
ANALYSIS
GREEN H2 PRODUCTION: WATER ELECTROLYSIS TECHNOLOGY TRENDS AND OUTLOOK
ENERGY JOBS IN JAPAN: FEATURES OF TOP LEADERSHIP TALENT FOR THE TRANSITION
ASIA PACIFIC REVIEW
This column provides a brief overview of the region’s main energy events from the past week
NEWS
WIND POWER AND OTHER RENEWABLES
CARBON CAPTURE & SYNTHETIC FUELS
EVENTS
Oct 8-9 Innovation for Cool Earth Forum @ Westin Hotel Tokyo IEA World Energy Outlook 2025 Release
Oct 15-16 Japan CCUS Summit
Oct 15-16 Connecting Green Hydrogen Japan
Oct 15-17 Global Offshore Wind Summit – Japan @ Akita Prefecture
Nov 10-21 COP30 @ Belem, Brazil
PUBLISHER
K. K. Yuri Group
Editorial Team
Yuriy Humber (Chief Editor)
John Varoli (Senior Editor, Americas)
Kyoko Fukuda (Data, Events)
Magdalena Osumi (Renewables & Storage)
Filippo Pedretti (Thermal, CCS, Nuclear)
Tetsuji Tomita (Power Market, Hydrogen)
Aglaé Bange (Renewables and Biomass)
George Hoffman (Sales, Business Development)
Tim Young (Design)
SUBSCRIPTIONS & ADVERTISING
Japan NRG offers individual, corporate and academic subscription plans. Basic details are our website or write to subscriptions@japan-nrg.com
For marketing, advertising, or collaboration opportunities, contact sales@japan-nrg.com For all other inquiries, write to info@japan-nrg.com

PV installations drop in 2024, while global growth continues
(Organization statement, September 17)
TAKEAWAY: Japan’s solar power market has slowed for several years now mainly due to a drop in tariffs, a shrinking pool of easily accessible land, and the gradual transition to market-linked mechanisms such as FIP and PPAs. The incoming prime minister, Takaichi, has said that she wants to focus on protecting national security by reducing Japan’s reliance on overseas panels. In effect, this means stifling imports of the Chinese products. The problem is, the perovskite home technology that Takaichi says she wants to promote is not yet at the stage of replacing silicon modules on a multi-MW basis. So, we expect the solar market to continue with the current reliance on Chinese models, but the cost of doing so may well increase, which would have a knockon effect on PPA pricing. Meanwhile, other govt support systems (see news item below) are actually trying to accelerate solar installations.
Subsidies for firms using renewables and nuclear, up to 50% of capital investment
(Nikkei, October 3)
ANRE talks on standards for imported wood for biomass
(Government statement, September 30)
MOL, etc achieve high-precision seabed observation of cold discharge water
(Company statement, September 29)
JERA decommissions four aging thermal power units, total of 3.2 GW capacity
(Company statement, September 30)
TAKEAWAY: Hirono Unit 2, located in Fukushima, was JERA’s last oil-fired plant in the Tokyo area. Other companies are also retiring aging thermal plants to cut maintenance costs. For example, Kansai Electric and J-Power are phasing out oil- and coal-fired units. Oil-fired stations are often used as peaker plants in Japan, helping to manage short periods of high consumption.
OCCTO reports survey results for balancing market regulation changes
(Agency statement, September 26)
Sharp launches AI battery control service aligned with FIT
(Company statement, September 24)
Nissan Motors develops subsidiary to include sales of high voltage electricity
(Company statement, September 25)
TAKEAWAY: Nissan has embedded climate strategy across its entire value chain, from raw material extraction to product disposal. As for renewable energy use, the company is promoting carbon emissions management by installing solar PV at its dealerships in Japan. Nissan is not alone in entering the renewable electricity business; Volkswagen and Tesla both launched similar services in 2025. Beyond meeting climate targets, expanding this business could also serve as a lever to strengthen Nissan’s financial performance.
Marubeni Power Trading to profit on growing electricity demand
(Company statement, October 1)
Hokuriku Electric suspends power station unit due to minor damage
(Company statement, September 29)
First two certified projects for low-carbon hydrogen/ ammonia CfD announced
(Government statement, September 30)
TAKEAWAY: With its large budget, the CfD program attracts attention even from overseas. There has been strong interest in which projects will be approved, and the announcement was long awaited. According to ANRE sources, the detailed business plans described in the applications made the selection very difficult. These first announcements come about six months after the application deadline. It is unclear how many projects will be selected in total, but the program is important for identifying Japan’s main hydrogen and ammonia suppliers and users. The first two selected projects are small-scale, but they are fully domestic; there was always an expectation that METI would green-light at least a few all-domestic projects. Large-scale supply projects will require fuel imports. The timing of the next announcement is unknown. See the Analysis section for a deeper dive into the hydrogen story and its context in Japan.
Isuzu, Toyota to develop next-gen fuel cell buses
(Company statement, September 29)
Shizen Energy signs 20-year long PPA deal with Microsoft
(Company statement, October 3)
MSFL acquires two large-scale BESS from West Holdings
(Company statement, September 30)
TAKEAWAY: More firms operating solar plants are adding BESS to their portfolios as a way to increase profits by adding an option to store the renewables-derived electricity. However, most non-Japanese players tend to see the future of the BESS market in large-scale projects, expecting market saturation for smaller projects in the coming few years.
TAKEAWAY: Most online BESS projects in Japan range between 2 and 8 MW; thus, this one is larger than usual. Storage facilities are essential in the Hibikinada area, which is designated as a ‘promising zone’ for wind power. The area has one offshore wind farm, which began operations in August. While J-Power is mainly active in solar, it’s expanding into battery storage to meet the growing demand for renewables.
Kanematsu acquires stake in solar firm Alam Energy Indonesia
(Company statement, September 25)
JinkoSolar and LONGi reach an agreement on patents
(Company statement, September 19)
TAKEAWAY: JinkoSolar and LONGi have a strong presence in Japan; thus, this agreement has ramifications for the country’s solar market. JinkoSolar holds a 26% share of Japan’s solar market, and LONGi has stable distribution in several prefectures (Fukushima, Yamagata, Aichi, Kumamoto, Fukuoka, and Miyagi).
Kuraray signs deal with Tokyo Gas to procure renewable certificates in the U.S.
(Company statement, October 1)
Sapporo seeks contractors to study solar power on unused municipal land
(Government statement, September 22)
TEPCO and Metropolitan Central agree on solar energy management
(Company statement, September 10)
METI Council explores further initiatives to promote geothermal energy
(Government statement, September 26)
METI and MLIT update zones for offshore wind development
(Government statement, October 3)
Developers want offshore wind to join LTDA’s 20-year fixed revenue
(Reuters, September 29)
Eurus Energy proceeds with EIA for 397 MW offshore wind farm
(Company statement, September 26)
JERA Nex transfers ownership in wind farm project in Hokkaido
(Company statement, October 1)
NYK signs long-term deal to provide CTV for offshore wind operations
(Company statement, Nikkei, September 29)
TDK Ventures and Toyota Ventures invest in North American geothermal
(Company statement, September 17)

Mitsui transfers shares to K&O Energy to expand geothermal business
(Company statement, October 2)
NEF releases auction results for subsidy allocation for hydro power
(Organization statement, September 16)
Survey area | Company | Project name |
Hokkaido | Kit Blue | Kamieuchi Village, Ninomega River – Small Hydroelectric Power Plant Feasibility Assessment Survey Project |
Akita | Akita Pref | Akita Pref Small Hydroelectric Power Plant Introduction Feasibility Study Project |
Shimane | Shimane Pref | Obe Power Plant Renewal Project Feasibility Assessment Survey Project |
Kochi | Kochi Pref | Project to outline possible sites for introducing small hydroelectric power generation in the Monobe River system |
Oita | Oita Pref | Feasibility study for the Yabakei Power Plant renewal project |
Miyazaki | Miyazaki Pref | Feasibility study for the Shimoaka Power Station renewal project |
METI says 55 GW of nuclear power capacity to be replaced by FY2040
(Denki Shimbun, October 2)
TAKEAWAY: As these expert panel discussions show, major nuclear players are advancing diverse SMR and next-gen reactor designs but, the real momentum remains overseas – not in Japan. Despite technical progress, Japan still lacks a clear domestic SMR strategy, which has pushed companies to build credibility and experience overseas before the technology may take root at home. For more information, see Japan NRG’s June 2 analysis section.
Niigata Pref releases public opinion survey for Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPP restart
(Nikkei, October 2)
TAKEAWAY: Any kind of restart of TEPCO’s Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPP remains uncertain despite the various efforts by the utility and the national government. Governor Hanazumi maintains a cautious stance, saying he will make a decision “at an appropriate time.” The ruling party in the regional assembly is pushing for a swift decision, but the governor will likely wait for the survey’s final report after November, buying time. A potential assembly resolution on the restart is a key focal point, likely during the December session. A final decision on the restart within this calendar year looks unlikely.
Kyushu Electric postpones restart date for Genkai NPP Unit 4
(Company statement, September 29)
Zero Watt Power acquires Surukawa Energy Center and its biomass facilities
(Company statement, September 22)
LNG stocks down from previous week, no change YoY
(Government data, October 1)
August Oil/ Gas/ Coal trade statistics
(Government data, September 26)
Imports | Volume | YoY | Value (Yen) | YoY |
Crude oil | 11.2 million kiloliters | -2.5% | 749.2 billion | -21% |
LNG | 5.4 million tons | -6.5% | 453.5 billion | -16.4% |
Thermal coal | 10.5 million tons | 13.7% | 187.7 billion | -13.1% |



Hard-to-abate sectors comment on ETS developments
(Government statement, October 2)
Mazda updates roadmap for carbon neutrality, will use LNG instead of ammonia
(Automotive world, September 30)
TAKEAWAY: Ammonia is seen as a key technology in decarbonization in power generation and transportation. However, with fuel deliveries and pricing uncertain, some manufacturers are turning to the near-term solution of burning natural gas, with the optionality of switching to H2 or ammonia in the future. This news suggests that industrial buyers in Japan are not certain of securing necessary volumes of ammonia by 2030 to switch directly to this fuel and away from coal.
Sumitomo Forestry and NTT Docomo to cooperate on J-Credits
(Nikkei, October 1)
ANALYSIS
BY TETSUJI TOMITA
Green Hydrogen Production: Water Electrolysis Technology Trends and Outlook
Japan has certified its first low-carbon hydrogen supply plan, approving subsidies for a project that will use wind power to produce green hydrogen through electrolysis. Led by Toyo Tsusho, Eurus Energy, Iwatani and Aichi Steel, the venture aims to make 1,600 tons a year from 2030 to help decarbonize specialty steelmaking.
Though small, the fact that the first award from the Contract for Difference (CfD) hydrogen support scheme is for a green fuel project is significant. While it’s almost certain that most of Japan’s hydrogen and ammonia consumption over the coming decade will rely on imports and cheaper blue fuels – derived from natural gas with the emissions captured – policymakers are signalling that green fuels, too, will have a role despite their high costs.
That support also dovetails with Japan’s efforts to develop domestic electrolysis technology. State-backed projects are advancing alkaline, PEM and solid oxide designs, aiming to cut costs and improve durability. The new certifications highlight why such innovation matters: only with cheaper and more efficient electrolyzers can green hydrogen compete with imported blue alternatives.
In contrast to the enthusiasm of policymakers, Japan’s potential hydrogen consumers are cautious about switching to a green fuel. Green hydrogen is often double or more the cost of the blue fuel. Meanwhile, when considered among a broader array of options, hydrogen’s energy losses during conversion weaken competitiveness with direct electrification pathways.
Advocates, however, say that hydrogen – and green hydrogen in particular – will play a major role in the decarbonization of hard-to-abate industries such as cement and steelmaking, as well as a feedstock for ammonia production. And thus the anointment of a domestic green steel project for initial CfD funds holds strategic significance. It is the first time that Tokyo has formally certified supply chains for hydrogen and ammonia.
Japan NRG takes a look at the development of the green hydrogen technologies, comparing advantages and challenges, and highlighting their potential.
The second project selected by METI for CfD funds, also approved on 30 September, aims to produce low-carbon ammonia from waste plastics and textiles. Renac and Japan Catalyst will gasify discarded material at Kawasaki to generate over 20,000 tons of ammonia annually – equivalent to 3,200 tonnes of hydrogen – and feed it into textile and recycling supply chains. This is not strictly speaking a ‘green’ fuel, but it does fit with the circular economy approach. Both the Aichi Steel and the Renac projects will run until 2055.
Electrolysis in green hydrogen
Electrolysis involves splitting water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen using electricity. When powered by renewable energy sources such as wind, solar, or hydropower, the resulting hydrogen can be classified as green. Unlike fossil-based hydrogen production, this process generates no direct CO2 emissions.
Electrolyzers also provide value by offering demand-side flexibility to power systems, absorbing excess renewable generation, and supplying hydrogen for industries that are otherwise difficult to decarbonize, such as steelmaking, refining, fertilizer production, and long-distance transport.
Understanding the strengths and limitations of these various technologies is essential for guiding investment and policy decisions. Scaling up electrolytic hydrogen production faces major challenges. Costs remain high, with electrolyzer systems contributing significantly to overall hydrogen prices. Improvements in efficiency, durability, and the ability to rapidly respond to variable renewable electricity also impact competitiveness.
With a levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) ranging from $3–5/ kg in optimal regions, equivalent to ~$90–150/ MWh, driven by high electrolyzer costs and ~70% electrolysis efficiency, green hydrogen is 1.5–3 times more expensive than unsubsidized renewable electricity.
That LCOH is projected to decline to $2–4/ kg (~$60–120/ MWh) due to cheaper electrolyzers (30–50% cost reductions) and falling renewable costs, particularly in regions with abundant solar or wind resources.
Overseas, some water electrolysis systems operate at a scale of several tens of megawatts, while Japanese projects tend to be no more than 10 MW. This is largely due to Japan’s more expensive renewables electricity. So, it has fallen to NEDO and the Green Innovation Fund to help find a competitive advantage in the electrolyser part of the value chain.
Water electrolysis technology development
The four prevailing green hydrogen electrolysis technologies differ significantly in their design, operating principles, performance characteristics, and commercial readiness. These are electrolysis (AWE), proton exchange membrane electrolysis (PEM), solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOEC), and anion exchange membrane electrolysis (AEM).
Table. Comparison of electrolysis technologies
Feature | AWE | PEM | SOEC | AEM |
Technology maturity | Commercial, decades of deployment | Commercial, scaling rapidly | Demonstration stage, pilots in EU/US | Early-stage, R&D and pilots |
Operating temperature | 60–90°C | 50–80°C | 600–850°C | 40–80°C |
Efficiency (LHV) | 60–70% | 65–75% | 80–90% (with heat integration) | 65–75% (target) |
Dynamic response | Slow | Fast | Moderate | Fast |
Stack lifetime | 60,000–90,000 h | 30,000–60,000 h | 10,000–30,000 h | <10,000 h |
Key materials | Nickel-based | Iridium, platinum | Ceramic oxides, perovskites | Nickel, cobalt, iron |
System cost | Lowest | High | Highest | Potentially low |
Best applications | Large, stable plants | Renewable integration, mobility | Industrial integration, e-fuels | Emerging distributed H₂ |
Major manufacturer | Asahi Kasei, Tokuyama, Thyssenkrupp, etc. | Kanadevia, Toyota Motor, Siemens, etc. | Sumitomo Electric, MHI, Enapter, etc. | MHI, Denso, Sunfire, etc. |
Source: Japan NRG based on METI, NEDO materials
1) AWE is the most established hydrogen production method, using an alkaline solution (KOH or NaOH) with nickel electrodes and a diaphragm. Robust, reliable, and relatively low-cost, it achieves 60–70% efficiency with lifetimes over 60,000 hours, making it suitable for large-scale hydrogen production from stable power sources.
Operating at low current densities, however, slows response which makes AWE tricky to integrate with variable renewable sources; it also requires maintenance due to liquid electrolytes. While still widely used, newer projects often prefer more flexible alternatives.
2) PEM is the second most commercially advanced hydrogen production technology, using a solid polymer membrane instead of a liquid electrolyte, operating at 50–80°C and high current densities for compact, high-output systems. PEMs can ramp up or down in seconds, suitable for intermittent renewable power and grid support.
Efficiency ranges from 65–75%, with stack lifetimes up to 60,000 hours. Challenges include high costs due to scarce materials like platinum and iridium, and the need for ultra-pure water. Advances in materials and scaling are expected to lower costs. PEM technology is deployed worldwide in multi-megawatt plants and hydrogen stations, with further growth anticipated alongside renewable energy expansion.
3) SOEC electrolysis operates differently from low-temperature systems, using a solid ceramic oxide electrolyte that conducts oxygen ions at 600–850°C. Steam is used as the feed, and high thermal energy reduces the electricity needed to split water. This enables SOEC to reach high efficiencies, often above 80% and potentially 90% when paired with industrial or nuclear waste heat.
They can also co-electrolyze steam and CO2 to produce syngas for synthetic fuels, supporting e-fuels for aviation and shipping. However, SOEC is a less mature technology than AWE or PEM. High temperatures stress ceramics, limiting stack lifetimes to 10,000–30,000 hours and reducing flexibility. Manufacturing complexity and high costs hinder large-scale deployment. Despite this, SOECs attract strong interest in Europe, the U.S., and Japan for their efficiency and industrial integration potential.
4) AEM is a newer technology combining the advantages of AWE and PEM. Like PEM, it uses a solid polymer membrane but conducts hydroxide ions (OH–) under alkaline conditions, allowing non-precious metal catalysts like nickel, cobalt, or iron, which can reduce costs. AEM electrolyzers operate at low temperatures with efficiencies of around 65–75%, and support fast response and compact design.
Durability is limited, however, with membranes often lasting under 10,000 hours. Multi-megawatt scaling has also proved tricky so far. If research improves the membrane and stack durability, AEM could become a cost-effective alternative to PEM for distributed or mid-scale applications. Currently, it is a promising technology that needs further refining.
Outlook for technology development
Over the next decade, all four technologies are expected to improve, though at different paces. Alkaline systems will likely retain their role in large-scale, low-cost hydrogen projects, particularly where renewable power is relatively stable. PEM is projected to scale rapidly, benefitting from falling catalyst loadings and economies of scale.
AEM’s trajectory will depend on breakthroughs in membrane durability, with successful developments potentially positioning it as a disruptive competitor. SOEC, meanwhile, is expected to expand in niche applications involving industrial integration, nuclear power, or synthetic fuel production, gradually moving toward larger commercial deployment.
Policy support, research funding, and international collaboration will be decisive in shaping outcomes. Governments in Europe, Asia, and North America are investing in electrolyzer deployment targets, which will help drive down costs across the industry.
Simultaneously, supply chain constraints, particularly around iridium and platinum for PEM systems, could accelerate the push toward AEM and other alternatives.
Conclusion
Green hydrogen production through water electrolysis stands at the center of global decarbonization strategies. Alkaline, PEM, AEM, and SOEC technologies each present unique advantages and challenges, with their relative roles likely to evolve as costs fall.
In the near term, AWE and PEM will dominate commercial deployments, with PEM growing fastest due to its compatibility with VRE integration. AEM may achieve competitive scale if technical challenges are overcome, while SOEC promises exceptional long-term potential for industrial integration and synthetic fuel pathways.
Ultimately, a diversified technological portfolio is likely to emerge, where different electrolysis technologies complement one another, depending in large part on the industry in question.
This continued technological innovation from the private sector, combined with state policy that provides additional support and frameworks, will be critical to unlocking the potential of green hydrogen as a decarbonization pathway.
BY ANDREW STATTER
Energy Jobs in Japan: Features of Top Leadership Talent for the Energy Transition
Technological innovation, shifting economics, evolving regulations, and geopolitical dynamics are accelerating change across the energy sector. While perspectives differ on how quickly and deeply these transitions will unfold, the effort to reconcile energy security, cost competitiveness, and long-term decarbonization goals is creating uncertainty about the industry’s future.
From a macro perspective the energy industry continues to grow, attracting new companies and talent. But if we look deeper the changes in market segments are rapid and significant. We’ve seen solar boom from almost zero, Japan being the fourth largest country for capacity deployed followed by a slowdown with the transition from FIT to a market based system, and finally shifting back into growth mode, with a stronger focus on a distributed asset model.
The promise of 30-45 GW of offshore wind by 2040 attracted dozens of domestic and international players, but this segment is facing major headwinds with increasing costs, cancelled projects and market exits. Energy storage is now booming and attracting billions in new investment, yet there is a limit to how much storage capacity Japan will need to balance the grid, stretch out the power curve and provide critical backup.
In a constantly changing, and increasingly competitive market, having the right strategy and ability to execute is critical. With an abundance of capital entering the market, technologies the same or similar from project to project, talent becomes the key to get ahead. The line between success and failure often is defined by leadership, rather than dollars and technology.
Shifting mindsets for a shifting market
Leaders across the energy sector, from emerging new-energy startups to established oil and gas companies, must address these unprecedented and evolving challenges. This includes balancing traditional and innovative business models, risk profiles, and corporate cultures.
In the past, developers could rely on subsidies, project revenue was relatively simple to forecast and therefore lever with debt. Today however, challenges from curtailment, customer demands, shifting regulatory requirements and technological advancements make project development, delivery and financing more complex. Successfully deployed strategies in the past are not a guarantee of success in the future. Teams need to be built out with new capabilities that were not necessary just a few years ago.
Success in today’s transforming energy sector will require different qualities than in the past. Leaders will face new expectations on strategy, execution and how they hire and build their teams. Below are three of the top qualities that companies look for when hiring for leadership talent.
Ability to design, build and retain a winning team
A team’s makeup in a typical independent power producer today is different from just a few years ago. Naturally the core members who cover land acquisition, project development, engineering and project financing remain. But now there is a greater emphasis placed on strategic procurement, data analytics, market research and offtake origination and negotiation.
As the business, and thus the makeup of the team is more complex, the leader of the past, who only knows core development and execution of projects, is left behind. As one client told me recently: ‘I need someone who can run a company, not just a development platform’.
What is required to achieve this?
Leaders who can identify top talent across all key functions and bring them to a new organization command a lot more value than those who join a new firm solo.
Commercial innovation to create shared value
To succeed in the evolving energy landscape, leaders may need to move beyond a win/lose mindset that was prevalent in the earlier, fixed revenue business model reliant on subsidies. Today, greater progress can come from adopting a win/win “growth mindset” that emphasizes pursuing new sources of value — collaborating with suppliers, customers, and stakeholders to deploy innovative co-creation plans and solutions, develop new products and services, and ultimately build markets that do not yet exist.
This can be seen for example in revenue sharing offtake models that have become prevalent in advanced energy markets such as the UK or Australia, where the developer and offtaker will share the risk, but also the profits of trading energy from renewable and storage assets.
New fuels such as hydrogen are another example where co-creation and commercial innovation is necessary. Without shared vision, investment and accountability across upstream, midstream and downstream segments, projects will stagnate and ultimately fail to be delivered.
Leaders who are able to learn from other markets and apply lessons to Japan are gaining value. Management professionals in Japanese firms who have been seconded to joint ventures in advanced overseas markets for example are in high demand.
As there is often not yet a clear blueprint for these co-created business models where developer, offtaker, financiers and supply chain players need to collaborate with each other, creativity and innovation in commercial negotiations has become a core value driver for leadership talent.
Put simply, the one who gets hired is the one who listens, thereby understanding the needs of all stakeholders and structure agreements that share risk, providing benefit to each player. In contrast, those who push their own agenda, chase the short-term gain and take a zero-sum approach to negotiations are often passed over.
Ability to execute
At the end of the day, a wonderful strategy and quality team will not save the leader if business results fail to follow. Delivering on targets, winning projects, generating profit is still king.
Results are quantifiable and clear. How many projects in a competitive bid were won, how many MW was built, how much offtake was signed or how many projects were sold and at what margin can be measured and compared.
Recent results are more valuable than historic results — 50 MW delivered now in an innovative offtake strategy with distributed assets, for example, is worth more than 500 MW of big FIT projects years ago. As the market has become more competitive and complex, past success is not seen to automatically translate into future results.
Companies are run by investors, whether a private equity investor, venture capital player or shareholders of a publicly traded company. Investors want to see the track record, both historical and recent, to be comfortable with the decision that hiring a certain leader will ultimately lead to maximization of profits.
Real results, and the ability to clearly articulate how those results came about, and why we can expect them to translate into future success is critical in leadership hiring decision making.
Andrew Statter is a Partner at Titan GreenTech, an executive recruitment agency focused on the clean energy space.
BY JOHN VAROLI
A brief overview of the region’s main energy events from the past week
Australia / BESS
The National Electricity Market achieved multiple battery energy storage records on 27-28 Sept, with total storage capacity reaching 6.6 GWh for the first time.
Australia / Oil & Gas
The oil & gas sector is forecast to pay AU $22 billion in taxes and royalties to state and federal govts in 2024–25, the industry’s highest annual tax contribution to date.
China / Natural gas
China became the world’s largest gas importer following the govt’s decision to convert urban heating systems from coal to reduce pollution and CO2 emissions. Imports increased to a record 130 Mt in 2024, up from zero less than two decades ago.
China / Nuclear power
Nuclear electricity generation rose at an average rate of 12% per year since 2005. China is now the world’s second-largest nuclear generator after the U.S., and has 59 operating reactors with a combined capacity of 56.7 GW.
China / Shale gas
China’s largest shale gas production base in the south Sichuan Basin in Sichuan province, achieved a total output exceeding 100 billion cubic meters.
India / Hydropower
The Central Electricity Authority, which approves construction of large dams, will hire external experts to speed up project designs across the country.
India / Renewables
Solar Energy Corp of India is tendering 1.2 GW of renewables projects coupled with energy storage to supply a total 4.8 GWh of electricity across four peak hours daily.
South Korea / Hydrogen
Work began on the $580 million Gangdong Hydrogen Fuel Cell Power Generation Project. It’s slated for completion by 2028.
Taiwan / Naphtha
Imports of Russian naphtha surged, making Taiwan the world’s largest buyer. Russian purchases by Formosa Petrochemical Corp rose from 9% of its total in 2021 to 90% in H1 of 2025.
Singapore / Electricity
More electricity retailers are offering plans with less costly rates during off-peak hours, which analysts say could lead to even cheaper plans amid stiffer competition.
Disclaimer
This communication has been prepared for information purposes only, is confidential and may be legally privileged. This is a subscription-only service and is directed at those who have expressly asked K.K. Yuri Group or one of its representatives to be added to the mailing list. This document may not be onwardly circulated or reproduced without prior written consent from Yuri Group, which retains all copyright to the content of this report.
Yuri Group is not registered as an investment advisor in any jurisdiction. Our research and all the content express our opinions, which are generally based on available public information, field studies and own analysis. Content is limited to general comment upon general political, economic and market issues, asset classes and types of investments. The report and all of its content does not constitute a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell, subscribe for or underwrite any product or physical commodity, or a financial instrument.
The information contained in this report is obtained from sources believed to be reliable and in good faith. No representation or warranty is made that it is accurate or complete. Opinions and views expressed are subject to change without notice, as are prices and availability, which are indicative only. There is no obligation to notify recipients of any changes to this data or to do so in the future. No responsibility is accepted for the use of or reliance on the information provided. In no circumstances will Yuri Group be liable for any indirect or direct loss, or consequential loss or damages arising from the use of, any inability to use, or any inaccuracy in the information.
K.K. Yuri Group: Hulic Ochanomizu Bldg. 3F, 2-3-11, Surugadai, Kanda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 101-0062.
NEWS
・PV installations in 2024 drop, while global growth continues
・Firms using renewables and nuclear to get subsidies of up to 50% of capital investment