
ANALYSIS
THE NEW HEADWINDS FACING JAPAN’S BIOMASS INDUSTRY
ENERGY JOBS IN JAPAN: OFFSHORE WIND SETBACK, DISASTER OR A SPEED BUMP?
ASIA PACIFIC REVIEW
This column provides a brief overview of the region’s main energy events from the past week
NEWS
WIND POWER AND OTHER RENEWABLES
CARBON CAPTURE & SYNTHETIC FUELS
EVENTS
Sept 9-12 Gastech 2025, Milan
Sept 15-19 IAEA General Conference 2025
Sept 16-18 APAC Wind Energy Summit @ Melbourne, Australia
Sept 17-19 Smart Energy Week Autumn 2025 / EV-HV-FCV Expo / Green Factory Expo / H2 & FC Expo / PV Expo / Battery Japan / Smart Grid Expo / Wind Expo / CCUS Expo / Decarbonization Expo / Circular Economy Expo @ Makuhari Messe
Oct 8-9 Innovation for Cool Earth Forum @ Westin Hotel Tokyo IEA World Energy Outlook 2025 Release
PUBLISHER
K. K. Yuri Group
Editorial Team
Yuriy Humber (Chief Editor)
John Varoli (Senior Editor, Americas)
Kyoko Fukuda (Data, Events)
Magdalena Osumi (Renewables & Storage)
Filippo Pedretti (Thermal, CCS, Nuclear)
Tetsuji Tomita (Power Market, Hydrogen)
George Hoffman (Sales, Business Development)
Tim Young (Design)
SUBSCRIPTIONS & ADVERTISING
Japan NRG offers individual, corporate and academic subscription plans. Basic details are our website or write to subscriptions@japan-nrg.com
For marketing, advertising, or collaboration opportunities, contact sales@japan-nrg.com For all other inquiries, write to info@japan-nrg.com
METI drafts steel industry benchmarking framework
(Government statement, September 1)
METI agrees with India to focus energy collaboration on hydrogen, renewables
(Government statement, August 29)
TAKEAWAY: India’s energy boom is important for Japan, which sees India as a major partner for energy security and economic opportunities. Japanese investment over the next decade is targeting India’s green energy, AI, and critical minerals sectors. Collaborations like green hydrogen exports and solar projects help Japan decarbonize while reducing reliance on other regions.
TAKEAWAY: Japan aims to create enough JCM credits to cover 100 million tons of CO2 equivalent by 2030, and a similar amount over the following decade. That’s a tall order, given that the JCM mechanism has been around since 2013 but it had only sponsored projects that would displace 20 million tons of CO2 equivalent as of late in 2024. India’s ambitious solar and green ammonia expansion plans potentially give the Japanese a bigger market to strive toward, broadening compliance options and creating new offtake and investment channels.
Hitachi to invest over $1 billion in T&D equipment manufacturing in the U.S.
(Company statement, September 5)
TAKEAWAY: Large power transformers, essential for high-voltage transmission and supporting applications like AI data centers and power generation, are in short supply. Lead times take up to three years due to increased global demand and supply chain complications. Hitachi’s expansion reduces reliance on foreign supply chains and improves grid reliability. Backed by the Trump admin’s pro-energy policies, this investment is framed as a step toward “energy dominance” and winning the “AI race.”
OCCTO finalizes guidelines and terms for 3rd LTDA
(Agency statements, September 1 and 3)
TAKEAWAY: The rules for the third LTDA in FY2025 are finally decided. Many changes have been made to application rules to promote clean capacity investment and enhance revenue predictability. Updates include raising the bid price ceiling, introducing an automatic adjustment system, expanding the scope of eligible power generation technologies, and establishing conditions for bidding.
JEPX releases the first FY2025 results of the baseload market
(Organization statement, August 29)
Year / Round | Contract Date | Base Price Area | Contract Price [¥/kWh] | Contract Volume [MW] | |
FY2024 | 1st | Aug 30, 2024 | Hokkaido | 15.60 | 41.0 |
Tokyo | 12.97 | 14.8 | |||
Kansai | 13.41 | 0.3 | |||
2nd | Oct 18, 2024 | Hokkaido | 15.65 | 1.4 | |
Tokyo | 13.31 | 10.7 | |||
Kansai | – | – | |||
3rd | Nov 27, 2024 | Hokkaido | 16.05 | 80.0 | |
Tokyo | 13.36 | 110.3 | |||
Kansai | 13.53 | 9.8 | |||
4th | Jan 31, 2025 | Hokkaido | 15.27 | 3.1 | |
Tokyo | 12.58 | 7.0 | |||
Kansai | – | – | |||
FY2025 | 1st | Aug 29, 2025 | Hokkaido | 13.3 | 10.0 |
Tokyo | 11.75 | 38.6 | |||
Kansai | 11.00 | 4.6 | |||
Source: JEPX
The first non-fossil value trading held in FY2025
(Organization statement, August 29)
Market Classification | Certificate | Trading Year / Round | Contract Date | Contract Volume [GWh] | Contract Price (max/min) [¥/kWh] | |
Renewable Energy Value Trading Market | FIT | FY2024 | 1st | Aug 30, 2024 | 14,379 | 0.40 (0.61/0.40) |
2nd | Oct 29, 2024 | 11,648 | 0.40 (0.60/0.40) | |||
3rd | Feb 28, 2025 | 15,343 | 0.40 (1.00/0.40) | |||
4th | May 23, 2025 | 19,068 | 0.67 (4.00/0.40) | |||
FY2025 | 1st | Aug 29, 2025 | 209,77 | 0.40 (4.00/0.40) | ||
Market for Compliance with the Act on Sophisticated Energy Supply Structure | Non-FIT: Renewable Energy Designation | FY2024 | 1st | Aug 29, 2024 | 1,732 | 0.60 |
2nd | Oct 28, 2024 | 1,166 | 0.60 | |||
3rd | Feb 27, 2025 | 81 | 1.30 | |||
4th | May 22, 2025 | 395 | 1.30 | |||
FY2025 | 1st | Aug 28, 2025 | 358 | 0.91 | ||
Non-FIT: No Renewable Energy Designation | FY2024 | 1st | Aug 28, 2024 | 262 | 0.60 | |
2nd | Oct 27, 2024 | 135 | 0.60 | |||
3rd | Feb 26, 2025 | 66 | 1.30 | |||
4th | May 21, 2025 | 258 | 1.30 | |||
FY2025 | 1st | Aug 27, 2025 | 431 | 0.72 | ||
Source: JEPX
TEPCO PG directs power generators to supply reserve capacity
(Denki Shimbun, September 2, 3, 4)
EGC approves TEPCO PG contract for securing pumped storage
(Government statement, August 29)
TAKEAWAY: With these contracts, the volume of the balancing market can be secured in advance, reducing the amount offered in the market and streamlining the contracting process. In addition, by reducing the need for additional parallel operation of pumped storage and thermal power, the overall balance of the power system can be made more efficient. That said, contracting a portion of the market at below revenue cap is a worrying signal for BESS operators, limiting the volumes of power that can be traded.
Chubu Electric PG launches transmission equipment inspection consultancy
(Company statement, September 1)
JSE and JFE Engineering sign FEED contract for H2 pipeline on Kawasaki coast
(Company statement, September 2)
TAKEAWAY: In early August, KHI began building a large liquefied hydrogen storage tank for Kawasaki LH2 Terminal, and work is progressing as scheduled. Also, JSE carried out a third-party allocation for liquefied hydrogen supply chain at the end of August. These investments should facilitate establishing a full-scale hydrogen supply chain after completion of the demo project.
JAL Group begins trial of first hydrogen-powered aircraft towing vehicle
(Company statement, August 29)
J-POWER to build one of U.S.’s largest solar plants
(Company statement, September 2)
TAKEAWAY: Texas is a leading solar market in the U.S., with over 37 GW of such installed capacity as of mid-2025, driven by abundant irradiation and a rapidly growing economy. The project’s location, equidistant from Houston and San Antonio, both high-energy-demand cities, is seen as a guarantee of commercial viability.


Merchant Bankers and Taiwanese firm to build 200 MW BESS in Japan
(Company statement, September 1)
Taiheiyo Cement inks 20-yr solar PPA with Kyuden Mirai Energy
(Nikkei, Company statement, September 5)
TAKEAWAY: This project is significant because it shows how Japan’s heavy industry is beginning to decarbonize through long-term PPAs, while also repurposing idle industrial land for renewable generation. By partnering directly with Kyushu Electric’s subsidiary, Taiheiyo Cement not only secures stable green power but also sets an example of how energy-intensive sectors can leverage existing assets to meet sustainability goals.
Ryohin Keikaku and JERA set up renewable power producer
(Company statement, September 1)
Hyogo Pref urges NTT Anode Energy to improve safety for solar farm
(Company statement, August 29)
NTT Anode Energy starts building grid-scale BESS in Tomakomai
(Company statement, September 1)
Eurus Energy begins building grid-scale BESS in Hokkaido
(Company statements, September 1 and 5)
Kyudenko and Shirokuma Electric launch BESS in Gunma and Tochigi
(Company statement, September 1)
TAKEAWAY: The projects highlight a growing wave of small-scale, high-voltage storage developments in Japan, a trend expected to continue in the coming years as part of govt efforts to bring greater grid stability and resilience to the national power system.
Lester enters grid battery market
(Company statement, August 29)
Akita offshore wind sites to be re-auctioned by year-end
(Denki Shimbun, September 5)
TAKEAWAY: It is not immediately clear if the “year-end” promise relates to the calendar or the fiscal year. The latter ends in March 2026. Either way, the decision to re-auction the Akita sites quickly underscores METI’s urgency to keep Japan’s offshore wind program on track after Mitsubishi Corp’s exit. With local govts and residents demanding clearer benefit-sharing and coexistence measures (such as, how much the local fisheries will be compensated), the new framework makes community engagement as critical to success as financial and technical capacity.
METI to extend renewables tax breaks, expand support for wind power
(Japan NRG, September 5)
TAKEAWAY: By easing upfront tax burdens, the measure frees up capital for reinvestment, signaling that Japan intends to keep backing large, capital-intensive renewable projects, especially in offshore wind. The measures are also tied to more explicit engagement with local communities and their acceptance. METI wants to show communities in Akita and elsewhere that feel let down by Mitsubishin’s exit from their wind projects, that the changes energy officials are making will benefit not only businesses but also the projects’ host communities.
Toda succeeds in test of one-step floating wind turbine installation tech
(Company statement, August 29)

Metal One invests in Global Energy Harvest to boost wave power tech
(Company statement, September 2)
Decision on Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPP’s future to come after Nov
(NHK and other media, September 3-4)
Kyushu Electric invests ¥13.7 billion to renovate Genkai NPP
(Nikkei, September 3)
MHI to increase workforce, prepares to develop next-gen reactors
(Nikkei, August 31)
TAKEAWAY: In addition to environmental consequences, one of the unforeseen impacts of the Fukushima disaster in March 2011 was a major disruption in the nuclear industry workforce. As NPPs sat idle, qualified workers abandoned the sector for other opportunities and student numbers on nuclear engineering courses dropped. Today, securing the workforce and ensuring technology continuity is a major problem. Mitsubishi’s decision to hire more than 200 people comes at a crucial juncture.
Onagawa NPP Unit 2 restarts after hydrogen detector replacement
(Company statement, August 30)
Chugoku Electric chief comments on planned interim storage
(Nikkei, September 1)
TAKEAWAY: Chugoku Electric, which wishes to build a new NPP in the area, says building the interim facility is feasible. If realized, it would be Japan’s second such facility. The other, by Recyclable-Fuel Storage Co, is in Mutsu, Aomori Pref. The Kaminoseki site would store spent fuel in metal casks before shipment to Rokkasho in Aomori Pref where it will be recycled into MOX fuel. While construction on the Rokkasho plant has faced repeated delays over 30 years, becoming an endless saga if not a symbol for the industry’s struggles, completion is now set for FY2026.
Japan explores Alaskan LNG purchases as part of $7 bln energy deal
(Reuters, September 5)
TAKEAWAY: It is difficult to analyse what is happening around the Alaska LNG at this moment since nearly all the announcements concerning “deals” are coming from politicians, rather than the companies that would be involved. Arguably, for the govt officials on both sides the headlines are more important than the deals themselves. We remain skeptical that a binding agreement is close without a number of other parts of the puzzle slotting into place. The project was dissected in detail in our Aug 25, 2025 issue.
Asahi Kasei seeks license for both high purity and recovery rate with biogas purification
(Nikkei, September 1)
LNG stocks down from previous week, up YoY
(Government data, Sept 3)
Cosmo Oil and Alaska Airlines ink SAF deal
(Company statement, August 29)
ANALYSIS
BY ANDREW SMALL
The New Headwinds Facing Japan’s Biomass Industry
The biomass sector in Japan has had a whirlwind of a year. On the one hand, several large biomass projects came online, such as Osaka Gas’s Sodegaura plant and Renova’s Omaezaki plant, adding 150 MW of total capacity.
On the other hand, these are most likely the last new large-scale plants to open for the rest of the decade. Multiple major players have already frozen further development of biomass projects in Japan this year. Also, changes in government policy are likely to reshape the availability and profitability of woody biomass fuels, limiting interest in new capacity.
Japan relies heavily on imported biomass – mainly wood pellets from North America and palm kernel shells from Southeast Asia – because the domestic supply of forestry residues and agricultural waste is too limited and costly to meet the needs of its substantial biomass power sector.
Still, as stated in the 7th Basic Energy Plan released earlier this year, current national targets aim for a 5-6% share of biomass in the national energy mix by 2040. With this goal and many recent changes in mind, what prospects might the biomass sector see in the coming years?
Declining profitability
Several developments in recent years have had a negative impact on the economic viability of Japan’s imported biomass fuels. Among these, the most important has been a rise in fuel costs and regulatory shifts in state subsidies.
First, with the yen’s depreciation and rising inflation, the cost of imported biomass fuels has increased noticeably. Between 2020 and 2023, the import costs for wood pellets increased by over 66% and PKS by over 63%. On top of this, earlier this year in a watershed decision, METI said it would no longer subsidize the use of wood as a feedstock for power generation projects larger than 10 MW. This includes the most commonly used wood pellets and palm kernel shells (PKS) fuels.
Starting FY2026, new projects that use such fuels will be excluded from the FIT and FIP schemes. Given that wood pellets and PKS are the most important fuels now used in large-scale plants in Japan, the shift will drastically impact the type of biomass projects likely to be profitable, as well as which ones attract further investment.
The fuel subsidy changes have been building for a while. In early 2024, METI said that rice husks and straw, as well as wheat straw, would not be recognized as biomass fuel and won’t be subsidized through the FIT and FIP. The decision was made due to the use of these natural materials for both food and energy, and the national goals of improving Japan’s self-sufficiency in both. Rice products being used for energy could add further pressure to prices for the food staples that are also a sensitive election issue.
The two policy shifts in tandem narrowed the type of biomass fuel projects that current and future projects could depend on. This reduced the incentives for firms to make capital-heavy investments in biomass plants, the profitability of which is already heavily dependent on fuel prices.
Normally, such a downturn in sector economics would worry energy officials. But in this case, there is no strong concern. That’s because, according to METI, the government’s 2030 goal for 8 GW of biomass introduction has already been exceeded with the current 8.1 GW installed. This allows energy planners to put support for large-scale biomass projects on ice until at least the end of the decade, and allocate budgets elsewhere.
Halting new investments
Over the last year, several major players have reacted to changing industry headwinds.
Renova, which started operation of its wood-fired Omaezaki plant earlier this year, has halted all new projects involving wood biomass until 2030. The decision was made primarily in response to the increase in fuel prices and the change to the government subsidy system. JAPEX, which operates four biomass plants, also announced shelving all plans to develop new plants, citing issues with profitability.
Erex, which operates mutliple biomass plants in Japan totalling just under 400 MW of capacity, said it would shift its growth strategy to focus on biomass in Cambodia and Vietnam. The firm operates with a 1.1 GW biomass portfolio already in Vietnam, the move locates erex’s biomass investments to the same region where a significant amount of biomass fuel is produced, which reduces its price variability.
Stable profitability has become increasingly difficult for both existing and new projects. Wood biomass power projects with than 10 MW of capacity will remain eligible for FIT and FIP subsidies, but such small projects are of little interest to the main industry players, which include Osaka Gas and Nippon Paper Industries.
Other Japanese firms involved in biomass are actually running coal-fired power plants that are configured to utilize woody biomass as a secondary fuel. For example, JERA converted the 1.07 GW Taketoyo Thermal Power Station in Aichi Pref. to co-fire biomass in 2022 at a rate of up to 17% (in terms of calorific value) as a means of reducing the CO2 footprint of the facility. But co-firing plants can run entirely on their primary fuel if necessary.
Uphill battle for imported biomass
Earlier this summer METI indicated it would continue to support projects with FIT and FIP certification even after those contracts come to an end, primarily to ensure that operators do not switch back to fossil fuel power after the end of their contracts.
METI is also attempting to develop a stable domestic supply chain for woody biomass fuel in 20 regions across Japan’s varied climates, aiming to convert wood-related waste into fuel. Even with such efforts, however, it is unlikely that a future domestic supply chain could support many more large-scale woody biomass projects.
In 2023, Japan imported over 5.8 million tons of wood pellets, and domestically produced just under 159,000 tons – a massive gap between domestic production capacity and national energy needs. If METI’s measures prove effective, they could provide a small, though more reliable fuel resource that complements imports for already completed biomass facilities.
New large-scale biomass projects that rely on imported materials, however, face significant hurdles and are now likely to be frozen.
Conclusion
The bleak outlook for large-scale biomass plans does not mean that Japan will not add any new biomass capacity this decade. Given continued support through FIT and FIP and a domestic supply chain, smaller-scale projects can still move forward. Fuels like methane fermentation biogas, municipal waste, construction waste, and unused materials are still eligible for FIT and FIP certification. These are not, however, available in large quantities.
In terms of Japan’s clean energy targets, the funk in the biomass sector is not likely to cause a lot of consternation. Current 2040 energy goals suggest that the government will prioritize other low-emissions power generation and is content to see the biomass sector shift to developing local and small-scale projects that tap into the biofuel resources already in place. These new projects will better fit with a ‘local production for local consumption’ approach that Japan has promoted for a while.
For the bigger utility players, however, the only option to pursue biomass at scale today is to consider carbon capture technology add-ons that could potentially generate carbon credits and therefore add a new revenue stream. How well the economics would work will become more clear next year with the launch of mandatory carbon credits trading in Tokyo.
Energy Type | Category | FIT/FIP Price (JPY/kWh) | Remarks | ||
FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2027 | |||
Biomass | Wood – Less than 2 MW | 24.0 | 24.0 | FIT/FIP same | |
Wood – 2 MW to less than 10 MW (wood) | 24.0 | 24.0 | FIP only | ||
Wood – 10 MW or more / Liquid | Bidding | Support will end from 2026 | |||
Unused material – Less than 2 MW | 40.0 | 40.0 | FIT/FIP same | ||
Unused material – 2 MW or more | 32.0 | 32.0 | FIP only | ||
Construction waste | 13.0 | 13.0 | FIT/FIP same | ||
Municipal waste | 17.0 | 17.0 | FIT/FIP same | ||
Methane fermentation biogas | 35.0 | 35.0 | FIT/FIP same | ||
Biomass FIT/FIP Pricing
ANALYSIS
BY ANDREW STATTER
Energy Jobs in Japan: Offshore wind setback, disaster or a speedbump?
In last week’s Analysis section, Japan NRG dug into the reasons behind Mitsubishi Corporation and their partner’s decision to renege on their commitments to deliver 1.75 GW of offshore wind power across the three projects they won in Round 1 auctions in December 2021.
What impact does this have on the workforce for offshore wind? This is a major industry, with METI targets of 30 to 45 GW of projects to be installed by 2050. With a 60% requirement of domestic content in the supply chain, this industry would create thousands of jobs in manufacturing, engineering, installation, operations and maintenance domestically. As seen with the initial flurry of market entries and investment into the sector, we also expected strong opportunities for experienced global professionals from developers and engineering firms to collaborate with Japanese firms to accelerate the successful rollout of quality projects.
Since the controversial 2021 wins, many foreign firms have exited the Japan market, while domestic firms have scaled back development and bid activity; the workforce has remained stagnant in some firms and shrunk in others. From Titan’s observations, after a developer has left the market, about half of their team moves to competitors to continue pursuing offshore wind; but the other half move to new, growth sectors within the energy industry.
Will the news of Mitsubishi’s exit be a hammer blow to the thousands of jobs expected to be created by offshore wind, or is this merely a speedbump on the way to inevitable growth?
Boom and slowdown, the damage was done in 2021, not 2025.
Naturally, the headlines now are about the exit of Mitsubishi and other partners, including Chubu Electric, as well as key suppliers GE Vernova and Kajima Corporation. At this point in time, with rising supply chain costs, the weakening yen and other economic factors, (Mitsubishi Corporation CEO Nakanishi and his management team had only one choice. Bound by responsibility to protect their business and shareholders, they had to pull the plug.
The brashness (and maybe a touch of arrogance?) of the 2021 bids is where the damage was done. Bidding at a rate far below all competitors and below the forecasts of all market experts caused massive ripple effects across the industry which was set to grow up until that point. It has several immediate consequences:
On the frontlines of supporting the development of the workforce in a nascent industry, the effect was clear to our team at Titan. In 2020 and 2021, offshore wind made up approximately 60% of our energy team revenue; this dropped to below 20% in 2022 and 2023.
METI’s reaction: make or break
As with Mitsubishi, we can point the finger at METI’s action, or lack of action back in 2021. Initially, policy was too heavily weighted toward price with inadequate regulation around a bidder’s ability to deliver the projects. When the inevitable industry backlash followed the 2021 auction results unveiling, officials were slow to respond and indecisive.
Now, it is time for officials at METI (and other ministries) to step forward and rebuild trust with not only the investors but also the domestic supply chain and the very professionals who decided to make a career out of wind energy. The initial signals are positive: barely a day after news of Mitsubishi’s decision was made official, public statements from METI Minister Muto and the ministry’s Head of Wind Development Fukuoka promised a re-auction of the Round 1 sites, a revision to auction rules and an ongoing commitment to growing the sector.
Both investors in offshore wind projects and Japanese professionals share one thing in common: a long-term mindset and aversion to risk / volatility. To convince companies to invest and hire again, as well as professionals to transition their careers into offshore wind, METI needs not only to address the Round 1 projects, but ensure that Round 2 and 3 winners are given enough support to deliver their projects successfully. Beyond this, a much clearer pathway toward the 30-45 GW 2050 target, inclusive of support for development of the EEZ, is necessary.
Silver lining?
Failure is only permanent if we fail to learn from mistakes. If METI is able to support winners of other projects, find new investors for Round 1 projects (which are generally considered to be attractive sites) and chart a sustainable path forward – we may be in the situation where the offshore wind sector experiences a rebirth. It would lead to jobs created not only in Tokyo, but in the regions hosting projects.
Assuming the six projects from Rounds 2 and 3 move ahead, and new, responsible stewards are found for the three projects that Mitsubishi gave up – the sector will finally need to transition to the construction phase. This will create dozens of jobs on the developer side, complemented by hundreds of jobs in the supply chain, installation, operations and maintenance.
Once the market is again seen as stable, and with long-term growth opportunities, both foreign and domestic players will likely flock back, which should lead to a healthier competitive market landscape and more labor demand.
The big hope is that METI will now look more to companies that have experience not only in investing, but also in developing, delivering and operating complex offshore wind and related infrastructure projects. This would bode well for experienced global players. It would also help Japanese players with excellence in engineering, while retaining a role for major trading houses to deliver on finances and the management of stakeholders in the political arena.
Increased diversity and capability of consortiums bidding for and winning projects will create more opportunities for both Japanese professionals to move into offshore wind and for experienced foreign talent to bring their skills to this market. With the U.S. offshore wind industry in dire straits and the Taiwan market winding down, this could be the ideal time for Japan to leverage top-tier global expertise and talent, which will then lead to reskilling of the domestic workforce.
Move, hold or run?
For professionals in the offshore wind industry or those considering the space, what to think about your future career prospects? Is it time to panic and exit, or will patience be rewarded?
My opinion right now is that the future depends on METI’s actions and industry reception. It is too early to run.
Delayed reactions to today’s decisions, we can learn from the past.
Four years had to pass in order for the full impact of Mitsubishi and partners’ over-confident and naive decisions to become manifest. Over that time, we’ve seen a steady decline in the industry: market exits, investor hesitation, a stalling of supply chain development, etc. All these were signs that pointed to what is now labeled the “Mitsubishi shock”.
Conversely, decisions made today will not turn things around tomorrow. But if we see a steady progression of small wins – policy changes, new agreements, new commitments, MoUs, or new market entrants, then it will build a runway to sector revitalization. The litmus test will likely be investor appetite for Round 4 (and the re-tendered Round 1).
In close proximity, Mitsubishi’s announcement looks like an insurmountable barrier to offshore wind in Japan. Zoom out, and it may look like merely a speedbump.
Andrew Statter is a Partner at Titan GreenTech, an executive recruitment agency focused on the clean energy space.
BY JOHN VAROLI
A brief overview of the region’s main energy events from the past week
Australia / Grid infrastructure
Clean Energy Finance Corp said it will make its largest-ever investment, with AU$3.8 billion to support the Marinus Link interconnector connecting the states of Tasmania and Victoria.
Australia / Wind power
ACEN Australia’s 900 MW Robbins Island wind project secured government approval. The AUD3 billion project will power up to 500,000 homes.
China / Natural gas
President Xi agreed with President Putin on construction of the Power of Siberia 2 pipeline, which if built in the early 2030s would more than double Chinese purchases of Russian gas to 100 bcm/ year. Power of Siberia 1 launched in 2019.
China / Oil
Russia’s largest oil producer Rosneft secured an additional deal on supply of 2.5 MMT of oil per year to China via Kazakhstan, said the Energy Ministry in Moscow.
China / Solar
Kazakhstan and China Energy Engineering Group (Energy China) have signed an investment agreement on constructing a 300 MW solar power plant in the Turkistan region, the Kazakh Energy Ministry’s press service said.
India / Russian relations
PM Modi praised his country’s growing energy ties with Russia at a meeting with President Putin, defying punitive tariffs levied on New Delhi by Trump over purchases of Russian oil.
Indonesia / Energy investment
Indonesia’s energy and mineral sector attracted $32.3 billion in investments in 2024 alone, with oil and gas claiming $17.5 billion and minerals/coal securing $7.7 billion.
Laos / Wind power
The 600 MW onshore wind farm in Laos achieves commercial operation four months early, injecting power into Vietnam via a 500 kV interconnection and consolidating an international financing package of $950 million.
Singapore / Nuclear power
The Energy Market Authority will conduct a study to evaluate the safety performance and technical feasibility of advanced nuclear energy technologies, such as SMRs. No final decision to deploy nuclear power has been made.
Vietnam / Wind power
Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners, through its Growth Market Fund II, and Petrovietnam agreed to develop an offshore wind project in Vietnam’s south-central region.
Disclaimer
This communication has been prepared for information purposes only, is confidential and may be legally privileged. This is a subscription-only service and is directed at those who have expressly asked K.K. Yuri Group or one of its representatives to be added to the mailing list. This document may not be onwardly circulated or reproduced without prior written consent from Yuri Group, which retains all copyright to the content of this report.
Yuri Group is not registered as an investment advisor in any jurisdiction. Our research and all the content express our opinions, which are generally based on available public information, field studies and own analysis. Content is limited to general comment upon general political, economic and market issues, asset classes and types of investments. The report and all of its content does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell, subscribe for or underwrite any product or physical commodity, or a financial instrument.
The information contained in this report is obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith. No representation or warranty is made that it is accurate or complete. Opinions and views expressed are subject to change without notice, as are prices and availability, which are indicative only. There is no obligation to notify recipients of any changes to this data or to do so in the future. No responsibility is accepted for the use of or reliance on the information provided. In no circumstances will Yuri Group be liable for any indirect or direct loss, or consequential loss or damages arising from the use of, any inability to use, or any inaccuracy in the information.
K.K. Yuri Group: Hulic Ochanomizu Bldg. 3F, 2-3-11, Surugadai, Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 101-0062.
NEWS:
・METI drafts steel and cement industry CO2 measuring benchmarks
・Hitachi to invest over $1 billion in T&D equipment manufacturing in the U.S.
・METI agrees with India to focus cooperation on hydrogen, renewables, and carbon