
AUGUST 26, 2024
NEWS
TOP
ANALYSIS
CAN JAPAN TRANSFORM CO2 SEA TRANSPORT FROM WASTE MANAGEMENT TO PROFIT?
When the Japanese Advanced CCS Projects were first announced last year, only two of the seven projects involved overseas CO2 transportation. But METI has added two more international projects. By 2030 most of the planned CCS projects are slated to start commercial operation, yet much of the technology remains stuck in R&D. Project developers are worried about the overall cost assessment of the value chain. Japan NRG explores some of the challenges that the nascent carbon industry is facing in envisioning a CCS value chain to overseas storage sites.
JAPANESE MUNICIPALITIES AIM FOR INCREASED USE OF CLEAN ENERGY IN EMERGENCIES
Local and national authorities are looking for emergency backup energy sources that can be utilized quickly and flexibly. Restarting a mothballed coal or oil-fired power plant can take days. That’s why municipalities are turning to batteries, EVs, and other clean energy sources, seeking both lower emissions and a nimbler approach. Japan NRG takes a glance at energy emergency response measures implemented in the wake of major disasters, as well as recent trends showing increased reliance on renewables in the times of emergency.
ASIA ENERGY VIEW
A wrap of top energy news that impacts other Asian countries.
EVENTS SCHEDULE
A selection of events to keep an eye on in 2024.
PUBLISHER
K. K. Yuri Group
Editorial Team
Yuriy Humber (Editor-in-Chief)
John Varoli (Senior Editor, Americas)
Mayumi Watanabe (Japan)
Kyoko Fukuda (Japan)
Magdalena Osumi (Japan
Filippo Pedretti (Japan)
Tim Young (Japan)
Regular Contributors
Chisaki Watanabe (Japan)
Takehiro Masutomo (Japan)
Events

SUBSCRIPTIONS & ADVERTISING
Japan NRG offers individual, corporate and academic subscription plans. Basic details are our website or write to subscriptions@japan-nrg.com
For marketing, advertising, or collaboration opportunities, contact sales@japan-nrg.com For all other inquiries, write to info@japan-nrg.com
OFTEN-USED ACRONYMS
|
METI |
The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry |
mmbtu |
Million British Thermal Units | |
|
MoE |
Ministry of Environment |
mb/d |
Million barrels per day | |
|
ANRE |
Agency for Natural Resources and Energy |
mtoe |
Million Tons of Oil Equivalent | |
|
NEDO |
New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization |
kWh |
Kilowatt hours (electricity generation volume) | |
|
TEPCO |
Tokyo Electric Power Company |
FIT |
Feed-in Tariff | |
|
KEPCO |
Kansai Electric Power Company |
FIP |
Feed-in Premium | |
|
EPCO |
Electric Power Company |
SAF |
Sustainable Aviation Fuel | |
|
JCC |
Japan Crude Cocktail |
NPP |
Nuclear power plant | |
|
JKM |
Japan Korea Market, the Platt’s LNG benchmark |
JOGMEC |
Japan Organization for Metals and Energy Security | |
|
CCUS |
Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage | |||
|
OCCTO |
Organization for Cross-regional Coordination of Transmission Operators | |||
|
NRA |
Nuclear Regulation Authority | |||
|
GX |
Green Transformation |

Japan’s next Basic Energy Plan likely to indicate strong electricity demand growth
(Japan NRG, Aug 23)
TAKEAWAY: Expectations for a decline in total electricity usage in the country were squashed in the last year after the emergence of mass-market generative AI models. Large Japanese corporations like SoftBank have vowed to build nationwide data center networks and pioneer home-grown genAI systems to support the nation’s competitiveness in the digital age. The quick emergence of AI as the next demand driver has caught the govt by surprise, but it’s now starting to provide its own outlook for the impact of this digital innovation. A 20% growth in 15 or so years is much lower than the numbers forecasted by experts, but it likely takes into account efficiency gains and various constraints on digital asset growth.
Hydrogen subsidy program likely to accept applications in late Sept, say industry insiders
(Japan NRG, Aug 23)
TAKEAWAY: There are about six such groups at the moment, but another two may emerge by the time the tender closes, say industry stakeholders. METI may then take as much as six months to review applications and select subsidy recipients.
MHI, Chevron to make green hydrogen in the U.S. starting 2025
(Nikkei, Aug 20)
TAKEAWAY: The production volumes are quite small compared to the sizes of planned blue hydrogen projects. At such volumes, export of hydrogen makes little sense, while creating a local demand point for the fuel helps to improve energy efficiency and lower costs. Japan’s domestic hydrogen production projects are taking a similar approach. They will make up a smaller proportion of the Japanese hydrogen market but should play an important role in future hydrogen industry development.
Toyota Tsusho, Pertamina to cooperate on biofuels and green hydrogen
(Nikkei Asia, Aug 21)
JERA’s venture entity invests in U.S. startup focused on electrolysis
(Company statement, Aug 21)
NYK inks deal to ship green ammonia from India to Japan
(Company statement, Aug 21)
Toshiba and PLN Nusantara Power ink MoU on CCS in Indonesia
(Company Statement, Aug 22)
Aisin eyes launching perovskite solar farms in Aichi
(Japan NRG, Aug 21)
West Group and Grid Corp to develop AI-based grid power storage plants
(Company statement, Aug 19)
TAKEAWAY: As Japan seeks to increase the ratio of renewables in its energy mix, the market for grid-scale BESS is expected to grow. The govt is bolstering support for such projects, such as through the Long-Term Decarbonized Power Source Auctions launched last year. This has led to more utilities opening up their grids to energy storage facilities.
NGK Insulators receives order for NaS batteries for demo project in Taiwan
(Company statement, Aug 22)
HOR, Idemitsu Kosan trial synthetic calcium carbonate for concrete products
(Company statement, Aug 20)
TAKEAWAY: While several entities are advancing this technology, the commercial use of CO2-derived concrete and similar materials is limited due to high production costs and competition from traditional products.
MLIT suspends NOx certificates to KHI over falsified data
(Government statement, Aug 21)

Hitachi Energy launches world’s first high-voltage switchgear to phase out SF6 emissions
(Company statement, Aug 22)
Sumitomo takes a stake in German monopile producer EEW Offshore Wind
(Company statement, Aug 19)

METI, OCCTO file interim report on ‘simultaneous’ market framework plans
(Denki Shimbun, Aug 20)
JEPX begins tracking non-fossil fuel certificates
(Denki Shimbun, Aug 22)
Climate NGO intensifies criticism of JERA and ammonia co-firing
(Japan NRG, Aug 15)
Chubu Electric: mistakes in renewables curtailment at dozens of power plants
(Company statement, Aug 21)
Japan’s business community advocates for nuclear power policy
(Denki Shimbun, Aug 19)
TEPCO to accelerate partial Kashiwazaki-Kariwa decommissioning
(Nikkei, Aug 21)
TAKEAWAY: The restart of Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPP, TEPCO’s only operable NPP, is proving to be complicated. Therefore, the utility is trying to win over public opinion by announcing new commitments on safety.
KEPCO submits long-term management plan for Takahama NPP Units 3-4
(Company statement, Aug 20)
JAPC to delay completion of safety upgrade at Tokai NPP Unit 2
(Nikkei, Aug 20)
TAKEAWAY: Tokai NPP is of particular importance to Japan’s national plan to restart NPPs. Completion of safety upgrades have been delayed since 2018, and dissatisfaction is growing among local communities, with officials calling for better planning.
RFS inks agreement ahead of Mutsu spent nuclear fuel storage launch
(NHK, Aug 20)
Vena Energy submits environmental statement for Okayama solar farm
(Company statement, Aug 20)
EX4Energy raises ¥350 mln to develop communication platform for PV systems
(Company statement, Aug 20)
Toyo inks MoU with Indonesia to cooperate in geothermal development
(Company statement, Aug 21)
Seven-Eleven Japan to deploy solar-powered trucks
(Nikkei, Aug 23)
TAKEAWAY: Although Japan has made progress in EV development, expansion to rural areas is still a long shot given poor charging infrastructure there. Solar-powered trucks might be an interesting alternative to EVs or FCVs, but their reliability and capacity are as yet unclear.

INPEX awarded exploration permit in offshore West Australia
(Company statement, Aug 20)
LNG futures trading resumes on TOCOM after two-year hiatus
(Denki Shimbun, Aug 19)
TAKEAWAY: Total contracts traded on Aug 16 would be less than one regular sized LNG ship cargo. At current trading volumes, it would be difficult for the exchange to attract financial players to grow the market, so TOCOM will first need to convince some of the LNG importers to use the platform to build up liquidity.
Nippon Steel, JFE acquire 30% of Blackwater coal mine
(Company statement, Aug 21)
TAKEAWAY: This year, JFE Steel closed its steelmaking plant in Kawasaki which will be converted into a liquefied hydrogen import terminal. This investment suggests the Kawasaki plant may be the last closure of coal-consuming blast furnace steelmaking in Japan.
LNG stocks remain steady compared to previous week, but up 11% YoY
(Government data, Aug 21)
July Oil/ Gas/ Coal Trade Statistics
(Government data, Aug 21)
|
Imports |
Volume |
YoY |
Value (Yen) |
YoY |
|
Crude oil |
10.3 million kiloliters |
-8.0% |
912.9 billion |
12.7% |
|
LNG |
5.6 million tons |
10.4% |
538.6 billion |
19.6% |
|
Thermal coal |
9.6 million tons |
10.9% |
235.1 billion |
-7.9% |
BY FILIPPO PEDRETTI
Can Japan Transform CO2 Sea Transport From
Waste Management to Profit?
When the Japanese Advanced CCS Projects were first announced last year, only two of the seven projects required overseas CO2 transportation. But recently, METI added two more international projects, bringing the total to nine.
Now, of these nine, six will require marine transportation of CO2 — four to overseas locations and two to domestic sites.
JOGMEC has stated that shipping CO2 from Japan to overseas storage sites will be vital. Transportation of liquefied CO2 (LCO2) by ship is the obvious solution for the CCS value chain, and this will require grappling with both engineering and cost issues.
Most storage sites are expected to be in Southeast Asia, as well as Australia, which means long shipping routes that bring additional complications than if the CO2 was stored at home. Clarifying on how most efficiently to transport CO2 will be imperative.
By 2030 most of the planned CCS projects are slated to start commercial operation, yet much of the technology remains stuck in the R&D stage. Project developers are worried about the overall cost assessment of the value chain, urging the industry to move from its current engineering phase to more practical tests and applications.
Japan NRG explores some of the challenges that the nascent carbon industry is facing in envisioning a CCS value chain to overseas storage sites.
New CCS advanced projects
The two newly added international projects are located in Malaysia, adding to the other two overseas projects already included in the original list of seven – 1) the Offshore Sarawak CCS involving JAPEX, K-Line, JGC Holdings, Petronas CCS Ventures, etc, and which could store between 1.9 to 2.9 million tons of CO2 per year from industries in Setouchi region (Okayama Pref) such as steel, power plants, and chemical factories.
The second one is the Southern Malaysian Offshore Project that includes Mitsui & Co, Chugoku Electric, Kansai Electric, and others. Plans call for storing around 5 million tons of CO2 each year, targeting different industries such as power, cement, chemicals, etc in Kinki, Chugoku and Kyushu. Both projects, according to METI, will involve ships as well as pipelines for transportation.
Japanese Advanced CCS Projects 
Source: JOGMEC
The two principal methods for mass CO2 transportation are by pipeline and ship. The first is most cost-effective when dealing with shorter distances, but as the distance increases, ships become necessary. A report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) claims that the financial break-even point is 1,000 km, but in Japan that figure can be lowered to 200-300 km, according to NYK and MHI.
Needless to say, this CO2 transportation method is not limited to the Japanese Advanced CCS Projects alone. Recently, Chubu Electric and BP told Japan NRG about plans for a major CCUS project at the Port of Nagoya and Indonesia’s Tangguh gas field. It seeks to annually capture 5 to 20 million tons of CO2 emissions that will be transported on 20 liquefied CO2 ships to Tangguh. Operations are targeted to begin by 2030, although the business model is still uncertain, and it will have to depend on government subsidies. The two companies will now proceed with a more detailed study before making a final investment decision.
Launching the CCS value chain
Marine transportation of CO2 is just one part of the overall CCS value chain. The first step is, of course, to capture CO2 from an emitting source. After that, a complete CCS value chain comprises the following phases:
In the final step, CO2 is injected directly into a offshore reservoir, or through a floating barge, or in an offshore terminal (and then into a reservoir). As with any other value chain, in order to be successful, minimizing the related costs is of crucial importance.
When it comes to the technical side of LCO2 ship transportation and its cost assessment, an important point to consider is the pressure method, of which there are three: Elevated Pressure (EP), Medium Pressure (MP), and Low Pressure (LP).
In March, NYK, in partnership with Chiyoda Corp and Knutsen Group, revealed the results of their studies on the three methods. Temperature and pressure specifications for the three look like this:
|
Mode |
Temperature |
Pressure |
|
EP |
from 0 to 10 C |
34 to 45 bar |
|
MP |
from -30 to -25 C |
15 to 18 bar |
|
LP |
from -50 to -45 C |
6 to 10 bar |
Considered were parameters such as operational risks, cost and energy consumption, and the type of tanks for CO2. According to circumstances, one method may prove to be better than another. In most situations, however, EP proved to be more cost effective when considering capital expenditure and operating expense. The cost stood between $52/ ton-CO2 (EP); and $59.9 (LP) for domestic transportation. In the case of overseas (from Japan to Australia), it rose to $90.3 (EP); and $103.6 (LP).
One reason is that EP is less energy intensive. Unlike MP and LP, CO2 is kept at ambient temperature in EP, not requiring refrigeration. Furthermore, EP allows for CO2 of less purity and usage of Knutsen NYK Carbon Carriers’s Cargo Tank Cylinders (CTC) tankers, two factors that make re-liquefaction unnecessary at the receiving terminal. One future goal for KNCC is to lower the cost of CTC tankers, which can handle 12 m3 of CO2 at a time.
CO2 density is actually a disadvantage for EP, since it’s lower than for the other methods. This means that larger tanks or more trips will be required in case of EP deployment. While this issue can be mitigated, it is one example of the factors that impede the possibility of establishing one method as superior to the others. Proceeding on a case-by-case basis remains essential.
Building the LCO2 carriers
LCO2 transportation by ship is a new industry, and the only notable CCS project involving shipping is Greensand in Denmark, which demonstrated crossborder CO2 storage, with CO2 captured in Antwerp transported by ship to Esbjerg, and then stored in a depleted oil field in the North Sea.
In April, Dalian Shipyard launched the first two LCO2 carriers with a 7,500 m3 capacity for the Northern Lights project in the North Sea, placing itself at the forefront of this industry. Before that, the only notable LCO2 carriers were four small-sized (1,000-2,000 m3) LCO2 carriers operated by Larvik Shipping built between 1999 and 2005.
As for Japan, in February METI unveiled the LCO2 transportation ship Excool built by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries. It has two tanks with a total capacity of 1,450 m3, and starting October it will transport CO2 from KEPCO Maizuru Power Station in Kyoto Prefecture to Tomakomai, Hokkaido.
General Arrangement of Excool

Source: Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
With LCO2 carriers still few in number, one of the next challenges is to build an entire fleet. From the time of contract signing, two to three years is needed to deliver a finished vessel. Still, securing the required port facilities and CO2 tanks could be a more daunting challenge.
JOGMEC’s view
Japan NRG reached out to JOGMEC regarding its expectations for CO2 transportation by ship, and the answer was that it will be a key method for enhancing the feasibility of CCS projects. JOGMEC recognizes the challenges that need to be overcome in order to launch the industry in a cost-efficient and sustainable manner.
First, current domestic construction capacity for storage tanks and ships is not sufficient. These challenges were made clear last year in a feasibility study, which pointed out the necessity for increased capacity. JOGMEC intends to further explore the matter with the newly announced projects.
One of the key issues to address is the standardization of liquefied CO2 ship transportation in CCS projects. As this new industry emerges, common rules, guidelines and technical standards are lacking, and they need to be established together with the necessary infrastructure (such as facilities at ports). Furthermore, JOGMEC is considering collaborating with the government to develop support measures to resolve these issues.
Conclusion
Ironically, the greatest challenge faced by CO2 transportation is CO2 itself. As a product without inherent value, handling it is basically waste management. Therefore, finding the most cost efficient way to dispose of it will be a top priority. Technical details such as choosing the best transportation method, or enabling the production of sufficient tanks and ships, are all part of the solution to the big question – “How can we make this tech work?”
The next question could be: Is CCS worth the effort and resources? A CCS chain could turn out to be far more costly than emitters and receivers would like to hear. The best solution would be to turn waste into a valuable product (i.e., CO2 utilization), but this alone won’t impact the amount of CO2 that abatement projects aim to capture. Therefore, efficient storage remains essential.
CO2 will have to prove itself as a convenient product in sectors where it’s considered to be a candidate for utilization. The CCS business model currently has little benefit from a carbon credits market that is voluntary, as is the case in Japan. Those businesses and investors that are voluntarily interested in ‘going green’ tend to prefer to put money into options further removed from oil and gas.
The most powerful catalyst for a CCS value chain will likely be found in carbon crediting under a compulsory market and with a carbon tax framework. This will require careful governmental intervention, both in terms of funding and regulation.
METI’s 2030 deadline for commercializing the CCS projects is approaching, and it’s time for the businesses involved to decide what to do before the day of reckoning arrives. Positioning CCS as an effective industry that fosters decarbonization goals will require settling technical matters and, perhaps most importantly, guaranteeing profits for those involved. Few will pay for CCS on a voluntary basis.
BY MAGDALENA OSUMI
Japanese Municipalities Aim for Increased
Use of Clean Energy in Emergencies
A series of natural disasters this summer, from an earthquake in south Japan to Typhoon Ampil along the coast of greater Tokyo, served as a reminder of the need to make energy systems resilient even in times of extreme crises.
Efforts to mitigate ensuing risks now extend to energy generation with a growing number of municipalities across the country seeking to switch from fossil fuels to renewable energy in order to secure power supply during emergencies.
The issue of securing backup sources is becoming more important as the mainstay of Japan’s energy system are aging thermal plants. This is a factor that even METI minister Saito recently underscored, noting that periods of extreme weather, such as this summer’s heat, are putting undue strain on domestic energy systems.
Given the difficulty in accurately predicting extreme weather impact, never mind the occurrence of a natural disaster, local and national authorities are also looking for emergency backup energy sources that could be utilized quickly and flexibly. Restarting a mothballed coal or oil-fired power plant would take days, even if it had received regular maintenance. That’s another reason why municipalities are turning to batteries, EVs, and other clean energy sources, seeking both lower emissions and a more nimble approach.
Japan NRG takes a look at some energy emergency response measures implemented in the wake of major disasters, as well as recent trends showing increased reliance on renewables in times of emergency.
Push for use of renewables-derived power in emergencies
The national government is urging municipalities to take the lead in introducing renewable energy to public facilities as part of measures for evacuation centers that are designated for use in disasters.
The goal to transition from thermal power to renewables-produced electricity during times of crises was included in the MoE’s disaster plan in 2020. The MoE allocated ¥2 billion in FY2024 on top of the ¥2 billion in the FY2023 supplementary budget for related initiatives. The amount covers subsidies for a portion of the cost of the installation of renewable energy generation facilities, cogeneration systems (CGS), and their ancillary facilities such as storage batteries, charging and discharging facilities, and CO2 reduction assets.
Perhaps the first example of when a local government in Japan reached for clean energy following a major disaster came in September 2018 when Hokkaido Prefecture procured power for some areas in the wake of an earthquake. Damage had led to a halt at Units 1, 2 and 4 at Hokkaido Electric’s coal-fired 1.65 GW Tomato-Atsuma Power Plant.
Early on Sept 8, the prefecture began to procure backup power using a redox flow grid-scale battery system at Hokkaido Electric’s Minami-Hayakita substation. That site paired solar power with batteries.
The Minami-Hayakita BESS, with a capacity of 51 MWh, and able to provide 17 MW for three hours, had been developed by Sumitomo Electric for Hokkaido Electric. The system, which is now in operation, was only launched at its current commercial scale in April 2022. However, it had already been installed in demo mode in 2015. At the time of the disaster, it was able to deliver power for four hours, at a rate of 15 MW.
Nissan lends a charge in emergencies
EVs are another solution to secure backup power during outages. In recent years, with a spate of natural disasters such as typhoons, torrential rains, and earthquakes, EV manufacturers have faced many requests to assist with their vehicles, including from municipal local governments.
Towards that goal, in 2020, Nissan unveiled a 100% electric emergency response car concept, designed to provide a mobile power supply following natural disasters or extreme weather conditions.
The RE-LEAF prototype is based on the Nissan LEAF passenger car. Alongside modifications to navigate roads covered in debris, the car features weatherproof plug sockets mounted directly to the exterior of the vehicle, which enable 110- to 230-volt devices to be powered from the car’s high-capacity lithium-ion battery.

In 2019, Sapporo agreed with Nissan Motor to supply electricity from EVs at evacuation centers and other facilities in case of a disaster. Nissan LEAF – the world’s first mass-produced EV – can be lent to evacuation centers for use as emergency power in the event of a major outage.
Sapporo also agreed with other car manufacturers to enable households using vehicle-to-home technology to use power from EVs even during blackouts.
During a power outage, the car can power:
Cogeneration among the options
In Tokyo, the metropolitan government has decided to diversify power supplies through a wider outreach to include independent and decentralized energy sources, such as high-efficiency cogeneration systems.
The Tokyo Metropolitan Government (TMG) is also installing solar power systems for medical institutions and emergency evacuations facilities in Tokyo. This effort was included in the revised 2023 plan for disaster response in Tokyo in 2023.
Tokyo’s efforts to expand renewable energy usage is influencing its wider activities. For example, the TMG is providing a range of subsidies for welfare organizations to build or refurbish their facilities and equipment to accommodate renewable energy sources for help in times of disasters. The authorities are offering up to ¥4 million for introducing portable storage batteries and up to ¥13 million for vehicle-to-home appliances that are used in connection with EVs.
Despite efforts to expand the use of renewables, the amount of electricity generated from green sources in Tokyo in FY2022 was estimated at about 166 TWh, while the amount consumed was estimated at 758 TWh; meaning that renewables provided roughly 22% of the capital’s power.
To expand this further, municipalities will need to be more creative not only in supplying the funds but also in infrastructure planning. Backup fossil fuel generation systems have been in place for decades and have evolved to have clear standards, processes, storage and transport infrastructure for moving fuel. Now the same will need to be put into place to accommodate EVs, grid batteries, and other clean energy sources.
For the moment, too much of the momentum for shifting emergency power sources from oil-based diesel generators is in the hands of the national and prefectural governments. Both set policy and distribute budgets but they’re usually not in charge of installing energy facilities.
And yet, giving more emphasis to the decarbonization of emergency power sources in the next iteration of the Basic Energy Plan should be able to motivate more municipalities to be active in this space.
BY JOHN VAROLI
This weekly column focuses on energy events in Asia and the Pacific
Australia / Solar power
Environmental approval was granted for a $19 billion solar power project to export electricity to Singapore. The Australia-Asia Power Link is planned to generate 6 GW of renewable energy, one-third of which would be sent to Singapore via an undersea cable.
Australia / Wind power
Collgar Renewables, which operates the largest wind farm in Western Australia, said it plans to boost its portfolio by building five new wind projects across the state, with a total capacity of 1.7 GW.
China / Coal power
China, the world’s largest builder of coal-fired power stations, cut the number of permits for new plants by nearly 80% in the first half of 2024, said Greenpeace East Asia.
China / Nuclear power
Nuclear power accounts for under 2% of China’s total installed energy capacity but has increased at 5% per year since 2018 compared with a total national capacity growth of 9% per year. China plans a major nuclear reactor expansion that should boost capacity and generation significantly in the next decade.
India / Natural gas
India is unlikely to meet its goal of increasing the share of natural gas in the national energy mix to 15% by 2030, said Spencer Dale, BP’s chief economist, adding that the country will reach only about 8%.
India / Nuclear power
Nuclear Power Corp of India said that Unit 4 of the Kakrapar NPP achieved full operation at 700 MW, becoming the country’s second domestically built nuclear reactor to reach full capacity.
Indonesia / Energy minister
Outgoing president Joko Widodo reshuffled the cabinet and replaced the country’s energy minister, just weeks before leaving office. Bahlil Lahadalia will replace Arifin Tasrif as the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources.
Marine bunkering
Global maritime trade is set to grow 40% by mid-century, while total global marine fuel sales are expected to grow 2% between now and 2030. Marine bunkering in Asia Pacific is set to grow 3 percentage points between now and 2030, increasing its global market share to 51%. However, that market’s volume might begin shrinking in the early 2030s due to increased fuel efficiency.
Offshore wind power
Global offshore wind installations grew 7% in 2023 and is expected to expand, surpassing 520 GW by 2040, (excluding China), according to Rystad Energy. Europe will drive most growth since it will heavily depend on floating wind to meet national targets. The continent is expected to account for more than 70% of global floating wind installations by 2040.
Southeast Asia / solar power
Southeast Asia’s solar industry boom could be threatened by looming U.S. tariff hikes of up to 50% as the U.S. and EU attempt to check China. Four countries are targeted: Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam and Cambodia. They account for over 40% of solar module production outside China, though many Chinese firms are setting up shop in the region.
A selection of domestic and international events we believe will have an impact on Japanese energy
|
January |
|
|
February |
|
|
March |
|
|
April |
|
|
May |
|
|
June |
|
|
July |
|
|
August |
|
|
September |
|
|
October |
|
|
November |
|
|
December |
|
Disclaimer
This communication has been prepared for information purposes only, is confidential and may be legally privileged. This is a subscription-only service and is directed at those who have expressly asked K.K. Yuri Group or one of its representatives to be added to the mailing list. This document may not be onwardly circulated or reproduced without prior written consent from Yuri Group, which retains all copyright to the content of this report.
Yuri Group is not registered as an investment advisor in any jurisdiction. Our research and all the content express our opinions, which are generally based on available public information, field studies and own analysis. Content is limited to general comment upon general political, economic and market issues, asset classes and types of investments. The report and all of its content does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell, subscribe for or underwrite any product or physical commodity, or a financial instrument.
The information contained in this report is obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith. No representation or warranty is made that it is accurate or complete. Opinions and views expressed are subject to change without notice, as are prices and availability, which are indicative only. There is no obligation to notify recipients of any changes to this data or to do so in the future. No responsibility is accepted for the use of or reliance on the information provided. In no circumstances will Yuri Group be liable for any indirect or direct loss, or consequential loss or damages arising from the use of, any inability to use, or any inaccuracy in the information.
K.K. Yuri Group: Hulic Ochanomizu Bldg. 3F, 2-3-11, Surugadai, Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 101-0062.
NEWS
・Japan’s next Basic Energy Plan likely to indicate strong electricity demand growth
・Hydrogen subsidy program may start accepting applications in late Sept, industry insiders say
・Hitachi Energy launches world’s first high-voltage switchgear to phase out toxic SF6 emissions