |
|
Sapporo, Ishikari coast (Hokkaido) |
City of Sapporo |
Attract foreign ships to conduct offshore wind installations, produce hydrogen from redundant wind power and supply to major commercial facilities |
In May, the government designated as special deregulation zone to attract foreign investment |
|
Tomakomai (Hokkaido) |
Sparx, Hitachi, City of Tomakomai, Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank, Toyota Motor Hokkaido |
Off-grid 7,000 – 10,000 tons/ year green hydrogen supply system using solar and waste-generated power |
Plant construction began in May, supplies to end-users Hokkaido Soda, city’s spa and Toyota start in Jan 2025 |
|
West Tomakomai area (Hokkaido) |
Hokkaido Electric, ENEOS, Idemitsu Kosan |
Producing 10,000 tons/ year of green hydrogen; developing power supply management system to supply power to industrial users |
Three companies signed MoU in Feb 2024 |
|
Muroran (Hokkaido) |
City of Muroran, Air Water Hokkaido, Muroran Gas, Taisei Corp, Kitakoudensha, etc. |
Users including homes, community stores, offices and hotels, will receive metal hydride charged with hydrogen. They will extract hydrogen from the metal to run hydrogen boilers. |
Trial started in May 2024 |
The next steps
Supply chains are organic. They continue to grow. The Central Japan consortium plans to build ammonia cracking and dehydrogenation facilities in the ports of Nagoya and Mikawa, to convert ammonia to hydrogen and to supply FCV fueling stations. They’re also developing the Yokkaichi Port as a backup, in case the JERA Kinuura port closes due to emergencies.
Resonac plans a 100 MW hydrogen-fueled power plant. As its plastic recycling plant is not capable of generating enough hydrogen, it will also import the fuel.
ENEOS is not limiting hydrogen opportunities to MCH. It is building another supply chain on the Kawasaki waterfront area, consisting of liquid hydrogen, with Iwatani Corp, Japan Suiso Energy and Kawasaki Heavy Industries. The liquid hydrogen supply chain consortium aims to hit the government hydrogen price target of ¥30 / NM3 in 2030.
Some say that the ultimate goal of the national hydrogen strategy is to run several GW-size power plants fully fueled by hydrogen or ammonia, or both. The spread of hydrogen via regional hubs could also see a kind of decentralization of power supply structures.
Green hydrogen producers in Yamanashi and Hokkaido are developing off-grid services for homes and farms, because it is more efficient to consume the energy source close to home than to transport it to faraway demand centers. The Muroran test is also off-grid. A wide variety of community-based suppliers may develop.
Conclusion: Everything hinges on METI subsidies
The bottom line is that neither super hydrogen power stations or supply diversity will happen unless hydrogen costs fall to around the government target or less, or the costs of incumbent energy sources rise due to carbon taxes or other factors.
For now, many advanced hydrogen projects exist thanks to subsidies from the feasibility study phase. At what point will they be able to stand on their own commercial feet?
There are already signs of a “decarbonization divide” between municipalities active in climate issues and those limiting their scope to rooftop solar and energy saving system installations. The latter are small municipalities, suffering from depopulation, staff shortage and tight budgets.
Outsourcing of community services has become common and local authorities are often happy to contract out the management of solar, FCV, EV and storage battery programs to save their dwindling human resources. According to the government’s Population Strategy Council, 40% of municipalities may cease to exist in 2050 due to depopulation.
If the above scenario plays out, then there is only a certain time window during which local authorities will be able to support new hydrogen supply chains and demos. After that, only those municipalities with large populations and industrial centers will continue. Meanwhile, the repurposing of existing facilities into cleaner alternatives will become the zero emission driver, if it isn’t already.
BY JAPAN NRG
Modernizing Port Infrastructure is Key to
Japan’s Wind Power Development
Japan has over 1,000 ports, yet when it came to selecting winners of the most recent offshore wind auction, a decision on one of the four projects offered was delayed for over three months due to concerns over port access. And this was only Round 2 of national offshore wind tenders.
With ambitions of building 45 GW of offshore wind capacity in the next two decades, Japan faces an unusual predicament. The country is well known for excellent infrastructure and plenty of ports, but few can handle the logistics and transport required to receive, store, and assemble wind farm components, as well as to support the installation and maintenance of offshore wind facilities.
The success of multi-billion-dollar offshore wind power projects can hinge on the availability of suitable port infrastructure. A port’s geographic proximity to an offshore wind project, for example, is a key factor impacting overall costs and efficiencies. Ports also determine the range and length of deployment of installation vessels, as well as those used for operations and maintenance. Investors determine their interest in a project partly based on port access.
As Japan’s offshore wind industry moves from tenders to the practicalities of managing multi-hundred-MW projects, the government has heeded to industry calls for a revamp of port facilities and began to assess the scale of modernizations, as well as what it will take to allow Japanese ports to cope with today’s larger vessels, wind turbines, and other equipment.
Since these challenges are too complex for individual developers to solve, the government is supporting public and private action, and corralling stakeholders for sector-wide cooperation.
Improving port infrastructure
Japan’s coastal geography and deep waters present challenges and opportunities for offshore wind development. Traditionally, Japanese ports have been geared towards supporting the fishing industry, trade, and fossil fuel imports. As a result, Japan has some of the world’s most advanced LNG terminals, but the ports will require significant upgrades to receive and then store 100-meter-long wind turbine towers and blades, or 300-ton nacelles.
Upgrades require investment to improve function as a hub for manufacturing, assembly, and maintenance of offshore wind components. For example, it takes around three days to install just one turbine, depending on the distance between the port and the project site.
As an island nation, Japan has many ports, totaling 1,020; but about 90% of these are small. The total breaks down as: 22 special-purpose major ports, 106 standard major ports, and 892 local ports.
Only a fraction of these, however, can be utilized to service the offshore wind industry, and only a handful are currently doing so on a commercial basis. That’s despite the fact that METI and the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT) have studied the port and harbor needs of offshore wind power generation facilities since 2016.
Still, in recent years, there’s been some progress. In 2023, the government updated the framework of the Port Improvement Promotion Act, pledging to support the development of port facilities nationwide. This ensured funding for wharves and other facilities at 70 ports nationwide.
With a budget of ¥79.8 billion for FY2023, the government has committed to funding not only the land for wharves themselves, but also to the construction of sheds and cranes, and the development of adjacent waterfront areas used for logistics.
As part of the wharf funding program, 62 ports were selected. These include ports where offshore wind power generation projects are planned or under consideration: Ishikari Bay New Port (Hokkaido); Akita Port, Noshiro Port (Akita Prefecture); Sakata Port, Kashima Port (Ibaraki Prefecture); Niigata Port, Fushiki-Toyama Port (Toyama Prefecture); Kitakyushu Port (Fukuoka Prefecture); and Nagasaki Port.
Japan currently has seven operational offshore wind farms, with three deemed large-scale: the 112 MW Ishikari Bay New Port Wind farm; the 84 MW Noshiro Port; and the 54.6 MW Akita Port projects. Akita Port was put into commercial operation in January 2023 while Noshiro Port has been in commercial operation since December 2022. Ishikari Bay consists of 14 wind turbines, each 8 MW; it began commercial operation on January 1, 2024.
Base ports
The outsized parameters of offshore wind power components and foundations require ports that can accommodate large vessels and have appropriate logistics facilities. To kick-start the upgrade of domestic ports to work with the wind sector, the government introduced a “base ports” program.
Such a port should have a pier that can handle heavy, large-scale materials and has sufficient load-bearing capacity and space to handle the components needed for the installation and maintenance of offshore wind power generation facilities. A base port agrees to set aside its harbor and specific wharves for a time during the first stage of wind farm construction.
In turn, project developers are asked by the government to state which port they plan to use as their base port when tendering bids in the offshore wind auctions.
In 2022, eleven ports applied for the official status of an Offshore Wind Hub Port, and two existing ports already designated as such expressed a wish for expansion.
The problem is, only seven locations passed the bar to receive the “base port” designation. In April, the MLIT added Aomori and Sakata to a list that contains port facilities in Kitakyushu, Niigata, Akita, Noshiro, and Kashima. And these ports have to handle the eight sea areas already selected by the government to move ahead with project development.
What’s more, the ports selected to date are aligned with existing projects and do not take into account other areas that have significant offshore wind potential. Perhaps the most glaring omission is not having any port that can service Hokkaido, the northern region with Japan’s greatest offshore wind resources.
The port of Muroran, on the southern coast of Hokkaido, is being promoted by an industry group that includes Mitsubishi Steel Group as another base port candidate. The Muroran Offshore Wind Promotion Association (MOPA) already counts 114 companies among its members, including offshore wind developers, and regularly hosts and supports wind sector forums and other events. But it has yet to clinch the official base port designation.
Source: MLIT
Among the challenges faced by ports is that they’re already busy servicing other industries. Muroran, for example, is key for Japan’s steel industry. Also, the ports are often located in densely populated coastal areas, limiting the availability of space for expansion. This makes it difficult to add things like specialized cranes, heavy-lift equipment, and facilities for the assembly of large wind turbine components.
Nonetheless, unless new base ports are added, they are unlikely to play a role in expanding the offshore wind project pipeline this decade. Due to the complex regulatory frameworks around port infrastructure at both the national and level levels, and the construction work itself, it takes about four years to upgrade the ports to fit with sector requirements.
Most offshore wind projects in the pipeline are set to begin commercial operations in 2029 or 2030.
The next frontier
Despite the above efforts, ports may need to go through yet another round of upgrades to accommodate floating wind power generation projects, the structures and turbines of which have different parameters from fixed bottom turbines.
To avoid this becoming a bottleneck to the wind power sector’s development in the future, the government is trying to get ahead of the issue.
In May, MLIT set up a new public-private forum to consider how floating wind power structures will impact land-based facilities such as ports, as well as vessels. The forum’s role is to get “various entities to work together to systematically design systems and conduct technical reviews on a range of issues related to offshore construction, such as the assembly and installation of floating bodies, and related ships.”
So far, the forum has held two meetings, and attracted a wide range of participants, from oil major INPEX, to EDF Renewables, Tokyo University, and floating wind promotion groups. Discussions have focused on measures that will update ports for the assembly and storage of floating foundations and related structures.
The ministry expects the forum to bring industry wide solutions to fruition by around the start of the next decade.
Meanwhile, in March, a public-private research hub for floating wind power was created to act as a kind of clearing house for various sector designs and technologies. The Floating Offshore Wind Technology Research Association [FLOWRA] seeks to standardize the domestic infrastructure and supply chains, and members include most of Japan’s major power utilities and large wind players like Mitsubishi Corp and Marubeni.
With the government and many domestic players involved in the above discussions, the development of floating offshore wind port infrastructure is expected to occur faster and smoother. It should also help not only the ports, but also other supply chain players such as those involved in vessel lease, charter, and operations.
Development of port infrastructure for offshore wind in Japan has had a slow start, but with the appropriate action by the government and private sector stakeholders, it should look significantly better towards the end of this decade.
BY JOHN VAROLI
This weekly column focuses on energy events in Asia and the Pacific
Australia / Electricity market
The West Australian govt seeks bids for dispatchable capacity projects in its wholesale electricity market. The tender aims to deliver 500 MW of 4-hour equivalent, or 2 GWh of clean dispatchable capacity. This will help support the state’s energy system to reach 82% renewables by 2030.
Australia / Natural gas
The govt is set to issue new offshore gas exploration permits to ensure a stable energy supply and move away from coal-fired power facilities.
China / Solar power
Leading solar panel makers are setting up in the U.S. to take advantage of the Inflation Reduction Act. These include Illuminate, a JV between Longi (China) and U.S. energy developer Invenergy. Trina (China) is investing $200 million in a 5 GW solar module plant in Texas. Jinko (China) opened a 400 MW panel factory in Florida in 2018.
India / Biomass
The Ministry of New and Renewable Energy announced new financial incentives for biomass pellet manufacturing in order to promote cleaner air quality and green energy sources
India / Energy transition
The country aims to achieve 50% non-fossil fuel-based energy by 2030. India’s renewable energy capacity has reached 190 GW as of April, according to the Economic Survey. This accounts for 43% of the nation’s total installed generation capacity.
India / Rooftop solar
The Asian Development Bank approved a $240 million loan to boost rooftop solar systems, helping India expand energy access and achieve its target of about 50% of cumulative electric power installed capacity from non-fossil fuel energy sources by 2030.
Malaysia / CRESS
In September, the govt will launch the Corporate Renewable Energy Supply Scheme (CRESS) in order to facilitate open grid access, allowing third parties to supply or purchase electricity through the grid system under agreed terms.
Philippines / Oil spill
A marine tanker carrying industrial fuel sank in rough seas, causing an oil spill that could spread to waters off the capital Manila.
South Korea / EV batteries
LG Energy Solution is in talks with about three Chinese suppliers to produce low-cost EV batteries for Europe, as competition is expected to intensify after the EU hit Chinese-built EVs with extra tariffs.
Thailand / Hydrogen power
Saudi Arabia is considering investing in Thailand, particularly hydrogen energy. Thailand’s Energy Minister was in Riyadh last week. Also, there is a proposal to extend cooperation to the transfer of Saudi know-how and energy technology, and assistance in establishing Thailand’s strategic oil reserve infrastructure.
A selection of domestic and international events we believe will have an impact on Japanese energy
|
January |
|
|
February |
|
|
March |
|
|
April |
|
|
May |
|
|
June |
|
|
July |
|
|
August |
|
|
September |
|
|
October |
|
|
November |
|
|
December |
|
Disclaimer
This communication has been prepared for information purposes only, is confidential and may be legally privileged. This is a subscription-only service and is directed at those who have expressly asked K.K. Yuri Group or one of its representatives to be added to the mailing list. This document may not be onwardly circulated or reproduced without prior written consent from Yuri Group, which retains all copyright to the content of this report.
Yuri Group is not registered as an investment advisor in any jurisdiction. Our research and all the content express our opinions, which are generally based on available public information, field studies and own analysis. Content is limited to general comment upon general political, economic and market issues, asset classes and types of investments. The report and all of its content does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell, subscribe for or underwrite any product or physical commodity, or a financial instrument.
The information contained in this report is obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith. No representation or warranty is made that it is accurate or complete. Opinions and views expressed are subject to change without notice, as are prices and availability, which are indicative only. There is no obligation to notify recipients of any changes to this data or to do so in the future. No responsibility is accepted for the use of or reliance on the information provided. In no circumstances will Yuri Group be liable for any indirect or direct loss, or consequential loss or damages arising from the use of, any inability to use, or any inaccuracy in the information.
K.K. Yuri Group: Hulic Ochanomizu Bldg. 3F, 2-3-11, Surugadai, Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 101-0062.
NEWS
・Japan Suiso Energy to build liquefied hydrogen import terminal in Kawasaki by FY2028
・AT TOKYO and partners ink PPA with TEPCO EP for renewable energy supply to data center
・Hokkaido Electric aims to be Japan’s first supplier of 100% ammonia-fired power, earlier than JERA